IAIN Short Course: Empirical Research Design & Methods



UIN Short Course: Empirical Research Methods

Instructor: Jeremy Menchik (menchik@wisc.edu)

Doctoral Candidate, Department of Political Science

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Seminar: Thursday 1:30-3:30pm

March 12 – April 30, 2009

Academic knowledge advances by scholarly research. This course introduces students to some of the analytical tools and methods that underpin qualitative research in the social sciences, with the goal of producing valid, generalizable conclusions about social life. Since no single approach to a research question is ideal, we will learn about the trade-offs involved in selecting one method over another. Students will also be sensitized to how the interactions of theory, data, and method form the “tripod” of successful empirical research. Finally, I hope this course will encourage students to read and value social science differently than they have in the past.

Format: Class meetings will include lecture and discussion based on readings completed beforehand. Please come prepared to critically engage with the material by raising questions, objections, and applying the content to contemporary issues in Islamic studies. I believe learning is a collective enterprise that only succeeds if everyone participates; by remaining silent, you deprive the class of your wisdom and deny yourself the opportunity to test out your ideas in a constructive environment.

Requirements: In addition to the readings, each student will develop an original research proposal. While both the proposal’s substantive subject matter and methodological approach are up to you, I assume that you will use this occasion to elaborate an initial version of a project you will undertake at some point in the future. This proposal can take one of two forms;

(1) An original research design. The paper should synthesize the relevant literature and suggest a hypothesis or theory to be examined. It should propose an empirical research project, a sort of blueprint for a study that depends on resources typically available to a graduate student. The design should lay out the data sources and method of analysis in explicit detail. I hope that this research design will eventually lead to a paper in another course or a part of a thesis. Most papers will be 10 pages long, should stand on their own as a proposal, and be suitable for submission to a dissertation or thesis committee.

(2) A funding proposal. The proposal should include a research design but also captivate the readers’ attention and “sell” the project to the funding agency. While the form and the organization of a proposal are up to you, the proposal should explicitly address three questions; what are we going to learn as the result of the proposed project that we do not know now? Why is it worth knowing? How will we know that the conclusions are valid? The final proposal should be 10 pages long and suitable for submission to a funding agency.

Final papers should be in the language most appropriate for the student. In other words, a funding proposal to AMINEF/Fulbright should be written in English while a research design for a PhD at UIN should be written in Indonesian. The final two weeks of class will be devoted to paper presentations, with papers due Thursday, May 7 at 12 noon.

Goals and Tools (March 12)

Key concepts: knowledge accumulation, descriptive findings, causal analysis, hypothesis testing, qualitative methods, quantitative methods.

US National Science Foundation. 2004. Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Pp.9-16.

Helen Ingram, “How Book Reviewers Can Recognize a Classic When They See One.” 1990. PS: Political Science & Politics. 23(4): 574-9.

James Mahoney. 2003. “Knowledge Accumulation in Comparative Historical Research.” In J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, eds. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Pp.131-137.

Recommended:

Herbert Feith. 1969. “The Study of Indonesian Politics: A Survey and an Apologia.” In Benedict Anderson and Audry Kahin (ed). Interpreting Indonesian Politics: Thirteen Contributions to the Debate. Ithaca: Cornell Modern Indonesian Project Interim Reports Series. No. 62.

Research Design (March 19)

Key concepts: explanatory variables (independent or ‘X’), outcome variable (dependent or ‘Y’), causal mechanism, case selection, level of analysis, unit of analysis, concept formation, measurement.

US National Science Foundation. 2004. Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Pp.17-18.

Alexander L. George and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp.67-88.

Adam Przeworski and Frank Salomon, “The Art of Writing Proposals: Some Candid

Suggestions for Applicants to Social Science Research Council Competitions,” SSRC, 1995.

Parluhutan Siregar. n.d. “Outline Proposal Penelitian Kualitatif.” Pp. 1-14.

Recommended:

Kenneth R. Benoit. 2005. “How Qualitative Research Really Counts.” Qualitative Methods. Vol. 3:1. Pp. 9-12.

Alexander L. George and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp.287-325.

John Gerring. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 86-50 (techniques for choosing cases).

Data Collection I: Historical Analysis (March 25 - WED)

Key concepts: process-tracing, comparative historical analysis, path dependence, critical junctures, evaluating archival material, timing, sequencing, periodization.

Alexander L. George and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 89-108, 210-224, 230-232.

Andrew Abbott. n.d. “Some Notes on Archival Research.” Department of Sociology, University of Chicago. Pp. 1-13.

Recommended:

Andrew Bennett and Colin Elman. Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence. Political Analysis (2006) 14:250–267

Paul Pierson. 2004. Politics in time: history, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pp. 54-78 (Timing and Sequence), 79-103 (Long-Term Processes).

Data Collection II: Interviewing (April 2)

Key concepts: Structured interviews, semi-structured interviews, in-depth interviews, probe, question ordering, access, transcription, data analysis.

Lisa Harrison and Wolfgand Deicke. 2001. “Conducting Interviews in Political Research.” in Lisa Harrison, Political Research: An Introduction. London: Routledge. Pp. 90-104.

Melani Cammett. 2006. “Political Ethnography in Deeply Divided Societies.” Qualitative Methods. Vol 6:2. Pp. 15-17.

Recommended:

Cynthia Weston, “Analyzing Interview Data: The Development and Evolution of a Coding System,” Qualitative Sociology 24:3 (2001): 381-400.

Ethnography & Intrepretivism (April 9)

Key concepts: participant observation, in-depth interviews, causal versus constitutive relationships, interpretivism, post-positivism.

Goffman, Erving. 1989. On Fieldwork, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,18:2 Pp.123-132.

Parluhutan Siregar. 2005. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Grounded Theory Approach.” Pp.1-9.

Lisa Wedeen. 2005. “Memo for the NSF workshop.” Unpublished manuscript. Pp.1-5.

Recommended:

Anderson, Benedict O’Gorman. “Perspective and Method in American Research on Indonesia.” In Benedict Anderson and Audry Kahin (ed). Interpreting Indonesian Politics: Thirteen Contributions to the Debate. Ithaca: Cornell Modern Indonesian Project Interim Reports Series. No. 62. 1969.

Geertz, Clifford. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight,” in Paul Rabinow and William M. Sullivan, eds., Interpretive Social Science: A Reader (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979), 181-223.

Lerner, Daniel. 1955. “The Grocer and the Chief.” Harper's Magazine, 211:1264. Pp. 1-11.

Wedeen, Lisa. 1998. “Acting ‘As If’: Symbolic Politics and Social Control in Syria.” Comparative Studies in Society and History. 40(3): 503-23

Analysis, Publishing & Policymaking (April 16)

Aceh Research Training Institute (ARTI), 2008, “Cara Menulis Artikel Akademis.” Pp.1-2.

Charles M. Bonjean and Jan Hullum. 1978. “Reasons for Journal Rejection: An Analysis of 600 Manuscripts.” PS: Political Science and Politics. Pp.480-483

Alexander L. George and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp.109-124, 263-285.

Recommended:

Richard Snyder. “The Human Dimension of Comparative Research.” In Gerardo L Munch and Richard Snyder, Passion, Craft and Method in Comparative Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 1-31.

Howard Wainer. “How to Display Data Badly.” The American Statistician, Vol. 38, No. 2 (May, 1984), pp. 137-147.

Student Presentations (April 23/30)

Final papers due May 7th at 12 noon.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download