INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

No sound approach to statutory interpretation would attribute to Congress an intent to “subvert the statutory plan.” Dep’t of Revenue of Or. v. ACF Indus. Inc., 510 U.S. 332, 340 (1994). The reliance commenters place on Commission precedent is misplaced. None of the cited precedent involved an interpretation of the scope of 39 U.S.C. 3622 ... ................
................