Interpretation of the mandate and methodology applied - Europa

嚜澠nterpretation of the

mandate and methodology

applied

Marco Vinceti

Chair, EFSA WG on free sugars

Technical meeting, 13 February 2018

TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) 每 ORIGINAL REQUEST

?

Mandate requestor

National food competent authorities of Denmark, Finland, Iceland,

Norway, and Sweden

?

Mandate

Exposure: added sugars

Science-based cut-off value not associated with adverse health

effects

Target population: general healthy population, including children,

adolescents, adults and the elderly 每 pregnant and lactating women

NOT to be considered specifically

5

TERMS OF REFERENCE 每 REVISED

?

In agreement with the mandate requestor

Exposure: free sugars from all dietary sources

6

TERMS OF REFERENCE 每 INTERPRETATION

?

By EFSA, in agreement with the mandate requestor:

Exposure

Objectives

Target population

Adverse effects and endpoints

?

Background information to be considered

7

BACKGROUND INFORMATION 每 EXISTING RECOMMENDATIONS

Guideline

Target population

Sugar fraction

EFSA, 2010

General population

Added sugars

GNS, 2012

NNR, 2012

SSBs

Added sugars

Free sugars

≒ 5E%

ANSES, 2016

IoM, 2002

DGA, 2015

General population

General population

General population

(>2 years)

Adults

General population

General population

Consider when setting

FBDGs

Limit consumption

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download