ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS
ACUTE RHINOSINUSITIS
HUNTER A. HOOVER, M.D.
CHARLOTTE EYE EAR NOSE AND THROAT ASSOCIATES, P.A.
Viral Rhinosinusitis − the common cold
1. History
(a) Duration of symptoms
− improving (but not necessarily resolved) after 7-10 days
(b) Pattern of symptoms
− initially, sore throat (with fever and myalgia)
− then, nasal symptoms (may have purulence for a few days)
− finally, cough (which usually lasts weeks)
2. Treatment
(a) Antihistamines
− first generation antihistamines help
− because of their anticholinergic activity
− alkylamines produce the least sedation and most anticholinergic activity
− ex: chlorpheniramine and brompheniramine
− majority of OTC meds contain chlorpheniramine
− ex: Chlor-Trimeton, Comtrex, Contac, Pediacare
− antihistamines in tannate form are dosed BID, even in suspension form
− ex. chlorpheniramine tannate (with phenylephrine tannate) in Rynatan susp.
(b) Methscopolamine nitrate
− antisecretory agent, so causes drying of secretions
− including saliva
− does not significantly cross blood brain barrier
− so sedation is unlikely
− may be combined with:
− decongestant (ex. AlleRx-D)
− decongestant in morning and antihistamine/decongestant in evening
(AlleRx Dose Pack & AlleRx-PE Dose Pack…available in 10 & 30 day packs)
− antihistamine (ex. AlleRx DF Dose Pack)
− antihistamine/decongestant (ex. Dallergy)
(c) Anticholinergic spray
− Atrovent 0.06% indicated for rhinorrhea of colds
− in adults and children 6 years and up
(d) Oral decongestants
− pseudoephedrine is probably superior to phenylephrine
− pseudoephedrine tannate and phenylephrine tannate are dosed BID, even in suspension
− does not seem to worsen controlled hypertension
(e) Topical decongestants
− in adults, oxymetazoline (Afrin) BID or phenylephrine (Neo-Synephrine) QID
− in children 2-6 years old, consider prescription for tetrahydrozoline (Tyzine) QID
− or, in select cases, diluted Afrin
− more effective with less side effects than oral decongestants
− must emphasize need to limit duration of use to 5 days or less
(f) Expectorants
− unlikely benefit, since secretions typically not thick
(g) Antitussives
− limited benefit
(h) Combination products
− antihistamine/decongestant combinations seem to have the most benefit
− Ryna-12 is a liquid combination dosed b.i.d.
− must weigh benefit against side effects (sedation, insomnia, urinary retention, etc.)
(i) Zinc gluconate lozenges
− theoretic mechanism of action is local, not systemic
− dissolve one lozenge in mouth every 2 hours while awake beginning within 24
hours of onset of cold
− high incidence of nausea and bad taste
− conflicting studies as to effectiveness
(j) Zinc nasal swabs and spray
− marketed as Zicam cold remedy swabs and spray
− removed from market due to FDA concerns
− regarding possible loss of sense of smell
(k) No antibiotics
− antibiotics have only a small chance of be beneficial
− in adults, only 1% of colds become bacterial sinusitis
− in children, only 0.5-5% of colds become bacterial sinusitis
− the small chance of preventing a bacterial infection must be weighed against
− increased incidence of developing resistant bacteria
− potential side effects of the antibiotic
− studies substantiate that patient satisfaction can be achieved without prescribing antibiotics
Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
1. History
− Factors to consider:
(a) duration of symptoms
− lasting at least 7-10 days
(b) persistency of symptoms
− not improving after 7-10 days
(c) pattern of symptoms
− worsening of symptoms after initial improvement (i.e “double sickening”)
d) type of symptoms
− persistent purulent nasal discharge
− facial pain/pressure
− especially localized facial pain and/or maxillary teeth pain
− nasal obstruction
− fever beyond the first few days
− Diagnostic guidelines (Otol-HNS 2007;137:S1-S31)
(a) symptoms persisting more than 10 days and including:
- purulent nasal discharge, and
- nasal obstruction, or facial pain
(b) symptoms worsening after initial improvement (i.e “double sickening”)
− even if less than 10 days
2. Physical Exam
(a) Anterior rhinoscopy
− pus in the nasal cavity is supportive, but not conclusive, for bacterial infection
− purulent drainage may also be seen in oropharynx
(b) Percussion (i.e. tap tenderness)
− not helpful, unless definitely abnormal
(c) Transillumination
− in adults, helpful if done with proper technique and if definitely normal or abnormal
− in children, no proven benefit
(d) Nasal endoscopy
− helpful but requires expertise, special equipment, and patient cooperation
3. X-Ray
(a) Plain films
− correspond to maxillary sinus aspirate in only 70% of cases
− findings of “air-fluid level” and “maxillary opacification” are relatively specific for bacterial maxillary sinusitis
− including the finding of “mucosal thickening” increases the sensitivity, but
decreases the specificity of plain films
− the absence of all three of these x-ray findings strongly suggests against
bacterial maxillary sinusitis
−extremely poor in evaluating the ethmoid sinuses
− a normal plain film may rule out maxillary sinusitis, but not ethmoid sinusitis
(b) CT
− “gold standard” for detecting inflammation, but not necessarily a bacterial infection
− 90% of viral infections have abnormal mucosal thickening on a sinus CT
− 30% of reportedly asymptomatic patients have abnormal findings on a sinus CT
4. Antibiotic Treatment
(a) Need for antibiotics
− spontaneous resolution rate of clinically determined sinusitis is around 66%
− benefits of antibiotic:
− more rapid resolution of symptoms
− 50% reduction in clinical failures
− recent position paper (Otol-HNS 2007; 137:S1-S31) endorsed watchful waiting as an
option (not recommendation) if:
− mild illness
− assurance of follow-up
(b) Choice of antibiotics
− first line:
− pediatric…amoxicillin 80 mg/kg/day divided BID
− take child’s weight in pounds
− double it
− add a zero
− give that dose BID
− adult…amoxicillin 500 mg three tablets BID
− second line (in order of efficacy):
− Avelox / Levaquin
− Augmentin XR and ES
− Augmentin 875
− Vantin / Omnicef / Ceftin
(c) Duration of antibiotics
− short course therapy of 5 days may be adequate for most routine cases
− as supported by “double tap studies”
− more prolonged courses may be warranted for chronic and/or recurrent cases
5. Adjunctive Treatment
(a) Topical decongestant
− refer to “Viral Rhinosinusitis” section
(b) Oral decongestant
− refer to “Viral Rhinosinusitis” section
(c) Antihistamine
− usually not necessary because most cases of sinusitis follow a “cold”, not allergies
− if used, select a second generation one to avoid anti-cholinergic drying effects
− unlike colds where first generation antihistamines should be used
(d) Expectorant
− for guaifenesin to be effective, need maximum dosing
− 2-6 years old……total daily dose of 600 mg
− 6-12 years old..…total daily dose of 1200 mg
− 12 years and up…total daily dose of 2400 mg
− products that provide 2400 mg for a day
− Robitussin (guaifenesin 100 mg/5 cc) 30 cc QID
− Mucinex (guaifenesin 600 mg) 2 tabs BID
− generic guaifenesin tabs (400 mg) 2 tabs TID
− immediate release and least expensive
(e) Saline wash
− instead of 1-2 sprays, “wash” with
− multiple squirts from OTC nasal spray container
− lavage bottle (ex. )
− neti pot
− commercial canisters which “wash”
− Simply Saline (available at most drugstores)…either normal or hypertonic saline
− ENTsol spray (available at )...hypertonic saline
− can make hypertonic saline, by adding
− 1 heaping teaspoon of Kosher or canning/pickling salt
− plus a pinch of baking soda
− into 8 ounces of distilled water
(f) Topical nasal steroid sprays
− appear safe to use even in the presence of a bacterial infection
− Cochrane review in 2007 supports their use
(g) Oral steroids
− a consideration for:
− severe sinusitis with impending complication
− persisting sinusitis despite appropriate antibiotic treatment
− most physiologic to use orally only once a day in the morning
− taper is probably not necessary if steroid course is 10 days or less
Allergic Rhinitis
1. History
-distinction from viral rhinitis:
-fever and other systemic symptoms suggest against allergy
-itching of nose and eyes are suggestive of allergy
-allergy symptoms are chronic
− often lasting longer than 7-10 days
-allergy symptoms are recurrent
− often in a predictable pattern based on change in environment
− “frequent colds” may be allergic rhinitis
-correlation with allergy testing
-results of allergy tests need to be consistent with timing of symptoms
2. Avoidance
-if symptoms worse during pollen seasons
-keep windows closed and allow AC to filter out the pollens
-if symptoms are perennial (i.e. possible dust mite allergy)
-use pillow and mattress mite-proof encasings
-use a vacuum with HEPA filtration or special allergy bags on a weekly basis
-keep humidity less than 50%
-exterminate any cockroaches
-if symptoms worse with animal exposure
-ideally, get rid of offending pet
-more realistically, keep pet out of patient’s bedroom, and
place free-standing HEPA air cleaner in patient’s bedroom
3. Nasal steroid sprays
-most effective allergy medicine available
-multiple trials show superior efficacy to oral antihistamines, Astelin, Singulair, etc.
-especially for the symptom of congestion
-most effective if used on a daily basis
-due to delayed onset of action
-but effective even with prn use
-current studies suggest excellent long-term safety profile
-clinical trials suggest equal efficacy between all nasal steroid sprays
-compliance is the key
-patients prefer unscented sprays
-Nasonex, Nasacort, Rhinocort, Omnaris and Veramyst (lowest volume of spray)
-patients prefer low co-pay
-Flonase is generic (but is scented)
-age indications
-Nasonex , Nasacort-AQ and Veramyst: 2 years and up
-Flonase: 4 years and up
-Rhinocort Aqua and Omnaris: 6 years and up
-technique of administering may decrease incidence of epistaxis
-avoid spraying towards the septum
4. First generation oral antihistamines
-studies show patients may have psychomotor impairment
-even without subjective sedation
-anticholinergic side effects are possible
-dry mouth, blurring of vision, urinary retention, etc.
5. Second generation oral antihistamines
-no anticholinergic side effects
-so no dry mouth nor urinary retention side effects
-so no benefit for rhinorrhea of colds or vasomotor rhinitis
-no significant decongestant properties
-so more beneficial for “runners” than “blockers”
-Cetirizine (Zyrtec)
-studies suggest superior efficacy
-low-sedating (not non-sedating)
-requires warning regarding driving and use with alcohol
-generic OTC is relatively inexpensive
-Levocetirizine (Xyzal)
-clinical trials showing superior efficacy to Zyrtec are lacking
-low-sedating (not non-sedating)
-requires warning regarding driving and use with alcohol
-Loratadine (Claritin)
-may not be as effective as other antihistamines
-generic OTC is relatively inexpensive
-Desloratadine (Clarinex)
-clinical trials showing superior efficacy to Claritin are lacking
-Fexofenadine (Allegra)
- combines effectiveness and safety
- The Medical Letter: April 30, 2001 and March 18, 2002
-available as a generic
6. Nasal antihistamine spray (Astelin and Astepro)
-indicated both for allergic and non-allergic rhinitis
-poor masking of the placebo may explain Astelin’s “efficacy” for non-allergic rhinitis
-bitter taste
-low sedating (not non-sedating)
-requires warning regarding driving and use with alcohol
7. Leukotriene receptor antagonist (Singulair)
-theoretically, should relieve congestion better than antihistamines
-however, not substantiated by clinical trials
-theoretically, combining antihistamine with leukotriene antagonist should be additive
-however, not substantiated by most clinical trials
-also indicated for asthma
-so may be a good option for patient with asthma and allergic rhinitis
8. Cromolyn sodium spray (Nasalcrom)
-OTC
-excellent safety profile, even in pregnancy
-frequent dosing required (t.i.d.-q.i.d.)
9. Immunotherapy
-subcutaneous injection of the antigens to which the patient is allergic
-begin at a low dose and gradually increase up to a long-term maintenance dose
-alters patient’s immune system
-so that their immune system no longer over-reacts to harmless environmental substances
-advantages
-addressing the underlying etiology (i.e. the immune system)
-outcome studies show better symptom control as compared to medications alone
-disadvantages
-potential for anaphylaxis
-20% of patients do not respond
-if respond, usually have to continue shots for 3 years or more
09/2010
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- acute viral conjunctivitis contagious
- acute myocardial ischemia definition
- diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction
- chronic infarct vs acute infarct
- acute complex regional pain syndrome
- acute myocardial disease
- acute myocardial infarction etiology
- acute myocardial infarction ppt
- acute myocardial ischemia
- acute myocardial infarction medications
- acute myocardial infarction prognosis
- acute myocardial infarction symptoms