Rule for Stating Uncertainties
In general, the result of any measurement of a quantity x is stated as
(measured value of x) = Xbest ++/- δx
Rules for Reporting
Measurements should be reported using one of the following two formats:
Standard notation: 345.5 +/- 0.5 m/s
Scientific notation: (3.455 +/- 0.005) x 102 m/s
It is good practice to leave the ‘0’ in front of any decimal point when writing a number that is less than 1. For example, in the Standard notation example above, the error of 0.5 m/s is written as:
0.5 m/s not .5 m/s
Rule for Stating Uncertainties
Experimental uncertainties should almost always be rounded to one significant figure.
For example: 56.78 +/- 0.04834 cm should be rewritten as 56.78 +/- 0.05 cm
456.8 +/- 0.789 km should be rewritten as 456.8 +/- 0.8 km
20,078 +/- 4.32 kg should be rewritten as 20,078 +/- 4 kg
Exception to the above rule: If the leading digit in the uncertainty δx is a ‘1’, then keeping two significant figures in δx may be more appropriate. For example, suppose that some calculation gave the uncertainty δx = 0.13. Rounding this number to δx = 0.1 would be a substantial percentage reduction, so we could argue that retaining two figures might be less misleading, and quote δx = 0.13. The same argument could perhaps be applied if the leading digit is a 2, but not if it is any larger.
For example: 34.567 +/- 0.001432 should be rewritten as 34.5670 +/- 0.0014
However, 34.567 +/- 0.0025474 should be rewritten as 34.567 +/- 0.003
Rule for Stating Answers
The last significant figure in any stated answer should usually be of the same order of magnitude (in the same decimal position) as the uncertainty.
For example: 345.87 +/- 30 m/s should be rounded to 350 +/- 30 m/s
92.81 +/- 0.3 m/s should be rounded to 92.8 +/- 0.3 m/s
92.81 +/- 3 m/s should be rounded to 93 +/- 3 m/s
92.81 +/- 30 m/s should be rounded to 90 +/- 30 m/s
Qualification to both the above rules: Any numbers that are used in intermediate calculations should not be rounded until the final answer is achieved. This will reduce inaccuracies caused by the compounding of rounding errors.
Sample test questions:
Rewrite each of the following measurements in its most appropriate form:
1) X = 8.6711345 +/- 0.999864 m/s
2) m = 44278 +/- 2 m
3) k = 7.7899 x 10-7 +/- 3 x 10-9 kg
4) g = 987.9004 +/- 52 m/s2
5) n = 3000 +/- 20 meters
6) 56.9 +/- 0.6 liters
7) 7.18 +/- 0.0143 m
8) 45.78934 x 10-2 +/- 5 x 10-3 cm
Answers:
1) X = 8.7 +/- 1.0 m/s
2) m = (4.4278 +/- 0.0002) x 104 m
3) k = (7.79 +/- 0.03) x 10-7 kg
4) g = 990 +/- 50 m/s2
5) no change necessary. This is already in the most appropriate form.
6) 56.9 +/- 0.6 liters
7) 7.180 +/- 0.014 m - due to the Exception to the Rule for Stating Uncertainties
8) (4.58 +/- 0.05) x 10-1 cm
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- mesa community college
- unit 1 notes scientific notation significant figures
- hints for locating accounting errors
- `web clock training
- rule for stating uncertainties
- the art of rounding
- significant figures practice worksheet
- 3b scheduled rounding protocol
- module a 1 positive and negative numbers and rounding
- configuration approach workgroups
Related searches
- sig fig rule for addition
- 55 rule for 401k withdrawals
- 6 hour rule for lunch
- rule for negative and positive numbers
- rule for fractions
- sentence starters for stating evidence
- chain rule for paths calculator
- sig fig rule for division
- product rule for derivatives
- chain rule for integral
- recursive rule for a sequence
- recursive rule for arithmetic sequence