Pro7.1-021 SOP Checklist - Internal Quality Control
|Author: Jo Shim |Document Number: |Pro71-21 |
| |Effective Date: |6 August 2009 |
|Review History |Date of last review: |3 April 2020 |
| |Reviewed by: |Heidi Hanes |
|pSMILE Comments: This document is provided as an example only. It must be revised to accurately reflect your lab’s specific processes and/or |
|specific protocol requirements. Users are encouraged to ensure compliance with local laws and study protocol policies when considering the |
|application of this document. If you have any questions contact SMILE. |
CHECKLIST FOR STUDY SITE SOP REQUIRED ELEMENTS
Internal Quality Control
|Element |CONTENT-SPECIFIC REQUIRED ELEMENTS |
|Present | |
| Internal Quality Control – Quantitative |
| |The SOP describes how: |
| |Internal quality control procedures are developed for all qualitative analytic procedures or specific QC information is|
| |included in individual test SOPs. |
| |The frequency of QC testing is determined and how many levels of control material are run. It is recommended that at |
| |least one control approximate the medical decision point. The frequency should meet the standards outlined in the |
| |current version of the DAIDS GCLP Standards document. |
| |Control materials are selected, obtained, prepared, labeled and stored. |
| |If QC materials are aliquoted they must be labeled so that they are traceable to the lot, date of preparation, |
| |expiration date and technologist. |
| |Acceptability criteria are established by the laboratory director and require that no patient results be released if |
| |acceptability criteria are not met. |
| |The procedure for establishing QC ranges should be outlined as part of the procedure. |
| |QC results are documented, monitored, and evaluated for acceptability. |
| |Describes the use of LJ charts as appropriate |
| |Describes the selection and use of Westgard rules |
| |Requires that all QC results, including those that exceed acceptable parameters, be documented. Documentation |
| |requirements include the initials of the individual who conducted the testing and the lot numbers of QC materials and |
| |reagents. |
| |QC results are reviewed and signed by the laboratory director or designee monthly. |
| |The follow-up of QC failures and the procedure for corrective actions that are to be performed and documented for any |
| |out of range results. |
| |The laboratory director or designee is to be notified immediately of any QC problems and is required to review the |
| |corrective actions at least monthly. |
| |QC records are to be stored and the required retention time for the documents. |
|Comments: |
| |
|Internal Quality Control – Qualitative |
| |The SOP describes how: |
| |Internal quality control procedures are developed for all qualitative analytic procedures or specific QC information is|
| |included in individual test SOPs. |
| |Internal quality control procedures are developed for all qualitative procedures, including running both positive |
| |negative controls and the frequency of testing controls. The frequency should meet the standards outlined in the |
| |current version of the DAIDS GCLP Standards document. |
| |Control materials are selected, obtained, and stored. |
| |If QC materials are aliquoted they must be labeled so that they are traceable to the lot, date of preparation, |
| |expiration date and technologist. |
| |Acceptability criteria are established by the laboratory director and require that no patient results be released if |
| |acceptability criteria are not met. |
| |QC results are documented, monitored, and evaluated for acceptability. Requires that all QC results, including those |
| |that exceed acceptable parameters, be documented. |
| |Documentation requirements include the initials of the individual who conducted the testing and the lot numbers of QC |
| |materials and reagents. |
| |QC results are reviewed and signed by the laboratory director or designee monthly. |
| |Corrective actions are to be performed and documented for any out of range results. The laboratory director or |
| |designee is to be notified immediately of any QC problems and is required to review the corrective actions at least |
| |monthly. |
| |QC records are to be stored and the required retention time for the documents. |
|Comments: |
| |
|References: |
|Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 42: Public Health, Part 493 - Laboratory Requirements, 18 February 2004 |
|Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21: Food and Drugs, Part 58 – Good Laboratory Practice for Non-clinical Laboratory Studies, 18 |
|February 2004 |
|College of American Pathologists (CAP), Laboratory General Checklist, , 6 October 2005 |
|Good Clinical Laboratory Practice Standards (DAIDS), Version 1.0, 30 June 2008 |
|ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guidance (GCP) |
|HPTN Manual of Operations, Johns Hopkins Hospital HIV laboratory |
|Westat SOP checklist General Required Elements |
|Berte, L. A World Wide Approach to Laboratory Quality Management – Session 1. Teleconference sponsored by ASCP on 06-Dec-2005. |
|CLSI document GP2-A5. Wayne, Pennsylvania: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2006. |
|CLSI. Management of Nonconforming Laboratory Events; Approved Guideline. CLSI document GP32-A. Wayne, Pennsylvania: Clinical and |
|Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007. |
|ISO. Medical laboratories – Particular requirements for quality and competence. EN/ISO15189. Geneva: International Organization for |
|Standardization; 2003. |
|NCCLS. Application of a Quality Management System Model for Laboratory Services – Approved Guideline – Third Edition. NCCLS document |
|GP26-A3. Wayne, Pennsylvania: NCCLS; 2004. |
|NCCLS. A Quality Management System Model for Health Care; Approved Guideline – Second Edition. NCCLS document HS1-A2. Wayne, Pennsylvania: |
|NCCLS; 2004. |
|NCCLS. Continuous Quality Improvement: Integrating Five Key Quality System Components; Approved Guideline – Second Edition. NCCLS document |
|GP22-A2. Wayne, Pennsylvania: NCCLS; 2004. |
|Review Comments/Recommendations to the Site: | Further Revisions Needed |
| |No Further Revisions Needed |
| |
|Review by: | |
|Date of Review: | |
|Response from Site: |
|Final Review Comments/Recommendations to the Site: | Further Revisions Needed |
| |Approved – Minor Revisions |
| |
|Final Review by: | |
|Date: | |
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- pro7 1 021 sop checklist internal quality control
- pro7 1 02 sop checklist quality management
- model sop quality assurance quality improvement
- giemsa stain is used to differentiate nuclear and or
- standard operating procedures and policies sops
- standard operating procedure sop
- example quality assurance quality control plan
- ngs method validation sop centers for disease control
Related searches
- tesla quality control issues
- quality control manager job description
- quality control terms and definitions
- types of quality control systems
- construction quality control manager duties
- quality control duties and responsibilities
- quality control job description example
- quality control plan template
- free quality control plan template
- quality control article
- total quality control pdf
- quality control manager resume sample