(ONE SPECIFIC EXAMPLE BELOW WITH THE NEW RAYTHEON …



RAYTHEON

DOCUMENT FROM WWW.ROB-

EDITED AUGUST 2012 … URL CHANGED TO WWW.ROB-

(INDEX PAGE)

THIS IS THE ORIGINAL INDEX PAGE … OWNER Robert O. Butner Jr. –

THIS IS A DOCUMENT FROM THAT INDEX PAGE.

EDITED August 27, 2012

I WAS AS SHOCKED AND CONFUSED ALSO WHEN I WAS FIRST TARGETED BUT IT IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THE FOLLOWING POSSIBILITIES TO HELP INNOCENT CITIZENS AND LAWS.

KEEP IN MIND THAT THE SATELLITE SYSTEM, EXPLAINED IN THIS REPORT ROB-, IS HIGHLY SENSITIVE – BOTH AUDIBLE AND VISUAL FEED-IN AND FEED-BACK. IN CONTINUOUS ATTEMPTS OF SHOWING THE SICK PERSONALITY OF THE PERPETRATORS AND THE SECURITY BREACHES, THIS SYSTEM HAS BEEN IN TURN-UP RATES PRE, DURING AND AFTER 9-11.

JANUARY 14, 2009 AND AUGUST 2012:

ADDED IMPORTANT NOTE: I CANNOT EXPRESS THE APPRECIATION AND REGAIN OF FAITH THAT I HAVE EXPERIENCED WITH THE RECENT FEDERAL ASSISTANCE. (ONE SPECIFIC EXAMPLE BELOW WITH THE NEW RAYTHEON CONTRACTS REFERRAL OF INFORMATION)

ORIGINAL Date posted: 01/12/2009*

In an open letter to president-elect Obama appearing in Aviation Week & Space Technology, Raytheon Chairman and CEO William H. Swanson calls for government and business to work closely together to upgrade American education. Improving students abilities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics is an imperative for national security and prosperity, Swanson notes, and is critical to ensuring innovation in industries such as aerospace and defense.

THE FOLLOWING RAYTHEON CONTRACTS ARE SIMILAR TO SATELLITE FREQUENCY SIGNAL INTERCEPTORS, ARRESTERS AND JAMMERS – BUT NOT PUBLICLY ADVERTISED. THEY CAN AND HAVE BEEN USED ON THIS CASE (PER THIS REPORT).

THIS PATHETIC ABUSE EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE KNOCKED-OUT DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF GOD AND EVERYBOBY - AND SOONER THAN LATER … AUGUST 2012 -

TYPICAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES AND CONTRACTS:

Raytheon Awarded $12.2 Million Miniature Air Launched Decoy-Jammer Study Contract

TUCSON, Ariz., Jan. 15, 2009 /PRNewswire/ -- The U.S. Air Force awarded Raytheon Company a $12.2 million contract to study the feasibility of increasing power and adding a data link capability for the Miniature Air Launched Decoy-Jammer(MALD-J™).

"This effort will allow us to evaluate the technical maturity of a radio frequency data link and to study further increases in jammer power levels," said Ken Watson, the U.S. Air Force's MALD program manager. "This will enhance MALD-J's ability to function as a key component in a system of electronic warfare systems."

MALD-J is a state-of-the-art, low-cost flight vehicle that is modular, air-launched and programmable. It weighs less than 300 pounds and has a range of approximately 500 nautical miles (about 575 statute miles).

The contract requires Raytheon to integrate a data link and more powerful jammer amplifiers into the baseline MALD/MALD-J vehicle. Raytheon will also determine the technical feasibility and performance capability of MALD-J Block II prior to building and flight testing the new vehicle.

"The modular design lends itself to these improvements," said Scott Muse, Raytheon's MALD program director. "This system is so versatile there is almost no limit to what kind of capabilities can be integrated on this platform."

Raytheon Company, with 2007 sales of $21.3 billion, is a technology leader specializing in defense, homeland security and other government markets throughout the world. With a history of innovation spanning 86 years, Raytheon provides state-of-the-art electronics, mission systems integration and other capabilities in the areas of sensing; effects; and command, control, communications and intelligence systems, as well as a broad range of mission support services. With headquarters in Waltham, Mass., Raytheon employs 72,000 people worldwide.

Note to Editors:

In November 2008, Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine named Raytheon's MALD the winner of the 2008 Program Excellence Award in System Research and Development.

More than 125 Raytheon employees design and build the MALD and MALD-J in Tucson, Ariz., Goleta, Calif., and El Segundo, Calif.

Hundreds of employees in scores of businesses across the U.S. design and manufacture MALD and MALD-J components. Major suppliers include: AUSCO, Port Washington, N.Y.; BAE, Berthoud, Colo.; CEI, Sacramento, Calif.; Celestica, Austin, Texas; Eagle Pitcher, Joplin, Mo.; EDO, Bohemia, N.Y.; Enser, Pinellas Park, Fla.; Engineered Fabrics Corp, Rockmart, Ga.; GDOTS, Redmond, Wash.; Hamilton-Sundstrand, Rockford, Ill.; Hamilton-Sundstrand, San Diego, Calif.; Kuchera, Windber, Pa.; LaBarge, Joplin, Mo.; Moog, East Aurora, N.Y.; Tecom, Westlake Village, Calif.

FROM: ROB- August 27, 2012

Original January 18, 2009

WHERE ARE THE INTERNATIONAL PROTECTIONS AND REGULATIONS?

President Obama and Staff – Please Follow-up!

D. SIGINT and Passive RF Tracking and Characterization Systems

Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) tracking and identification involves the collection and analysis of electronic signals for intelligence purposes. Typical targets for SIGINT collection include space system components that emit electromagnetic waves; uplink, downlink, or crosslink transmitters (Microwave, and/or any of the various wave capabilities). The basic capability to collect communications signals from satellites requires little more equipment than what is used by many home satellite television subscribers.

Passive RF tracking involves the use of antennas on the ground to gather tracking information to precisely locate the source of a satellite's signal. Because electromagnetic waves from a satellite's transmitter travel in a straight line, the direction of arrival of the signal is the direction of the transmitter. Directional bearing information on a particular radiator can determine the location of that radiator. Data, from one of the sources discussed in the previous sections, on the location of a satellite can be used as a source for the initial satellite tracking information.

IV. Offensive Counterspace Operations

Offensive counterspace operations involve the use of lethal or non-lethal means to neutralize an adversary's space systems or the information they provide. According to recent DoD studies, offensive counterspace operations are designed to achieve five major purposes:(17)

• Deception--manipulate, distort or falsify information

• Disruption--temporary impairment of utility

• Denial--temporary elimination of utility

• Degradation--permanent impairment of utility

• Destruction--permanent elimination of utility

To accomplish these objectives, four types of offensive counterspace operations are used: denial and deception; attack or sabotage of ground segments; direct anti-satellite (ASAT) attacks on space assets; and electronic attack on the communications, data, and command links of the satellites and ground stations. With the proliferation of satellite warning data, denial and deception has become a highly effective means of limiting the information obtained by an intelligence collection satellite. Attacking or sabotaging the supporting ground facilities has long been considered one of the easiest methods for a U.S. adversary to conduct offensive counterspace operations. Most of these facilities are relatively easy to get in close physical proximity to or access by way of a computer network, making them a prime target.

The U.S. space assets themselves are also very vulnerable. While some national security space systems have built-in security and countermeasures, most of our government and all of our commercial space assets are vulnerable to a variety of ASAT attacks. The reason for this vulnerability is that the additional cost and weight of the security and countermeasures is regarded as unnecessary when compared to what is INCORRECTLY characterized as a lack of threats to our space assets.

The proliferation of ballistic missile and space technology has made it easier to develop direct ascent anti-satellite weapons and to obtain the capability to deliver nuclear warheads into space. Studies have shown that the detonation of a low-yield nuclear weapon in LEO will not only fatally damage nearby satellites but will also increase the naturally occurring radiation around the earth, reducing most LEO satellites lifetimes from years to months. NOTE: Many countries such as China, India, Iran, Pakistan, and Russia have this capability.

Advancements in miniaturized space systems technology have led to a global proliferation in the use of micro/nanosatellites. Microsatellites ( ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download