Strategies and Resources for Mainstream Teachers of ...

B Y R E Q U E S T. . .

Strategies and Resources for Mainstream Teachers of ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

MAY 2003 NORTHWEST REGIONAL EDUC ATIONAL LABORATORY

TITLES IN THE BY REQUEST SERIES

x Service Learning in the Northwest Region x Tutoring: Strategies for Successful Learning x Scheduling Alternatives: Options for Student Success x Grade Configuration:Who Goes Where? x Alternative Schools: Approaches for Students at Risk x All Students Learning: Making It Happen in Your School x High-Quality Professional Development: An Essential

Component of Successful Schools x Student Mentoring x Peaceful Schools x After-School Programs: Good for Kids, Good for Communities x Parent Partners: Using Parents To Enhance Education x When Students Don't Succeed: Shedding Light on Grade

Retention x Making Positive Connections With Homeschoolers x Increasing Student Motivation and Engagement: From Time-on-

Task to Homework x The Power of Public Relations in Schools x Supporting Beginning Teachers: How Administrators,Teachers,

and Policymakers Can Help New Teachers Succeed x Technology in Early Childhood Education: Finding the Balance x Profiles of Progress:What Works in Northwest Title I Schools x Schoolwide Prevention of Bullying x Working Together for Successful Paraeducator Services x Summer School Programs: A Look at the Research, Implications

for Practice, and Program Sampler x Project-Based Instruction: Creating Excitement for Learning x Full-Day Kindergarten: Exploring an Option for Extended

Learning

B Y R E Q U E S T. . .

Strategies and Resources for Mainstream Teachers of ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

BRACKEN REED EDUC ATION RESOURCE SPECIALIST

COMPREHENSIVE CENTER JENNIFER RAILSBACK EDUC ATION RESOURCE SPECIALIST PLANNING & SERVICE COORDINATION

MAY 2003 NORTHWEST REGIONAL EDUC ATIONAL LABORATORY

TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S

Foreword ............................................................................................................................ 3 A Note on Terminology ........................................................................................ 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5 In Context: English Language Learners and No Child

Left Behind .................................................................................................................. 7 The Implications of No Child Left Behind for the

Mainstream Teacher ............................................................................................ 9 Instructional Methods and Program Models for Serving

English Language Learners: An Overview for the Mainstream Teacher .......................................................................................... 10 Overview of Second Language Acquisition Theory ................ 15 General Principles for Teaching ELL Students .................................... 21 A Sampling of Teaching Strategies ............................................................ 22 Examples of Instructional Strategies Linked to

Appropriate Language Acquisition Stages .................................. 29 Ten Things the Mainstream Teacher Can Do Today

To Improve Instruction for ELL Students ...................................... 31 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 33 Northwest Sampler ........................................................................................................ 34

Fairbanks North Star Borough School District-- Fairbanks, Alaska .................................................................................................. 35

Burley Senior High School--Burley, Idaho .......................................... 39 Irving School--Bozeman, Montana .......................................................... 44 Ontario High School--Ontario, Oregon ................................................ 52 Appendix .................................................................................................................................. 57 Resources .................................................................................................................................. 59 References ................................................................................................................................ 71 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 80

FOREWORD

This booklet is one in a series of "hot topics" reports produced by the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. These reports briefly address current educational concerns and issues as indicated by requests for information that come to the Laboratory from the Northwest region and beyond. Each booklet contains a discussion of research and literature pertinent to the issue, a sampling of how Northwest schools and programs are addressing the issue, selected resources, and contact information.

One objective of the series is to foster a sense of community and connection among educators. Another is to increase awareness of current education-related themes and concerns. Each booklet gives practitioners a glimpse of how fellow educators from around the Northwest are addressing issues, overcoming obstacles, and attaining success. The goal of the series is to give educators current, reliable, and useful information on topics that are important to them.

This By Request has been compiled from existing research in the field of second language acquisition and education of English language learners, including works by acknowledged experts in ELL. Several researchers have noted (e.g., August & Hakuta, 1997; Costantino, 1999; Thomas & Collier, 2002), that the reader should keep in mind the limitations of many research studies. Without randomized trial and control-group studies focused on the effects of an individual strategy, it is difficult to speak unequivocally of a strategy as scientifically based. See the Appendix of this publication for forthcoming research that may address ELL issues and programs using scientific or quasi-experimental research methods.

3

A NOTE ON TERMINOLOGY

Numerous acronyms exist to describe those students who are learning English as an additional language (EAL). For example, "learners of English as a second language" (ESL) is often found in the literature to date. Both EAL and ESL refer to students as people first, much as we now term a person with a disability as "a person who is hearing impaired" rather than "the deaf person." Recent federal legislation continues to use the term limited English proficient (LEP). In our survey of recent literature we found English language learners (ELL) to be the most prevalent and widely accepted term. We use this term throughout this publication, except when referring to specific program models that use other terminology.

4

INTRODUCTION

Mainstream teachers throughout the region face new challenges as rapidly changing demographics have collided with new federal and state policies, politically charged debates on bilingual education, and limited school resources, to create classrooms that are more diverse than ever.

Approximately 4.6 million students identified as English language learners attended school in the U.S. pre-kindergarten through grade 12 education system in 2000?2001, representing 9.3 percent of the total public school enrollment (Kindler, 2002). Since the 1989?1990 school year, the ELL population has increased approximately 101 percent, in a trend that researchers predict will continue for at least the next two decades (Thomas & Collier, 2002).

Regional trends in the Northwest closely mirror these national statistics. In Idaho the ELL population increased by 18.2 percent between the 1999?2000 and 2000?2001 school years, while nearly every state in our region had an increase of at least 4 percent during that same period.

In this issue of By Request, we attempt to avoid current debates about program models and legislative policies by focusing instead on practical, research-based principles and instructional strategies that mainstream teachers can use to meet the needs of these diverse learners.

We have provided a brief overview of the major legislative changes in the No Child Left Behind Act, an outline of instructional methods and program models, and a description of important theories of second language acquisition

5

that have direct implications for mainstream classroom instruction. We have also provided a list of resources and references at the back of the book that will guide you to organizations, Web sites, research studies, and instructional materials that can further your understanding of this complex and important topic. In the Northwest Sampler section, we profile four schools in the region that are answering the challenge of serving culturally and linguistically diverse students in the mainstream classroom.

6

IN CONTEXT: ENGLISH

LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND

NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND

The federal legislation for Title III (Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students) of the No Child Left Behind Act (U.S. Department of Education, 2001) is both a continuation and an alteration of previous federal policies designed to meet the needs of diverse learners in the U.S. public school system. There are several key differences between the new legislation and the previous Improving America's Schools Act of 1994, some of which have significant implications for the mainstream classroom teacher. These changes include:

x Title VII under IASA is now Title III in the No Child Left Behind Act.

x The bilingual education program and the immigrant education program were consolidated into a single, formuladriven, state grant program. All funds are awarded at the state level.

x All ELL students must be tested at least once a year using an English proficiency test.

x ELL students who have been in U.S. schools for three consecutive years must be tested in reading/language arts using a test written in English, although students who meet certain criteria may receive a waiver for up to two more years.

7

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download