McKennitt v Ash and others - Link

a case which saw the Supreme Court divided 3-2. Whilst in this case the majority were not prepared to accept that JR’s activities (criminal rioting) fell within the ‘protected zone of interaction between a person and others’, or was ‘the type of activity’ which article 8 protects, Lord Toulson’s comments, recognising the importance of the ‘circumstances’ in which a photograph ... ................
................