Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI)



Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI)

Marilyn Field

Abstract

The aim of this project was to describe the dominant culture type for Unit X through the use of the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI). The analysis was for the purpose of describing and exploring the X organizational culture. The OCAI results will be used as part of a larger effort to diagnose issues and change efforts related to teamwork, management behavior, and leadership and to study issues that may explain the differences among the culture profiles of larger organization. “Uplifting connections associated with interpersonal interactions boost personal physiological health, emotional well-being, and work performance” (Cameron, 2010, p.1). Through the six steps for diagnosing and changing organizational culture recommended by Cameron and Quinn (2006), a plan is developed to increase Clan Culture characteristics and reduce some of the Hierarchy characteristics of the larger organization X’s unit.

Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument

The Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) assesses six important dimensions of an organization’s culture. The organizational leaders are provided a scenario of what characteristics the organization have, their values, and how they operate (Cameron & Quinn, 2006). Leaders are instructed to rate their organizations when answering a series of questions. The assessment consists of six questions; each with four possible answers. The individuals taking the assessment should keep in mind the cultural unit intended for change. Through learning activities, lecture notes, interviews, observations, as well as a literature review, the X unit’s culture is understood by noting the prevailing behaviors, values, and attitudes of the personnel that engender a sense of continuity, commitment, and order within the organization. One should understand the culture taking into consideration store wide behaviors as well as the X specific unit behaviors both are important since one workplace design is not necessarily the best support for differing work cultures. Cameron and Quinn’s diagnostic instrument has demonstrated reliability and validity (Cameron & Ettington, 1988; Lavine, et al, 2008; Trice & Beyer, 1993) and is therefore a useful tool for improving organizational culture.

The present-day definition of organizational culture (OC) includes the daily routines, procedures, and dominant leadership style that characterize an organization’s definition of success. The “Competing Values Framework” was developed by Cameron and Quinn (1999) to conceptualize if an organization has an external focus or a predominant internal focus and if the organization is working towards a flexible and individuality based climate or if it is striving for control and stability. The main focus associated with the culture of an organization is its relationship with organizational performance. The relationship between an organization’s culture and its performance has been empirically studied with mounting evidence to support the linkage between them (Kotter & Heskett, 1992; Wagner & Spencer, 1996).

The dominant culture type for the X personnel was the Hierarchy culture (35%) (See table 1). According to Cameron and Quinn (2006), historically the Hierarchy culture was the ideal form of leadership behavior because standardized rules and procedures make the lines of communication clear leading to an efficient and stable environment. The dominance of the hierarchy culture (35%) indicates that efficiency, structure, and stability are the central themes. Stable environments produced in a hierarchy culture “allow this strategy to be successful, particularly for large and dominant organizations in mature industries” (Duncan, Gintei, & Swayne, 1996, p.2).

Theoretically, company environments are resistant to change, and when in a hierarchal environment, a sub-culture such as the X might feel there is little reason to change. Even though the change process may be easier at the corporate level, the objective of this report is to provide a cultural change technique to address the relationships of the X worker’s and during supervisor’s internal weaknesses and strengths necessary to sustain a competitive advantage. A better approach could have been to survey the workers for their personal insights; however, tentatively these results were based on observations made at the X on three different days and two different shifts of workers. Each group was observed for one hour. Some of the strengths noted during the observations included management experience, financial and administrative support from Wal-Mart Industries, leading-edge technology, and inventory control models.

The degree of the dominant culture type exhibited by X personnel is related to the number of points accumulated in a specific culture type (see figure 1). In the now situation, the Hierarchy culture type exhibited by X personnel is slightly strong (210 points); while in the preferred situation, the Clan culture type is stronger (200 points) (see figure 1). In the case of the dominant Hierarchy culture type exhibited by X personnel in the now situation, a mean score of 35 was considered stronger than a mean score of 22.5 in the preferred situation (see table 1).

When the mean scores of the culture types (Market, Clan, and Adhocracy) are compared with the mean scores of the dominant Hierarchy culture exhibited by X personnel, there is a significant indication that the presence of characteristics associated with the Clan culture are less strong; as evident in the organization mean Clan score of 26.6 (see table 1). To enhance the X toward a Clan culture, the goals should be defined in terms of mutual respect, concern for people, and a healthy internal climate. I would assess how to capitalize on the Clan characteristics while still maintaining the benefits acquired from the existing Hierarchy culture. Also, by ensuring the management personnel are strong advocates for health by actively pursuing optimal health and wellness on a personal level as well as for their employees.

The OCAI indicated a mean score of 16.6 in the Adhocracy Culture quadrant for the X (see table 1). According to Cameron and Quinn (2006), the Adhocracy culture fosters innovation and a more forward-looking organization. They do not imply that Adhocracy means running “amuck”; but rather it means putting dynamism into the company. Although, the current culture of Hierarchy at the X does eliminate useless reporting, procedures and rules, it also creates an atmosphere where the workers are simply working at the X but not necessarily enjoying the workplace experience the way they would if they were in a more motivational and self-managed role.

As demonstrated in figure 1, a consensus is determined that the X's functions on a day-to-day basis in a hierarchal way and the desired future are one of Adhocracy and Clan culture characteristics. According to Cameron and Quinn (2006), the Clan culture has less focus on control and structure and greater emphasis on flexibility. With a Clan culture organization, employees are driven thorough shared goals and causes. Even though the rules exist they are more often communicated socially. The X would benefit from a more inward sense of family with strong loyalty to one another in a more supportive and facilitative manner (preferred Clan culture mean score = 33.6) (See table 1). “In contrast to Hierarchies, clans often have flat organizations with people and teams acting more autonomously” (, 2010, webpage). In moving towards the preferred Clan culture, the X personnel will assist in learning opportunities to promote health and to integrate wellness into key areas of the company (see figure 1). The OCAI will help the unit understand how to streamline efforts to maximize company resources and wellness program development.

The first step for organizational change, according to Cameron and Quinn (2006), is to indentify a set of key individuals in the larger organization who have a good perspective of the overall culture of the organization. Each of these employees will be administered the OCAI, and then they would have meetings on a weekly basis to discuss the consensus. This way each worker is permitted to think deeply about their views. Every month, a Unit Champion would be appointed to ensure that the strategic plan for health is aligned with the corporation’s values, objectives, and strategic focus. Having the X personnel take the OCAI will foster more of a Clan culture because lines of communication will lead to an appreciation for one another’s ideas.

The next (second) step necessary to induce a shift towards Clan and Adhocracy for the X is to focus on the desired outcome. We would do this by having discussions of how things are now separately from how things are with the preferred culture. In other words, what would we need to change? Everyone from counter staff to management will be involved in team meetings. Evidence and rationales will be encouraged to help produce a consensual preferred culture toward which the X must move.

The third step in this process is to determine what the changes will or will not mean for the X. Each member of the team will identify what the positive aspects are by becoming more of a Clan culture. I will remind them that moving forward does not mean that all of the hierarchal characteristics will be abandoned. We would come to a consensus on which attributes should be reduced, and which attributes should be enhanced for the preferred culture. Cameron and Quinn (2006) refer to this as building company character in any organizational change effort and capitalizing on the core competencies by structuring the identity of the business over time. It is important to note that we want to save or preserve the hierarchical characteristics that have proven valuable.

The fourth step in the change process is to develop illustrative stories (Cameron & Quinn, 2006). I would set up a work shop where the X workers could illustrate their behavioral principles, key values, and desired orientation through story telling. Customer relations issues usually provide funny, and some not so funny stories that can convey the desired values and culture that the X unit wants to achieve. There are always morals to every story. Through illustrative and compelling story telling, positive connections can be created to reinforce the X personnel’s resilience and flexibility with a quality learning experience and to foster individual cooperation and commitment. This form of communication will embrace the employee’s “satisfaction from accomplishments and friendships, balanced personal and professional lives, and to have fun in their endeavors” (Mensch, 1999, p.4).

With the fifth step, a strategic action plan is developed now that there is a shared understanding of a change in the company’s organizational culture. The actions and behaviors identified are a necessary part of the cultural change process. According to Sokol (1997), “Although some companies strive to stay on the leading edge of change, others follow at a slower pace and still experience similar tensions as they implement new practices and relationships” (p.3). Cameron and Quinn (2006) list the following suggestion:

• Identify small wins by first finding something easy to change and make small successful steps.

• Generate social support by building coalitions of supporters and empowering them and those affected by the changes.

• Design follow-up and accountability by specifying time frames, reporting events, and mechanisms for ensuring the workers follow thorough on commitments and assignments.

• Provide information and share it on a regular basis as to reduce rumors and ambiguity and open lines of communication.

• Measure the criteria that will indicate successful culture change.

• Create readiness by indentifying the advantages of the future cultural state.

• Explain why change in necessary.

• Hold a funeral for the past to facilitate the transition to a future that will be different.

• Implement a symbolic as well as substantive change to help the X personnel visualize the change with a mental interpretation to rally around.

• Focus on the process of selecting, appraising, and rewarding workers to reflect the preferred change (Cameron & Quinn, 2006).

The final step will be to implement the plan. During this phase, short-term goals complete with time tables will be set. In other words, how the process of change will unfold (Cameron and Quinn, 2006). Task forces will be developed to target the specific themes identified for the preferred Clan culture unit. This part of the process includes creating short-term goals and timetables that will initiate the culture change process. The X team will decide on the goals that need the most attention and will develop a communication model to address the new cultural values. In an article by Quinn (2006) entitled Moments of Greatness, he states “I am hopeful that employees will find pleasure in unleashing their instinctive curiosity and creativity” (p.1).

Lavine, Cameron, and Brumback (2010) suggest incentives for helping company members to feel committed to the new preferred culture. Reinforcing cultural change is a process assisted by individual change. Through, managing teams in the preferred Clan culture facilitate “effective, cohesive, smooth functioning, and high performance teamwork” (Cameron & Quinn, p. 120). Maintaining through group consensus, positive hierarchy characteristics (i.e. helping individuals have a clear understanding of what is expected of them) can accentuate a Clan culture of optimal health and wellness.

Change is an ongoing process of adaptation and adjustment; although they may be small adjustments, they can be frequent and continuous across the many units of personnel within the organization. That means they are able to alter their structure and strategies necessary to facilitate an increase in the growth and enhancement of a Clan culture (Weick, & Quinn, 1999). In order to increase the emphasis in the Clan quadrant for the X, more support and employee involvement must take place. Through the approach of cultural change, specific activities can be implemented in or to deemphasize the hierarchy culture.

This type of culture will promote employees who participate in wellness programs to be more psychologically and physically fit thereby, reducing organizational cost (Parks & Steelman, 2008). Cameron and Quinn (2006) discuss changing the culture requires that a multitude of cultural elements need to be identified and altered. The OCAI is a useful method for identifying what needs to change in the company’s culture through a process of dialogue among the people charged with starting and managing the change (Cameron & Quinn). In order to increase the emphasis in the Clan quadrant for the X, more support and employee involvement must take place. A Clan culture can assist the X workers to “maintain a separation between the idea of an authentic self and the idea of a corporate self” (Johnson et al., p.67), thus creating an innovative team approach for top quality work performance. “A change in culture, in the end, depends on the implementation of behaviors by individuals in the organization that reinforce the new cultural values and are consistent with them” (Cameron & Quinn, 2006, p.117). Through this approach of cultural change, specific activities can be implemented to increase a Clan culture environment or to deemphasize the hierarchy culture leading to an optimal and productive environment.

References

Cameron, K. (2010, March). Positive Leaders. Leadership Excellence, 27(3), 8. Retrieved from ProQuest Central. (Document ID: 1985253621).

Cameron, K. S. & Quinn, R. E. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. (Rev. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley (Jossey Bass).

Changing (2010). The competing values framework. Retrieved August 19, 2010 from

Duncan, J., Gintei, P., & Swayne, L. (1996). Competitive advantage and internal organizational assessment. Academy of Management Executive, 12(8)1-12. Retrieved August 19, 2010 from

Johnsen, R., et al. (2009). Organizational change management: Research on organizational change management detailed by R. Johnsen and co-authors. (2009, June). Economics Week, 67. (ProQuest Document ID: 1743804891). 

Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. Ten3 Global Business Learning Report. Retrieved August 18, 2010 from business_guide /crosscuttings/culture_corporate.html

Lavine, M., Cameron, K., & Brumback, G. (2008). Making the Impossible Possible. Personnel Psychology, 61(3), 682-684.  Retrieved ProQuest Central. (Document ID: 1548764461).

Lucas, C. & Kline, T. (2008). Understanding the influence of organizational culture and group dynamics on organizational change and learning. The Learning Organization, 15(3), 277-287. (ProQuest Document ID: 1469075071).

Parks, K., & Steelman, L. (2008). Organizational wellness programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(1), 58-68. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.58.

Mensch, L. (1999). Employee health and productivity. Corporate Health and Wellness. Retrieved from

O’Donnel (1995). Design of wellness programs. American Journal of Wellness Design of Retrieved from

Quinn, R.  (2006). Moments of Greatness. Leadership Excellence, 23(9), 8.  Retrieved August 21, 2010, from ProQuest Central. (Document ID: 1140377971).

Sokol, M. (1997). Introduction. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 49(1), 3-5. doi: 10.1037/h0092666.

Trice, H. & Beyer, J. (1993). The cultures of work organizations. Upper Saddle River, N.J. Prentice Hall.

Wagner, D. B., & Spencer J. L. (1996). The role of surveys in transforming culture: Data, knowledge, and action. In Kraut, A. I. (Eds.), Organizational surveys: Tools for assessment and change. (pp.67-87). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from

Weick, K. & Quinn, R. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361-86.  Retrieved from ProQuest Central. (Document ID: 39329209).

Table 1

Mean Scores for X Unit

Current Average Preferred

|Clan 26.6 |Clan 33.6 |

|Adhocracy 16.6 |Adhocracy 25.8 |

|Market 22.5 |Market 18.3 |

|Hierarchy 35 |Hierarchy 22.5 |

[pic]

-----Preferred

-----Now

Preferred divided by 6 Now divided by 6

A =200 = 33.6 A = 160 = 26.6

B =155 = 25.8 B = 100 = 16.6

C =110= 18.3 C = 135 = 22.5

D =135 = 22.5 D = 210 = 35

Figure 1 Graphical Representation of the Highest Mean Scores and Total Point per quadrant in the Four Culture Types for Both Now and Preferred Situations of X personnel

-----------------------

Clan (A)

Adhocracy (B)

Hierarchy (D)

Market (C)

10-

50

10

50

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download