Kirkland Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP)
2015
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BASIC PLAN
INTRODUCTION MISSION PURPOSE SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY
INCIDENT MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AUTHORITIES
PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS COMMUNITY PROFILE INTERNAL COMMUNITY PROFILE EXTERNAL COMMUNITY PROFILE ENVIRONMENT IDENTIFICATION OF VULNERABLE POPULATIONS CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS GENERAL NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS) EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS DIRECTION AND CONTROL EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER READINESS ACTIVITIES RESPONSE ACTIVITIES RECOVERY ACTIVITIES ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES COMMON RESPONSIBILITIES SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES
Office of Emergency Management
City Manager's Office
City Attorney
Finance and Administration
Fire and Building
Human Resources
Information Technology
Parks and community services
Planning and community development
Police
Public Works
May 2015
Page |1
1
1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 6 7 10 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 19 19 21
Basic Plan
CITY OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS
33
NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
35
ONGOING PLAN MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE
37
APPENDIXES
39
APPENDIX 1: DEFINITIONS
39
APPENDIX 2: ACRONYMS
49
APPENDIX 3: AUTHORITIES AND REFERENCES
51
APPENDIX 4: MAPS
53
EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
ESF 1: TRANSPORTATION
4
ESF 2: COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, AND WARNING
8
ESF 3: PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING
13
ESF 4: FIRE PROTECTION
20
ESF 5: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
26
ESF 6: MASS CARE, HOUSING, AND HUMAN SERVICES
32
ESF 7: LOGISTICS
40
ESF 8: PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES
45
ESF 9: SEARCH AND RESCUE
54
ESF 10: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
60
ESF 11: AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES
67
ESF 12: ENERGY
73
ESF 13: PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY
77
ESF 14: LONG-TERM RECOVERY
81
ESF 15: PUBLIC AFFAIRS
87
May 2015
Page |2
Basic Plan
CITY OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
BASIC PLAN
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Mission
To provide guidance for comprehensive emergency management in the City of Kirkland that can:
? Minimize loss of life, protect property and the environment, and otherwise reduce community and government vulnerability to natural, human-caused, and technological hazards.
? Promote community, business, family, and individual disaster preparedness. ? Hasten the restoration of public services and provide for effective recovery in all
sectors of the community.
B. Purpose
The Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) (hereafter the Plan or the CEMP) establishes a mutual understanding of authority, responsibilities, and functions within the City of Kirkland and provides a basis for incorporating essential governmental and nongovernmental agencies into the emergency management structure. The plan outlines the City's capability to handle a disaster and the organizational structure under which readiness, response and recovery activities will take place. It discusses guidelines on how City departments organize, direct, control, and coordinate their actions to continue to deliver essential functions during emergencies or disasters. The Plan uses the Incident Command System (ICS), a command and control structure implemented during an emergency or disaster.
This CEMP coordinates with the National Response Framework, the Washington State CEMP and the King County Regional Disaster Plan. It also establishes the structure for an organized and effective response to multi-agency emergencies and disasters that occur within the City. The plan defines common assumptions and policies, establishes a shared concept of operations, and pre-assigns functional responsibilities to appropriate city departments, community-based organizations, government agencies and the private sector. Through the implementation of this plan, the resources and capabilities of these various sectors can be more efficiently utilized to minimize the loss of life and property and to protect the environmental and economic health of the City.
C. Scope and Applicability
This plan outlines the capabilities and responsibilities of the City before, during, and after an incident has occurred and speaks to what City government and partner organizations can and cannot provide to the citizenry.
As a guide, and not a procedures document, the plan does not state exactly what to do from minute to minute once an emergency occurs. Rather, it provides guidelines for a well-devised system to prepare for, respond to and recovery from incidents involving all hazards.
May 2015
Page |1
Basic Plan
CITY OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN
This Plan supports and is compatible with the State of Washington, King County, and surrounding jurisdictional plans. D. Incident Management Activities The City has institutionalized the utilization of the Incident Command System (ICS) per the National Incident Management System (NIMS) for all natural, technological and human-caused disasters. Under the guidance of NIMS, this plan addresses the full spectrum of activities related to local incident management, including mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery actions. E. Authorities The City of Kirkland's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan is developed under the authority of the following local, state, and federal statutes and regulations: 1. Kirkland Municipal Code
a. Chapter 3.20: Emergency Management b. Section 3.85.090: Emergency Procurement 2. State a. RCW 35.33.081, Emergency Expenditures - Non-debatable Emergencies b. RCW 35A.38.010, Emergency Services - Local Organizations c. RCW 38.52, Emergency Management d. Chapter 118-04 WAC, Emergency Worker Program e. Chapter 118-30 WAC, Local Emergency Management/Services
Organizations, Plans and Programs f. Chapter 296-62 WAC, General Occupational Health Standards 3. Federal a. 93-288, Disaster Relief Act of 1974, the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended b. 96-342, Improved Civil Defense Act of 1980, as amended c. 99-499, Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986,
Title III, Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know d. 106-390 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2K) e. 113-2, Sandy Recovery Improvement Act (SRIA) and Disaster Relief
Appropriations Act of 2013 City officials, employees or volunteers engaged in authorized response activities on behalf of the City shall be entitled to all privileges, benefits and immunities provided by state law and state or federal regulations for registered emergency workers (WAC 118-04).
II. PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS
May 2015
Page |2
Basic Plan
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- i 405 sr 167 corridor wa
- june 2018 system expansion sound transit
- appendix i i distribution list puget sound regional
- ufmpjuly2013 final draft 08212013 kirkland
- kingsgate park and ride transit city of kirkland
- business stryzewski named advisor sound planning group
- kirkland totem lake puget sound regional council
- what s next in the u s china strategic
- kirkland comprehensive emergency management plan cemp
- city of kirkland
Related searches
- emergency management of snake bite
- pa emergency management certification
- emergency management consulting firms
- emergency management and communications
- pa emergency management association
- emergency management roles and responsibilities
- private emergency management companies
- fsu emergency management certificate
- emergency management team members
- emergency management information system
- emergency management system
- emergency management communication plan