SundayReview



Free speech and people power helped women fight creepsAndrew Bolt, Herald SunOctober 29, 2017 7:30pm I MAY love this witch hunt against workplace sex predators like Harvey Weinstein more than I should.I love, for instance, that some media stars right here must name-check themselves on Google every day, freaking they’ll be outed next.I loved reading just last weekend the oops-you-got-me confession of author and MSNBC political commentator Mark Halperin, accused of groping and propositioning women much his junior when he was political director at America’s ABC.It’s such fun to see bullies get paid back, especially by the very people they once thought too weak to resist.So many women who were expected to accept the hand on the backside from a boss now find themselves with power to make the bastard pay.Weinstein is now sacked from his own film production company, and Halperin lost his job, a book deal and an HBO project.Women are suddenly believed and gropers are running scared. Hollywood star Ben Affleck and even George Bush Sr, the former US president, have had to apologise now for gropes they’d probably long forgotten.Excellent, although I worry about quite how much I’m liking this. For a start, witch-hunts can get wild, confusing allegations with proof, and trivial with serious.I also wonder whether some of the outrage from men, particularly, is tainted with envy and frustration that their own virtue was not its own reward.How many are thinking: At last! Weinstein won’t be around to make virtue seem for losers by bullying yet more women into his bed. He won’t get extra for breaking the rules.But there is a more moral comfort to take from this great reckoning. See how Weinstein fell? How Halperin lost his living?It wasn’t from being sued or denounced to some commission. In fact, the legal suits against Weinstein always ended in confidential settlements that left him free to molest again.No, two things brought down these men. First, free speech: laws that allowed women to denounce them without running the same risk of being sued that women face here.Second, people power: people don’t want to buy things from a known sex creep — not books or even opinions. The market works, especially now women do so much of the earning and buying.Trust free speech and people over nanny laws and commissars.The victims brought down their own monster, and the people cheered.SundayReview?|?EDITORIALWill Harvey Weinstein’s Fall Finally Reform Men?By?THE EDITORIAL BOARDOCT. 28, 2017Continue reading the main storyShare This PageCreditFrancesco CiccolellaHas America at last reached a turning point on sexual harassment? Watching the events of the past three weeks, one can hope.In the wake of Harvey Weinstein’s?sudden?and overdue expulsion?from Hollywood for his serial predation, hundreds of long-silent women are calling out powerful, influential men at a remarkable clip and accusing them of sexual misconduct:?Roy Price, the head of Amazon Studios; the film director?James Toback; the literary critic?Leon Wieseltier; the restaurateur and celebrity chef?John Besh; and the political commentator?Mark Halperin, to name just a few.Several of these men have accepted some degree of responsibility for their behavior. Former President George Bush, now 93 and using a wheelchair,?apologized last?week?after multiple women?said?he groped them and whispered a crude joke during photo ops. He described it as an “attempt at humor.”Let’s not forget — let’s not ever forget —?Bill Cosby,?Roger Ailes?and?Bill O’Reilly, three giants of American popular culture who treated women despicably for decades, and paid a price, whether through criminal prosecution, public humiliation, job loss or forking out tens of millions of dollars in hush money.?#MeToo, indeed.This reckoning is all to the good, even if it is far too late. It feels as though a real and lasting transformation may be afoot — until you remember that this isn’t the first time women have sounded the alarm.Remember Anita Hill, who?told a firing line of skeptical senators?the story of constant harassment by her boss, Clarence Thomas, more than 25 years ago. The lawmakers, every one of them male, seemed less concerned with the alleged misconduct of a Supreme Court nominee than that a woman would drag such a tawdry subject into the halls of Congress. While Ms. Hill’s brave testimony prompted a sharp rise in sexual-harassment claims, she was vilified in public; nearly twice as many Americans said at the time that they believed now-Justice Thomas’s account of what happened over hers.Remember former President Bill Clinton, whose popularity endures despite a long string of allegations of sexual misconduct and, in one case, rape — all of which he has denied. Mr. Clinton did eventually admit to the affair with an intern, Monica Lewinsky, that nearly toppled his presidency, but he pointed out that it was not illegal.Then, of course, there’s the current occupant of the Oval Office, who won the election only weeks after the public?heard him brag?about grabbing women’s genitalia, and who once said that if his daughter were ever sexually harassed at work,?she should go find a new job. That president leads a party intent on passing laws that would re-establish gender norms and hierarchies from the middle of the last century (Defund Planned Parenthood!?No abortions after six weeks!) — making it harder for women to attain the social equality and economic independence that would go a long way toward reducing sexual harassment in the workplace.In other words, even the highest-profile opportunities to change America’s endemic culture of sexual harassment, which is overwhelmingly, though not exclusively, committed by men against women, can somehow be lost or swept away. How do we keep that from happening again?And how do we ensure that progress filters down to average American workplaces, where sexual harassment occurs all the time but rarely gets media attention? The answer is part cultural, part economic and part legal.The most conservative estimates say 25 percent of women have experienced sexual harassment at work, although the real number is surely much higher, since only a small fraction of such behavior is ever reported. As many as 90 percent of workers who are harassed never file a formal complaint, according to?a 2016 report?by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which receives?more than 12,000 complaints?of sex-based harassment each year.The reasons for this silence are obvious: Women fear retaliation, indifference or disbelief if they speak up. If it’s hard for rich and famous people, so many of whom kept silent in the face of Mr. Weinstein’s well-known depredations, imagine how much harder it is for someone with no political or economic power. But the Weinstein saga also illustrates what a difference it can make when women join together — and men join with them — to confront harassers openly.HOW TO CHANGE THE CULTURE?The key is to foster work environments where women feel safe and men feel obliged to report sexual harassment. “People need to be afraid not just of doing these things, but also of not doing anything when someone around them does it,” Sheryl Sandberg, the chief operating officer of Facebook,?told The Times’s Nicholas Kristof?last week. “If you know something is happening and you fail to take action, whether you are a man or a woman — especially when you are in power — you are responsible, too.”But speaking up only goes so far if employers don’t make reporting harassment easy or the consequences for harassers swift and clear. Treating sexual harassment seriously is essential, not to protect against liability or to safeguard the bottom line, but because it’s wrong for anyone to have to endure harassment at work. (Though it sure helps when liability and the bottom line are at stake, too.)Some of the nation’s largest companies are moving in the right direction. For example, McDonald’s, Burger King, Aramark and Walmart have signed on to?a program?requiring their tomato growers to adhere to a code of conduct that prohibits sexual harassment and assault of farmworkers, and provides a clear system for the growers’ 30,000 workers to file complaints. Fourteen businesses are part of the program; many more should join.IT’S ABOUT POWER AND MONEY?Sexual-harassment culture is tied directly to the economics of the workplace. Since harassment is about power, it’s no surprise that it thrives in industries where women are?systematically kept out of powerful roles?— and?paid less?for doing the same work as men. (This may help explain why sexual-harassment cases make up?nearly half of all harassment complaints?from the private sector, but less than 10 percent of those from employees of the federal government, where women have more opportunities to rise to positions of authority.)CreditFrancesco CiccolellaToo often, male harassers use their economic power to silence women, as Mr. Weinstein and Mr. O’Reilly did repeatedly, offering them hefty payments in return for signing nondisclosure agreements. If employers were more responsive and harassment cases were easier to pursue in the courts, there would be fewer of these settlements, which can be good for individual women but?allow the predatory?behavior to continue unchecked.One compromise could be to require businesses to report how many sexual-harassment claims they settle every year, or even how many complaints they receive. This would at least give prospective employees a chance to assess how bad the problem is at a given company, and could lead to greater public scrutiny in more extreme cases.LEGAL BARRIERS?The Supreme Court?ruled in 1986?that sexual harassment violates?Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of sex, race, religion and other protected classes. Twelve years later, it?made employers liable?for?supervisors’ harassment of workers. But in 2013, the court?stepped backward, ruling that employers are liable only for racial or sexual harassment by a supervisor who has the power to fire a worker or prevent his or her promotion.?In a 5-to-4 ruling, with only male justices in the majority, the court held that employers are not automatically liable for harassment by the larger number of supervisors who don’t have that power, even if they control all other aspects of a worker’s daily activities.In her?dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the decision ignored the realities of the modern workplace, and the “particular threatening character” of a supervisor’s power and authority, even one not vested with the power to fire. A worker who confronts a harassing supervisor risks “receiving an undesirable or unsafe work assignment or an unwanted transfer. She may be saddled with an excessive workload or with placement on a shift spanning hours disruptive of her family life.”Congress could and should overturn that ruling today by passing a law that reinstates the broader and more realistic definition of a supervisor. But good luck with that; Capitol Hill can’t even keep its own house in order. Representative Jackie Speier of California, who said she was sexually assaulted years ago when she was a congressional staff member,?told Politico on Thursday?that the compliance office tasked with handling harassment complaints is “toothless,” and said that Congress has been “a breeding ground for a hostile work environment for far too long.”This may turn out to be the year when the tide finally turned on sexual harassment. The elements for a permanent cultural shift are certainly in place. More women have entered the work force, and the pay gap with men is closing, though not fast enough. More women than men are graduating from college; more are earning advanced degrees; and increasing numbers are managers, though the proportions of women still become thinner and thinner the higher in management you look. And, crucially, the internet and social media have opened a door to instant communication and community support that didn’t exist before, helping women feel less isolation and shame about their experiences, and more confident that speaking out will have a positive result.In the end, though, the most lasting change will have to come from men, who are doing virtually all the sexual harassing. Boys must be raised to understand why that behavior is wrong, teenagers need to be reminded of it and grown men need to pay for it until they get the message.The Mercury News (US) ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download