934 M1MM - Federal Election Commission
[Pages:205]El "V Ii
7,q
L, * A
*~4
S~'A~W~'P~
~Z'~ ~
~
I'LOIRAI U-ICJ ION COMMI.61tON
IVs ksI I1. NAW.
WNS1 IINC ION.f). 2046 1
934 THIS IS THE E1,111 OF flUR I.
7, Date Filmed
amera No. -- 2
Cameraman
-
M1MM
-I,
~'jI
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
1325 K SI REEl N.W WASHINGTOND.C. 20463 Ares
April. 6, 1979
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN'RECEIPT REQUESTED
W
Edward J. Stack
450 North Park Road
Hollywood, Florida 33021
Dear Mr. Stack:
RE: MUR 9,34
I am forwarding for your information the enclosed complaint which was received by the Commission.
cc
The Commission has determined that on the basis of
the information in the complaint there is no reason to
believe that a violation of any statute within its juris-
diction has been committed. Accordingly, the Commission
intends to close its f ile on this matter. A copy of the
Commission's certification and the General Counsel's
Report is enclosed for your information.
Sincerely,
i
Enclosures
William C.le kr General Counsel
Complaint
Commission's Certification General Counsel's Report
.4Q%-UTIOA,
4*)
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
~I~&Y)1325 KS1 KEETN.W WASHINGTOND.C. 20463Api6,17
CERTIFIED,-MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Quinton White 207 Northeast 28th Court Wilton Manors, Florida 33334
RE: MUR 934
Dear Mr. White:
The Federal Election Commission has reviewed the allegations of your complaint of March 24, 1979 and
cc
determined that on the basis of the information provided
in your complaint, there is no reason to believe that a
violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971,
as amended, ("the Act") has been committed.
Accordingly, upon my recommendation the Commission has decided to close the file in this matter.
Should additional information come to your attention which you believe establishes a violation of the Act, please contact me. The f ile reference number for this matter is MUR 934.
Sincerp v -
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
In the Matter of )
Edward J. Stack
)
MUR 934
CERTIFICATION
cc
7 7
I,,Marjorie W. Emimons, Secretary to the Federal Election Commission, do hereby certify that on April 6, 1979, the Commission determined by a vote of 4-0 to adopt the following recommendations, as set forth in the First General Counsel's Report dated April 3, 1979, regarding the above-captioned matter:
1. Find no reason to believe a violation has occurred.
2. Close the file. 3. Send the appropriate let-ters. Voting for this determination were Commissioners Aikens, Harris, McGarry, and Friedersdorf.
Attest:
Date
Mroi .Emn Secretary to the Commission
Received in Office of Commission Secretary: 4-3-79, 10:17
Circulated on 48 hour vote basis:
4-3-79, 1:00
tt> ~ 4
sine
C
qq.
-9
2
.4'
;t'944'4 -*,,-~
Ms "-P
$4~ '4 A
mA
4< -~
~ 4
;A,
low,
41M
0 DRALELECTION COMMISP'ON 1325 K Street, N.W.. Washington, D.C. 20463
't(
0
FV~eD
FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT 19.APR 3 RI:A
DATE AND TIME OF TRANSMITTAL
BY OGC TO THE COMMISSION
APR~ 3 1979
MUR NO. 934 DATE COMPLAINT RECZEIVED BY OGC 3-27-79
STAFF MEMBER I)AM Brcwin
COMPLAINANT'S NAME: Quinton White
RESPONDENT'S NAME: Edward J. Stack
RELEVANT STATUTE: 2 U.S.C. S44lh, S44ld
INTERNAL REPORTS CHECKED: None
FEDERAL AGENCIES CHECKED: None
SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS
S.1aahgThEtt(-eillooihlC4tllveseoleeepciueggrrtcncneeniiotatIssimom1nim8nanpVmpgrlit)aatioadhCihlfiaaanatgayntthmnontaeeptdtnhaarttfteierpscohhlgoiroaeeilnzlmaUel.eiplrrasSAdlcaee.cewiisscgtaotgppocetninoonoCscnnngomohgTpdddrpfeireeeelcrtannsaef1slcttsiur9(etinnt7Cidot1uacr(sc,nsi4oiCe2aenmrmoslddmeaiuouvsicnnfcrihstaetiiieolatitsnalmevItetIgPaheed)dretndp,obwidoncyoeoUsuMie,.dnrnimatdS.skhetru.ririctirenooohhneafugnCetS)tsoep2,ldrahce62ees,oocvnumiUaiairp.fnCol1n(slSido9ilgP.ac7uaau9Cia,ntFib(,.nltilnlCltyooadioy.nrpit5cu,.sihv5pnSdHei4tohaed4oietu1facXnrh)adloesti.lttmiftshafpncahtglnoeuadmAatftipnlFdooendltree4saah4dpiW1noieunshetunrtafu,lgaailspfhlenupasteorrnetc)e,
'LEGALANALYSIS rClpccuoeelenursercntpathtaorainlindynVsseIpnnoptonetttToshrhaosvetoritanehopsedlpctalhobetimt"yeocppdraluebpaabsuli2lbpenilloaocUinctna.cdoatStel.inCootat.hnfplefolilevoScirgia4eetol4sillldceadiiagtsiflawentthdreieilCconbleoSnuucu4sbtt4nt.ielthoddesn.tIwaIrIIthoneeefCsdnooep.amfpocponthllhdhaeieiitsninitnlacsacnattopltatmrnepocraslmeltai,saipsotnaeetidSmd4ae4lttnllohftdeaosgtra"ewp,shpatiohcieiihnsnt
2 U.S.C.
The complainant alleges in Count III S44lh when the respondent promised to
that the respondent violated appoint certain Persons to
0
0
-2-
public office if elected. Since 5441h pertains to the "fraudln misrepresentation of 'campaign authority", this provision- is. not' applicable to the allegations stated.
CONCLUSIONt
The allegations cited in the complaint do not appear to violatwpany provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971,, as amended.
RECOMMENDATION
Find no reason to believe a violation has occurred. Close the file Send the appropriate letters.
Attachment
Complaint Letter to Respondent Letter to Complainant
GWFeaensdeheriranalgltoCEnolu,eicnDts.eilCo*.'fuui4c6ie3 ssion
TL~J
q
L)(e~
Dear Sirs:
FA~' LClO
wldaiiwsthtvrii1oc1 tlawCto1.uiF2lo.dRnSs.tlaikta1eeg1a1ito.2nof.stFfliolEerdiwdatarhed anfSdtoalhclikoswicnacgnadmapi3id!aagtenegafstotoranffcoonifgnreeas2clsceocrtdiaonn ce
My name and address follows:
Quinton White
207 N.E. 28th Court Wilton Manors, Florida
33334
9 L~
The filing of this complaint is with the knowledge of the
defeated candidate, John Adams, but not with his consent, as he
felt the filing of this complaint by himself would not be in
the best interest of the charges. However, he will act as a
witness to many of the charges or be a witness to testimony of
N
others.
I therefore asked Mr. Adams to allow me to submit the
CC
following allegations-with ible violations which have
you. Enclosed is a copy of already been filed with the
18 possBroward
County State Attorney's office and the state division of elect-
ions in Tallahassee.
Each area of federal law which night have 'beenviolated, I
will now attempt to reference. The count number refers to the
-
numerical numbering of enclosed item.
T
Countl - possible violation of 42 U.S.C.-1973 cc-23;
18 U.S.C.-594; 18 U.S.C.-600; 42 U.S.C.-1973 i (b);
5 U.S.C.-1502; 18 U.S.C.-606; 5 C.F.R. -733.122
Count 2 -Appears only the area where appointed deputies influenced votes might be a violation of % 5 C.F.R.-733.122; 2 U,S.C.-594; 42 U.SC.-1973cc
Count 3 - 5 C.F.R.-733.122; 5 U.S.C.-1502; 18 U.S.C.-600; 2 U.S.C.-441h; 42 U.S.C.-1973i(b); 2 U.S.C.-441d;
Count 4 - Same as count 1
Count 5 - Same as count 1
Count 6 - 2 U.S.C.-441 d
Count 7 - 18 All have similar charges I could not determine
anything differentl~q~~g ft pind
but perhaps in a
different light.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
Related searches
- federal insurance commission complaints
- election sri lanka lk
- federal insurance commission office
- how do i find my election district
- election campaign ideas
- election campaign products
- election slogan generator
- washington state election endorsements
- usa presidential election poll
- 2020 usa presidential election poll
- 2016 pre election polls
- election polls october 2016