Ephesians-511.net



MAY 10, 2017

“The Modernist Wrecking Ball”, “the worst teacher of the Faith in the history of the Catholic Church”

[pic] [pic]

These, among other things, is how George Neumayr describes Pope Francis and what he accuses him of being:

(a Modernist wrecking ball

(the prototypical “progressive” Jesuit

(promot(ing) political liberalism while downplaying doctrine

(a product of political leftism and theological Modernism

(a follower of the Modernist school. He is a student of Modernist Biblical Scholarship

(using the pulpit of the papacy, not to present the teachings of the Church, but, rather, to promote his personal political agenda

(statements not in line with the Church’s teaching… Pope Francis is the worst teacher of the Faith in the history of the Catholic Church

(subverting the Church’s sacramental theology

He states:

(the Catholic Church is suffering under a bad pope and that the cardinals must address this crisis

Who is George Neumayr?

George Neumayr is contributing editor to and former executive editor of the American Spectator. He has written extensively on politics and religion for many outlets, including the Washington Times, National Review Online, and Catholic World Report (where he is editor). His pieces have also been read on the air by Rush Limbaugh. He lives in Virginia, USA

But naturally, he is hated by the liberal-left like the team at the National “Catholic” Reporter (and this article deprecating him is published just six months into Pope Francis’ pontificate, even much before Neumayr authored The Political Pope):

Vile, vile, vile



By Michael Sean Winters, October 17, 2013

Over at the American Spectator, George Neumayr has a particularly vile column in which he attacks, well, just about everybody. He laments the decision of Cardinal Donald Wuerl not to turn the communion rail into a trench in the culture wars, writing:

Cardinal Raymond Burke, who is the foremost authority on canon law as the head of the Vatican Supreme Court, has said repeatedly that priests should deny her [Nancy Pelosi] Holy Communion. But Wuerl refuses, saying, simultaneously, that denial isn’t “pastoral” and sniffing that Pelosi isn’t a member of “his flock.” That comically craven and contradictory copout is all one needs to know about the emptiness of “pastoral” Catholicism.

First, Cardinal Wuerl does not “sniff” unless he has a cold. Second, there is nothing craven nor contradictory about the stance Cardinal Wuerl has taken, Cardinal Burke’s statements notwithstanding.

Neumayr writes: “The pews of the big bad pre-Vatican II Church were full; the pews of “pastoral” Francis-style Jesuit shepherds are empty.” It is true that the Catholic Church in recent decades has seen Mass attendance rates drop, and drop precipitously. I will note, however, that the rise of the “nones,” those who claim no religious affiliation, only began to tick upwards in the Pew polls after the Moral Majority had been at work presenting a caricature of the faith in the public realm for ten years. The reasons for the drop in Mass attendance rates are varied and complex, and I would decline to lay the blame to any one cause, but if I had to do so, it would be the cultural effects of the market that would top my list. From a very early age, we are bombarded with promises of store-bought happiness. Who needs heaven when you can get a new toy, or a new car, or a new girlfriend, all on the internet, and all at half-price.

Like Neumayr, I caught my breath when I read in the Washington Post of a client who told their counselor that “I am a Pope Francis-Nancy Pelosi Catholic.” Unless the patient knew both Ms. Pelosi and Pope Francis personally, I can only assume that the judgment had to do with their public personas, and I see little in common between those two personas myself. But, most likely, this person was using the two names as shorthand to describe themselves as someone who cares about social justice. I think Ms. Pelosi’s inability to extend her concern about her fellow humans to the very littlest ones is a large mark against her claim to promote social justice. That said, I applaud Pelosi for her willingness to stand up against those who would cut food stamps but never touch an oil company subsidy. I applaud Papa Francesco, too, when he notes the bizarre moral calculus of our times that weeps bitter tears when a bank goes under but cares not a whit about children who go to bed hungry.

Conservatives like Neumayr should be applauding, not fretting, Pope Francis. He is causing many, many people to give the Church a second look. I do not know how many of them will turn away again when they realize that the pope is not going to ordain women or not going to preside at a same-sex marriage ceremony. It is my hope, however, that some will, as the Pope has urged, go out and meet the poor and there encounter the Lord, and that the Lord will lead such people in His own good way and His own good time. Neumayr’s time would be better spent fretting about the lack of hierarchic leadership these past few decades that has reduced our rich faith to a few political talking points spouted by right-wing pols, and how and why Pope Francis’ different style is achieving the fuller pews the conservatives claimed they wanted. 

An Interview with George Neumayr, Author of The Political Pope



By Maike Hickson, May 6, 2017 – All bold emphases mine -Michael

Editor’s Note

On 2 May, George Neumayr’s book, The Political Pope: How Pope Francis is Delighting the Liberal Left and Abandoning Conservatives, was published. OnePeterFive reached out to him, and he kindly gave us an interview. George Neumayr also gave us permission to publish Chapter One of his book, which we post here below, right after the interview itself.

We strongly encourage our readers to support George Neumayr’s courageous book by buying it. It is available on Amazon.

Maike Hickson: What inspired you to write a book on Pope Francis?

George Neumayr: From the first moment I saw him, I knew that he was going to be a Modernist wrecking ball, and he struck me from the beginning as the prototypical “progressive” Jesuit.

I knew it was an extremely bad sign that the Church would name the first Jesuit pope at the very moment the Jesuit Order was in its most corrupt and heterodox condition. I knew it was going to be a distressingly historic pontificate, and from the first moment of Francis’ papacy I began thinking that his pontificate would be a good subject for a book. As it unfolded, it became clearer and clearer that someone need to chronicle this consequentially chaotic pontificate.

MH: You studied at the Jesuit University of San Francisco. What was your first response when you saw and heard Pope Francis, the first Jesuit Pope in the Church’s history?

GN: Having gone to a Jesuit university, I am very familiar with the flakes and frauds that populate that order. When I heard the pope, in the first few months of his pontificate, engage in non-stop left-wing babble, it reminded me of all the nonsense that I heard as a student from similar “progressive” Jesuits. The program of Francis was so obviously set to promote political liberalism while downplaying doctrine; that was the formula of trendy and empty Catholicism that I saw on display at the Jesuit University of San Francisco.

MH: What approach did you take in order to be able to make a proportionate characterization of Pope Francis as pope in his actions and words?

GN: I went back and looked at his time at Buenos Aires, Argentina, at his formation in the Jesuit Order, I read all of his available speeches and writings – when he was a bishop, before he was pope; I read all the existing biographies about him; I talked to Latin American priests, I talked to Jesuits, I talked to Vatican officials, I talked to Catholic activists and Catholic academics and canon lawyers. Given the sensitivity of the topic, most of the people were only willing to speak anonymously with me. I tried to look at all the salient news items that relate to Bergoglio, before he was pope and when he was pope.

MH: What is the main conclusion of your research?

GN: The undeniable conclusion is that the Catholic Church is suffering under a bad pope and that the cardinals must address this crisis.

MH: How do you describe in your book the political worldview of Pope Francis? In which fields of politics does he show his left-leaning tendencies?

GN: Pope Francis is a product of political leftism and theological Modernism. His mind has been shaped by all of the post-enlightenment heresies and ideologies from Marx to Freud to Darwin. He is the realization of Cardinal Carlo Martini’s vision of a Modernist Church that conforms to the heresies of the Enlightenment. On almost all intellectual fronts, Francis is a follower of the Modernist school. He is a student of Modernist Biblical Scholarship, which can be seen in his ludicrous interpretation of certain passages from the Gospel: such as the time when he described the miracle of the multiplication of the loaves and fishes as a metaphor and not a miracle. On more than one occasion, he said that it was not a miracle but a lesson in sharing: “This is the miracle: rather than a multiplication it is a sharing, inspired by faith and prayer. Everyone eats and some is left over: it is the sign of Jesus, the Bread of God for humanity.”

MH: Do you think that Pope Francis, in his more political statements, misuses his office as Head of the Catholic Church?

GN: Yes, this pontificate is a blatant example of out-of-control clericalism. Pope Francis is using the pulpit of the papacy, not to present the teachings of the Church, but, rather, to promote his personal political agenda.

MH: Are his political statements in line with Catholic teaching?

GN: Many of his statements are not in line with the Church’s teaching, as I document in the book. Pope Francis is the worst teacher of the Faith in the history of the Catholic Church. One could not trust him to teach an elementary school religion class.

MH: When describing Pope Francis as a more left-leaning man, could you give us evidence for that? Which Marxist authors for example did he admire or approve of? Which political figures of the left are admired by him?

GN: I speak about this at the beginning of the book. His mentor was Esther Ballestrino de Careaga who was a very fervent Communist. Francis has acknowledged that he had teachers who were Communists who influenced him. I point out in my book that he also met with the widow of Paulo Freire, the author of the book The Pedagogy of the Oppressed which is a classic of the Socialist left in Latin America.

MH: Which practical acts as pope show that Pope Francis actively supports Marxist or revolutionary movements?

GN: I document in the book all of the liberation theologians whom Pope Francis has rehabilitated. Leonardo Boff is at the top of the list. He is an openly Socialist priest who left the priesthood but who is now in the good graces of the Vatican so much so that he was a counselor to the papal encyclical Laudato si’. He also reinstated to the priesthood the Communist priest Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann from Nicaragua who is still in touch with President Daniel Ortega. That priest has now resumed his Communist polemics.

QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 41-LIBERATION THEOLOGIAN BANNED EX-PRIEST BOFF SAYS FRANCIS IS ONE OF US



MH: How would you describe Pope Francis’ moral teaching in relation with his political teaching? Is there a parallel between his political and moral liberalism?

GN: He pays homage to the moral relativism and socialism that are at the heart of the global left. It is no coincidence that his signature phrases have been “Who am I to judge” and “Inequality is the root of all evil.” He is a darling of the global left because he is advancing many of the items of their agenda, such as climate-change activism, open borders, and abolition of lifetime imprisonment (a position still so far left that not even the U.S. Democrats take that position). He is a spokesman for gun control, for world government, for the redistribution of wealth by central planners. The pope is pandering to the wilfulness inherent in liberalism which takes both the form of moral relativism and a form of a “virtue signaling” socialism. He gratifies the liberals’ egos by offering them a pontificate of “virtue signaling” without any teaching of actual virtue. In other words, liberals like to appear good but not be good. And a pontificate which combines political liberalism with moral or doctrinal relativism agrees with their self-indulgent politics. They also like a dash of non-threatening spirituality in their politics which a Jesuit dilettante from Latin America provides them with.

MH: You talk in your book also about Pope Francis’ apostolic exhortation, Amoris Laetitia. Is this document in line with Catholic teaching as it has been always taught by the Catholic Church?

GN: Amoris Laetitia is one of the most scandalous documents in the history of the Church. Pope Francis gives an obvious wink and a nod to adulterers in footnote 329 of that document (“In such situations, many [divorced and “remarried”] people, knowing and accepting the possibility of living ‘as brothers and sisters’ which the Church offers them, point out that if certain expressions of intimacy are lacking, it often happens that faithfulness is endangered and the good of the children suffers.”). In my book, I speak about the intentional ambiguity of that document and that Archbishop Bruno Forte, who helped to write the draft of the 2014 Synod on the Family, had acknowledged the deviousness of the document and said that it was typical of a Jesuit; and that Pope Francis himself had told Archbishop Forte at the time that, if they had explicitly endorsed adultery, it would have caused a backlash, and, so, they had to introduce this topic into the Synod document more subtly.

MH: Are there other fields of Catholic teaching where you would say that Pope Francis departs from orthodoxy?

GN: Pope Francis is subverting the Church’s teaching on divorce and thereby subverting teaching on many of the Sacraments such as Marriage, Penance, Holy Eucharist, Holy Orders. He is subverting the Church’s sacramental theology. I chronicle in my book many of his subversions of Church teaching, from his support of the use of contraceptives with regard to the Zika virus, to his religious indifferentism and his antinomianism, which has become a hallmark of his pontificate. Pope Francis frequently pits the law against mercy which is the essence of the antinomian heresy.

MH: What do you say about the response of the prelates of the Church, especially the cardinals, to some of the problematic parts of Amoris Laetitia?

GN: The response has been feeble. Bishop Athanasius Schneider is an outstanding exception, he has spoken forthrightly about the heresy at work within that document.

MH: What should the cardinals be doing now? Are there ways for the cardinals to correct a pope?

GN: My position is that the cardinals should forthrightly confront the pope on this matter and make it clear to him that the heterodox position to which he is adhering is absolutely unacceptable. And then, if he fails to respond to the dubia, they must move to a formal correction.

MH: What are the reasons for the silence of so many prelates of the Church in the face of heterodox teachings coming out of Rome?

GN: One reason is their lack of conviction, another reason is shameful careerism, the third reason is that many of the bishops are cowards before the spirit of the age, and a lot of these “conservatives” are Modernists in slow motion.

MH: How is it possible that such a revolutionary pope could be elected as head of the Catholic Church? Do you touch upon this matter in your book?

GN: As I argue in the book, Pope Francis is the culmination of the Modernist movement which goes back over a hundred years. Modernism has been gathering strength in the Church since the Enlightenment, and it picked up speed in the 19th century and went into overdrive in the 20th century, producing the pontificate of Pope Francis. Pope Pius X’s encyclical on Modernism reads almost like a clinical description of the relativistic pontificate of Francis. Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI were later speed bumps in that road, inasmuch as they realized that the “Spirit of Vatican II” was wreaking havoc within the Church. But, with Francis now at the wheel, those speed bumps have been completely disregarded, and he seeks to complete the Modernist revolution.

MH: How would you describe Modernism, and what is fundamentally wrong with it?

GN: The essence of Modernism is the absorption of modern liberalism into Catholicism.

MH: So how should the Church find its way back to a strong and healthy response to any weakening and undermining of its teaching as it has been handed down to us from the Apostles?

GN: All of the reforms can be reduced to one reform: a return to orthodoxy and holiness.

MH: You are of the younger Catholic generation, born in 1972. What is and was your own response to the Catholic Church as it presented itself to you in the Novus Ordo Mass, but also in the Catechesis and in all the other aspects of Catholic life? What went wrong and what is missing?

GN: I belong to a generation of Catholics that asked for bread and only received stones.

MH: What do you intend to effect with your book, and what would you say that we Catholic authors and journalists should and could do in this current situation of confusion in order to help the faithful?

GN: My hope is that a book like this would contribute to the restoration of orthodoxy and holiness in the Church, and I think it is the duty of journalists to speak the truth without fear or favor.

Excerpt from THE POLITICAL POPE

By George Neumayr

The Pope They Have Been Waiting For

“You must straighten out your position with the Church,” Pope John Paul II shouted at a cowering Ernesto Cardenal, a Catholic priest turned Marxist activist. In violation of his religious vows, Cardenal had joined the communist Sandinista government in Nicaragua, and Pope John Paul II was scolding him before the cameras of the entire world. That sensational scene in 1983 on a Managua airport runway provided one of the most startling images of Pope John Paul II’s anti-communist pontificate.

So strong were Pope John Paul II’s anti-communist credentials and so effective was his anti-Soviet advocacy that Kremlin leaders, according to historians, hired a Turkish gunman to assassinate him. That attempt failed, and Pope John Paul II continued to denounce the Soviets until their empire crumbled in 1991.

Joseph Ratzinger also opposed communism fiercely. After serving as the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Ratzinger succeeded John Paul II in 2005 and took as his papal name Benedict XVI. In his role as doctrinal guardian of the Church, Ratzinger repeatedly warned the faithful to reject “liberation theology,” a Marxist-inspired ideology disguised as concern for the poor that the Soviet Union’s KGB spies had helped smuggle into Latin America’s Catholic Church in the 1950s.

“The movement was born in the KGB, and it had a KGB-invented name: liberation theology,” according to Ion Mihai Pacepa, who served as a spymaster for Romania’s secret police in the 1950s and 1960s.

The Soviets had long eyed the Catholic Church for infiltration. In the 1950s, Bella Dodd, the former head of the Soviet-controlled Communist Party of America, testified before the U.S. Congress that communists occupied some of the “highest places” in the Catholic Church. “We put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within,” she said. “The idea was for these men to be ordained, and then climb the ladder of influence and authority as monsignors and bishops.” As an active party member, Dodd said that she knew of “four cardinals within the Vatican who were working for us.”

According to Pacepa, the KGB took “secret control of the World Council of Churches (WCC), based in Geneva, Switzerland, and used it as cover for converting liberation theology into a South American revolutionary tool.” Seeking to spread atheistic Marxism among the religious peasants of Latin America, Soviet leaders instructed the KGB to send agents into ecclesiastical circles. In 1968, Latin America’s bishops loudly endorsed liberation theology at a conference in Medellín, Colombia. The KGB served as a puppet master at the event, reported Pacepa.

“In the 1950s and 1960s, most Latin Americans were poor, religious peasants who had accepted the status quo, and [Soviet premier Nikita] Khrushchev was confident they could be converted to communism through the judicious manipulation of religion,” he wrote. “In 1968, the KGB was able to maneuver a group of leftist South American bishops into holding a conference in Medellín, Colombia. At the KGB’s request, my [spies] provided logistical assistance to the organizers. The official task of the conference was to help eliminate poverty in Latin America. Its undeclared goal was to legitimize a KGB-created religious movement dubbed ‘liberation theology,’ the secret task of which was to incite Latin America’s poor to rebel against the ‘institutionalized violence of poverty’ generated by the United States.”

Against this historical backdrop, Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI viewed the spread of liberation theology in Latin America with alarm. They feared that a Marxist-influenced ideology, which progressive theologians within the Catholic Church were harnessing to their own long-percolating socialist politics, would corrupt the Catholic faith. Pope Benedict XVI called liberation theology a “singular heresy.” He argued that it deceives the faithful by concealing “Marxist dialectics” within seemingly harmless advocacy for the lower classes. He drew attention to Marxism’s philosophical incompatibility with Christianity and disputed the claim of many churchmen that Christianity could purify the Marxist elements of socialist thought.

How shockingly different statements from the Holy See sound today under Pope Francis. The first Latin American pope in Church history, Jorge Mario Bergoglio has generated headlines not for scolding Marxists but for supporting them, not for rebuking liberation theologians but for honoring them.

Under Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI, the Western media spoke disapprovingly of a “holy war against liberation theology.” Now media outlets eagerly run stories about Pope Francis’s sympathy for it. “Liberation Theology Rehabilitation Continues at Vatican,” ran a characteristic headline on a story from the Associated Press.

In one of his first major interviews, Pope Francis said that liberation theologians have a “high concept of humanity.” A few months after he became pope on March 13, 2013, Francis welcomed the founding father of liberation theology, the Peruvian priest Gustavo Gutiérrez, to the Vatican as an honored guest. Gutiérrez had disappeared from high ecclesiastical circles under Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI after making a Marxist appeal for “effective participation in the struggle which the exploited classes have undertaken against their oppressors.” But after the elevation of Francis, Gutiérrez suddenly found himself basking in praise. Vatican officials pronounced him an impeccable thinker, responsible for one of “the most important currents in 20th century Catholic theology.” The Vatican’s newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano, asserted that the election of Pope Francis would bring liberation theology out of the “shadows to which it has been relegated for some years, at least in Europe.”

Leonardo Boff, who has long gloried in his status as a renegade liberation theologian from Brazil, also enjoyed a stunning change of fortune after the election of Pope Francis. Owing to his open Marxism, Boff was silenced by Pope John Paul II’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Boff was also condemned by the Vatican for his threatened hijinks at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, activism that eventually led Boff to leave the priesthood. But these days Boff finds himself back in the Church’s good graces. Pope Francis recruited him to serve as an adviser for Laudato Si’, his 2015 encyclical endorsing the political agenda of climate change activists.

QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 12-CATHOLIC CRITICISM OF ENCYCLICAL LAUDATO SI’

’.doc

THE UNACCEPTABLE PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY OF LAUDATO SI



Taking advantage of the new wind blowing from the Vatican, Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann, whose role in Nicaragua’s Marxist revolutionary government in the 1970s led to his suspension from the priesthood, sent in 2014 a request to Pope Francis that his priestly faculties be reinstated. Pope Francis granted the request. “The Holy Father has given his benevolent assent that Father Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann be absolved from the canonical censure inflicted upon him, and entrusts him to the superior general of the institute (Maryknoll) for the purpose of accompanying him in the process of reintegration into the ministerial priesthood,” announced the Vatican.

D’Escoto, among his other Marxist activities, had served as an official at the aforementioned KGB-controlled World Council of Churches. No sooner had Pope Francis granted d’Escoto’s request than the recipient of the Lenin Peace Prize resumed his Marxist polemics, calling capitalism the “most un-Christian doctrine and practice ever devised by man to keep us separate and unequal in a kind of global apartheid.” He condemned Pope John Paul II for an “abuse of authority” and rhapsodized about Fidel Castro as an inspired figure whose murderous regime heralded “the reign of God on this earth that is the alternative to the empire.” Even now as a priest in good standing under Pope Francis, d’Escoto lobbies for the Libyans, remains a member of the Sandinista National Liberation Front, and continues to serve as an adviser to Daniel Ortega, whom the Soviets planted in the presidency of Nicaragua in the 1980s.

According to Boff, Pope Francis will eventually rehabilitate all of the condemned liberation theologians from Latin America. Boff believes that Pope Francis is waiting until their old critic, Pope Benedict XVI, dies. “I believe that as long as the retired pope lives, he will neither reconcile nor redeem these theologians,” according to Boff. “But, when he is by himself, he will rescue the 500 theologians whose heads were severed. I believe this pope is capable of dismantling this machine of punishment and control, and leave it to the local churches.”

A Radical Pontificate

After only four years of his pontificate, Francis has emerged as one of the most political popes in the history of the Church. His left-wing activism is relentless, ranging across causes from the promotion of global warming theory to support for amnesty and open borders to the abolition of lifetime imprisonment. That alone would make this papacy historically significant. But the ambitions of Pope Francis go well beyond an unusually aggressive political dilettantism. As this book will detail, he is not only championing the radical political agenda of the global left but also subverting centuries-old Catholic teaching on faith and morals, evident in his unprecedented support for granting the sacrament of Holy Communion to the divorced and remarried and in his drive to dilute the Church’s moral and theological commitments.

At a time of widespread moral relativism and assaults on marriage, his 2014–2015 Synod of Bishops on the Family served not to strengthen the Church’s stances but to weaken them. For the first time in the history of the Church, a pope approved of Catholics in a state of adultery. He also authorized his aides to float unprecedented proposals in favor of blessing the “positive aspects” of gay relationships and couples living together outside of marriage.

Amidst this doctrinal confusion, many cardinals are beginning to feel buyer’s remorse. “The more he talks, the worse it gets,” says a Vatican official, who asked to remain anonymous, in an interview for this book. “Many bishops and cardinals are terrified to speak out, but they are in a state of apoplexy. The atmosphere is so politicized and skewed. The Church is becoming unrecognizable.”

“We haven’t hit bottom,” says an American priest interviewed for this book. He describes his parishioners as “distressed,” so much so that he carries around a list of all the popes to remind them that “bad popes don’t live forever.”

“I have never been so discouraged about the prospects for the Church,” an unnamed prelate said to Traditionalist magazine in 2015.

In an interview with the Spanish Catholic weekly Vida Nueva, Cardinal Raymond Burke, the former head of the Vatican’s highest court who was removed from that position by Pope Francis in 2013, disclosed that “many have expressed their concerns to me” and that “at this very critical moment, there is a strong sense that the Church is like a ship without a rudder.”

These are “dark times,” Bishop Athanasius Schneider of Kazakhstan has said. The liberalism of this pontificate, he argues, is exposing the faithful to “spiritual danger” and creating the conditions for the “fast and easy spreading of heterodox doctrines.”

“There are evident manifestations of uneasiness,” according to the Vatican correspondent Sandro Magister in an interview with Italia Oggi. “It’s beginning to look as if the cardinals made a terrible mistake when they decided that this particular Catholic should be a pope,” wrote the British Catholic journalist Damian Thompson.

“In the Vatican, some people are already sighing: ‘Today, he has already again another different idea from yesterday,’” the German philosopher Robert Spaemann has said. “One does not fully get rid of the impression of chaos.”

In an interview for this book, Michael Hichborn, president of a Catholic watchdog organization in Virginia called the Lepanto Institute, recounted, “I had a meeting with a bishop who turned to me and said, ‘How do you remain loyal to Peter when Peter is not loyal to the Church?’ He was genuinely confused and felt stuck.”

Such bewilderment leaves Pope Francis untroubled. He even romanticizes his reckless heterodox activism. “I want a mess,” he said at the 2013 World Youth Day in Rio de Janeiro. “We knew that in Rio there would be a great disorder, but I want trouble in the dioceses!” Many Catholics found this a puzzling goal to set for the Church. But his pontificate has undeniably lived up to it. “Mission accomplished,” quipped Bishop Thomas Tobin of Providence, Rhode Island, in 2014.

QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 65-EXHORTS CATHOLIC YOUTH TO MAKE A MESS



Supremely confident in his chaotic course, Pope Francis is shrugging off the mounting concerns and delighting in his reputation as a socialist and modernist maverick. After Pope Francis early in his papacy decried capitalism as “trickle-down economics” — a polemical phrase coined by the left during the Reagan years that Francis frequently borrows — radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh commented, “This is just pure Marxism coming out of the mouth of the Pope.” Talk show host Michael Savage called him “Lenin’s pope.” Pope Francis took such comments as a compliment. “I have met many Marxists in my life who are good people, so I don’t feel offended,” he told the Italian press.

His Communist Mentor

Pope Francis grew up in socialist Argentina, an experience that left a deep impression on his thinking. He told the Latin American journalists Javier Cámara and Sebastián Pfaffen that as a young man he “read books of the Communist Party that my boss in the laboratory gave me” and that “there was a period where I would wait anxiously for the newspaper La Vanguardia, which was not allowed to be sold with the other newspapers and was brought to us by the socialist militants.”

The “boss” to whom Pope Francis referred is Esther Ballestrino de Careaga. He has described her as a “Paraguayan woman” and a “fervent communist.” He considers her one of his most important mentors. “I owe a huge amount to that great woman,” he has said, saying that she “taught me so much about politics.” (He worked for her as an assistant at Hickethier-Bachmann Laboratory in Buenos Aires.)

“She often read Communist Party texts to me and gave them to me to read. So I also got to know that very materialistic conception. I remember that she also gave me the statement from the American Communists in defense of the Rosenbergs, who had been sentenced to death,” he has said. Learning about communism, he said, “through a courageous and honest person was helpful. I realized a few things, an aspect of the social, which I then found in the social doctrine of the Church.” After entering the priesthood, he took pride in helping her hide the family’s Marxist literature from the authorities who were investigating her. According to the author James Carroll, Bergoglio smuggled her communist books, including Marx’s Das Kapital, into a “Jesuit library.”

“Tragically, Ballestrino herself ‘disappeared’ at the hands of security forces in 1977,” reported Vatican correspondent John Allen. “Almost three decades later, when her remains were discovered and identified, Bergoglio gave permission for her to be buried in the garden of a Buenos Aires church called Santa Cruz, the spot where she had been abducted. Her daughter requested that her mother and several other women be buried there because ‘it was the last place they had been as free people.’ Despite knowing full well that Ballestrino was not a believing Catholic, the future pope readily consented.”

These biographical details throw light on the pope’s ideological instincts. Yet many commentators have ignored them, breezily casting his leftism as a bit confused but basically harmless.

“I must say that communists have stolen our flag. The flag of the poor is Christian,” he said in 2014. Such a comment would have startled his predecessors. They didn’t see communism as a benign exaggeration. They saw it as a grave threat to God-given freedom, as it proposes that governments eliminate large swaths of individual freedom, private property, and business in order to produce the “equality” of a society without economic classes.

In the early twentieth century, as Marx’s socialism spread across the world, Pope Pius XI declared the theory anathema. “No one can be at the same time a good Catholic and a true socialist,” he said. To hear Pope Francis speak today, one might conclude the reverse: that no can be at the same time a good Catholic and an opponent of socialism.

“Inequality is the root of all evil,” Pope Francis wrote on his Twitter account in 2014. One can imagine Karl Marx blurting that out, but none of Francis’s predecessors would have made such an outrageous claim. According to traditional Catholic theology, the root of all evil came not from inequality but from Satan’s refusal to accept inequality. Out of envy of God’s superiority, Satan rebelled. He could not bear his lesser status.

He was in effect the first revolutionary, which is why the socialist agitator Saul Alinsky — a mentor to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton (who did her senior thesis at Wellesley on his thought) — offered an “acknowledgment” in his book, Rules for Radicals, to Satan. Alinsky saw him as the first champion of the “have-nots.”

Were the twentieth-century English Catholic satirist Evelyn Waugh alive today, he would find the radical left-wing political flirtations of Pope Francis too bitterly farcical even for fiction. Could a satirist like Waugh have imagined a pope happily receiving from a Latin American despot the “gift” of a crucifix shaped in the form of a Marxist hammer and sickle? That surreal scene happened during Pope Francis’s visit to Bolivia in July 2015.

QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 34-POPE FRANCIS AND THE HAMMER AND SICKLE CRUCIFIX



Evo Morales, Bolivia’s proudly Marxist president, offered the pontiff that sacrilegious image of Jesus Christ. Morales described the gift as a copy of a crucifix designed by a late priest, Fr. Luís Espinal, who belonged to the Jesuit order (as does Pope Francis) and had committed his life to melding Marxism with religion. Pope Francis had honored Espinal’s memory upon his arrival in Bolivia.

Had John Paul II or Pope Benedict XVI seen such a grotesque cross, they might have broken it over their knees. Not Pope Francis. He accepted the hammer-and-sickle cross warmly, telling the press on the plane ride back to Rome that “I understand this work” and that “for me it wasn’t an offense.” After the visit, Morales gushed, “I feel like now I have a Pope. I didn’t feel that before.”

Under Francis, the papacy has become a collage of such politicized images: friendly papal meetings with communist thugs like the Castro brothers, a papal Mass conducted under the shadow of the mass murderer Che Guevara’s mural in Havana, papal audiences with a steady stream of crude Marxist theoreticians and anti-capitalist celebrities such as Leonardo DiCaprio, “selfies” while holding up an anti-fracking T-shirt, a pro-amnesty Mass said on the border between Mexico and America, a succession of sermons, speeches, and writings that rip into capitalism and tout greater government control over private property and business.

By pushing the papacy in such a “progressive” direction, Francis has become a darling of the global left. His program of promoting left-wing politics while downplaying and undermining doctrine on faith and morals has turned him into the ecclesiastical equivalent of Barack Obama. “Pope Francis is a gift from heaven,” the radical academic Cornel West said to Rolling Stone. “I love who he is, in terms of what he says, and the impact of his words on progressive forces around the world.”

Pope Francis, as liberals once said of Barack Obama, is the “one they have been waiting for.” The world is witnessing nothing less than a liberal revolution in the Catholic Church — a revolution that is emboldening the Church’s enemies and alienating her friends.

10 of 272 readers’ comments

1. The moment Bergoglio walked out onto the balcony of St. Peter's on the night of his election and leered at the throng gathered below with a psychopathic, glassy-eyed stare, I got a real bad feeling. That bad feeling turned to deep foreboding shortly after when he announced that he was much too humble to simply follow in the footsteps of his predecessors and live in the simple papal apartments but would instead reside in his own suite in a Vatican hotel.

I knew right then that this man hated Catholic tradition

2. Remember the vision of Pope St. Pius X who saw a pope alone crying and praying in the Vatican then being martyred... who had the same name as Pius X. His name was Giuseppe Sarto. Giuseppe is the Italian name for Joseph.

Joseph...Ratzinger?

3. Very interesting. I wonder if that ties into part of the Fatima secrets where a bishop in white is martyred.

4. Pope Pius X (1903-14): In 1909, in the midst of an audience with members of the Franciscan order, he seemed to fall into a trance. Moments passed, then his eyes sprung open and he jumped to his feet. "What I have seen is terrifying!” he cried out. “Will I be the one, or will it be a successor? What is certain is that the Pope will leave Rome and, in leaving the Vatican, he will have to pass over the dead bodies of his priests!" Later, shortly before his death, another vision came to him: "I have seen one of my successors, of the same name, who was fleeing over the bodies of his brethren. He will take refuge in some hiding place; but after a brief respite, he will die a cruel death. Respect for God has disappeared from human hearts. They wish to efface even God's memory. This perversity is nothing less than the beginning of the last days of the world."

5. Not to beat a dead horse -- but it really wasn't a feeling. It was the absolute certitude that a catastrophe had befallen us. In the following weeks there was confirmation almost on a daily basis. Of course, it continues.

My formative years were unfortunately mutilated by "sixties" priests and sisters peddling a fraudulent Catholicism. Thankfully I had sufficient common sense and pre-1965 catechesis to recognize that the generation entrusted with my Catholic education were catering to their own necessities. I think more of us than we care to acknowledge knew they were dealing out a bill of goods that was entirely vacuous. Of course as time went most of them peeled away, abandoned their vocations and got married or something. There were more than a few, however who peeled away because they too knew they were being sold a bill of goods and didn't want to endure the evisceration of the Church, the priesthood and religious life. Of course, then there was a group that stayed -- some thankfully orthodox, then the rest...

It was a horrible time to live through. Who knew we would have a repeat performance with a clown leading the second act.

6. I didn't buy into that 'false prophet' theory early on, even though I knew he was very bad news for the Church of Christ. But I whole heartedly believe that is absolutely true now. He can be none other than THE false prophet of the Bible, full stop.

There were many comments on Pope Francis’ being the False Prophet of the Book of Revelation.

7. Pope Francis has abandoned the faithful. There can be absolutely no mistake about this.

He has taken our Church, while seemingly on "skid row" and has thrown her into the alley of drunkards and wayward tormentors. He uses the sense of anger and resentment and jealousy to spurn many on to savagely attack her teachings, employing Marxism as a panacea for their ills. The world is his "oyster", not heaven, and he proposes in so many countless ways to encourage anyone and everyone of this mind set.

Pope Francis is indeed a very bad pope. There can be no mistake about this as well.

I have never witnessed so much unleashing of the demonic within the Church during my lifetime.

We now have many bishops of England promoting LGBT teaching in their Catholic schools, with children of a very young age. A.L. exhortation is the tip of the iceberg with this pope. Married and divorced and remarriage is really irrelevant for him, in my estimation. It is a way of opening the barn door to the acceptance of sin.

And when that unfolds, as we are seeing before our very eyes.......a Church may no longer be needed by most.

Her sacraments, Sanctifying Grace unnecessary many will claim.

I cannot believe that we have not yet had public correction of this pope, after all this time.

What a terrible shame and forgive me, very possibly, a terrible sin that our cardinals will have committed, if they fail in their duty to protect the faith, to protect the flock in fidelity to Christ.

I remain dutifully patient in prayer.

8. As one unnamed bishop is quoted here: "How do you remain loyal to Peter when Peter is not loyal to the Church?" An essential requirement of our beloved Catholic faith is fidelity to the Holy Father since, as Jesus told St. Peter; "Whoever hears you, hears Me." Yet at this time, we know in our heart of hearts that Christ is not speaking through this man with regard to faith and morals. So, while we long to feel secure in the guidance that must come to us from the Petrine Office, we find ourselves in the unique position of choosing to disregard what this pope says with an easy conscience, while earnestly longing for that proper guidance to be restored. We need a shepherd whom we can trust. Frankly, for most of this purposely chaotic pontificate, I cannot bring myself to refer to this man as 'the Holy Father'. It sounds like a sick joke.

9. This is a work for which can be truly thankful.

The lid is lifted. The stench is overwhelming. The raking light is brought to bear – let our eyes remain wide open.

One phrase after another in the interview – an exacting litany of the gross injustice, the fraudulent comportment, the pastoral malpractice we endure. Of all his bulls eyes the one that strikes me to the core is the rationale supporting the episcopate’s silence “…their lack of conviction, another reason is shameful careerism, the third reason is that many of the bishops are cowards before the spirit of the age, and a lot of these “conservatives” are Modernists in slow motion.” 

Mr. Neumayr is kind. Let it be said plainly – not simply a lack of conviction, rather their lack of faith.

How Mr. Neumayr could muster the fortitude and self-governance to probe the Bergoglian catastrophe is beyond me. God reward him, and I have ordered the book and will read it cover to cover – provided I too am graced with the courage.

10. All this chatter and outrage isn't worth a hill of beans if nothing is done to get rid of this tool of Satan. The faithful Cardinals and bishops must take over the Vatican and throw the bum out! No Catholic should obey him in any way. He should be marginalized.

SYLLABUS OF ERRORS AND OATH AGAINST MODERNISM (LAMENTABILI SANE) PIUS X, JULY 3, 1907



PASCENDI DOMINICI GREGIS-ON THE ERRORS OF MODERNISM PIUS X, SEPTEMBER 8, 1907



SACRORUM ANTISTITUM-THE OATH AGAINST MODERNISM PIUS X SEPTEMBER 1, 1910



DIVINI REDEMPTORIS-ON ATHEISTIC COMMUNISM PIUS XI MARCH 19, 1937



DECREE AGAINST COMMUNISM PIUS XII JANUARY 31, 1949



VATICAN COUNCIL II CONDEMNATIONS OF COMMUNISM REVEALED



RELATED FILES

CAN A CATHOLIC CRITICIZE THE POPE?



CRITICISMS OF POPE FRANCIS FROM WITHIN THE ROMAN CURIA MADE PUBLIC



ON THE MORAL AND CANONICAL LICEITY OF PUBLICLY CORRECTING THE POPE



ON THE FORMAL CORRECTION OF POPE FRANCIS



WHEN PUBLIC CORRECTION OF A POPE IS URGENT AND NECESSARY



IF THE BIBLE IS INFALLIBLE THEN SO IS THE CHURCH



INFALLIBILITY OF THE POPE, COUNCILS, PAPAL AND VATICAN DOCUMENTS



INFALLIBILITY OF THE POPE COUNCILS PAPAL AND VATICAN DOCUMENTS 02



OBEDIENCE TO THE BISHOPS-RON SMITH



CORRECTIO FILIALIS DE HAERESIBUS PROPAGATIS-ON THE PROPAGATION OF HERESIES BY POPE FRANCIS



THE FILIAL CORRECTION OF POPE FRANCIS ON HIS PROPAGATION OF HERESIES-AMORIS LAETITIA AND MARTIN LUTHER



THE SYNOD ON THE FAMILY-BETWEEN HERESY AND SCHISM 01



THE SYNOD ON THE FAMILY-BETWEEN HERESY AND SCHISM 02



THE SYNOD ON THE FAMILY-BETWEEN HERESY AND SCHISM 03



CAN A POPE COMMIT HERESY?



COULD POPE FRANCIS BE A HERETIC?



IS POPE FRANCIS A HERETIC?



POPE FRANCIS APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION AMORIS LAETITIA ACCUSED OF HERESY BY 45 THEOLOGIANS



THE QUESTION OF PAPAL HERESY



THE PAPA FRANCISCO SERIES

QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 01-WASHING THE FEET- OF WOMEN ON MAUNDY THURSDAY



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 01A-WASHING THE FEET OF WOMEN ON MAUNDY THURSDAY



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 01B-FRANCIS LEGITIMIZES WASHING THE FEET OF WOMEN AFTER VIOLATING RUBRICS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 01C-MAUNDY THURSDAY FOOT WASHING 4.0-MORE REACTIONS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 01D-MAUNDY THURSDAY FOOT KISSING



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 02-MEDJUGORJE



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 03-HOMOSEXUALITY THE SEX ABUSE CRISIS AND THE GAY LOBBY

QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 04-COMPROMISED BY NEW AGE ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE?



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 05-BAPTISM OF ALIENS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 06-ENDORSEMENT OF A NEW AGE HEALER FROM INDIA?



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 07-TEAM BERGOGLIO IS A HERETICAL CONSPIRACY TO OVERTHROW THE CHURCH OF CHRIST



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 08-CONSULTOR TO THE PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR CULTURE PRACTISES NEW AGE ADVOCATES THE HERESY OF WOMEN PRIESTS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 09-THE POPE UNDERGOES NEW AGE TREATMENTS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 10-NEW AGE CONSULTOR TO THE PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR CULTURE NOW DENIGRATES THE EUCHARIST



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 11-PRESIDENT OF THE PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR CULTURE JOINS IN RELIGIOUS RITUAL OF NEW AGE CULT



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 12-CATHOLIC CRITICISM OF ENCYCLICAL LAUDATO SI’

’.doc

QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 13-SOME QUESTIONABLE ECCLESIAL APPOINTMENTS OF POPE FRANCIS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 14-A DANGEROUS POPE CHALLENGING THE CHURCH?



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 15-THE POPE SPEAKS ON CLIMATE CHANGE AIR POLLUTION AND A HERETICAL PRIEST EVADES PROLIFE ISSUES

EVADES _PROLIFE_ISSUES.doc

QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 16-CARDINAL DANNEELS REVEALS THAT HIS CLERICAL MAFIA STRIVED FOR BERGOGLIO AS POPE



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 17-HOW WILL TRADITION VIEW POPE FRANCIS’ PAPACY?



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 18-CATHOLIC CRITICISM OF POPE FRANCIS’ MOTU PROPRIOS ON MARRIAGE ANNULMENT



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 19-CRACKDOWN ON THE FRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE IMMACULATE



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 20-ATHEIST PAPAL ADVISOR BELIEVES IN NEW AGE GODDESS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 21-AWARDED 2015 PERSON OF THE YEAR BY ANTICHRISTIAN PETA



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 22-THE CONTRACEPTION AND RABBITGATE CONTROVERSIES



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 23-THE LUTHERANIZATION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 24-APOSTOLIC DECEPTION AMORIS LAETITIA



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 25-SHAME AND SCANDAL IN THE FAMILY



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 26-THE DECENTRALIZATION OF DOCTRINAL AUTHORITY (SYNODALITY AND COLLEGIALITY)



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 27-THE CHIEF DRAFTER OF AMORIS LAETITIA AND THE ART OF KISSING



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 28- QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 28-DID GERMAN PELF INFLUENCE THE SYNOD ON THE FAMILY?



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 29-PROTESTANT ALPHA COURSE ENDORSED BY POPE FRANCIS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 30-ECUMENISM WITH PROTESTANTS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 31-AMORIS LAETITIA-CONTINUING FALLOUT



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 32-PONTIFICAL COUNCIL FOR THE FAMILY UNVEILS DIABOLICAL SEX-ED PROGRAMME



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 33-POPE FRANCIS DECLINES DONATION BECAUSE OF 666 FIGURE



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 34-POPE FRANCIS AND THE HAMMER AND SICKLE CRUCIFIX



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 35-RESURREXIFIXES AND A STRANGE CROZIER



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 36-THE BENT CROSS CONTROVERSY



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 37-A BEACH BALL BEFORE THE TABERNACLE



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 38-CONFESSIONAL ABSOLUTION WITHOUT A SHRED OF REPENTANCE



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 39-SILENT ON ISLAMIST TERRORISM CONCEDING TO ISLAM



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 40-THE PURGE OF THE CONGREGATION FOR DIVINE WORSHIP



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 41-LIBERATION THEOLOGIAN BANNED EX-PRIEST BOFF SAYS FRANCIS IS ONE OF US



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 42-PRO-SOCIALISM, ANTI-CAPITALISM



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 43-FIRST-EVER ANGLICAN SERVICE IN VATICANS ST PETERS BASILICA



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 44-ARE THESE RUMOURS OR ARE INTERRELIGIOUS MASSES NEXT



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 45-CRITICISM OF TRADITIONAL RELIGIOUS ORDERS AND THE TRIDENTINE MASS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 46-CLIMATE OF FEAR IN THE VATICAN



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 47-CRASS COMMENTS AND AD HOMINEM ATTACKS ON FAITHFUL CATHOLICS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 48-THE DESECRATION OF SACRED SPACES IN ROME



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 49-LITTLE REVERENCE FOR THE BLESSED SACRAMENT



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 50-ABOLITION OF THE SOLEMN TRAPPINGS OF THE PONTIFICAL OFFICE



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 51-I AM THE POPE-I DO NOT NEED TO GIVE REASONS FOR ANY OF MY DECISIONS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 52-STRIPPING THE CHURCH-THE CATHOLIC FUNERAL OF THE FUTURE



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 53-POLICE BUST DRUG AND GAY-SEX ORGY IN VATICAN APARTMENT



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 54-PRESBYTERIAN PASTOR MADE DIRECTOR OF L’OSSERVATORE ROMANO ARGENTINA

’OSSERVATORE_ROMANO_ARGENTINA.doc

QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 55-BRUTAL DISMISSAL OF CARDINAL MULLER AS PREFECT OF THE CDF



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 56-HELL BENT ON THE DESTRUCTION OF CHRISTIANITY (POLITICISATION/ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION)



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 57-MORE NON-CATHOLIC EXPERTS ENTER THE VATICAN UNDER ARCHBISHOP PAGLIA



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 58-HIS NEW PONTIFICAL ACADEMY FOR DEATH



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 59-HERESY-GOD CANNOT BE GOD WITHOUT MAN



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 60-RESHAPING THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS TO INFLUENCE THE FUTURE OF THE CHURCH



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 61-CURIAL CARDINAL QUESTIONS POPE LEO XIII DECLARATION ON NULLITY OF ANGLICAN ORDERS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 62-CALLS HOMOEOPATHY A SCIENCE



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 63-DISTORTS SCRIPTURE TEACHES FALSE CATHOLIC ESCHATOLOGY



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 64-CLIMATE OF FEAR IN THE ROMAN CURIA



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 65-EXHORTS CATHOLIC YOUTH TO MAKE A MESS



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 66-THE RIGGING OF THE SYNOD ON THE FAMILY CTD



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 67-IN SWEDEN TO HONOUR HERETIC LUTHER AND THE REFORMATION



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 68-CELEBRATES HERETIC LUTHER WITH STATUE AND POSTAL STAMP



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 69-ECUMANIA IS THE NEW EVANGELIZATION



QUO VADIS PAPA FRANCISCO 70-ROMAN SQUARE NAMED AFTER ARCHHERESIARCH LUTHER



MORE POPE FRANCIS-RELATED FILES

2016-THE YEAR POPE FRANCIS FINALLY SHOWED HIS HAND



A-Z LIST OF CONCERNS WITH POPE FRANCIS



A CLOSED LETTER TO POPE FRANCIS NOW OPEN-FR CONRAD SALDANHA



AN INDICTMENT OF POPE FRANCIS-ANTONIO SOCCI



AN OPEN LETTER ON THE CRISIS IN THE CHURCH-ARCHBISHOP PAWEL



AN OPEN LETTER TO POPE FRANCIS-FR GEORGE DAVID BYERS



AN OPEN LETTER TO POPE FRANCIS-FR RICHARD CIPOLLA



AN OPEN LETTER TO POPE FRANCIS-RANDY ENGEL



BUILDUP OF RESISTANCE TO POPE FRANCIS



CARDINAL OSWALD GRACIAS INTERPRETS POPE FRANCIS PERSONAL REMARK ON HOMOSEXUALS AS CHURCH TEACHING



CATHOLIC ANSWERS DIRECTOR APOLOGIST TIM STAPLES ADVOCATES HOLY COMMUNION FOR THOSE LIVING IN ADULTERY



CATHOLIC OPPOSITION TO POPE FRANCIS GROWING



COULD POPE FRANCIS BE A HERETIC?



DO NOT BE MORE CATHOLIC THAN I-POPE FRANCIS TO FAITHFUL CATHOLICS



EUCHARIST DESECRATED AT POPE FRANCIS MASS IN PHILIPPINES



FOUR YEARS LATER-REFLECTIONS ON AN UNPRECEDENTED PONTIFICATE



HOMOSEXUALITY INSIDE THE VATICAN



INDIAN PRIEST IN ITALY CRITICIZES POPE FRANCIS CONGREGATION STORMS OUT



IS POPE FRANCIS A HERETIC?



IS POPE FRANCIS PLANNING TO OVERTURN SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM AND END THE LATIN MASS



IS POPE FRANCIS THE FALSE PROPHET OF THE BIBLE? 



IS POPE FRANCIS UNDERGOING TREATMENT WITH NEW AGE ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES?



JESUIT FR ARTURO SOSA MARXIST-BUDDHIST BLACK POPE REINTERPRETING JESUS AND SATAN



POPE EMERITUS BENEDICT XVI BREAKS HIS SILENCE FOR A FOURTH TIME



POPE EMERITUS BENEDICT XVI BREAKS HIS SILENCE FOR A FIFTH TIME-CHURCH ON THE VERGE OF CAPSIZING



POPE FRANCIS-APPOINTED PRO-GAY JESUIT FR JAMES MARTIN



POPE FRANCIS AMBIGUOUS WORDS AND ACTS HAVE CAUSED APOSTASY



POPE FRANCIS CONFIDANTE JESUIT FR ANTONIO SPADARO ATTACKS CATHOLIC MINISTRY



POPE FRANCIS POPULAR BUT THE CHURCH IN DECLINE



PUTTING POPE FRANCIS INTO PERSPECTIVE 2013-2017



ROME IS IN CHAOS AND NO ONE SHOULD BE SURPRISED ONE BIT



SATAN MUST REIGN IN THE VATICAN-THE POPE MUST BE HIS SLAVE



STAUNCH DUBIA OPPONENT MSGR VITO PINTO IS A FREEMASON



THE ANTI-CHURCH IS HERE



THE CATHOLIC CHURCH UNDER POPE FRANCIS IN SCHISM



THE DESTRUCTION OF CARDINAL PELL-THE INSIDE STORY



THE FRANCIS EFFECT & WHO AM I TO JUDGE-THE SPIRIT OF VATICAN COUNCIL II?



THE LANGUAGE OF POPE FRANCIS IS AT TIMES TRYING FOR CATHOLICS-EVANGELII GAUDIUM



THE MORE POPE FRANCIS TALKS THE WORSE IT GETS



THE POPE FRANCIS LITTLE BOOK OF INSULTS AND NAME-CALLING



THE SHOCKING INITIATIVES OF POPE FRANCIS



UNDER POPE FRANCIS HOMOSEXUALISTS ARE NOW IN CONTROL OF THE VATICAN



UNEDIFYING IMAGES OF POPE FRANCIS



WE ACCUSE POPE FRANCIS



WE CANT WAIT FOR POPE FRANCIS TO DIE

FOR_POPE_FRANCIS_TO_DIE.doc

THE UNACCEPTABLE PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY OF LAUDATO SI



AMORIS LAETITIA AND THE CURRENT CRISIS IN THE CHURCH



AMORIS LAETITIA AND THE GAY MAFIA IN THE VATICAN 01



AMORIS LAETITIA-THE SSPX ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM



INDIAN CHURCH SYMPOSIUM ON AMORIS LAETITIA



INTERVIEW WITH JOHN VENNARI ON AMORIS LAETITIA AND SEX EDUCATION-RANDY ENGEL

POPE FRANCIS APOSTOLIC EXHORTATION AMORIS LAETITIA ACCUSED OF HERESY BY 45 THEOLOGIANS



POPE FRANCIS HIMSELF QUESTIONED ORTHODOXY OF AMORIS LAETITIA



THE DUBIA OR DOUBTS ABOUT AMORIS LAETITIA-FOUR CARDINALS ASK FIVE QUESTIONS



................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download