Mrs. Harrington: Martin Middle School



Background and context Capital punishment is the execution of a person by the state as punishment for a crime. The word "capital" comes from the Latin word "capitalis", which means "regarding the head". At one point and time capital crimes where punished by severing the head. Crimes that can result in the death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offenses. Capital punishment has been used in societies throughout history as a way to punish crime and suppress political dissent. In most places that practice capital punishment today, the death penalty is reserved as punishment for premeditated murder, espionage, treason, or as part of military justice. In some countries sexual crimes, such as rape, adultery and sodomy, carry the death penalty, as do religious crimes such as apostasy (the formal renunciation of the State religion). In many retentionist countries (countries that use the death penalty), drug trafficking is also a capital offense. In China human trafficking and serious cases of corruption are also punished by the death penalty. In the past, capital punishment has been practiced in almost every society. Currently, only 58 nations actively practice it, with 95 countries abolishing it. Many countries have abandoned capital punishment, including almost all European and many Pacific Area states (including Australia, New Zealand and Timor Leste), and Canada. In Latin America, most states have completely abolished the use of capital punishment, while some countries, such as Brazil, allow for capital punishment only in exceptional situations, such as treason committed during wartime. The United States (the federal government and 36 of its states), Guatemala, most of the Caribbean and the majority of democracies in Asia (e.g. Japan and India) and Africa (e.g. Botswana and Zambia) retain it. South Africa, which is probably the most developed African nation, and which has been a democracy since 1994, does not have the death penalty. This fact is currently quite controversial in that country, due to the high levels of violent crime, including murder and rape. The latest countries to abolish the death penalty de facto for all crimes were Gabon, which announced on September 14, 2007 that they would no longer apply capital punishment and South Korea in practice on December 31, 2007 after ten years of disuse. The latest to abolish executions de jure was Uzbekistan on January 1, 2008. Around the world, the capital punishment debate revolves around a number of questions, which are important to layout as a way of summarizing the moral trade-offs of the debate. They include, is capital punishment intended primarily as a punishment? Is it a just and proportional punishment for certain crimes, like murder? Do murderers and some other criminals commit crimes so horrific that they forfeit the right to life? Should innocent life be valued over a murderers life, and does capital punishment demonstrate this? Is life imprisonment without parole a sufficient punishment? Is the idea of proportional justice a slippery slope to abusive forms of punishment? Does capital punishment jeopardize our sense of the "dignity of life"? Or, is it important to demonstrate compassion even to murderers by sparing them their lives? Is the purpose of our prison system retribution or rehabilitation? Is the execution of innocent convicts a serious problem. Is it OK that wrongful executions can't be corrected? Does this deprive due process, by foreclosing the option of appeal to those that have been executed? Does it generally contravene a right to due process, even for those that are guilty? Is the death penalty a necessary means of demonstrating the horror felt by a family and a society at a crime? Or, should we draw a line before capital punishment? If a family or a public desires capital punishment to see "justice done", is it important for the law to grant these wishes? Does capital punishment give solace, closure, and comfort to families and society generally? Is the death penalty a legitimate means of protecting society? Is it important to kill a murderer so that they have a 0% chance of killing again? Or, can we trust that prisons should be able to hold these prisoners with 100% effectiveness so as to prevent further murders? Does capital punishment have a deterrent effect, dissuading criminals from committing future crimes? How disputed is this notion? If it remains highly disputed, can policy be based on it? Even if there is a deterrent effect, should this be considered? Or, would this be an instance of the ends (deterrence) justifying the means (capital punishment)? Is it a major concern that innocent people may be wrongly convicted of a crime and sentenced to death? Does this happen infrequently? Is it statistically insignificant, or does it only have to happen once for it to put the whole idea of capital punishment on hold? Does capital punishment violate the notion of due process by killing those that might make future appeals? Are capital punishment convictions given in a discriminatory manner? If so, is this a problem with capital punishment or the judicial system? Is it possible to apply capital punishment consistently, or is it susceptible to arbitrary application? What are the economics of capital punishment? Is capital punishment more expensive than life imprisonment? Should the economics be considered? These are the moral questions that must be asked by an individual considering this debate, and attempting to fully weigh its pro and con arguments. The death penalty prevents future murders.Society has always used punishment to discourage would-be criminals from unlawful action. Since society has the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment available to deter murder, and that is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own life. For years, criminologists analyzed murder rates to see if they fluctuated with the likelihood of convicted murderers being executed, but the results were inconclusive. Then in 1973 Isaac Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing murder. Similar results have been produced by disciples of Ehrlich in follow-up studies.Moreover, even if some studies regarding deterrence are inconclusive, that is only because the death penalty is rarely used and takes years before an execution is actually carried out. Punishments which are swift and sure are the best deterrent. The fact that some states or countries which do not use the death penalty have lower murder rates than jurisdictions which do is not evidence of the failure of deterrence. States with high murder rates would have even higher rates if they did not use the death penalty. Ernest van den Haag, a Professor of Jurisprudence at Fordham University who has studied the question of deterrence closely, wrote: "Even though statistical demonstrations are not conclusive, and perhaps cannot be, capital punishment is likely to deter more than other punishments because people fear death more than anything else. They fear most death deliberately inflicted by law and scheduled by the courts. Whatever people fear most is likely to deter most. Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred. And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence. Perhaps they will not be deterred. But they would certainly not be deterred by anything else. We owe all the protection we can give to law enforcers exposed to special risks."Finally, the death penalty certainly "deters" the murderer who is executed. Strictly speaking, this is a form of incapacitation, similar to the way a robber put in prison is prevented from robbing on the streets. Vicious murderers must be killed to prevent them from murdering again, either in prison, or in society if they should get out. Both as a deterrent and as a form of permanent incapacitation, the death penalty helps to prevent future crime.The death penalty is not a proven deterrent to future murders.Those who believe that deterrence justifies the execution of certain offenders bear the burden of proving that the death penalty is a deterrent. The overwhelming conclusion from years of deterrence studies is that the death penalty is, at best, no more of a deterrent than a sentence of life in prison. The Ehrlich studies have been widely discredited. In fact, some criminologists, such as William Bowers of Northeastern University, maintain that the death penalty has the opposite effect: that is, society is brutalized by the use of the death penalty, and this increases the likelihood of more murder. Even most supporters of the death penalty now place little or no weight on deterrence as a serious justification for its continued use. States in the United States that do not employ the death penalty generally have lower murder rates than states that do. The same is true when the U.S. is compared to countries similar to it. The U.S., with the death penalty, has a higher murder rate than the countries of Europe or Canada, which do not use the death penalty.The death penalty is not a deterrent because most people who commit murders either do not expect to be caught or do not carefully weigh the differences between a possible execution and life in prison before they act. Frequently, murders are committed in moments of passion or anger, or by criminals who are substance abusers and acted impulsively. As someone who presided over many of Texas's executions, former Texas Attorney General Jim Mattox has remarked, "It is my own experience that those executed in Texas were not deterred by the existence of the death penalty law. I think in most cases you'll find that the murder was committed under severe drug and alcohol abuse."There is no conclusive proof that the death penalty acts as a better deterrent than the threat of life imprisonment. A survey of the former and present presidents of the country's top academic criminological societies found that 84% of these experts rejected the notion that research had demonstrated any deterrent effect from the death penalty . Once in prison, those serving life sentences often settle into a routine and are less of a threat to commit violence than other prisoners. Moreover, most states now have a sentence of life without parole. Prisoners who are given this sentence will never be released. Thus, the safety of society can be assured without using the death penalty.Just society requires the death penalty for the taking of a life.When someone takes a life, the balance of justice is disturbed. Unless that balance is restored, society succumbs to a rule of violence. Only the taking of the murderer's life restores the balance and allows society to show convincingly that murder is an intolerable crime which will be punished in kind. Retribution has its basis in religious values, which have historically maintained that it is proper to take an "eye for an eye" and a life for a life. Although the victim and the victim's family cannot be restored to the status which preceded the murder, at least an execution brings closure to the murderer's crime (and closure to the ordeal for the victim's family) and ensures that the murderer will create no more victims.For the most cruel and heinous crimes, the ones for which the death penalty is applied, offenders deserve the worst punishment under our system of law, and that is the death penalty. Any lesser punishment would undermine the value society places on protecting lives.Robert Macy, District Attorney of Oklahoma City, described his concept of the need for retribution in one case: "In 1991, a young mother was rendered helpless and made to watch as her baby was executed. The mother was then mutilated and killed. The killer should not lie in some prison with three meals a day, clean sheets, cable TV, family visits and endless appeals. For justice to prevail, some killers just need to die."Testimony in Opposition to the Death Penalty National Council of Synagogues and the Bishops' Committee for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs of the National Conference of Catholic BishopsExcerpts from “To End the Death Penalty: A Report of the National Jewish/Catholic Consultation” (December, 1999)“Some would argue that the death penalty is needed as a means of retributive justice, to balance out the crime with the punishment. This reflects a natural concern of society, and especially of victims and their families. Yet we believe that we are called to seek a higher road even while punishing the guilty, for example through long and in some cases life-long incarceration, so that the healing of all can ultimately take place.Some would argue that the death penalty will teach society at large the seriousness of crime. Yet we say that teaching people to respond to violence with violence will, again, only breed more violence. The strongest argument of all [in favor of the death penalty] is the deep pain and grief of the families of victims, and their quite natural desire to see punishment meted out to those who have plunged them into such agony. Yet it is the clear teaching of our traditions that this pain and suffering cannot be healed simply through the retribution of capital punishment or by vengeance. It is a difficult and long process of healing which comes about through personal growth and God's grace. We agree that much more must be done by the religious community and by society at large to solace and care for the grieving families of the victims of violent crime.Recent statements of the Reform and Conservative movements in Judaism, and of the U.S. Catholic Conference sum up well the increasingly strong convictions shared by Jews and Catholics...:'Respect for all human life and opposition to the violence in our society are at the root of our long-standing opposition (as bishops) to the death penalty. We see the death penalty as perpetuating a cycle of violence and promoting a sense of vengeance in our culture. As we said in Confronting the Culture of Violence: 'We cannot teach that killing is wrong by killing.' We oppose capital punishment not just for what it does to those guilty of horrible crimes, but for what it does to all of us as a society. Increasing reliance on the death penalty diminishes all of us and is a sign of growing disrespect for human life. We cannot overcome crime by simply executing criminals, nor can we restore the lives of the innocent by ending the lives of those convicted of their murders. The death penalty offers the tragic illusion that we can defend life by taking life.'1We affirm that we came to these conclusions because of our shared understanding of the sanctity of human life. We have committed ourselves to work together, and each within our own communities, toward ending the death penalty.”Endnote 1. Statement of the Administrative Committee of the United States Catholic Conference, March 24, 1999.Historical TimelineHistory of the Death Penalty1700 BC - 17991800-19451946-1979???1980-19992000-Present???1770 BC - 1799Date/Event/SportDescription1700s BCCode of Hammurabi Codifies the Death Penalty for the First TimeCode of Hammurabi (c. 1760 BC). Source: louvre.fr (accessed Apr. 15, 2010)"The Code of Hammurabi (39 KB) , a legal document from ancient Babylonia (in modern-day Iraq), contained the first known death penalty laws. Under the code, written in the 1700s B.C., twenty-five crimes were punishable by death. These crimes included adultery (cheating on a wife or husband) and helping slaves escape. Murder was not one of the twenty-five crimes." JoAnn Bren Guernsey Death Penalty: Fair Solution or Moral Failure?, 20091608First Recorded Execution in the British American Colonies Was for Treason"In fourteenth-century England, one could be executed for a crime as minor as disturbing the peace. And three centuries later, when the first colonists came to the land now known as the United States, they brought the British penal system across the ocean with them. A colonist in Virginia could be executed for crimes as trivial as stealing grapes, killing chickens, or trading with the Indians. But the first documented execution in the new colonies was for a far more serious offense. In the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1608, Captain George Kendall was hanged for the capital offense of treason. Among other serious capital crimes in colonial times were murder, rape, heresy - and witchcraft." Ron Fridell, MA Capital Punishment, 20031682Pennsylvania Limits Crimes Punishable by Death to Treason and MurderFrame of the Government of Pennsylvania, 1682. Source: (accessed Jan. 6, 2010)Pennsylvania founder William Penn convened his first General Assembly at Chester, PA, on Dec. 4, 1682. Following a debate on Pennsylvania's Frame of Government, the conference produced The Great Law or Body of Laws, which consisted of 61 chapters dictating the governance of Pennsylvania. It included the original Quaker criminal code which limited crimes punishable by death to premeditated murder and treason. Penn replaced the death penalty and bodily punishments with imprisonment in a House of Correction. This Quaker code was a radical departure from the practices of other societies around the world. Negley King Teeters, PhD The Cradle of the Penitentiary: The Walnut Jail at Philadelphia, 1773-1885, 1955 1764Italian Jurist Presents a Critique of the Death Penalty That Influences AbolitionistsPortrait of Cesare Beccaria. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)"The first prominent European to call for an end to the death penalty, Beccaria is considered the founder of the modern abolition movement... In 1764, Beccaria published his famous Essays on Crimes and Punishments. It was the first major study of the criminal justice system as it operated in eighteenth-century Europe, as well as the first call for the abolition of capital punishment. It remains the most influential attack on the death penalty ever published...It was Beccaria, though, who focused the attention of philosophers and political leaders on the issue. In addition to its effects in Europe, the Essay also had a significant effect on the thinking of abolitionists in America, including Dr. Benjamin Rush." Michael John Kronenwetter Capital Punishment: A Reference Handbook, 20011775Death Penalty Used in All 13 US Colonies at Outbreak of American RevolutionBy the start of the American Revolution, the death penalty was used in all 13 colonies. Rhode Island was the only colony that did not have at least 10 crimes punishable by death. The colonies had "roughly comparable death statutes which covered arson, piracy, treason, murder, sodomy, burglary, robbery, rape, horse-stealing, slave rebellion, and often counterfeiting. Hanging was the usual sentence. Rhode Island was probably the only colony which decreased the number of capital crimes in the late 1700's." Michael H. Reggio "History of the Death Penalty," (accessed Dec. 16, 2009)1787Founding Fathers Allow for Death Penalty When Writing Constitution"To most constitutional lawyers there seems little doubt that the Founding Fathers intended to allow for the death penalty in drawing up the US Constitution of 1787. Not only did certain provisions of the Constitution - such as the Fifth Amendment - expressly allow for the taking of life, but others - such as the Eighth Amendment - were deliberately phrased in ambigious ways that suggested even if certain forms of punishment could be banned (such as crucifixions or beheadings) the basic principle of government executions remained permissible if individual states and the federal government wished to legislate for these." Robert Singh, PhD Governing America: The Politics of a Divided Democracy, 2003At least one signer of the Declaration of Independence, Benjamin Rush, opposed the death penalty. He is often cited as the political forebearer of the abolitionist movement. Joshua Marquis, JD "Truth and Consequences: The Penalty of Death," Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment?, 2004Apr. 30, 1790First US Congress Establishes Federal Death Penalty"The First Congress adopted several other bills relating to the federal judiciary or its functions. Except for the bill providing salaries, these bills originated in the Senate. Most important was the Punishment of Crimes Act, the first listing of federal crimes and their punishment. In addition to treason and counterfeiting of federal records, the crimes included murder, disfigurement, and robbery committed in federal jurisdictions or on the high seas. The fourth paragraph of the act authorized judges to sentence convicted murderers to surgical dissection after execution. The fifth paragraph provided fines and imprisonment for anyone attempting to rescue a body of an individual sentenced to dissection." First Federal Congress Project "First Federal Congress: Creation of the Judiciary," Gwu.edu (accessed Jan. 27, 2010)June 25, 1790First Person Executed Under US Federal Death Penalty"The first federal execution was on June 25, 1790, when U.S. Marshall Henry Dearborn coordinated the hanging of Thomas Bird in Massachusetts. Dearborn spent five dollars and fifty cents for the construction of a gallows and a coffin." Turner Publishing Company Retired U.S. Marshalls Association, Nov. 9, 20011793PA Attorney General's Writings Introduce Concept of Varying Degrees of Murder and Contributes to Softening of Death Penalty Laws in PA and Other StatesPortrait of William Bradford, 1872. Source: (accessed Jan. 7, 2010)"One of the first American documents in the discussion of the death penalty was An Inquiry How Far the Punishment of Death is Necessary in Pennsylvania, published in 1793 by William Bradford, Pennsylvania's attorney-general. Although Bradford favored capital punishment, he concluded that the death penalty made it harder for the state to convict the guilty in some cases because juries did not want to sentence people to death. This feeling was reflected in a wave of new laws throughout the 1790s that curbed capital punishment, abolishing it for certain classes of crime. Five states, for example, limited capital punishment to cases of murder." Rebecca Stefoff, MA Furman v. Georgia: Debating the Death Penalty, 20071800-1945Date/Event/SportDescription1833-1835 Public Executions Are Attacked as Cruel and States Switch to Private HangingsIllustration of a public execution. Source: (accessed Apr. 23, 2010)Starting around 1833, "public executions were attacked as cruel. Sometimes tens of thousands of eager viewers would show up to view hangings; local merchants would sell souvenirs and alcohol. Fighting and pushing would often break out as people jockeyed for the best view of the hanging or the corpse! Onlookers often cursed the widow or the victim and would try to tear down the scaffold or the rope for keepsakes. Violence and drunkenness often ruled towns far into the night after 'justice had been served.' Many states enacted laws providing private hangings. Rhode Island (1833), Pennsylvania (1834), New York (1835), Massachusetts (1835), and New Jersey (1835) all abolished public hangings. By 1849, fifteen states were holding private hangings. This move was opposed by many death penalty abolitionists who thought public executions would eventually cause people to cry out against execution itself. For example, in 1835, Maine enacted what was in effect a moratorium on capital punishment after over ten thousand people who watched a hanging had to be restrained by police after they became unruly and began fighting. All felons sentenced to death would have to remain in prison at hard labor and could not be executed until one year had elapsed and then only on the governor's order. No governor ordered an execution under the 'Maine Law' for twenty-seven years." Michael H. Reggio "History of the Death Penalty," (accessed Dec. 16, 2009)Jan.-Feb. 1843Rev. George Barrel Cheever and Abolitionist John O'Sullivan Hold Debates on Capital Punishment in New York"Scores of legislative reports, newspaper articles, and essay on capital punishment flooded the reading public in the 1840s, but few of those works differed substantially from O'Sullivan's report and Cheever's book. When the Broadway Tabernacle in New York decided to sponsor a series of public debates, no question was as controversial as capital punishment and no two opponents as well known as O'Sullivan and Cheever...For three evenings, January 27, February 3, and February 17, 1843, O'Sullivan and Cheever debated the question 'Ought Capital Punishment to Be Abolished?'...The debate between O'Sullivan and Cheever also demonstrated the shift from an emphasis on reforming criminals to a preoccupation with the deterrent effect of punishment. Opponents of capital punishment argued that life in prison served as a powerful enough deterrent; defenders of the death penalty insisted that imprisonment could never deter as effectively as the threat of death." Louis P. Masur, PhD Rites of Execution: Capital Punishment and the Transformation of American Culture, 1776-1865, 19911845First National Death Penalty Abolition Society Is FormedThe first national death penalty abolition society, the American Society for the Abolition of Capital Punishment, is founded. US Department of State "The Evolution of the Death Penalty in the United States," Infousa. (accessed Dec. 15, 2009)1846Michigan Becomes the First US State to Abolish Capital Punishment (Except for Treason)"In 1846, the state of Michigan abolished the death penalty for all crimes, except treason, and replaced the death penalty with life imprisonment. The law took effect the next year, making Michigan, for all intents and purposes, the first English-speaking jurisdiction in the world to abolish capital punishment." Robert Bohm, PhD "The Death Penalty in the United States,” Battleground Criminal Justice Vol. 1, Ed. Gregg Barak, PhD, 20071852Rhode Island Becomes the First State to Outlaw the Death Penalty for All Crimes (Including Treason)"The first state to outlaw the death penalty for all crimes, including treason, was Rhode Island, in 1852; Wisconsin was the second state to do so a year later." Robert Bohm, PhD "The Death Penalty in the United States,” Battleground Criminal Justice Vol. 1, Ed. Gregg Barak, PhD, 2007July 9, 186814th Amendment Passes and Is Later Used to Challenge the Death PenaltyThe Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution is passed after the Civil War. The amendment extends the Fifth Amendment's protections to the states. The Fourteenth Amendment states: "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The Fourteenth Amendment was cited in the June 29, 1972 Supreme Court case Furman v. Georgia which ruled the death penalty unconstitutional as administered. The Fourteenth Amendment was also cited in the Mar. 1, 2005 Supreme Court case Roper v. Simmons which ruled the death penalty unconstitutional for offenders under the age of 18. William W. Van Alstyne, JD "The Fourteenth Amendment, the 'Right' to Vote, and the Understanding of the Thirty-Ninth Congress," The Supreme Court Review, 1965 [Editor's Note: See our question "Does the death penalty violate the 14th Amendment?"]1887-1903Thomas Edison Demonstrates Power of Electricity by Electrocuting AnimalsTopsy the Elephant being electrocuted by Thomas Edison, 1903. Source: (accessed Apr. 23, 2010)"In the 1880s, inventor Thomas Edison started building electrical lighting systems in U.S. cities. Edison's company demonstrated the power of electricity by electrocuting animals (killing them with electricity). These demonstrations led some people to reason that electrocution was a quick and painless form of execution." In 1887, Edison conducted many of these demonstrations in West Orange, NJ where he electrocuted numerous dogs and cats. [Warning: graphic and potentially emotionally jarring material follows]. A Jan. 4, 1903 video of Thomas Edison electrocuting Topsy the Elephant can be seen here. JoAnn Bren Guernsey Death Penalty: Fair Solution or Moral Failure?, 2009Aug. 6, 1890New York State Performs the First Execution by Electrocution with the Assistance of Thomas Edison's EngineersArtist's rendering of William Kemmler's execution. Source: (accessed Jan. 7, 2010)"On August 6, 1890, New York State used an 'electric chair' to carry out the first execution by electrocution. The condemned was murderer William Kemmler. As it turned out, the process was hardly quick or painless. It took two surges of electricity, one of them lasting more than one minute, to kill Kemmler. The electricity burned Kemmler to death. Despite the gruesome procedure, people still thought electrocution was more humane and efficient than previous methods. With some refinements, it soon became the preferred method of execution in the United States." JoAnn Bren Guernsey Death Penalty: Fair Solution or Moral Failure?, 20091895-1917Nine States Abolish Capital Punishment during Second Great Reform Era"In 1897, U.S. Congress passed a bill reducing the number of federal death crimes. In 1907, Kansas took the 'Maine Law' a step further and abolished all death penalties. Between 1911 and 1917, eight more states abolished capital punishment (Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Oregon, Arizona, Missouri and Tennessee - the latter in all cases but rape). Votes in other states came close to ending the death penalty."Michael H. Reggio "History of the Death Penalty," Society's Final Solution: A History and Discussion of the Death Penalty, Ed. Laura Randa, MBA, 1997May 2, 1910Weems v. United States Establish Precedents on "Cruel and Unusual Punishment"US Supreme Court Room where the Court sat from 1860-1935. Source: , c. 1900"In Weems v. United States, however, the Court did make a ruling that would significantly affect the debate on the death penalty. Weems concerned a defendant who had been sentenced to fifteen years of hard labor, a heavy fine, and a number of other penalties for the relatively minor crime of falsifying official records. The Court overturned the sentence, ruling that the penalty was too harsh considering the nature of the offense. Ultimately, in the Weems decision, the Court set three important precedents concerning sentencing:1. Cruel and unusual punishment is defined by the changing norms and standards of society and therefore is not based on historical interpretations.2. Courts may decide whether a punishment is unnecessarily cruel with regard to physical pain.3. Courts may decide whether a punishment is unnecessarily cruel with regard to psychological pain."Larry K. Gaines, PhD Roger LeRoy Miller, PhD Criminal Justice in Action, 2008 Feb. 8, 1924First US Execution by Gas Chamber Carried Out in NevadaInterior of a gas death house in Nevada in 1926. Source: Bettman/CORBIS"The first execution by lethal gas in American history [was] carried out in Carson City, Nevada on Feb. 8, 1924. The executed man was Tong Lee, a member of a Chinese gang who was convicted of murdering a rival gang member. Lethal gas was adopted by Nevada in 1921 as a more humane method of carrying out its death sentences, as opposed to the traditional techniques of execution by hanging, firing squad, or electrocution." The History Channel "First Execution by Lethal Gas," (accessed Dec. 16, 2009)Mar. 1, 1932Lindbergh Act Makes Kidnapping a Federal Capital Offense"The baby son of Charles A. Lindbergh is kidnapped from his home in Hopewell, New Jersey. The body of the infant is found in the nearby woods two months later. The incident leads Congress to pass a federal kidnapping statute, popularly known as the Lindbergh Act, that makes the crime a capital offense. Similar 'Lindbergh laws' are enacted in more than 20 states by the end of the decade." Harry Henderson Capital Punishment, Revised Edition, 2000Aug. 14, 1936Last Public ExecutionRainey Bethea in 1936, the last prisoner to be publicly executed. Source: Associated PressAt 5:45 a.m. on Aug. 14, 1936, Rainey Bethea became the last person to be publicly executed in the US. Bethea was hanged for raping and murdering a 70-year-old woman in Owensboro, Kentucky. The execution garnered significant media and public attention because it was the first hanging in the US to be conducted by a woman. At least 20,000 people witnessed Bethea's hanging, which reporters called the "carnival in Owensboro." Several scholars believe Bethea's execution was an important contributor to the eventual ban on public executions in America.NPR "The Last Public Execution in America," , May 1, 2001Jan. 31, 1945Private Eddie Slovik Becomes First American Executed for Desertion Since the Civil WarPrivate Eddie Slovik. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)"It was for the execution of a deserter, Private Eddie Slovik, he thereby achieving the unique distinction of being the only American soldier to be executed in that manner since 1864. During the Second World War 2,648 soldiers were tried by General Courts Martial, 49 being sentenced to death. They were all reprieved, their sentences being commuted to varying terms of imprisonment, but it was obviously felt that an example had to be made in Slovik's case, and all appeals for clemency were denied." Geoffrey Abbott Execution: The Guillotine, the Pendulum, the Thousand Cuts, the Spanish Donkey, and 66 Other Ways of Putting Someone to Death, 20061946 - 1979Date/Event/SportDescriptionJan. 13, 1947US Supreme Court Finds That a Second Execution Attempt after Technical Malfunction Does Not Constitute Cruel and Unusual PunishmentWillie Francis photographed in his cell the evening of the first attempt to execute him. Source: (accessed Jan. 8, 2010)"In one case (Louisiana ex rel Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947) the Court confronted the situation of a young man who was condemned to die in the electric chair. For some reason, the chair was faulty, and although electric current apparently shot through the man, he survived. The issue was whether a second electrocution could proceed or whether it was barred by the constitutional proscription of cruel and unusual punishment, double jeopardy and other violations of due process. [US Supreme Court Justice] Frankfurter, finding that the chair's deficiency was entirely accidental, concurred in the decision of the [5-4] majority of the Supreme Court that nothing in the Constitution prevented the state from proceeding with a second execution, but he also implied that the situation was one in which a governor might be expected to intercede with executive clemency. Not content with this, Frankfurter, after the opinion was filed, wrote a personal letter to the governor urging the extension of mercy... The governor allowed the execution." Richard Lempert, JD, PhD Joseph Sanders, JD, PhD An Invitation to Law and Social Science: Desert, Disputes, and Distribution, 1989June 19, 1953Rosenberg's Become the First US Civilians Executed for EspionageThe Rosenbergs on their way from jail to court, 1951. Source: (accessed Jan. 8, 2010)"Julius Rosenberg, 33, and his 35-year-old wife, Ethel, were accused of stealing technical information from the atom research centre in Los Alamos and turning it over to the KGB...The Rosenbergs were sentenced to death on 5 April 1951 and despite numerous appeals for clemency were executed by the electric chair at Sing-Sing Prison on 19 June 1953. They were the only people in the United States ever executed for Cold War espionage, and their conviction fuelled US Senator Joseph McCarthy's anti-communist crusade against 'anti-American activities" by US citizens." BBC "1951: Rosenbergs Guilty of Espionage," Bbc.co.uk, (accessed Dec. 16, 2009)1957-1972Several States Abolish Capital Punishment"The movement against capital punishment revived again between 1955 and 1972. England and Canada completed exhaustive studies which were largely critical of the death penalty and these were widely circulated in the U.S. Death row criminals gave their own moving accounts of capital punishment in books and film. Convicted kidnapper Caryl Chessman published Cell 2455 Death Row and Trial by Ordeal. Barbara Graham's story was utilized in book and film with I Want to Live! after her execution. Television shows were broadcast on the death penalty. Hawaii and Alaska ended capital punishment in 1957, and Delaware did so the next year. Controversy over the death penalty gripped the nation forcing politicians to take sides. Delaware restored the death penalty in 1961. Michigan abolished capital punishment for treason in 1963. Voters in 1964 abolished the death penalty in Oregon. In 1965 Iowa, New York, West Virginia, and Vermont ended the death penalty. New Mexico abolished the death penalty in 1969. Trying to end capital punishment state-by-state was difficult at best, so death penalty abolitionists turned much of their efforts to the courts." Michael H. Reggio "History of the Death Penalty," Society's Final Solution: A History and Discussion of the Death Penalty, Ed. Laura Randa, MBA, 1997June 3, 1968US Supreme Court Forbids the Dismissal of Jurors Based on Personal Opposition to Capital Punishment "Witherspoon v. Illinois: The Supreme Court rules that the practice of excluding prospective jurors who have reservations about the death penalty from capital trials results in juries whose sentencing decisions could be considered biased and therefore unconstitutional." Bryan Vila, PhD Cynthia Morris Capital Punishment in the United States: A Documentary History, 1997June 29, 1972US Supreme Court Rules Death Penalty Unconstitutional as Administered and Overturns over 600 Death SentencesWilliam Furman at the time of his arrest on Aug. 11, 1967. Source: Rebecca Stetoff, Furman V. Georgia: Debating the Death Penalty, 2007."In Furman v. Georgia, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on June 29, 1972 that in all cases before the court, the death penalty as administered violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments. Of the five Supreme Court Justices, William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall were alone in declaring the death penalty unconstitutional as a form of punishment entirely. Justice Brennan was sweeping in his indictment, claiming the death penalty was unconstitutional for any crime, any person, using any method. All five justices concurred on the grounds of arbitrariness. Specifically, Justice Stewart proclaimed that the decisions were randomly made as if 'being struck by lightening.' At the same time the death penalty was declared random, it was also declared discriminatory in its application...The Furman decision invalidated the death penalty statutes in several states. Thirty-five states responded to this ruling, not by abolishing capital punishment, but by using Furman as a guideline for developing a constitutionally acceptable statute. During this moratorium, hundreds of sentences were commuted to life imprisonment."Thomas Blomberg, PhD Karol Lucken, PhD American Penology: A History of Control, 2000Nov. 21, 1974National Conference of Catholic Bishops Publicly Opposes Death Penalty"The National Conference of Catholic Bishops speaks out against capital punishment in a reversal of the traditional Roman Catholic Church position supporting the death penalty as a legitimate means of self-protection for the state." Harry Henderson Capital Punishment, Revised Edition, 2000July 2,1976US Supreme Court Reaffirms Constitutionality of Death PenaltyUS Supreme Court. Source: (accessed Apr. 21, 2010)"The Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutionality of capital punishment for aggravated murder in [the July 2, 1976, 7-2 decision] Gregg v. Georgia. The question presented to the Court in this case was whether the imposition of capital punishment under Georgia's revised death penalty statute was prohibited under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution...On appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed Gregg's conviction and death sentence because Georgia's revised death penalty statute provided for bifurcated trials, consideration of mitigating circumstances of the defendant and the crime, and appellate review of capital sentences. The Court affirmed these guidelines because Georgia intended them to prevent arbitrary and discriminatory imposition of the death penatly." Marvin D. Free Jr., PhD Racial Issues in Criminal Justice: The Case of African Americans, 2003Jan. 17, 1977Gary Gilmore Becomes the First Person to be Executed in the US in 10 YearsGary Gilmore in court, 1976. Source: apsu.edu (accessed Jan. 8, 2010)"Gregg gave states the green light to implement the death penalty, as long as juries received adequate guidance. Half a year later, on January 17, 1977, the first execution in the United States since June 1967 took place. The condemned man was Gary Gilmore, convicted in Utah of murder. Like Wallace Wilkerson in the Utah Territory a century earlier, Gilmore was executed by firing squad - at his request."Rebecca Stefoff, MA Furnam v. Georgia: Debating the Death Penalty, 2007June 29, 1977US Supreme Court Finds Death Penalty to be an Excessive Punishment for Rape Crimes"Shortly after it revived state death penalty schemes in Gregg v. Georgia (1976), the U.S. Supreme Court was asked [in Coker v. Georgia] to determine whether the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments prohibited the death penalty for rape...Justice Bryon White's plurality opinion for the Supreme Court [in a 7-2 vote on June 29, 1977,] reversed the sentence, finding the death penalty disproportionate to the crime of raping an adult woman."Paul Finkelman, PhD The Encyclopedia of American Civil Liberties, 2006 ?1980 - 1999Date/Event/SportDescriptionJune 1980American Medical Association Passes Resolution Saying Physicians Should Not Participate in Executions"The debate about the role of doctors in executions was never addressed seriously until legislation in 1977 in the states of Oklahoma and Texas introduced execution by lethal injection onto their statutes. This started a vigorous discussion with the weight of argument being against participation. In 1980, the Judicial Affairs Committee on the American Medical Association approved a statement recalling that the doctor's role was to preserve life where there was a possibility of doing so and that the only possible role for a doctor at an execution was to certify the death of the prisoner." In June 1980, the House of Delegates of the AMA approved the resolution. British Medical Association Medicine Betrayed: The Participation of Doctors in Human Rights Abuses, 1992July 2, 1982US Supreme Court Rules That Capital Punishment Is Excessive for a Defendant Who Played a Minor Role in a Felony Murder"The United States Supreme Court (Endmund v. Florida) overturns [in a 5-4 vote on July 2, 1982] the death sentence of a man who was convicted of the robbery and murder of an elderly couple in Florida. Endmund had not directly participated in the murders himself, but had only drive the getaway car. This was enough, under Florida law, to make him a 'constructive aider and abettor' in the killings, and so liable to the death penalty. However, a majority of five of the Supreme Court justices rules that this is not enough to subject him to the death penalty, since they find Endmund had no intent to kill." Michael Kronenwetter Capital Punishment: A Reference Handbook, 2001Dec. 2, 1982Texas Performs First Lethal InjectionIllustration of Charles Brooks execution, Dec. 7, 1982. Source: "Charlie Brooks, Jr.," "In 1977, an Oklahoma medical examiner named Jay Chapman proposed that death-row inmates be executed using three drugs administered in a specific sequence: a barbiturate (to anesthetize inmates), pancuronium bromide (to paralyze inmates and stop their breathing) and lastly potassium chloride (which stops the heart)... Chapman's proposal was approved by the Oklahoma state legislature the same year and quickly adopted by other states...[On Dec. 2, 1982,] Texas became the first to use the procedure, executing 40-year-old Charles Brooks for murdering Fort Worth mechanic David Gregory."TIME "A Brief History of Lethal Injection," Time website, Nov. 10, 2009July 26, 1983US Supreme Court Approves Streamlined Federal Appeals Procedures for Capital CrimesConvicted cop-killer Thomas Barefoot, 1983. Source: "Justices Give Killer a Reprieve," Gainseville Sun, Jan. 25, 1983"Barefoot v. Estelle: The Supreme Court upholds expedited federal review procedures in death penalty appeals [in a 6-3 vote on July 26, 1983] and also upholds the prosecution's right to present psychiatric evidence regarding a defendant's future dangerousness during the penalty phase of a capital trial." Bryan Vila, PhD Cynthia Morris Capital Punishment in the United States: A Documentary History, 1997June 26, 1986US Supreme Court Rules Execution of Insane Persons Unconstitutional"[In] Ford v. Wainwright, 1986, the U.S. Supreme Court held [in a 5-4 vote on June 26, 1986] that the execution of an insane prisoner was an unconstitutional violation of the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unsual punishment." Stuart Kirk, DSW Mental Disorders in the Social Environment: Critical Perspectives, 2004Nov. 4, 1986California Chief Justice Rose Bird Is Voted Out of Office for Voting Record in Death Penalty CasesChief Justice Rose Bird. Source: (accessed Jan. 8, 2010)"In 1986, California Chief Justice Rose Bird and two other 'liberal' members of the state supreme court were ousted in a retention election. The election followed a bitter campaign that centered on the three justices' records in death penalty cases." Gordon Morris Bakken, JD, PhD Law in the Western United States, 2000[Editor's Note: Read more about the Rose Bird election at Rose Bird ]Nov. 1987A Study Finds 350 Cases of Defendents Wrongfully Convicted for Capital Crimes"In 1987, Hugo Bedau and Michael Radelet published a landmark study [in the Stanford Law Review] (5 MB) documenting 350 cases involving defendants convicted of capital crimes in the United States between 1900 and 1985 and who were later found to be innocent. In the decade following the publication of that study, scores of additional death row inmates were discovered to have been falsely convicted, largely through the emergence of DNA evidence." Brian Forst, PhD, MBA Errors of Justice: Nature, Sources, and Remedies, 2003June 29, 1988US Supreme Court Rules Executions of Individuals Under Age of 16 Unconstitutional"The main issue the Supreme Court considered in Thompson v. Oklahoma was whether it is constitutional to execute a person who was a 'child' at the time he committed the offense. Thompson's attorneys argued that he should not be executed because this would violate Thompson's rights, as a 'child,' under the Eighth Amendment, which forbids 'cruel and unusual punishment.'In June 1988 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, in a [5-3] majority decision, to vacate the order to excute Thompson. The majority opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens noted that 'evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society' compelled the conclusion that it would be unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution to execute a person for a crime committed as a fifteen-year-old." Raymond Gibbs, PhD Intentions in the Experience of Meaning, 1999Apr. 21, 1992First CA Execution in 25 Years Proceeds after US Supreme Court Prevents Lower Courts from Granting Further Stays Robert Alton Harris. Source: cdcr. (accessed Jan. 9, 2010) "After an extraordinary bicoastal judicial duel kept his fate in doubt throughout the night, Robert Alton Harris died in San Quentin's gas chamber at sunrise Tuesday, becoming the first person executed in California in 25 years. Harris, 39, was pronounced dead at 6:21 a.m., just 36 minutes after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the last of four overnight reprieves that delayed his execution by more than six hours.Earlier Tuesday, a seemingly jaunty Harris came within seconds of death but was rescued by a federal judge, who halted the execution even as the acid used to form the lethal gas flowed into a vat beneath the prisoner's seat. That final stay was quickly tossed out by the U.S. Supreme Court, which clearly had had its fill of the Harris case. In an unprecedented ruling that capped a night of coast-to-coast faxes and deliberations the justices voted 7 to 2 to forbid any federal court from meddling further in the execution." Los Angeles Times "Harris Dies After Judicial Duel 4 Stays Quashed," Los Angeles Times, Apr. 22, 1992Jan. 25, 1993US Supreme Court Rules That New Evidence of Innocence Does Not Entitle Prisoners to Be Freed Unless It Also Shows a Constitutional Violation"The Supreme Court in Herrera v. Collins held [in a 6-3 vote on Jan. 25, 1993] that a death-row inmate is not ordinarily entitled to relief where a claim of innonence is based on newly discovered evidence, unless the claim also includes an independent constitutional violation. The Supreme Court found that there is no due process violation in the execution of someone who was arguably innocent." Alan Clarke, JD, LLM Laurelyn Whitt, PhD The Bitter Fruit of American Justice: International and Domestic Resistance to the Death Penalty, 2007June 28, 1993Kirk Bloodsworth Becomes First American Sentenced to Death Row to Be Exonerated with DNA TestingKirk Bloodsworth was released from prison on June 28, 1993 after a DNA test showed that a semen stain on the underwear of the 9-year-old girl he was twice convicted of raping and killing was not his. Bloodsworth spent one year awaiting trial, two years on death row, and then six years in prison after his death sentence was commuted to a life sentence before being exonerated. Bloodsworth is the first prisoner to have served time on death row to be exonerated with DNA testing. He received $300,000 in compensation for wrongful imprisonment and was granted a full pardon in Dec. 1994 by Maryland Governor William Donald Schaefer. CNN "Kirk Bloodsworth, Twice Convicted of Rape and Murder, Exonerated by DNA Evidence," , June 20 20001994Federal Death Penalty Is Expanded When President Clinton Signs 1994 Crime BillPresident Clinton signs the 1994 crime bill, 1994. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)"The 1994 crime bill (1.4 MB) - passed by the Democratic 103rd Congress (1993-4) and signed by President Clinton - created sixty new federal crimes for which the death penalty could be imposed and extended it to include certain drug offences." Offenses eligible for the federal death penalty include large-scale drug trafficking, terorrist homicides, murder of a Federal law enforcement officer, and drive-by-shootings and carjackings that result in a death. Robert Singh, PhD Governing America: The Politics of a Divided Democracy, 2003?Jan. 12, 1996Release of the Film Dead Man Walking Invigorates Debate on Death PenaltyPoster for the film Dead Man Walking, 1996. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)In 1994, Sister Helen Prejean released a book [titled Dead Man Walking] about her role as spiritual advisor for two death row inmates. The book was adapted into an Academy-Award-winning film starring Susan Sarandon and Sean Penn. The popularity of the film [Dead Man Walking] led to increased levels of public discourse on the morality of the death penalty.James J. Megivern, ThD The Death Penalty: An Historical and Theological Survey, 1997Jan. 25, 1996Last Execution by HangingJames T. Vaughn Correctional Center where Delaware's only gallows stood between 1986 and 2003. dpc. (accessed Apr. 26, 2010)Convicted double-murder Bill Bailey was executed by hanging on Jan. 25, 1996 in Delaware. Bailey was the third person executed by hanging since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976 and the first hanging in Delaware since 1946. As of Apr. 21, 2010, Bailey was the last person executed by hanging in the US. CNN "Delaware Holds First Hanging Since 1946," , Jan. 25, 1996Apr. 24, 1996Ability of Judges to Reverse Sentences of Death Row Inmates Is Restricted"Over the past decade, death penalty proponents have made successful efforts at both the state and federal level to streamline the capital appeals process and expedite executions. The most significant of these efforts is the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). Capital punishment proponents argued that death row inmates abused the writ of habeas corpus by filing multiple, repetitive petitions. Congress passed AEDPA to restrict the availability of federal habeas relief in several significant manners." The bill passed 293-133-7 in the House of Representatives and 91-8-1 in the Senate. It was signed into law on Apr. 24, 1996. Evan Mandery, JD Capital Punishment in America: A Balanced Examination, 2004Feb. 3, 1997American Bar Association Urges a Halt to Executions"On February 3, 1997, the ABA therefore took action that it hoped would focus more attention on systemic problems and lack of fairness in the application of the death penalty in the United States. While taking no position on the death penalty per se, the ABA adopted a resolution initiated by the Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities that urges a halt to executions until concerns about capital punishment in the U.S. are addressed. Specifically, the resolution calls for capital jurisdictions to impose a moratorium on all executions until they can (1) ensure that death penalty cases are administered fairly and impartially, in accordance with due process, and (2) minimize the risk that innocent persons may be executed." American Bar Association "Policy History: Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project," American Bar Association website (accessed Dec. 21, 2009)Mar. 3, 1999Last Execution by Gas ChamberGerman national Walter LaGrand was executed in an Arizona gas chamber on Mar. 3, 1999. In addition to US courts, his case was also heard by the International Court of Justice in the Hague, where "Judge Christopher Weeramantry of Sri Lanka urged the US Government to use 'all the measures at its disposal' to prevent the execution. Germany asked the world court to intervene after Arizona Governor Jane Hull rejected appeals from German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer to stop the execution. Germany does not have the death penalty and contends Arizona failed to advise the LaGrand brothers of their right to consular assistance at their trials. The LaGrands were born in Germany but came to the United States when they were children." LaGrand twice refused offers of lethal injeciton and reportedly chose the gas chamber to protest the death penalty. As of Apr. 21, 2010, LaGrand is the last prisoner to be executed by the gas chamber. BBC "World: Americas Countdown to US execution," BBC.co.uk, Mar. 4, 1999?2000 - PresentDate/Event/SportDescriptionJan. 31, 2000Illinois Governor George Ryan Declares a Moratorium on ExecutionsGovernor George Ryan. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010) "In 2000, Illinois Governor George Ryan declared a moratorium on the death penalty in response to the exonerations that were revealing persistent errors in the administration of capital punishment. Since the death penalty was reinstated in that state in 1977, 12 death row inmates had been executed and 13 were exonerated. In 2003, he granted clemency to all 167 persons on the state's death row. His actions were fiercely attacked by capital-punishment advocates who accused him of abusing his power but were applauded both by legal scholars across country and by the growing movement to abolish the death penalty." Robert Bohm, PhD "The Death Penalty in the United States,” Battleground Criminal Justice Vol. 1, Ed. Gregg Barak, PhD, 2007Dec. 21, 2000Texas and Governor George W. Bush Lead US with Most Executions In 2000, Texas led the US in executions with 40 inmates being put to death. Oklahoma followed with 11, Virginia with 8, and Florida with 6 executions. Between 1976 and Mar. 30, 2010, Texas executed 452 inmates. Virginia came in second most with 106 executions and Oklahoma in third with 92 executions.Between Jan. 17, 1995 and Dec. 21, 2000, Texas Governor George W. Bush presided over the execution of 150 men and two women, more than any other governor since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. Governor Bush received a summary from his legal counsel before each execution to determine whether or not to allow the execution to proceed. The first fifty-seven summaries were prepared by Alberto R. Gonzales, who served as US Attorney General under President Bush between Feb. 3, 2005 and Sep. 17, 2007. Governor Bush granted one clemency during his term in office. Death Penalty Information Center "Number of Executions by State and Region Since 1976," Death Penalty Information Center website, Mar. 30, 2010Alan Berlow "The Texas Clemency Memos," Atlantic, July/Aug. 2003June 11, 2001Oklahoma City Bomber Timothy McVeigh Becomes the First Federal Prisoner to Be Executed in 38 YearsTimothy McVeigh on the cover of Time magazine, 1997. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh becomes the first federal prisoner to be executed in 38 years. McVeigh was responsible for the death of 168 people in the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City on Apr. 19, 1995. BBC "Defiant McVeigh Dies in Silence," BBC.co.uk, June 11, 2001June 20, 2002US Supreme Court Rules the Execution of Mentally Retarded Offenders Unconstitutional"The Constitution bars the execution of mentally retarded offenders, the Supreme Court declared today in a landmark death penalty ruling based on the majority's view that a 'national consensus' now rejected such executions as excessive and inappropriate.Of the 38 states that have a death penalty, 18 now prohibit executing the retarded, up from 2 when the court last considered the question in 1989. This 'dramatic shift in the state legislative landscape,' especially when anticrime legislation is extremely popular, 'provides powerful evidence that today our society views mentally retarded offenders as categorically less culpable than the average criminal,' Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the 6-to-3 majority" on June 20,2002. New York Times "Citing 'National Consensus,' Justices Bar Death Penalty for Retarded Defendants," New York Times, June, 21, 2002June 24, 2002US Supreme Court Rules That Juries, Not Judges, Must Determine Presence of Aggravating Factors Necessary for a Death Sentence"In Ring v. Arizona (2002), the Supreme Court ruled [7-2 on June 24, 2002] that juries, rather than judges, must make the crucial factual decisions as to whether a convicted murderer should receive the death penalty. Ring v. Arizona overturned the law of that and four others - Colorado, Idaho, Montana, and Nebraska - where judges alone decided whether there were aggravating factors that warrant capital punishment. The decision also raised questions about the procedure in four other states - Alabama, Delaware, Florida, and Indiana - where the judge decided life imprisonment or death after hearing a jury's recommendation. The Ring opinion also says that any aggravating factors must be stated in the indictment, thus also requiring a change in federal death penalty laws." Todd Clear, PhD American Corrections, 2008Mar. 1, 2005Death Sentences for Offenders Under the Age of 18 Is Ruled Unconstitutional Christopher Simmons was 17 when he kidnapped and killed a woman. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)"Perhaps the most controversial death penalty decision by the Supreme Court in recent years was that handed down in 2005 in Roper v. Simmons. This ruling overturned a 1989 Supreme Court decision in Stanford v. Kentucky, which allowed the execution of persons who were age 16 or 17 at the time they committed their crimes. In Roper, the Court held that the execution of a person under the age of 18 is disproportionate punishment under the Eighth Amendment and, therefore, is cruel and unusual punishment." Robert Regoli, PhD John D. Hewitt, PhD Exploring Criminal Justice, 2007Jan. 17, 2006California Executes a 76-year-old Inmate"California executes Clarence Ray Allen, its oldest death row inmate, minutes after his 76th birthday. The execution took place despite arguments that putting to death an elderly, blind and wheelchair-bound man was cruel and unusual punishment. Allen arranged a triple murder 25 years ago." CBS News "Capital Punishment Timeline," , Oct. 16, 2007Dec. 30, 2006Execution of Saddam HusseinSaddam Hussein at his trial, 2005. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)"The US joined its arch-foe Iran today in hailing the justice of Saddam Hussein's execution, but European powers opposed the use of capital punishment even though they condemned the former dictator's crimes in Iraq.US president George Bush said Saddam had received the kind of justice he denied his victims.Some key US allies expressed discomfort at the execution. And Russia, which opposed the March 20, 2003 invasion to oust the dictator, and the Vatican expressed regret at the hanging which some Muslim leaders said would exacerbate the violence in Iraq." "US Welcomes Saddam Hanging, Europe Opposes Execution," , Dec. 30, 2006Dec. 18, 2007United Nations General Assembly Passes a Resolution Calling for a Moratorium on the Death PenaltyUnited Nations General Assembly. Source: (accessed Apr. 21, 2010)"The U.N. General Assembly passed a nonbinding resolution on Tuesday calling for a moratorium on the death penalty, overcoming protests from a bloc of states that said it undermined their sovereignty. The resolution (30 KB) , which calls for 'a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty,' was passed by a 104 to 54 vote, with 29 abstentions...Two similar moves in the 1990s failed in the assembly. The resolution's text stops short of an outright demand for immediate abolition; it carries no legal force but backers say it has powerful moral authority.Among nations who voted against were Egypt, Iran, Singapore, the United States and a bloc of Caribbean states. Eighty-seven countries -- including the 27 European Union states, more than a dozen Latin American countries and eight African states -- jointly introduced the resolution, though opponents singled out the EU as the driving force." Reuters "UN Assembly Calls for Moratorium on Death Penalty," , Dec. 18, 2007June 25, 2008US Supreme Court Finds Death Penalty Excessive for the Crime of Child Rape Patrick O. Kennedy was spared execution in a 5-4 Supreme Court decision. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)"A divided U.S. Supreme Court barred the death penalty for the crime of child rape, saying a Louisiana man's execution would violate the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The justices, voting 5-4 [in Kennedy v. Louisiana on June 25, 2008], spared Patrick Kennedy from becoming the first person since 1964 to be executed in the U.S. for a crime other than murder. Kennedy was convicted of raping his 8-year-old stepdaughter. `The death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child,' Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the court. The ruling extends a line of Supreme Court cases that have restricted the circumstances in which the death penalty can be applied. It also underscores Kennedy's significance as the court's deciding vote on many social issues. The court divided along ideological lines. Justices Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens, David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined the majority. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented." Bloomberg "Death Penalty for Child Rape Barred by Top U.S. Court," , June 25, 2008Mar. 18, 2009New Mexico Repeals the Death PenaltyFormer New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)"Gov. Bill Richardson, who has supported capital punishment, signed legislation to repeal New Mexico's death penalty, calling it the 'most difficult decision in my political life.'The new law replaces lethal injection with a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. The repeal takes effect on July 1, and applies only to crimes committed after that date.'Regardless of my personal opinion about the death penalty, I do not have confidence in the criminal justice system as it currently operates to be the final arbiter when it comes to who lives and who dies for their crime,' Richardson said." Associated Press "New Mexico Governor Abolishes Capital Punishment," , Mar. 19, 2009Sep. 30, 2009Texas Governor Rick Perry Removes Four Members of a Commission Before They Issue a Report That Casts Doubt on the Guilt of an Executed Prisoner Governor Rick Perry. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)"Did Texas execute an innocent man? That question, and the controversy surrounding it, continues to dog Gov. Rick Perry. Critics say the governor has tried to squelch an investigation into the case. Now the issue has moved to the forefront of Perry's effort to win re-election.At the heart of the controversy is Cameron Todd Willingham, who was executed by lethal injection in 2004 after being convicted of setting a house fire in Corsicana that killed his three children.The Texas Forensic Science Commission hired a nationally recognized arson expert to examine the fire science used to convict Willingham. In a report made public in August, that expert, Craig Beyler, asserted the initial arson investigation was deeply flawed, adding his voice to those of other fire investigators who now doubt whether arson caused the fatal blaze. Just as the commission was set to hear from Beyler in late September, Perry abruptly removed three of its members, including the chairman. The chairman, Sam Bassett, later said he felt pressure from the governor's office because it was unhappy over how the Willingham probe was proceeding." NPR "2004 Execution Haunts Texas Governor's Race," , Dec. 21, 2009Dec. 8, 2009Ohio Performs the First Execution with a One-Drug Intravenous Lethal InjectionExecution chamber at Southern Ohio Correction Facility in Lucasville where Kenneth Biros was executed. Source: (accessed Jan. 9, 2010)"On Dec. 8, 2009, Ohio prison officials executed a death row inmate, Kenneth Biros, with a one-drug intravenous lethal injection, a method never before used on a human. The new method, which involved a large dose of anesthetic, akin to how animals are euthanized, has been hailed by most experts as painless and an improvement over the three-drug cocktail used in most states, but it is unlikely to settle the debate over the death penalty.While praising the shift to a single drug, death penalty opponents argue that Ohio's new method, and specifically its backup plan of using intra-muscular injection, has not been properly vetted by legal and medical experts and that since it has never been tried out on humans before, it is the equivalent of human experimentation. But the United States Supreme Court refused to intervene and the procedure went largely as planned." New York Times "Capital Punishment," , Dec. 18, 2009Dec. 18, 2009Lowest Annual Number of Death Sentences Handed Down in 2009 since Death Penalty was Reinstated in 1976 "Use of capital punishment by states continues its steady decline, with fewer death sentences handed down in 2009 than any year since the death penalty was reinstated by the Supreme Court in 1976. Year-end figures released Friday by the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) show 11 states are now considering abolishing executions, with many legislators citing high costs associated with incarcerating and handling often decades-long appeals by death row inmates...Fifty-two inmates were executed this year in 11 states... As in previous years, Texas in 2009 led the states in executions, with 24 -- four times as many as the next-highest, Alabama...Nine men who had been sentenced to death were exonerated and freed in 2009, most after new DNA or other forensic testing cleared them, or raised doubts their culpability. That is the second highest total since the death penalty was reinstated 33 years ago." CNN "Death Penalty Use Declining Nationwide," , Dec. 18, 2009June 18, 2010Last Execution by Firing SquadUtah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff Announces on Microblogging site Twitter He Had Given FInal Approval for Gardner's Execution. Source: (accessed June 18, 2010)"Utah executed convicted killer Ronnie Lee Gardner after midnight this morning by firing squad. He becomes just the third person [all in Utah] in the last 33 years to be executed by being shot and likely one of the last. Utah has eliminated the firing squad (Gardner, convicted before the legal change, was grandfathered in) and it only remains legal as a means of execution in Oklahoma - even then, only as a backup.Gardner’s attorney said he chose the method of execution because it was 'more humane' than a lethal injection.""A hood was placed over Gardner's head and a paper target pinned to his chest. He was heavily restrained as a five-person firing squad took aim at the target and shot him, witnesses said... Gardner, 49, was convicted for the shooting death of attorney Michael Burdell during a botched escape attempt from custody in 1985 at a Salt Lake City, Utah, courthouse."As of June 18, 2010, Gardner was the last person executed by firing squad in the US. TIME "Ronnie Lee Gardner Executed By Firing Squad," TIME website, June 18, 2010CNN "Killer Executed by Utah Firing Squad," , June 18, 2010Aug. 2010Lethal Drug Shortage Delays Executions in Kentucky"Some states are delaying executions because of a shortage of sodium thiopental, a drug used as an anesthetic and given to prisoners during lethal injections. It's one of three drugs used for lethal injection in more than 30 states...Some states have been trying to get additional supplies of the drug for months. In August, Gov. Steve Beshear was asked to sign death warrants for three prisoners in Kentucky but could set only one execution date because it only had a single dose.'We've had the drug on back order since March,' says Todd Henson, a spokesman for the Kentucky Department of Corrections. 'The company that supplies it to us advised that they were unable to produce it because they weren't able to get the active ingredient from their supplier.'Hospira, based in Lake Forest, Ill., is apparently the only manufacturer of the drug. The company has told Kentucky officials it won't be available until early next year." NPR "States Delay Executions Owing to Drug Shortage," , Sep. 16, 2010Sep. 23, 2010Woman with 72 IQ Executed in Virginia"Teresa Lewis was put to death in Virginia on Thursday for arranging the killings of her husband and a stepson over a $250,000 insurance payment. The 41-year-old was the first woman to be executed in the United States in five years...More than 7,300 appeals to stop the execution - the first of a woman in Virginia since 1912 - had been made to the governor in a state second only to Texas in the number of people it executes.Texas held the most recent U.S. execution of a woman in 2005. Out of more than 1,200 people put to death since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976, only 11 have been women.Lewis, who defense attorneys said was borderline mentally disabled, had inspired other inmates by singing Christian hymns in prison. Her execution stirred an unusual amount of attention because of her gender, claims she lacked the intelligence to mastermind the killings and the post-conviction emergence of defense evidence that one of the triggermen manipulated her." Under US law, anyone with an execution under 70 cannot be excuted. Lewis was judged to have an IQ of 72. CBS News "Teresa Lewis Execution: Virginia Executes Woman Amid Outcry," , Sep. 24, 2010Jan. 21, 2011Sole Firm Stops Making Key Death Penalty DrugPentothal Sodium. Source: (accessed Jan. 21, 2011)"The sole U.S. maker of the anesthetic used in executions announced Friday [Jan. 21, 2011] it would stop manufacturing sodium thiopental to prevent its product from being used to put prisoners to death...Hospira Inc., of Lake Forest, Ill., stopped making its brand of sodium thiopental, Pentothal, at a North Carolina plant early last year because of an unspecified raw material supply problem. When Hospira attempted to move production to a factory in Liscate, Italy, near Milan, Italian authorities demanded assurances that the drug wouldn't end up in the hands of executioners. Hospira spokesman Dan Rosenberg said company officers couldn't make that guarantee and decided instead to ‘exit the sodium thiopental market.’...California corrections officials imported a large quantity of sodium thiopental - enough for about 90 executions - from a British distributor in November, before a public outcry in Britain led to a ban on export of the drug to the United States."Los Angeles Times "Maker of Anesthetic Used in Executions Is Discontinuing Drug" Los Angeles Times, Jan. 22, 2011??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download