Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
Stray Voltage Phase I and Phase II
Combined Database Summary
January 26, 2006
Since 1988, the Public Service Commission (PSC) has been accepting data filed by the five major
investor-owned utilities (IOU¡¯s) regarding certain aspects of their stray voltage (SV) Phase I
investigations. Recently, the database has been expanded to include extra fields from their Phase II
investigations. The Wisconsin Electric Cooperative Association has also been submitting some data
on behalf of a number of its members in the last few years. Please refer to the glossary in Appendix A
for definitions of various terms and acronyms use in this document. All voltage and current data is
express as rms, 60-Hz, AC, steady state.
To date, the PSC SV database has entries from 7,441 farms. A separate database of Phase II primary
profiles now has data on 12,430 grounded distribution poles. The data from these databases is
summarized in this paper. A statistical summary for each parameter is presented along with
correlations and contrasts between some of the parameters. All of the submitted data is accepted as it
comes in. Some data are suspect as the magnitudes do not seem within a reasonable range, but are
included and will appear as statistical outliers. Entries of zero or blank fields are treated the same ¨C as
a ¡®no report¡¯ condition.
Farms reported per year in PSC database
800
700
600
500
400
300
farms
200
100
20
05
20
04
20
03
20
02
20
01
20
00
19
99
19
98
19
97
19
96
19
95
19
94
19
93
19
92
19
91
19
90
year
19
89
19
88
0
There were very few submissions to the database in the first five years of record keeping, but the last
thirteen years has shown a relatively steady level of submissions. Only half of the 2005 data had been
received by the time this report was prepared.
The data can be analyzed and presented using several statistical methods. Each numerical parameter
has an overall average along with a 5-number summary that lists the minimum value, the median
1
value, the maximum value along with the first and third quartile values. The distribution of values for
each parameter is summarized in a graph or a table that lists the percent of entries that fall within a
specific range of values. These statistics provide a standard yardstick against which any subsequent
data point collected in the field can be compared to see how it measures up and where it falls within
the known range of reported values.
A historic trend of the values versus the year they have been submitted is also presented in graphic
form. Lastly, a correlation is usually made with the most important parameter, the average cow
contact current, to see if the parameter in question may have any influence on the magnitude of current
that can be measured at the animal contact point or itself be influenced by the cow contact current.
Farm s in PSCW Utility Database - T rend
8000
7000
Database total
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
YEAR
1989
0
1988
1000
The data are divided up into electrical and similar parameters and farm and miscellaneous parameters
as follows.
Electric parameters
Location within WI
Distance to substation
Grounds per mile
Rshunt
Vp Primary neutral-toreference voltage
Vs Secondary neutral-toreference voltage
End-of-line status
Vcc Cow contact voltage
Primary Voltage
Icc Cow contact current
Neutral Conductor
Resistance/mile
Vcc source on/off farm
status
Transformer kVA rating
As-found mitigation
Measured Vps drop
Secondary phase
arrangement
Rsource
Farm/misc. parameters
Recommended on-farm
mitigation
Recommended off-farm
mitigation
Recommended neutral
isolation
2
Load box test
Rprimary
Fencer status
Load box test Rfarm
Stanchion/other milking
Load box test K-factor
Pipeline/other delivery
Load box test CRR ¨C
current return ratio
Secondary neutral
voltage drop test
Vdrop
Primary profile current
Ipp
Primary profile
resistance Rpp
Primary profile voltage
Vne
Electric/pneumatic
pulsation
Herd size
Test program
Milk production level
Somatic cell count (SCC)
level
ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS
1) Distance to Substation
This parameter is defined as the circuit miles from the farm being investigated to its serving
distribution substation.
7 number
Distribution % in
summary
UNIT
Range
range
mile
Average
6
0.1 - 1.0
3.3
mile
Minimum
0.1
1.1 - 3.0
20.1
mile
1st quartile
3.5
3.1 - 6.0
39.6
mile
Median
5
6.1 - 10.0
25.5
mile
3rd quartile
7.8
10.1 - 15.0
9.1
mile
Maximum
55
15.1 - 21.0
2.0
Entries, N
7,068
21.1 & up
0.4
Average distance to substation trend
7.5
7
6.5
6
5.5
5
miles
4.5
4
3.5
year
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
3
The trend indicates that in the early years of the SV program at the PSC, most farms that were
investigated by the IOU¡¯s were closer to the substation. Recently, there is a trend to investigate farms
that are farther away from the substation. From 1988 to 2005, the average distance has increased 44%.
Avg. Icc vs. Dist. to substation
N = 6772
C orrel C oeff. = -0.04
1.4
1.2
1.18
1
0.94
0.92
0.84
0.78
0.8
0.67
0.71
0.6
0.4
mA
0.2
0
.1 - 1.0
1.1 - 3.0
3.1 - 6.0
6.1 - 10.0
M iles range
3
10.1 - 15.0 15.1 - 21.0 21.1 & up
There is a slight visual correlation between cow contact current levels and being too close or too far
from the substation. The data is skewed by the fact that early investigations (1988 ¨C 1993) found
higher levels of stray voltage than are found today and these farms were close to the substation. The
mathematical correlation coefficient indicates a very weak link between distance and cow contact
current.
2) Location
One of nine specific areas of the state where the farm is located is submitted as a data point. The areas
are named central, east central, north central, northeast, northwest, south central, southeast, southwest
and west central. They are determined by a table look-up based on the county in which the farmstead
is located. The average cow contact voltage and the average secondary neutral-to-reference voltage for
each of the nine locations is shown in the following table.
Avg Vcc
points
Avg Vcc
points
Avg Vcc
points
total points
Avg Vcc (Volts) vs. location:
0.47
0.28
0.33
315(NW)
645(NC)
428(NE)
0.38
0.33
0.30
362(WC)
824(C)
1,612(EC)
0.51
0.48
0.62
987(SW)
1,214(SC)
161(SE)
6,548
Avg Vs
points
Avg Vs
points
Avg Vs
points
total points
Avg Vs (Volts) vs. location:
1.42
1.07
1.19
320(NW)
645(NC)
427(NE)
1.29
1.18
1.03
369(WC)
827(C)
1,503(EC)
1.31
1.28
1.44
981(SW)
1,205(SC)
159(SE)
6,436
We can calculate an average K-factor (defined as Vcc/Vs) for each of the nine locations as follows:
Average K-factor (N = 6,079)
in percent from above data
Overall average = 29%
29(NW)
24(NC) 27(NE)
28(WC)
26(C)
27(EC)
32(SW)
33(SC)
37(SE)
The average K-factor for the state is therefore 29% which agrees well with the typical value of 33.3%
predicted by the PSC REPS team.
3) Grounds per mile
This parameter is defined as the average number of neutral-to-earth grounding electrode connections
on the primary distribution system per mile in the area of the farm towards the substation.
4
7 number
summary
Distribution
Range
UNIT
Grnds/mile
Grnds/mile
Grnds/mile
Grnds/mile
Grnds/mile
Grnds/mile
% in
range
Average
13
1-4
0.6
Minimum
1
5-8
5.0
1st quartile
9
9 - 12
53.7
Median
12
13 - 16
20.1
3rd quartile
15
17 - 20
11.1
Maximum
33
21 - 24
6.9
Entries, N
6,418
25 & up
2.6
Wisconsin has always required nine grounds per mile in any continuous one mile section for overhead
distribution systems and 4 grounds per mile for underground distribution systems. The measurement is
made starting at any point on the line to include at least one mile, if possible, or a prorating thereof.
Modified in 1996, PSC ch. 114.096C now requires a connection between the distribution neutral and a
grounding electrode at every pole for all new rural overhead construction.
Trend of average grounds/mile
17
16
15
14
gr / mi
13
12
11
20
05
20
04
20
03
20
02
20
01
20
00
19
99
19
98
19
97
19
96
19
95
19
94
19
93
19
92
19
91
19
90
year
19
89
19
88
10
No data for this parameter was submitted before 1992. The trend shows the effect of the 1996 change
in code, as there was an overall decrease in the recorded average grounds per mile between 1992 and
1996 of 2.5%. From 1996 to 2005, however, the average has increased 37%.
Avg. Icc vs. Gnds/mi.
C orrel C oeff. = -0.041
N = 6255
1.2
1.09
1
0.95
0.8
0.79
0.8
0.72
0.69
0.61
0.6
0.4
mA
0.2
0
1 - 4
5 - 8
9 - 12
13 - 16
Gnds/m i. range
5
17 - 20
21 - 24
25 & up
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- secretary s record public service commission
- wisconsin electric service 006 dahlberg light
- state of north dakota public service commission
- north central communications inc psc ky tariff
- electric service territory public service commission
- public service commission of wisconsin
- public service commission
- mississippi public service commission
- north central communications inc psc ky tariff no 1
- pcs news book psc
Related searches
- public service commission western province
- public service commission new york
- nys public service commission complaints
- public service commission central province
- public service commission in sri lanka
- public service commission sri lanka contact
- public service commission north central
- public service commission website
- ny public service commission website
- public service commission complaint form
- new york public service commission filings
- public service commission sri lanka