2019 Accountability Points Criteria
2019 Accountability Reporting: Criteria for Awarding Points for Progress Toward Improvement TargetsTable A- SEQ Table_A- \* ARABIC 1: Point Assignments for Non-High School GradesMCAS Achievement (ELA & Math)(Grades 3-8)MCAS Achievement (Science)(Grades 5 & 8) Student Growth(ELA & Math)Chronic Absenteeism Rate(Grades 1-8)Progress Toward English Language Proficiency(Grades 1-8)Exceeded Target(4 Points)Met scaled score of 90th percentile for all students in grades 3-8 statewide; orExceeded target by more than 0.5 scaled score pointsCPI of 97.5 or higher; or Met CPI of 90th percentile for all students in grades 5 & 8 statewide; orExceeded CPI target by more than 1.25 pointsMean SGP of 60.0 or higher (reported as Exceeded Typical Growth)Exceeded target by more than 0.5 percentage points; orMet the chronic absenteeism rate of 90th percentile for all students statewideMet the 90th percentile making progress rate within difficulty index quartile; orExceeded making progress rate target by more than 3.0 percentage pointsMet Target(3 Points)Within +/- 0.5 scaled score points of target; or Met scaled score of 90th percentile for the subgroup in grades 3-8 statewide; or Met scaled score of 80th percentile for all students in grades 3-8 statewideWithin +/- 1.25 points of CPI target; or Met CPI of 90th percentile for the group in grades 5 & 8 statewide; orMet CPI of 80th percentile for all students in grades 5 & 8 statewideMean SGP of 50.0 to 59.9 (reported as Typical Growth – High)Within +/- 0.5 percentage points of the target; or Met the chronic absenteeism rate of 80th percentile for all students statewideMet the 80th percentile making progress rate within difficulty index quartile; orWithin +/-3.0 percentage points of making progress rate targetImproved Below Target(2 Points)Improved from prior year up to 0.5 scaled score points below the targetImproved from prior year up to 1.25 CPI points below the target Mean SGP of 40.0 to 49.9 (reported as Typical Growth – Low)Improved from prior year up to 0.5 percentage points below the targetImproved from prior year up to 3.0 percentage points below the targetNo Change(1 Points)No change from prior year; orUp to 0.5 scaled score point decline from prior yearNo change from prior year; orUp to 2.5 CPI point decline from prior yearMean SGP of 30.0 to 39.9 (reported as Low Growth)Up to 0.5 percentage points above prior rateNo change from prior year; orUp to 3.0 percentage point decline from prior year making progress rateDeclined(0 Points)Decline of more than 0.5 scaled score points from prior yearDecline of more than 2.5 CPI points from prior yearMean SGP of 1.0 to 29.9 (reported as Very Low Growth)Increase of more than 0.5 percentage points from prior yearDecline of more than 3.0 percentage points from prior year making progress rateTable A- SEQ Table_A- \* ARABIC 2: Point Assignments for High School GradesMCAS Achievement (ELA, Math, & Science)(Grade 10) Student Growth (ELA & Math)(Grade 10)Four-Year Cohort Graduation RateExtended Engagement RateAnnual Dropout RateAdvanced Coursework Completion Rate(Grades 11-12)Chronic Absenteeism Rate(Grades 9-12)Progress Toward English Language Proficiency(Grades 9-12)Exceeded Target(4 Points)CPI of 97.5 or higher; or Met CPI of 90th percentile for all students in grade 10 category statewide; orExceeded CPI target by more than 1.25 pointsMean SGP of 60.0 or higher (reported as Exceeded Typical Growth)Exceeded target by more than 0.5 percentage points; orMet the four-year cohort graduation rate of 90th percentile for all students statewideExceeded target by more than 0.5 percentage points; orMet the extended engagement rate of 90th percentile for all students statewideDropout rate of 0.0 percent; orReduced dropout rate by 20 percent or more from previous yearExceeded target by more than 1.0 percentage points; orMet the advanced coursework completion rate of 90th percentile for all students statewideExceeded target by more than 0.5 percentage points; orMet the chronic absenteeism rate of 90th percentile for all students statewideMet the 90th percentile making progress rate within difficulty index quartile; orExceeded making progress rate target by more than 3.0 percentage pointsMet Target(3 Points)Within +/- 1.25 points of CPI target; or Met CPI of 90th percentile for the group in grade 10 statewide; orMet CPI of 80th percentile for all students in grade 10 statewideMean SGP of 50.0 to 59.9 (reported as Typical Growth – High)Four-year cohort graduation rate of 95.0 percent or higher; orWithin +/- 0.5 percentage points of the targetExtended engagement rate of 95.0 percent or higher; or Within +/- 0.5 percentage points of the targetDropout rate equal to the target; orDropout rate of 1.0 percent or less (but greater than 0.0 percent); or Reduced dropout rate by 10.0 percent or more (up to 20.0 percent) from previous yearWithin +/- 1.0 percentage points of the target; orMet the advanced coursework completion rate of 80th percentile for all students statewideWithin +/- 0.5 percentage points of the target; orMet the chronic absenteeism rate of 80th percentile for all students statewideMet the 80th percentile making progress rate within difficulty index quartile; orWithin +/-3.0 percentage points of making progress rate targetMCASAchievement(ELA, Math, & Science)(Grade 10)StudentGrowth(ELA & Math)(Grade 10)Four-Year Cohort Graduation RateExtended Engagement RateAnnual Dropout RateAdvanced Coursework Completion Rate(Grades 11-12)Chronic Absenteeism Rate(Grades 9-12)Progress Toward English Language Proficiency(Grades 9-12)Improved Below Target(2 Points)Improved from prior year up to 1.25 CPI points below the targetMean SGP of 40.0 to 49.9 (reported as Typical Growth – Low)Improved from prior year up to 0.5 percentage points below the targetImproved from prior year up to 0.5 percentage points below the targetDropout rate greater than 1.0 percent, & reduced rate by 5.0 percent or more (up to 10.0 percent)Improved from prior year up to 1.0 percentage points below the targetImproved from prior year up to 0.5 percentage points below the targetImproved from prior year up to 3.0 percentage points below the targetNo Change(1 Points)No change from prior year; orUp to 2.5 CPI point decline from prior yearMean SGP of 30.0 to 39.9 (reported as Low Growth)Up to 0.5 percentage points below prior four-year rateUp to 0.5 percentage points below prior rateDropout rate greater than 1.0 percent, & reduced rate by up to 5.0 percent from previous year; orDropout rate greater than 1.0 percent & no more than 5.0 percent increase from previous yearUp to 1.0 percentage points below prior year rateUp to 0.5 percentage points above prior rateNo change from prior year; orUp to 3.0 percentage point decline from prior year making progress rateDeclined(0 Points)Decline of more than 2.5 CPI points from prior yearMean SGP of 1.0 to 29.9 (reported as Very Low Growth)Decline of more than 0.5 percentage points from prior yearDecline of more than 0.5 percentage points from prior yearDropout rate greater than 1.0 percent, & more than 5.0 percent increase from previous year’s rateDecline of more than 1.0 percentage points from prior yearIncrease of more than 0.5 percentage points from prior yearDecline of more than 3.0 percentage points from prior year making progress rate ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- sample test questions test 1 university of florida
- westerville city school district
- gre practice test 1 evaluating your performance
- summary of 2019 mcas state results
- hrp 262 pre test stanford university
- 2019 accountability points criteria
- inspecting outcomes using data primary
- lynden haley s professional portfolio home
- standard deviation standard score correspondence
Related searches
- tea accountability ratings 2018
- tea accountability reports
- mde accountability scorecard
- 2018 tea accountability reports
- mde accountability model
- texas education agency accountability ratings
- tea accountability results
- tea 2019 accountability ratings
- 2018 accountability rating system
- texas school accountability grades
- texas school accountability ratings
- tea accountability 2019