Kirkland Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP)

2015

COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

CITY OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON

COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BASIC PLAN

INTRODUCTION MISSION PURPOSE SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY

INCIDENT MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES AUTHORITIES

PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS COMMUNITY PROFILE INTERNAL COMMUNITY PROFILE EXTERNAL COMMUNITY PROFILE ENVIRONMENT IDENTIFICATION OF VULNERABLE POPULATIONS CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS GENERAL NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS) EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS DIRECTION AND CONTROL EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER READINESS ACTIVITIES RESPONSE ACTIVITIES RECOVERY ACTIVITIES ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES COMMON RESPONSIBILITIES SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES

Office of Emergency Management

City Manager's Office

City Attorney

Finance and Administration

Fire and Building

Human Resources

Information Technology

Parks and community services

Planning and community development

Police

Public Works

May 2015

Page |1

1

1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 6 7 10 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 19 19 21

Basic Plan

CITY OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON

COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS

33

NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS

35

ONGOING PLAN MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE

37

APPENDIXES

39

APPENDIX 1: DEFINITIONS

39

APPENDIX 2: ACRONYMS

49

APPENDIX 3: AUTHORITIES AND REFERENCES

51

APPENDIX 4: MAPS

53

EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTIONS

ESF 1: TRANSPORTATION

4

ESF 2: COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, AND WARNING

8

ESF 3: PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING

13

ESF 4: FIRE PROTECTION

20

ESF 5: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

26

ESF 6: MASS CARE, HOUSING, AND HUMAN SERVICES

32

ESF 7: LOGISTICS

40

ESF 8: PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL SERVICES

45

ESF 9: SEARCH AND RESCUE

54

ESF 10: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

60

ESF 11: AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES

67

ESF 12: ENERGY

73

ESF 13: PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY

77

ESF 14: LONG-TERM RECOVERY

81

ESF 15: PUBLIC AFFAIRS

87

May 2015

Page |2

Basic Plan

CITY OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON

COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

BASIC PLAN

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Mission

To provide guidance for comprehensive emergency management in the City of Kirkland that can:

? Minimize loss of life, protect property and the environment, and otherwise reduce community and government vulnerability to natural, human-caused, and technological hazards.

? Promote community, business, family, and individual disaster preparedness. ? Hasten the restoration of public services and provide for effective recovery in all

sectors of the community.

B. Purpose

The Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) (hereafter the Plan or the CEMP) establishes a mutual understanding of authority, responsibilities, and functions within the City of Kirkland and provides a basis for incorporating essential governmental and nongovernmental agencies into the emergency management structure. The plan outlines the City's capability to handle a disaster and the organizational structure under which readiness, response and recovery activities will take place. It discusses guidelines on how City departments organize, direct, control, and coordinate their actions to continue to deliver essential functions during emergencies or disasters. The Plan uses the Incident Command System (ICS), a command and control structure implemented during an emergency or disaster.

This CEMP coordinates with the National Response Framework, the Washington State CEMP and the King County Regional Disaster Plan. It also establishes the structure for an organized and effective response to multi-agency emergencies and disasters that occur within the City. The plan defines common assumptions and policies, establishes a shared concept of operations, and pre-assigns functional responsibilities to appropriate city departments, community-based organizations, government agencies and the private sector. Through the implementation of this plan, the resources and capabilities of these various sectors can be more efficiently utilized to minimize the loss of life and property and to protect the environmental and economic health of the City.

C. Scope and Applicability

This plan outlines the capabilities and responsibilities of the City before, during, and after an incident has occurred and speaks to what City government and partner organizations can and cannot provide to the citizenry.

As a guide, and not a procedures document, the plan does not state exactly what to do from minute to minute once an emergency occurs. Rather, it provides guidelines for a well-devised system to prepare for, respond to and recovery from incidents involving all hazards.

May 2015

Page |1

Basic Plan

CITY OF KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON

COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN

This Plan supports and is compatible with the State of Washington, King County, and surrounding jurisdictional plans. D. Incident Management Activities The City has institutionalized the utilization of the Incident Command System (ICS) per the National Incident Management System (NIMS) for all natural, technological and human-caused disasters. Under the guidance of NIMS, this plan addresses the full spectrum of activities related to local incident management, including mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery actions. E. Authorities The City of Kirkland's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan is developed under the authority of the following local, state, and federal statutes and regulations: 1. Kirkland Municipal Code

a. Chapter 3.20: Emergency Management b. Section 3.85.090: Emergency Procurement 2. State a. RCW 35.33.081, Emergency Expenditures - Non-debatable Emergencies b. RCW 35A.38.010, Emergency Services - Local Organizations c. RCW 38.52, Emergency Management d. Chapter 118-04 WAC, Emergency Worker Program e. Chapter 118-30 WAC, Local Emergency Management/Services

Organizations, Plans and Programs f. Chapter 296-62 WAC, General Occupational Health Standards 3. Federal a. 93-288, Disaster Relief Act of 1974, the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief

and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended b. 96-342, Improved Civil Defense Act of 1980, as amended c. 99-499, Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986,

Title III, Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know d. 106-390 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2K) e. 113-2, Sandy Recovery Improvement Act (SRIA) and Disaster Relief

Appropriations Act of 2013 City officials, employees or volunteers engaged in authorized response activities on behalf of the City shall be entitled to all privileges, benefits and immunities provided by state law and state or federal regulations for registered emergency workers (WAC 118-04).

II. PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS

May 2015

Page |2

Basic Plan

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download