Grading Rubric for PowerPoint Presentation



Grading Rubric for Individual Case Analysis – 100 point Max

CATEGORY – 20 pts |3 |2 |1 |0 |Points | |Effectiveness

(20 pts) |Submission includes excellent organization report with introduction, main body, and conclusion. Submissions are easy to understand and “flow” logically and professionally. Content is extremely persuasive and current management theories are fully explored and referenced. |Submission has good organization, with relevant report format. Submissions are somewhat easy to understand and there is a good “flow” from one paragraph to the next. Content is acceptable for credit. |Submission has organization but needs work and format meets minimum requirements. Reports are confusing to understand direction and content. Theories are not explored and thought process is disjointed. Minimum effort is involved |Submission is lacking any formal structure. Paragraphs are not detailed out and there is a complete breakdown in the writing process.

Report does not meet the bare minimum requirement. Submission falls below bare minimum expectations. | | |Originality

(20 pts) |Content is original with constructive opinions and direction. Content is researched and evaluated to form a well written submission. Submissions are min of 3 pages of original text. |Content is somewhat original with some duplication. There is some research but more could be done. Submissions are 1-2 pages or original text. |Content lacks originality and does not have constructive opinions. Submission meets bare minimum but more work needs to be completed for better cohesion and understanding. |Content is NOT original and there is a great deal of duplication. No research was completed and overall submission falls below the minimum expectation marker. | | |Spelling and Grammar

(20 pts) |Submission has no spelling and grammatical errors. All content is reviewed and checked before submitting. |Submission has 1-2 misspellings, and 1-2 grammatical errors. Submission is still effective. There is some review before submitting |Submission has multiple spelling and grammatical errors which impeded the readers understanding. Lack of review before submitting |Submission cannot be graded due to spelling and grammatical errors. Submission falls below bare minimum expectations. | | |Theories and Insight

(20 pts) |Submission has an excellent use of current theories pertaining to the topic. Excellent insight into the topic. All areas are researched and all citations are in correct APA format with the final sheet being “Reference” sheet. |Submission has some theoretical input and there is adequate research supporting viewpoints. Most citations are correctly referenced in APA with “Reference” sheet at the end. |Submission has no theoretical base and very little research has been completed. References are not cited properly in APA format and there is a clear lack of effort and understanding. |Submission lacks any formal format. There is no theoretical support, no citations and no references. Submission falls below bare minimum expectations. | | |Sources

(20 pts) |All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in APA format. Submissions have a minimum of 3 valid sources (article, website, book, etc) used |Some sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented. There are 2 valid sources (article, website, book, etc) used. |Sources are not cited and documented properly. There is a lack of understanding on expectations and APA format. |Submission falls below bare minimum expectations. | | |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download