Initial - Social Security Administration



Initial Disability Determination Claims and the rate of those with Representation by Title and Fiscal Year. We derived Initial data from the Electronic Disability (eDIB) Folder Database which was not designed to capture representation information so we must rely on proxies to identify representation. We define “Representation” as claims with the “Appointed Representative” box checked in the eDIB Electronic Folder Database or a form 1696 in the Electronic Folder added at the time of adjudication.The data presented reflect electronic cases with a medical determination of disability. The included data may reflect any changes caused by the most recent representative fee increase (mid-2009) but the impact of EDPNA or reimbursement for Title XVI claims (early 2005) predate this data.FYTitle II Title XVIConcurrentFY TotalsUnrepresentedRepresentedUnrepresentedRepresentedUnrepresentedRepresentedUnrepresentedRepresentedCounts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%2008605,609 85%103,998 15%856,531 92%77,452 8%702,902 88%93,361 12%2,165,042 89%274,811 11%2009636,385 84%121,211 16%912,360 90%103,548 10%740,820 86%116,194 14%2,289,565 87%340,953 13%2010714,787 82%162,142 18%998,149 88%132,727 12%812,132 84%153,839 16%2,525,068 85%448,708 15%2011744,749 79%201,838 21%1,031,094 86%161,691 14%821,344 81%193,883 19%2,597,187 82%557,412 18%2012692,626 75%228,498 25%986,279 85%171,382 15%746,565 78%205,207 22%2,425,470 80%605,087 20%2013648,997 73%238,856 27%895,789 83%180,143 17%650,599 75%217,651 25%2,195,385 78%636,650 22%2014645,959 71%265,317 29%829,303 82%181,657 18%572,082 72%223,205 28%2,047,344 75%670,179 25%2015638,473 72%253,414 28%817,913 82%178,869 18%520,590 72%202,328 28%1,976,976 76%634,611 24%2016621,865 72%237,304 28%813,662 83%171,247 17%490,241 73%181,313 27%1,925,768 77%589,864 23%2017580,293 73%217,322 27%750,857 82%169,025 18%443,888 72%169,872 28%1,775,038 76%556,219 24%2018540,597 73%203,763 27%690,390 81%163,553 19%410,512 72%162,706 28%1,641,499 76%530,022 24%Reconsideration Disability Determination Claims and the rate of those with Representation by Title and Fiscal Year. We derived Reconsideration data from the Electronic Disability (eDIB) Folder Database which was not designed to capture representation information so we must rely on proxies to identify representation. We define “Representation” as claims with the “Appointed Representative” box checked in the eDIB Electronic Folder Database or a form 1696 in the Electronic Folder added at the time of adjudication.The data presented reflect electronic cases with a medical determination of disability. The included data may reflect any changes caused by the most recent representative fee increase (mid-2009) but the impact of EDPNA or reimbursement for Title XVI claims (early 2005) predate this data.FYTitle II Title XVIConcurrentFY TotalsUnrepresentedRepresentedUnrepresentedRepresentedUnrepresentedRepresentedUnrepresentedRepresentedCounts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%200874,065 41%107,061 59%101,080 69%44,934 31%96,635 48%103,883 52%271,780 52%255,878 48%200973,187 42%101,853 58%100,452 62%62,242 38%105,963 48%115,051 52%279,602 50%279,146 50%201083,735 39%132,018 61%119,614 58%86,671 42%118,814 43%154,836 57%322,163 46%373,525 54%201190,965 36%159,902 64%123,863 54%104,221 46%118,705 39%182,038 61%333,533 43%446,161 57%201283,006 33%165,069 67%117,074 51%110,912 49%105,923 37%184,080 63%306,003 40%460,061 60%201380,632 32%172,112 68%111,370 49%117,895 51%95,608 34%189,270 66%287,610 38%479,277 62%201475,022 29%180,629 71%95,863 46%112,523 54%79,026 31%179,404 69%249,911 35%472,556 65%201574,103 29%177,174 71%87,580 46%103,083 54%69,178 30%162,397 70%230,861 34%442,654 66%201672,412 31%164,820 69%86,852 48%94,411 52%65,767 32%142,250 68%225,031 36%401,481 64%201767,179 32%143,088 68%77,318 48%84,740 52%57,089 32%122,636 68%201,586 37%350,464 63%201858,590 34%114,411 66%67,104 48%71,920 52%49,974 33%99,771 67%175,668 38%286,102 62%Hearing Disability Decisions and Representation Rates by Title and Fiscal Year.We derived Hearing data from the Case Processing Management System (CPMS) MI Database, which was designed to capture information on representation. The data presented reflect all OHO dispositions, including dismissals. The included figures may reflect any changes caused by the most recent representative fee increase (mid-2009) but the impact of EDPNA or reimbursement for Title XVI claims (early 2005) predate this data. FYTitle II Title XVIConcurrentFY TotalsUnrepresentedRepresentedUnrepresentedRepresentedUnrepresentedRepresentedUnrepresentedRepresentedCounts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%Counts%200835,267 17%166,983 83%55,006 37%92,343 63%44,157 20%181,626 80%134,430 23%440,952 77%200937,502 16%192,774 84%60,467 36%108,420 64%48,097 18%213,583 82%146,066 22%514,777 78%201039,413 17%195,558 83%69,241 35%131,440 65%53,982 18%247,982 82%162,636 22%574,980 78%201142,093 17%203,387 83%78,828 35%148,240 65%57,896 18%263,119 82%178,817 23%614,746 77%201241,245 16%213,461 84%80,984 35%153,704 65%59,007 18%272,083 82%181,236 22%639,248 78%201341,219 17%205,638 83%82,019 36%148,326 64%58,925 19%257,453 81%182,163 23%611,417 77%201437,669 18%175,419 82%75,781 38%125,202 62%52,626 20%214,266 80%166,076 24%514,887 76%201537,535 17%180,581 83%71,135 37%118,885 63%49,711 19%205,282 81%158,381 24%504,748 76%201641,102 19%178,576 81%72,393 40%108,677 60%49,970 21%186,755 79%163,465 26%474,008 74%201746,681 19%199,255 81%81,032 41%114,715 59%54,005 22%189,969 78%181,718 27%503,939 73%201857,396 21%222,575 79%95,709 43%128,169 57%61,945 24%199,760 76%215,050 28%550,504 72% ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download