RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE KARNATAKA
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health sciences
Bangalore,Karnataka.
ANNEXURE – II
PROFORMA FOR REGISTRATION OF SUBJECTS FOR DISSERTATION
| | | |
|1. |Name of the Candidate and Address |SOHAN SINGH |
| | |Welavat Bhavan, V.po Shankhwali, |
| | |Teh. Ahore, Dist Jalore, |
| | |Rajasthan-307029 |
| | | |
|2. |Name of the Institution |GOUTHAM COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY |
| | | |
| | |#258, 5th Main,2nd Cross, WOC Road,Manjunathanagar, Rajajinagar, |
| | |Bangalore-560010. |
| | | |
|3. |Course of Study & Subject |MASTER OF PHYSIOTHERAPY |
| | |(Musculoskeletal Disorders and Sports |
| | |Physiotherapy) |
| | | |
|4. |Date of Admission to the Course |09 JULY 2013 |
| | |
|5. |Title of the Topic : |
| | |
| |EFFECTIVENESS OF CORE STABILIATION EXERCISES FOR SUBJECTS WITH BILATERAL SACROILIAC JOINT DYSFUNCTION |
|6 |Brief Resume of the Intended Work: |
| |6.1 Need of study : |
| |Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) is a condition in which the joint is locked, partially dislocated or ‘subluxated’ in a non-anatomically |
| |correct position due to hypermobility (too much movement) or hypomobility (too little movement) within the joint. It is commonly characterized|
| |by low back and gluteal pain and may be accompanied with referred groin, hip and sciatic leg pain.2 It can affect bilaterally or unilaterally. |
| |It is reported to affect 15% to 38% of general population with women being 3 to 4 times more likely to be affected than men. It has been |
| |implicated as primary pain source in 10-25 % of patients with low back pain.1,3,4 |
| |The muscular and ligamentous relationships composing the lumbosacral connection are of extreme importance in stabilizing the lumbar vertebrae |
| |with Sacoiliac joint and arrangement has been termed a ‘self-bracing mechanism. The trunk muscles, the abdominals have been reported to |
| |increase the stability of the lumbosacral and Sacoiliac joint, further controls excessive anterior tilt of the pelvis.8,12 |
| |Studies have shown that part of core, i.e. transverses abdominalis contraction helps reduce the laxity of the sacroiliac joint. It was |
| |revealed that all core are needed for optimal stabilization and performance in sacroiliac mechanics.9,10 |
| |“CORE” is described as a box with the abdominals in the front, paraspinals and gluteus in the back, the diaphragm as the roof, and the pelvic |
| |floor and hip girdle musculature as the bottom. |
| |Particular attention has been paid to the core because it serves as a muscular corset that works as a unit to stabilize the body and spine, |
| |with or without limb movement.8 |
| |The term core stability is a generic description for the training of the abdominal and lumbopelvic region. Bergmark et al divided the active |
| |muscle subsystem (core) into "global" and "local" groups, based on their primary roles in stabilizing the core. The global muscles (dynamic, |
| |phasic, torque producing) which includes Rectus abdominis, External oblique, Internal oblique, Iliocostalis (thoracic portion) which are |
| |superficial muscles that they are the prime movers for the trunk, of hip flexion, extension, and rotation and the local muscles (postural, |
| |tonic, segmental stabilizers) which are deep intrinsic ones include Multifidus, Psoas major, Transversus abdominis, Quadratus lumborum, |
| |Diaphragm, Internal oblique (posterior fibers), Iliocostalis and longissimus (lumbar portions) are associated with the segmental stability of |
| |the lumbar spine during gross whole body movements and where postural adjustments are required. 9,16,17 |
| |Strengthening core muscles found to be effective in lumbosacral dysfunctions. But there are no studies found on effectiveness of core muscle |
| |strengthening exercises in patients with bilateral SI joint dysfunctions as the core muscle functions influence on Sacroiliac joint |
| |pathomechanics. |
| |Therefore, there is a need to know the effect of Core muscle strengthening exercises in bilateral Sacroiliac joint Dysfunction that clinically |
| |benefit in considering core strengthening exercises in bilateral SI joint Dysfunction. Hence, the purpose of the study to find the effect of |
| |core muscle strengthening exercises for subjects with SI joint dysfunction on pain using VAS and functional disability using modified Oswestry |
| |disability index scale. |
| |Research Question: whether core muscle strengthening exercises does have an effect on improving pain and functional disability for subjects |
| |with bilateral sacroiliac dysfunction? |
| |6.2 Hypothesis: |
| |Null hypothesis : |
| |There will be no significant effect of core muscle strengthening exercises on improving pain and functional disability in subjects with |
| |bilateral sacroiliac joint dysfunction. |
| |Alternate hypothesis : |
| |There will be significant effect of core muscle strengthening exercises on improving pain and functional disability in subjects with bilateral |
| |sacroiliac joint dysfunction |
| |6.3 Review of literature : |
| |Carolyn A. Richardson, Chris J. Snijders et. al. (2002): studied the relation between the transverses abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint |
| |mechanics and low back pain proved that there is significant decrease in the joint laxity in the sacroiliac joint when the transversus |
| |abdominis muscle were trained.10 |
| |Eyal Lederman et. al. (2008): studied the myth of core stability, followed the principles of core strengthening program and proved that it is |
| |essential in prevention as well as rehabilitation in case of lower back pain.11 |
| |Barr KP, Griggs M, Cadby T et. al. (2005): in their study to assess the benefits of lumbar stabilisation program to treat low back pain proved |
| |their point that the core muscles strengthening does play a major role in the lumbar stabilization and hence reduces low back pain.18 |
| |Julie M Fritz, Julie M Whitman et. al. (2004): in their study about the factors related to the inability of individuals with low back pain to |
| |improve with a spinal manipulation established their idea about inability of the manipulative therapy only, to reduce the low back pain.15 |
| |Christopher Norrisa, Martyn Matthewsb et. al. (2008): studied the role of an integrated back stability program in patients with chronic low |
| |back pain and proved that the integrated back stability program including core strengthening along with the other trunk stabilising exercises |
| |improved the patients with chronic low back pain by reducing their pain and disability.19 |
| |Garry T. Allison, BApp Sci et. al. (2008): in his research reports to find whether the feed forward response in transverses abdominis are |
| |directionally specific and act symetrical studied, the feed forward transverse abdominalis activity is specific to the direction of the arm |
| |movement and not bilaterally symmetrical which is to stabilize the spine and not contribute to the control of the centre of mass or the |
| |individual task.20 |
| |Fabio Renovato Franca, Thomaz Nogueira Burke et. al. (2010): performed a study wherein he took two groups into consideration where one group |
| |was trained with segmental stabilization exercises and the other with only superficial strengthening regime and in which he proved that both |
| |do reduce the pain but segmental stabilization of the core muscles was superior to superficial strengthening regime in reducing the pain and |
| |disability in patients with chronic back pain, and the superficial strengthening does not improve transverses abdominis activation capacity.21 |
| |Felipe Pivetta Carpes, Fernanda Beatriz Reinehr et. al. (2007): put up a study which was, Effects of a program for trunk strength and |
| |stability on pain, low back and pelvis kinematics, and body balance: A pilot study, wherein the results suggested that the recruitmentment of |
| |trunk strength and stability has positive effect on low back and pelvis pain and kinematics as well as on body balance.22 |
| |Venu Akuthota, Andrea Ferreiro et. al. (2007): described the available literature in core strengthening and also with the available knowledge |
| |in motor learning using a theoretical framework has mentioned that the core stability is essential for proper load balance within the spine, |
| |pelvis, and kinetic chain.8 |
| |Craig Leibenson et. al. (2004): studied the relationship between the sacroiliac joint musculature with lumbopelvic instability and showed that |
| |the exercises of the key stabilizers of the lumbopelvic region do re-establish the pain.23 |
| |Kukuh Noertjojo et al (2012) studied that Outcome measures should be routinely assessed in CLBP patients, and should be chosen based on the |
| |patient’s most important domains, such as pain, function, and quality of life. Based on the ease of administration and the patient’s |
| |responsiveness, the Visual Analog Scale or the Numeric Rating Pain Scale is recommended for measuring pain, the Oswestry Disability Index or |
| |the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire for measuring function, and the SF-36 or SF-12 for measuring quality of life.24 |
| |Boonstra AM et al (2008) studied the reliability and validity of Visual analogous scale (VAS) for disability in patient with chronic |
| |musculoskeletal pain and conclude that the reliability of VAS for disability is moderate to good because of weak correlation with other |
| |disability instrument.25 |
| |Luo X, et al (2003) studied on a total of 2520 patients and found that The short form 12-item survey demonstrated good internal consistency |
| |reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness in patients with back pain.26 |
| |Albert HB et al (2003) studied that RMQ can be used as a valid tool in the assessment of the functional level of patient with lumber pain |
| |previous lumber herniation due to the fact that the questionnaire is fast and easy to complete. It is valid, reliable and sensitive and widely |
| |used internationally. we recommend the questionnaire to be used as supplement to the clinical examination both in clinical practice an in |
| |research.27 |
| |6.4 Objectives of study: |
| |Primary objective: |
| |1. To find the effect of core muscle strengthening exercises for subjects with SI joint dysfunction on pain using VAS and functional disability|
| |using modified Oswestry disability index scale. |
| | |
| |Secondary Objective |
| |2. To measure and analyse pain and functional disability before and after core muscle strengthening exercises program. |
| |3. To measure and analyse pain and functional disability before and after conventional exercise program. |
| |3. To determine the effect of core muscle strengthening exercises by comparing with conventional exercises. |
| |MATERIALS AND METHODS: |
| |7.1 Study Design |
| |Pre and post test experimental study design. |
| |7.2 Methodology |
| |Study population |
| |Subjects with bilateral SI joint dysfunction. |
| |Source of data |
| |Goutham College of physiotherapy and Rehabilitation centre. Bangalore. |
| |Sample size |
|7 |40 subjects (20 in control group and 20 in study group) |
| |Sampling method |
| |Simple random sampling method |
| |Duration of the study- 1 week study, 3 sessions per week. |
| | |
| | |
| |Materials used: |
| |Examination Table |
| |Plinth |
| |Pillow |
| |Chair |
| |Pressure Biofeedback Apparatus |
| |Inclusion criteria- |
| |1. Age group between 20 – 50 years |
| |2. Both males and females |
| |3. Patients diagnosed with Bilateral SI joint dysfunction and referred to physiotherapy intervention |
| |4. Positive provocation test – a. Gaeslen test |
| |b. Post sheer test |
| |c. Compression / distraction test |
| |Exclusion Criteria: |
| |Spinal injuries or post surgical for the past 6 months |
| |Neurological Conditions |
| |Cardiac Conditions |
| |Spondylolysthesis |
| |Bone TB (Pott’s Spine) |
| |Metabolic Disorders |
| |History of fractures in Pelvis or Spine. |
| | |
| |Outcome measures: |
| |1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain intensity. ( Appendix-2) |
| |2. Modified Oswestry low back pain disability index for functional disability. ( Appendix-3) |
| |7.3 Method of data collection: |
| |As the study includes human subjects ethical clearance is obtained from ethical committee of Goutham College of Physiotherapy. |
| |All the subjects will undergo through complete assessment and those subjects fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be explained in detail |
| |about the study and written consent ( Appendix-1) will be taken from them and randomly allocated to either study or control group. |
| |After taking the baseline parameters, subjects were given the treatment according to the groups allotted. |
| |A) Study group - Patients who will be given core muscle strengthening protocol with conventional treatment. |
| |B) Control group – Patients who will be given only conventional treatment. |
| |The conventional treatment includes ultrasound for 8-10 mins, followed with exercises including mobility exercises, such as in supine static |
| |back exercise, where the patient presses his back against the back support hold it for 2-3 secs, static abductors/ adductors, here the patients|
| |are made to squeeze a pillow between his both knees, in prone- back extension here the patient is asked to lie on their stomach place the hands|
| |near your ears and raise the back slowly, hip extension, in the same position the whole leg is asked to be lift straight up. |
| | |
| | |
| |The core strengthening exercises protocol will include progression of the exercises: |
| |Base position Cue: Supine with knees bent and feet on floor; spine stabilized in neutral position with instructing the subject to get his |
| |“navel to spine”, also termed the Abdomen Hollowing exercise, the tummy tuck or Bracing the abdomen. |
| |Once the subject is through with this level of exercise the further progression are: |
| |Base position with 1 foot lifted |
| |Base position with 1 knee held to chest and other foot lifted |
| |Base position with 1 knee held lightly to chest and other foot lifted |
| |Base position with Knee to chest (at 90° of hip flexion) held actively and other foot lifted |
| |Base position with Knee to chest (at 90° of hip flexion) held actively and other foot lifted and slide on ground. |
| |Base position with Knee to chest (at 90° of hip flexion) held actively and other foot lifted and slide not on ground |
| |Base position with Bilateral heel slides |
| |Base position with Bilateral leg lifts to 90° |
| |Bracing in standing |
| |Bracing with standing row |
| |Bracing with walking |
| |Further the progression in Quadriped position wherein the subjects are made to go on both his knees and his hands like the all four position. |
| |Quadruped arm lifts with bracing |
| |Quadruped leg lifts with bracing |
| |Quadruped alternate arm and legs lifts with bracing. |
| |Plank-patient asked to lie prone and go on their elbows without any other contact of the body except the foot and elbow. |
| |Oblique plank- the exercise of plank used in side lying |
| |Further the abdominal exercises in supine: Trunk curl, oblique crunches |
| |Controlled lowering and raising of legs together: here the patient lie’s supine and has to raise both legs up to maximum and then gradually put|
| |it down. |
| |Hundreds: Lie on your back with your arms by your sides. Raise your legs and bend them so that you form a right angle at your hips and knees. |
| |Keeping your arms straight and lifting your hands no more than a few inches, gently tap the floor 100 times. |
| |Leg extensions in supine: ask the subject to move the limbs in a way that are riding a bicycle. |
| |Each exercise is performed with set of 30 times each. And then the exercises are performed in the next progressions once the present exercise |
| |is performed successfully. Pre and Post these sessions the VAS scale and disability index will be collected and used for data analysis.. |
| |Statistical Analysis: |
| |Statistical analysis will be performed by using SPSS software for window (version16) and p value will be set as 0.05. |
| |Descriptive statistics and Chi square test will be used to analyze baseline data for demographic data. |
| |Paired t test and Wilcoxon signed ranked test will be used to find the significance of parameters pre to post test. |
| |7.4 Ethical clearance : |
| |As the study includes human subjects ethical clearance is obtained from ethical committee of institution where the subject belongs if any. Also|
| |written consent will be taken from the participants in the study. |
| | |
| |List of references : |
| |Sherman, Andrew, Gothin. Sacroiliac joint injury, 2011;1-3. |
| |Gentile, Julie, What is Sacroiliac joint dysfunction, 2010;16-21. |
| |Isaac, Zacharia, Denine, Jennifer. Sacroiliac joint dysfunctions. Essentials of Physical medicine and Rehabilitation: Musculoskeletal |
| |disorders, pain and rehabilitation, Saunders/ Elsevier.pg 26-30. |
| |Sembrane; Jonathan N. Spine 2009 34(1): E27-E32. |
| |Sims, Vicki, PT. The secret cause of low back pain, Georgia- Sipress. 2004 |
| |Don Tigny, RL: Sacroiliac 201; Dysfunctions and management, A Biomechanical solution, 2011, 3:644-652. |
|8 |Darin T. Leetun, Mary Lloyd Ireland, John D. Willson, Bryon T. Ballantyne and Irene Mcclay Davis, Medicine & Science in sports and medicine, by|
| |the American College of Sports Medicine 2004, pg.- 926-927. |
| |Akuthota V, Nadler SF. Core strengthening. Arch Phys. Med Rehabilitation 2004;85 (3 Suppl 1): S86-92. |
| |V. Akuthota, Nadler SF. Core strengthening. Arch Phys. Med Rehabilitation 2007;85 (3 Suppl 1): S86-92. |
| |Carolyn A. Richardson PhD. Relation between the transverse abdominals muscles, SI joint mechanics and low back pain- Spine Vol. 27, No.-4, |
| |2002, pg 399-405. |
| |Eyal Lederman. The myth of core stability- Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 4 Aug. 2009 |
| |Cusi M. F. Paradigm for assessment and treatment of Sacroiliac joint mechanism, and Dysfunctions, Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, |
| |2011. |
| |Boris A. Zelle. Sacroiliac joint dysfunctions, evaluation and management- The clinical journal of pain21, no. 5, Oct.-2005, 446-455. |
| |Akuthota V., A. Ferreiro, T. Moore, Current sports medicine reports from American college of sports medicine; 2008, 39-44. |
| |Julie M. Fritz, Julie M. Whitman, factors related to the instability of individuals with low back pain improve with a spinal manipulation, |
| |Physical Therapy, Vol. 84, No.-2, Feb-2004. |
| |Marshall PW, Murphy BA. Core stability exercises on and off a Swiss ball. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:242-9. |
| |Willardson, J.M. Core stability training: Applications to sports conditioning programs. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2007. 21(3):979-985. |
| |Barr KP, Griggs M, Cadby T: Lumbar stabilization: Core concepts and current literature, part 1. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:473-480. |
| |Christopher Norrisa, Martyn Matthewsb : The role of an integrated back stability program in patients with chronic low back pain: Complementary |
| |therapies in clinical practice.2008;14;4;255-263. |
| |Garry T. Allison, BApp Sci : Feedforward Responses of Transversus Abdominis Are Directionally Specific and Act Asymmetrically: Implications for|
| |Core Stability Theories. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy.2008;38;5;228-237. |
| |Fabio Renovato Franca, Thomaz Nogueira Burke : Segmental stabilization and muscular strengthening in chronic low back pain - a comparative |
| |study.2010;65;10. |
| |Felipe Pivetta Carpes, Fernanda Beatriz Reinehr : Effects of a program for trunk strength and stability on pain, low back and pelvis |
| |kinematics, and body balance: A pilot study.2008;12;1;22-30. |
| |Craig Leibenson: The relationship of the sacroiliac joint, stabilization musculature, and lumbo-pelvic instability. Journal of Bodywork and |
| |Movement Therapies (2004) 8, 43–45. |
| |Jose M. Muyor, Pedro A. Lopez Minarro, Antonio J. Casimiro. Effect of stretching Program in an industrial workplace on hamstring flexibility |
| |and sagittal spinal posture of adult women workers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Back and Mus Rehab 2012; 25: 161-169. |
| |Boonstra AM, Schiphorst Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients |
| |with chronic musculoskeletal pain. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research.2008; 31(2): 165-169. |
| |Luo X, Lynn George M, Kakouras I, Edwards CL, Pietrobon R, Richardson W, Hey L, Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form |
| |12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Spine. 2003; 28(15): 1739-45. |
| |Albert HB, Jensen AM, Dahi D, Rasmussen MN. Criterian Validation of the RMQ. A Denish translation of the International scalp for the assessment|
| |of Functional level in patients with low back pain and sciatica. Ugeskr laeger, 2003; 165(18): 1875-80. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|9. |Signature of Candidate |
| | |
|10. |Remarks of the Guide |
| | |
|11. |Name and Designation of |
| |11.1 Guide : AKSHATA AKALWADI |
| | |
| |11.2 Signature |
| | |
| |11.3 Co-Guide : |
| | |
| | |
| |11.4 Signature |
| | |
| |11.5 Head of Department : |
| | |
| | |
| |11.6 Signature |
|12. |12.1 Remarks of the Chairman & Principal |
| | |
| | |
| |12.2 Signature |
APPENDIX -1
CONSENT FORM
I SOHAN SINGH have explained to................... the purpose of the research, the procedures required, and the possible risks and benefits to the best of my ability.
......................................... ...............................................
Investigator Signature Date
College: GOUTHAM COLLEGE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
Place: Bangalore
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STUDY
Purpose of Research
I .........................have been informed that this study will be for subjects with bilateral Sacroiliac joint dysfunction problems like mine. Both approaches /techniques are acceptable Physiotherapy intervention for this problem. This study will help physiotherapy better understand the use of Physiotherapy services in management of The sacroiliac joint dysfunction with study of Effect of core muscles strengthening exercises in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
Procedure
I understand that I will be assigned by lot to receive exercise therapy. I will be expected to attend Physiotherapy treatment sessions two to three times in a week in addition to doing exercises at home.
I am aware that in addition to ordinary care received, I will be examined and asked a series of questions by a research Physiotherapist. The Physiotherapist examination consists of measuring Visual analog scale and the Modified Oswestry scale. I have been asked to undergo these tests at the beginning of the study, and after the study.
Risk and Discomforts
I understand that I may experience some pain or discomfort during the examination or during my treatment. This is mainly the result of my condition, and the procedures of this study are not expected to exaggerate these feelings which are associated with the usual course of treatment.
Benefits
I understand that my participation in the study will have no direct benefit to me other than potential benefit of the treatment which is planned to reduce my pain and increase my shoulder function. The major potential benefit is to find out which treatment program is more effective.
Confidentiality
I understand that the information produced by this study will became part of my research record and will be subject to the confidentiality and privacy regulation, but will be stored in the investigator’s research file.
If the data are used for publication in the literature or for the teaching purpose, no names will be used, and other identifiers, such as photographs and audio or videotapes, will be used with my special written permission.
Refusal or Withdrawal of Participation
I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I may refuse to participate or may withdraw consent and discontinue participation in the study at any time without prejudice to my present or future care at the Hospital. I also understand that Sohan Rajurohit may terminate my participation in this study at any time after She/He explained the reasons for doing so.
I confirmed that Sohan Rajurohit has explained to me the purpose of the research, the study procedures that I will undergo, and the possible risks and discomforts as well as benefits that I may experience. Alternatives to my participation in the study have also been discussed. I have read and I understand this consent form. Therefore, I agree to give my consent to participate as a subject in this research project.
............................................... ..........................................
Participant Signature Date
.............................................. ..........................................
Witness to Signature Date
APPENDIX -2
VAS is presented as 10cm line.
No pain at one end and worst imaginable pain at other end
Patient is asked to mark a 100mm line to indicate pain intensity
[pic]
APPENDIX -3
| |
|MODIFIED OSWESTRY SCALE |
| |
|To be completed by patient |
|This questionnaire has been designed to give your therapist information as to how your back pain has affected your ability to manage in |
|every day life. Please answer every question by placing a mark on the line that best describes your condition today. We realize you may |
|feel that two of the statements may describe your condition, but please mark only the line which most closely describes your current |
|condition. |
| |
|Pain Intensity |
|_____The pain is mild and comes and goes. |
|_____The pain is mild and does not vary much. |
|_____The pain is moderate and comes and goes. |
|_____The pain is moderate and does not vary much. |
|_____The pain is severe and comes and goes. |
|_____The pain is severe and does not vary much. |
|Personal Care (Washing, Dressing, etc.) |
|_____I do not have to change the way I wash and dress myself to avoid pain. |
|_____I do not normally change the way I wash or dress myself even though it causes some pain. |
|_____Washing and dressing increases my pain, but I can do it without changing my way of doing it. |
|_____Washing and dressing increases my pain, and I find it necessary to change the way I do it. |
|_____Because of my pain I am partially unable to wash and dress without help. |
|_____Because of my pain I am completely unable to wash or dress without help. |
|Lifting |
|_____I can lift heavy weights without increased pain. |
|_____I can lift heavy weights but it causes increased pain |
|_____Pain prevents me from lifting heavy weights off of the floor, but I can manage if theyare conveniently positioned (ex. on a table, |
|etc.). |
|_____Pain prevents me from lifting heavy weights off of the floor, but I can manage light to medium weights if they are conveniently |
|positioned. |
|_____I can lift only very light weights. |
|_____I can not lift or carry anything at all. |
|Walking |
|_____I have no pain when walking. |
|_____I have pain when walking, but I can still walk my required normal distances. |
|_____Pain prevents me from walking long distances. |
|_____Pain prevents me from walking intermediate distances. |
|_____Pain prevents me from walking even short distances. |
|_____Pain prevents me from walking at all. |
|Sitting |
|_____Sitting does not cause me any pain. |
|_____I can only sit as long as I like providing that I have my choice of seating surfaces. |
|_____Pain prevents me from sitting for more than 1 hour. |
|_____Pain prevents me from sitting for more than 1/2 hour. |
|_____Pain prevents me from sitting for more than 10 minutes. |
|_____Pain prevents me from sitting at all. |
| |
| |
| |
|To be completed by patient |
|Standing |
|_____I can stand as long as I want without increased pain. |
|_____I can stand as long as I want but my pain increases with time. |
|_____Pain prevents me from standing more than 1 hour. |
|_____Pain prevents me from standing more than 1/2 hour. |
|_____Pain prevents me from standing more than 10 minutes. |
|_____I avoid standing because it increases my pain right away. |
|Sleeping |
|_____I get no pain when I am in bed. |
|_____I get pain in bed, but it does not prevent me from sleeping well. |
|_____Because of my pain, my sleep is only 3/4 of my normal amount. |
|_____Because of my pain, my sleep is only 1/2 of my normal amount. |
|_____Because of my pain, my sleep is only 1/4 of my normal amount. |
|_____Pain prevents me from sleeping at all. |
|Social Life |
|_____My social life is normal and does not increase my pain. |
|_____My social life is normal, but it increases my level of pain. |
|_____Pain prevents me from participating in more energetic activities (ex. sports, dancing, etc.) |
|_____Pain prevents me from going out very often. |
|_____Pain has restricted my social life to my home. |
|_____I have hardly any social life because of my pain. |
|Traveling |
|_____I get no increased pain when traveling. |
|_____I get some pain while traveling, but none of my usual forms of travel make it any worse. |
|_____I get increased pain while traveling, but it does not cause me to seek alternative forms of travel. |
|_____I get increased pain while traveling which causes me to seek alternative forms of travel. |
|_____My pain restricts all forms of travel except that which is done while I am lying down. |
|_____My pain restricts all forms of travel. |
|Employment/Homemaking |
|_____My normal job/homemaking activities do not cause pain. |
|_____My normal job/homemaking activities increase my pain, but I can still perform all that is required of me. |
|_____I can perform most of my job/homemaking duties, but pain prevents me from performing more physically stressful activities (ex. |
|lifting, vacuuming) |
|_____Pain prevents me from doing anything but light duties. |
|_____Pain prevents me from doing even light duties. |
|_____Pain prevents me from performing any job or homemaking chores. |
|Section 3: To be completed by physical therapist/provider |
|SCORE: Initial_____% Subsequent_____% Subsequent_____% Discharge_____% |
|Number of treatment sessions:________________ |
|Diagnosis/ICD-9 Code:_______________________ |
[pic]
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.