Southeastern Louisiana University



Love Over Death (Scene 7)

Alive

There were disagreements and arguments during their stay on the glacier but nothing was strong enough to break the bond they formed while praying together.

Felt solidarity with themselves, God, and the friends who had died and became their sustenance.

Miracle in the Andes

Death has an opposite but the opposite of death isn't living it is love.

Love as a motivator

King Edward VIII

King of England in England 1900's

Popular, good looking, powerful.

Sacrificed everything for Wallis Simpson.

2x divorcee which at the time was a huge scandle in high society

Love is one of the strongest forces for compelling sacrifices.

Nando Parrado

The love of his father drove him to risk his own life.

Climbed the mountain and endured everything thrown at him in order to return to his family.

Love of family, group, or nation are all equally capable of driving someone to self-sacrificing behavior.

Fairchild Survivors

The strong bond they formed help them from splintering into factions driven by self interest.

While the individuals frequently took advantage of the system when they saw an opportunity they never let this get in the way of the greater good of the group.

Love of the group remained stronger than personal fear.

Modern Examples

Running into a burning building to save a loved one, dying for your country, and suicide bombing

All of these are strong examples of how strong emotional attachments to “our people” or the “us” in the us vs them scenario can override our drive for self preservation.

One of the best ways to compel humans to sacrifice themselves for other is to get them to love those they are sacrificing themselves for.

Ritual plays a large role in forming this bond of love

Ginges, Hansen, & Norenzayan (2009)

Psychologists from the University of British Columbia

Cross cultural study investigating the phenomenon known as “parochial altruism”

Parochial Altruism: Self-sacrificing act made on behalf of one's group, an extreme form of which involves aggression or violence against an out-group.

Suicide bombings, kamikaze pilots, the 300 Spartans at Thermopylae, the French resistance during Nazi occupation.

Suicide bombing

Many believe religion to be the prime motivator (rewards in the afterlife)

An alternative explanation is “coalitional commitment” which is the powerful emotional attachment among group members

Group members see dying as preferable to letting the group down.

Belief and Coalitional commitment were measured via surveys of people's self-reported frequency of both praying (religious indicator) and measures of their support for parochial altruism.

Surveys were conducted among Palestinian Muslims, Indonesian Muslims, Mexican Catholics, British Protestants, Russian Orthodox, Israeli Jews, and Indian Hindus.

Among every group attendance to worship, not frequency of prayer, predicted support of parochial altruism.

Frequency of prayer showed a negative correlation with support of parochial altruism among Indonesian Muslims. (aka the more devoted members of this group were less likely to support parochial altruism)

All indicates that it is group rituals that build the emotional attachment more so than religious devotion.

Also conducted an experimental manipulation with Jewish settlers in the Gaza or the West Bank.

Primed by either a synagogue reminder or a prayer reminder.

Subjects were asked if they thought the 1994 attack on a mosque to be “extremely heroic”

In the synagogue reminder condition 23% agreed while in the prayer condition only 6% agreed.

Suggests that when group ritual behavior is fresh in their minds they tend to be more sympathetic to parochial altruism.

Religion is not unique in this ability to bond people. Fraternities/Sororities, military service, and social/political movements all function under the same basic principles.

In-Group Love vs Out-Group Hate

How do we know that this behavior is motivated by love for the “us” rather than hatred for the “them”?

Several studies have shown that ritualized group actions can produce greater cooperation, compassion, and altruism.

Muscular bonding in dance, chanting, marching.

Studies have shown that these can enhance liking, cooperation, and compassion

Can also increase the endurance and pain tolerance

Wiltermuth and Heath (2009) experimentally manipulated ritual activity and measured prosocial behavior. Participants engaged in synchronous movements, non synchronous movements, or no movements at all. They then played a economic game involving trust and cooperation. The results were as expected with group 1 being highest in cooperation and trust. And group 3 being the lowest.

There is evidence to show that when someone matches another's physical actions during a conversation their likability rating tends to go up.

Finger taping in/out of sync study. Those who tapped in sync reported greater liking for one another and greater perceived similarity. In the 2nd stage participants were informed that the other participant was assigned a task and they could choose to be altruistic and help. Those who were in sync in the 1st stage extended greater altruism.

Increased pain threshold study. Row teams rowing in sync had higher pain thresholds than those rowing independently.

Economic game

Two players. Each gets $10. They can choose to keep as much as they want or give as much as they want to the other player. Any money given is doubled. So if you give $1 you now have $9 and they get $2. The most beneficial to BOTH is to give all $10 and each participant gets $20. But if you do not trust the other individual you could keep all $10 and hope they give anything which would put you ahead.

The amount given was the index of cooperation

Participants were more generous to in-group members than out-group members.

In some cases males were shown to be cooperative to fellow group members even when they don't expect reciprocity.

The study also showed that participants were less cooperative with out-group players than they were with strangers (participants whose group affiliation was unknown)

Study showed that there was no correlation between in-group trust and out-group distrust. Strangers and out-group members were both initially approached with caution. This could quickly lead to hate.

Prayer Against the Mountain

Rosary

Most powerful mountain ritual

Studies have shown that reciting the rosary can syncronize breathing and heart rhythms

Releases endorphins

Releases AVP (arginine vasopresin) which decreases self-perceived fatigue and increases positive affect

Formed a bond that could keep the group together despite personal fear

The religious significance can not be ignored

Research has shown that the pain tolerance of religious individuals is significantly higher than non religious individuals (done by shocking participants while religious ones looked at a religious image and non religious looked at a non religious image.)

Brain activity showed the religious participants had higher levels of activity in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex which modulates pain among other things.

The Urgency of Ritual

Miracle in the Andes

Survivors were characterized as saints which Nando Perrado vehemently rejects.

All were selfish and trying to better their own situation even at the expense of others. He believes the only thing that saved them was their collective concern outweighing their natural instincts.

Natural Self-Interest vs Collective Concern

South African Venda people

Studied by ethnomusicologist John Blacking

Venda people have a ritual of communal dancing and music making.

Blacking observed that during times of plenty these rituals were more common than during times of hardships.

Concluded that the reason they do this is that when the individuals/small groups don't think they need the group is when they need reminders of how important the group is.

Ultimately communal ritual is necessary to revitalize social commitment (such as the rosary)

The Evolution of Ritual

Primates

Highly social and possess a wide array of ritualized actions

Baboon “scrotum grasp”

Foraging chimps embrace, kiss, groom, and engage in group pant-hooting when they reunite

When chimps desire reconciliation after a fight the loser uses submissive bows and begging gestures and the winner embraces and kisses the loser.

Humans

Differ from primates in two ways.

Are able to move in coordinated and synchronized ways

Construct ritualized gestures and link them into behavioral sequences.

Such as doing something a specific way even when it is not necessary to achieve the goal. (ritualized object washing)

Learning to Move Together

Synchronicity

Pendulums in close physical proximity will, over time, become synced but if moved away from each other will lose their synchronicity. (physical system)

Caused by perturbations traveling through the air or wall

Women will sync menstrual cycles if they live together. (biological system)

Caused by pheromones

Precedence Effect

Commonly occurs when one animal vocalized and another matches the first to intensify the signal (if working together) or to mask it (if competing).

Even if they are working together it is still a competitive action. The group of males are working together against out-group males.

Fireflies, frogs, crickets, and dolphins all commonly show these activities.

These all serve as examples of physical and biological systems naturally falling into sync.

What is rare or nonexistant outside of humans is intentional cooperative synchrony. (aka intentionally matching movements to bond emotionally.

Some higher order primates show they are close to the threshold of intentional cooperative synchrony.

Gibbon pairs often engage in a call-and-response duet that is thought to serve as a way of strengthening their bond.

Chimps and Bonobos also engage in group pant-hooting during territorial defense or reuniting after foraging. Which may serve to demonstrate group bond.

The difference in these actions and humans I that they are only vocal in their synchronicity.

The only example of group motor synchrony among primates is a single account by Wolfgang Kohler who observed that chimps at his research station began to “march in an orderly fashion in a single file line around and around the post.. a roughly approximate rhythm developed and they tended to keep time with one another”

Believed to be a result of emulating humans.

Kohler encouraged this by stamping his foot rhythmically but once he stopped they would also stop.

Stone Tools and the Evolution of Motor Control

Early Development

Toolmaking is likely what provided the selection pressure necessary

In simple terms coordinated motor movements requires one to make their body do what they observe another's body doing.

Toolmaking caused a drastic increase in hominin motor control. This was likely made possible by becoming bipedal and being able to visually guide hand movements as well as bringing natural hand movements into conscious awareness/control.

Stone tool making still took around 600k years to emerge after bipedalism but it is assumed that before stone they were making tools out of perishable materials that simply could not survive in the archeological record.

Chimps are seen to fashion tools out of organic matter

Oldowan Tools

Wild apes do not make tools comparable to the Oldowan tools

Oldowan tools were nothing but stone flakes that show signs of deliberate creation though specific striking motions.

Apes in captivity have been taught to make Oldowan-like tools but they do not use the same techniques as hominins.

This does show that the capabilities are not far from what modern apes are capable of

While the Oldowan technique involves striking a core stone with a hammer stone to create sharp flakes when apes are taught to make flakes they do so by throwing the core stone against the ground or wall.

Oldowan tool making likely evolved from using a rock to crack open nuts which wild chimps are known to do.

Acheulean tools & the Hand Axe

While Oldowan tools mark a significant step in our evolution they are not distinct. One could mix in with the gravel in the drive way and never be noticed.

900k years after the emergence of Oldowan tools the Acheulean tools emerged.

Recognizable as primitive modern tools

Much more emphasis on shape

Most significant and recognizable tool in the Acheulean tool kit was the hand axe.

Within 1.2 million years of their emergence hand axes changed from a rough tool to a symmetrical work of art that showed great care and skill.

While a Oldowan flake could be crafted in a couple minutes a hand axe could take months of practice to make and take a large amount of time to craft once the skills were acquired through trial and error which would have lead to many unusable failures.

This was also believed to be a fairly hazardous activity. Some scientists believe that injuries due to tool making were likely one of the most common “occupational hazards” at the time.

Brain imagine studies show that the cognitive functions required to make a hand axe are significantly greater than those needed to make an Oldowan flake.

Another significant aspect is that the hand axe was likely the first tool primitive man viewed as a tool. They kept it with them and treated it with care and a certain degree of reverence. The Oldowan flake on the other hand was something that was created on the spot for a specific purpose than discarded.

Hand Axe & Active Teaching

Due to the Hand Axe's complex nature it is believed that for these skills to develop and advance active teaching must have took place.

Active teaching is the idea that the teacher directly interacts with the learner to teach a skill (such as slowly demonstrating or using vocalizations to bring attention to certain critical actions)

Active teaching is nonexistent among nonhuman primates who only engage in imitation/emulation (aka they learn through observing)

Active teaching is discussed in previous chapters as motionese which human adults use to teach behavioral skills to children. This is basically a ritualized behavior.

One tribe in New Guinea make stone hand axes. Only adult males craft these tools and the male children are taught to make them through a 10+ year apprenticeship with an adult male which starts around age twelve.

A tribe from Khambat, India also engages in a similar apprenticeship training which begins at age 10-12 and lasts for 3-10 years.

In both cases oral and gestural instruction takes place to transmit the skills necessary.

Gesture Without Purpose

In Oldowan tool making a simple action makes a useful tool (a sharp cutting edge) and thus the action's purpose is easily understood though passive learning (a novice observes a adult strike one stone with another and then pick up the flake created, inspect it's sharpness, and begin cutting hide)

In Acheulean hand axe making there are so many actions that with passive learning would not make sense (repeated inspection, rotating, flaking, etc) thus active learning must have taken place to teach the novice how to tell if their actions were leading to the desired end result.

There are three levels of tool use among chimps

Level 1 is a simple tool use to produce a desired effect (such as chimps poking sticks into ant hills to remove ants to eat)

Level 2 is when two tools are used in a more complex way (such as placing a nut on a rock and using another rock to smash it) the 1st action taken (placing the nut on the anvil rock) does not in and of itself produce a desired result.

Level 3 is when a third tool is used (such as placing a wedge under the anvil rock to strengthen it)

This all shows that chimps have at least a small capacity to chain together actions that do not individually produce a result in order to achieve a goal.

One significant difference between hominin tool making and chimp tool making is that the chimps goal (the nut) is within sight throughout the whole process. In hominin tool making, especially once they began making composite tools, could take hours or days to accomplish.

Homo sapiens were highly skilled tool makers which were capable of making complex adhesives which were used to bind their composite tools together.

These actions had to become highly ritualized due to their complexity as well as their seperation from the end result.

A modern example would be miming drinking from a bottle to a bartender to signal that you would like another beer or giving someone the finger.

From Ritualized Action to Ritual

The Rise Of Rituals

By around 500,000 to 300,000 YBP it is evident that our ancestors had the mental and physical capabilities to ritualize actions.

They had to be able to actively teach tool making techniques in order to pass these complicated skills down from generation to generation

They must also have been able to understand a rituals importance even when the reward of completing it was greatly removed from the action itself (such as making the glue for the tools)

It is believed that by this time they would have been capable of coordinating the haka ritual dance.

The biggest question is would they. Even if they were capable of rituals what would motivate them to engage in human level rituals. Aka those beyond just spontaneous responses (such as cheering/dancing when something good happens)

Two anthropologists (Power and Knight) propose that true human rituals appeared around the same time ornate tools appeared (500,000 to 250,000 YBP)

Around this same time brain size was increasing which would have led to more helpless children at birth. This would lead to the mothers being more and more dependent on the father for survival which could have lead to ritual dance to ensure fidelity.

The idea being that the young women would be initiated into the woman social group by dancing which would bond them.

The evidence Power and Knight use for this hypothesis is the increase of mineral pigments and the presence of female initiating ceremonies in traditional societies.

This is strong evidence due to tying directly to reproductive success.

Ritual Objects

Going back to the modern bar example another way to signal that you want another beer could be pointing to the empty beer bottle in your hand. Which would mean the empty beer bottle is a object representing a desire.

Since it is believed hand axes were seen as distinct “tool” objects (unlike the flakes) then it could have been possible for the hand axe to represent different desires. Such as raising their axe in the air to represent the desire to go on a hunt for food.

At this time it hand axes could have taken on a family heirloom quality. Passed from father to son. The problem with this is there is not any solid evidence for it.

The first real evidence of ritualized behavior is from 160,000 YBP where some defleshed Homo sapien skulls were found in Herto, Ethiopia. Due to the poor return of nutrition vs the labor required to deflesh a skull it is believed that this was done for ritual purposes.

The skulls also show signs of polishing.

Around 35,000 to 10,000 YBP a wide variety of what looks like ornamental/ceremonial artifacts appear.

Antler batons, half human/half animal carvings, drawings, figurines, and blades that would serve no practical purpose.

One site in Saint-Germain-la-Riviere (France) contained a woman buried with a great many deer-tooth ornaments which originated hundreds of miles from the burial sight. This shows that a great amount of effort was taken to acquire these for seemingly no other purpose than to bury them with the woman.

Beginning around 70,000 YBP evidence of inergroup trade emerges. While practical items were traded there is also a great deal of evidence to suggest that ornamental/ceremonial items were traded.

This occurred in modern history as well such as Richard Nixon being gifted a pair of pandas during a visit to China. This was reciprocated with a pair of ox.

This is thought to build trust between groups.

Scene 8: Can Roberto Be Trusted?

Roberto Canessa was known as an intense and volatile individual which were seen as virtues on the rugby field but were “trying and unpredictable” off of it.

It seems he also knew how to motivate someone in tough times. During the final expedition out of the Andes at a low point in morale Canessa pointed to the belt he was wearing (which belonged to Parrado's now deceased best friend Panchito) and said “He was your best friend. Now I am your best friend”

Roberto Canessa was one of the most pivotal characters in the group's success. His impact was widespread as seen in his willingness to fill any and every role among the group even if he was not invited to do so.

Spent time with the medical crew, inventing tools, on the expeditionary crew, and discussing theology and philosophy.

Due to his volatile nature some worried about trusting him Nando Parrado most of all.

When Parrado needed a partner to climb out of the mountain he went to Canessa. They were not the closest friends prior to the crash and Parrado worried that if Canessa was not controlled and directed their energy could be wasted.

Famous personal relics have been seen throughout history and believed to gain some power due to their association with the individual.

The bones of saints, the spinters from the true cross, the Spear of Destiny (spear that pierced Jesus on the cross), Muhummad's cloak, etc.

In the Iliad Achilles's armor is shown to be a relic. The armor was believed to be enchanted due to being forged by the god Hehaestus as well as from being worn by the son of a goddess. The armor was believed to bestow divine protection as well as give the wearer the fighting prowess of Achilles. The armor was also thought to bestow a responsibility on the wearer to follow Achilles' wishes.

This is the same as a king wearing the royal crown. It bestows power and authority but it also makes the wearer responsibility for all that occurs in his kingdom as long as he wears it. He could be immortalized in history for elevating his kingdom or he could be immortalized as the one who oversaw the downfall of his empire. This is seen when Augustus is known as the emperor who oversaw the fall of the Roman Empire.

When Canessa became aware of the hesitation from the others to place his trust in them he turned to ritual to earn their trust. He acquired and wore Panchito's belt.

While he may have worn the belt simply due to weight loss originally he saw the significance of the belt during their final trek and called attention to this.

On the 9th day when Canessa collapsed Parrado took his pack and continued on keeping an eye on Canessa struggling to keep going.

Parrado commented that nothing but “stubbornness and the sheer power of his will” was Canessa able to keep going.

QUESTIONS

Define and give 2 examples of Parochial Altruism.

We discussed several animals who seem to engage in synchronous actions. Discuss why these are not truly synchronous actions in the way humans are able to synchronize movements.

There are two types of systems discussed that can call into sync. List them and give an example of each

Discuss the differences between a Oldowan flake and a Acheulean hand axe.

List the three levels of tools used by wild chimps and give an example of each.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download