Office of Missouri State Auditor Nicole Galloway, CPA
Office of Missouri State Auditor
Nicole Galloway, CPA
Missouri School Data Reporting
Report No. 2017-146 December 2017
auditor.
Nicole Galloway, CPA
Missouri State Auditor
December 2017
CITIZENS SUMMARY
Findings in the audit of Missouri School Data Reporting
School Data
Administration expenditures are not consistently recorded between schools and are not always properly recorded. Schools did not consistently record expenditures to the same function codes or in accordance with the Missouri Financial Accounting Manual. School officials indicated additional information and reports of school expenditures and salary data would be useful when planning and preparing budgets and contracts.
Expenditures and School Performance
Administrator Salaries and Contracts
School administration expenditures are increasing at a higher rate than instruction expenditures.
The DESE does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure administrator salaries are reported for all schools or to verify salaries are reported accurately. Superintendent and executive director salaries are not always reported to the DESE and salary alone may not be representative of total compensation received. Eleven of the 35 charter schools (31 percent) that responded to our survey did not have a written agreement for the top administrator, typically a superintendent or executive director, for the 20152016 school year.
Due to the nature of this audit, no overall rating has been provided.
*The rating(s) cover only audited areas and do not reflect an opinion on the overall operation of the entity. Within that context, the rating scale indicates the following:
Excellent: The audit results indicate this entity is very well managed. The report contains no findings. In addition, if applicable, prior recommendations have been implemented.
Good:
The audit results indicate this entity is well managed. The report contains few findings, and the entity has indicated most or all recommendations have already been, or will be, implemented. In addition, if applicable, many of the prior recommendations have been implemented.
Fair:
The audit results indicate this entity needs to improve operations in several areas. The report contains several findings, or one or more findings that require management's immediate attention, and/or the entity has indicated several recommendations will not be implemented. In addition, if applicable, several prior recommendations have not been implemented.
Poor:
The audit results indicate this entity needs to significantly improve operations. The report contains numerous findings that require management's immediate attention, and/or the entity has indicated most recommendations will not be implemented. In addition, if applicable, most prior recommendations have not been implemented.
SMuirsvseoyuroifSMchiossooluDriaStachRoeoplosratinndgAnalysis of School Data Table of Contents
State Auditor's Report Introduction
2
Background ....................................................................................................4 Scope and Methodology.................................................................................7
Management Advisory Report - State Auditor's Findings
1. School Data ............................................................................................9 2. Expenditures and School Performance.................................................15 3. Administrator Salaries and Contracts...................................................18
Other Information
Number and Size of Missouri Schools.........................................................21
Appendixes
Missouri Public Schools 2015-2016 Employee and Salary Data A-1 School Districts..................................................................................23 A-2 Charter Schools..................................................................................35
Missouri Public Schools 2015-2016 Expenditure Data B-1 School Districts..................................................................................36 B-2 Charter Schools..................................................................................47
Comparative Statement of Instruction and Administration Expenditures
C-1 School Districts..................................................................................49 C-2 Charter Schools..................................................................................62
D Missouri County and School District Boundaries ................................64
E School District Letter and Survey ........................................................65
1
NICOLE GALLOWAY, CPA
Missouri State Auditor
Honorable Eric R. Greitens, Governor and
Dr. Roger Dorson, Interim Commissioner Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Jefferson City, Missouri We have audited certain operations of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education as it relates to the process of reporting Missouri school data, in fulfillment of our duties under Chapter 29, RSMo. The purpose of the audit is to present key school district and charter school data and determine whether the data is properly reported. The objectives of our audit were to:
1. Report key comparative school data. 2. Evaluate the internal controls over significant management and financial functions for the
reporting of Missouri school data. 3. Determine if Missouri school data is reported consistently and accurately. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards applicable to performance audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides such a basis. The accompanying appendixes are presented for informational purposes. This information was obtained from the department's management and Missouri schools and was not subjected to the procedures applied in our audit.
2
For the areas audited, we (1) reported key comparative data, (2) identified deficiencies in internal controls, and (3) identified inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the reporting of school data. The accompanying Management Advisory Report presents our findings arising from our audit of the processes of reporting Missouri school data.
Nicole R. Galloway, CPA State Auditor
The following auditors participated in the preparation of this report:
Director of Audits: Audit Manager: In-Charge Auditor:
Audit Staff:
Douglas J. Porting, CPA, CFE Kelly Davis, M.Acct., CPA, CFE Brian Hammann, M.Acct., CPA Matthew Schulenberg, CFE Jason M. Huffman, MBA John-Henry T. Jarwood, MBA Albert Borde-Koufie, MBA Stephanie M. Kroner Sherrye Lesmes
3
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- 2018 missouri poverty report
- missouri k 12 school choice survey
- missouri law enforcement manual
- the board of education of the city of st louis
- missouri health assessment
- inventory of historic buildings 1993 with the assistance
- illinois state board of education
- office of missouri state auditor nicole galloway cpa
- missouri compilation of school discipline laws and regulations
Related searches
- wyoming state auditor s office ess
- colorado office of the state controller
- wyoming state auditor s office website
- office of the state auditor
- state auditor s office wyoming
- state auditor s office texas
- office of state auditor colorado
- office of the state auditor mn
- washington state auditor s office olympia
- mn office of the state auditor
- nm office of the state auditor connect
- colorado office of the state auditor