Pro7.1-19 SOP Checklist - Method Validation
|Author: Heidi Hanes |Document Number: | Pro71-20 |
| |Effective (or Post) Date: |17 June 2009 |
|Review History |Date of last review: |3 April 2020 |
| |Reviewed by: |Heidi Hanes |
|pSMILE Comments: This document is provided as an example only. It must be revised to accurately reflect your lab’s specific processes and/or |
|specific protocol requirements. Users are encouraged to ensure compliance with local laws and study protocol policies when considering the |
|application of this document. If you have any questions contact SMILE. |
Qualitative Method Validation SOP Checklist
|Qualitative Method Validation SOP Checklist |Document Number |040 |
| |Effective Date |17 Jun 2009 |
|Subject |Page |1 of 1 |
|CHECKLIST FOR STUDY SITE SOP REQUIRED ELEMENTS | | |
|Qualitative Validation Procedures | | |
| |Supercedes |New |
|Review History |Date of last review: |17 Jun 2009 |
| |Reviewed by: |Heidi Hanes |
| |Version # [0.0] |Revision Date |Description (notes) |
|Revision History | |[dd/mm/yy] | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
CHECKLIST FOR STUDY SITE SOP REQUIRED ELEMENTS
Qualitative Validation Procedures
|Element |CONTENT-SPECIFIC REQUIRED ELEMENTS |
|Present | |
|CRITERIA |
| |Procedure identifies requirements for new qualitative methods and equipment to be validated and approved by the lab director |
| |before being place in service. |
|Comments: |
|PROCEDURE |
| |Procedure specifies minimum requirements for precision studies: |
|a.) |Note: Not applicable unless the qualitative values are derived from a quantitative result such as an optical density. |
| |Between day and/or within-in day studies - SMILE recommends performing both. |
|b.) |Sample requirements |
| |Matrix (controls, patient samples, etc) |
| |Levels (number and estimate - i.e., low/high, normal/abnormal) |
|c.) |Replicate runs per level - SMILE recommends 20 |
|d.) |Data evaluation - SMILE recommends using CV, where possible. |
|e.) |Acceptability criteria - SMILE recommends manufacturer’s limits or a percentage of the total allowable error. |
| | |
| |Procedure specifies minimum requirements for accuracy studies: |
|a.) |Acceptable reference or comparison methods - SMILE recommends previously validated and successful in-house methods be used for|
| |comparison testing. |
| |Sample Requirements |
|b.) |Matrix (controls, patient samples, etc.) |
| |Number of samples - SMILE recommends 10 samples for each expected result. |
| |Testing limitations (i.e., test old and new methods within 2 hours of each other) |
| |Data evaluation and acceptable criteria – Performance of qualitztive test is most commonly described in terms of sensitivity |
|c.) |and specificity. SMILE recommends using a decision/truth table. See SMILE Qualitative Validation Overview Guideline for an |
| |example. |
|d.) | |
| |Procedure specifies requirements for sensitivity and specificity verification on non-FDA approved methods. |
| |Procedure specifies minimum requirements for reference range studies: |
|a.) |Requires reference range verification or establishment, as applicable. |
|b.) |Manufacturer’s stated reference ranges may be used. |
| |Data evaluation and acceptable criteria – is the range of test values expected for a designated population where 95% of the |
|c.) |individuals are presumed to be healthy (or normal). |
|Comments: |
|DOCUMENTATION |
| |Procedure requires that all data and reports related to the validation be retained indefinitely and retrievable within 24 |
| |hours. SMILE recommends that data be retained in an organized manner using binders and dividers. |
|Comments: |
|References: |
|GCLP Workshop and Workbook18-20 May 2008, page 16 |
|E. Piwowar-Manning, et. al., HIV Prevention Trials Network Microbicide Trials Network Laboratory Manual, Version 1.0, Release Date: 15 |
|November 2006 |
|Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). User Verification of Performance for Precision and Trueness: Approved Guideline-Second |
|Edition. CLSI document EP15-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-574-7). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 100, Wayne, |
|Pennsylvania 19098-1898 USA, 2005. |
|NCCLS. (Currently CLSI) Evaluation of Precision Performance of Quantitative Measurement Methods; Approved Guideline—Second Edition. NCCLS |
|document EP5-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-542-9). NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898 USA, 2004. |
|Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples: approved Guidelines- Second |
|Edition. CLSI document EP9-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-472-4). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 100, Wayne, |
|Pennsylvania 19098-1898 USA, 2005. |
|Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).Preliminary Evaluation of Quantitative Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedure: Approved |
|Guideline – Third Edition. CLSI document EP10-A3 (ISBN 1-56238-622-0). ). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes, 940 West Valley Road, |
|Suite 100, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19098-1898 USA, 2005. |
|Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).Estimation of Total analytical Error for Clinical Laboratory Methods. Approved 2003. CLSI |
|document EP21-A (ISBN 1-56238-502-xX. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 100, Wayne, Pennsylvania |
|19098-1898 USA, 2005. |
|Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Approved Guideline-Second Edition,|
|CLSI document EP6-A (ISBN 1-56238-498-8) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 100, Wayne, Pennsylvania |
|19098-1898 USA, 2005. |
|Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).Defining, Establishing, and Verifying reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory |
|Proposed Guideline-Third Edition, March 2008. CLSI document C28-P3 (ISBN 1-56238-663-8). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes, 940 |
|West Valley Road, Suite 100, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19098-1898 USA, 2005. |
|James O. Westgard, Online Validation Training, Westgard QC, Inc. , Module 10: Determining Imprecision. |
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- critical realism and qualitative research methods
- models for evaluating the effectiveness of internal controls
- quantitative versus qualitative economics
- disasters are not merely ornamental or interesting events
- validation verification and testing plan template
- qualitative vs
- action research vs traditional basic research paper
- pro7 1 19 sop checklist method validation
Related searches
- ich harmonised trpartite guideline validation analytical procedures
- validation analytical procedures step 4 2005
- validation procedures q2 r1 step 4 2005
- xfinity internet 19 99 1 year
- excel data validation multi select
- 1 19 inches to fraction
- 350 1 training checklist 2019
- equipment validation fda guidance
- gxp validation process
- ecopy validation module
- fedex address validation tool
- javascript form validation example