Forensic Pathology Evaluation of the 1993 Branch Davidian ...

Forensic Pathology Evaluation of the 1993 Branch Davidian Deaths and Other Pertinent

Issues

Prepared for the

Office of Special Counsel John C. Danforth

By

Michael A. Graham, M.D. Professor of Pathology

Co-director, Division of Forensic Pathology Saint Louis University School of Medicine

Chief Medical Examiner City of Saint Louis, Missouri

Page 1 of 151

Table of Contents

I. Introduction

II. Review summary

1. General 2. Firearms injuries 3. Fire/smoke injuries 4. Blunt force injuries 5. Sharp force injuries 6. Explosives 7. Undetermined causes of deaths 8. Suffocation / Smothering / Overlaying 9. Toxicology 10. Manner of death

III. Specific Cases?Synopses and Comments

1. Decedent Tables A. Name (alphabetical) B. MC # C. Children (by name) D. Causes of deaths E. Recovery location of body

2. Specific cases?synopses and comments A. Branch Davidian decedents (see decedent tables for individual case page numbers) B. Clive Doyle C. Carlos Ghigliotty

IV. Signature Page

V. Curriculum vitae 1. Michael Graham, M.D.

Page 3

6

6 8 12 16 16 16 17 18 19 21

22 27 32 34 39

43 149 150

151

Attached

Page 2 of 151

I. Introduction

At the request of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), I reviewed a variety of materials pertinent to the Mount Carmel, Texas confrontation. I was asked to evaluate the authority under which the examinations of the decedents were carried out; evaluate adequacy and accuracy of the recovery and examination processes; identify significant obstacles to the recovery and examination processes; evaluate the reliability of the data; comment on opinions and statements made by other experts and non-experts; interpret the available information in order to offer independent opinions as to the nature, extent and effects of injuries/diseases, their potential significance and how they may have been sustained; offer opinions as to the causes and manners of the deaths; address other pertinent issues as they arise during the investigation; and, serve as a source of information/advice to the staff of the Office of Special Counsel. My review does not include evaluating the deaths of the four government agents killed by gunfire during the initial confrontation on February 28, 1993. All of my opinions are stated to a reasonable degree of medical certainty unless otherwise specified.

My opinions are based on my review of the following information:

1. Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office records including the autopsy records, toxicology reports, dental charting, summary sheets and forensic laboratory reports

2. Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Summary Report (September 29, 1993) 3. Radiographs of the decedents 4. Photographs of the bodies at the scene and during the examinations in the

morgue 5. Anthropology reports prepared by Drs. Owsley and Ubelaker 6. Transcribed preliminary anthropology notes 7. DNA test results (Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory) 8. Death certificates 9. Schematic drawings of the complex (pre- and post-fire) 10. Fire investigation expert report 11. Dr. Jerry Spencer's report and deposition testimony 12. United Kingdom (UK) forensic experts' reports and accompanying documents

pertaining to second autopsies performed on repatriated Davidian remains 13. Greater Manchester (UK) Police witness' statements 14. Dr. Joseph Burton's forensic pathology consultation report regarding his

review of information about several of the Davidian deaths 15. Dr. Patrick Fardal's (forensic pathologist) affidavit summarizing his opinions

based on his review of information about several of the Davidian deaths 16. Dr. Paul Radelat's (consulting pathologist) report regarding his review of

information about several of the Davidian deaths 17. Dr. Ronald Graeser's report and letter containing his opinions based on his

examination of the remains of James Riddle

Page 3 of 151

18. List of FBI Hostage Rescue Team (HRT) munitions present on April 19, 1993 19. Portions of FBI laboratory reports 20. Manuscripts of article for publication and published article (Owsley DW, J

Forensic Sci, JFSCA, Vol 40, May 1995, pp 341-348) regarding the forensic anthropology aspects of the event at Waco 21. Excerpts from David Thibodeau's book A Place Called Waco?A Survivor's Story (excerpts dealing with a listing of the dead and specific details about the deaths of Perry Jones, Winston Blake, Peter Gent, Peter Hipsman and Jaydean Wendell) 22. Excerpt from Kathryn Schroeder's testimony discussing the deaths of Perry Jones and Peter Hipsman 23. Records from the State of Maryland Medical Examiner's Office (including police reports) pertinent to the death of Carlos Ghigliotty 24. Select medical records relating to the treatment of Clive Doyle 25. Select portions of U.S. Treasury Department, FBI and Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) investigation reports pertaining to Judy Schneider's hand gunshot injury

The Branch Davidian complex, known as Mt. Carmel, was located in McLennan County, Texas, near the city of Waco. Jurisdiction over the death investigation, as per Texas state law, was assumed by the McLennan County Justices of the Peace. The Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office (TCMEO) assisted the Justices of the Peace as independent examiners. The examinations of the remains were carried out at the Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office. The death certificates were completed by McLennan County officials.

TCMEO personnel examined the bodies of four law enforcement agents who were killed by gunfire during the initial confrontation on February 28, 1993. They also examined the body of Davidian Michael Schroeder (currently referred to as MC 81) who was also killed by gunfire on February 28, 1993, and whose body was recovered on March 4, 1993, from a low lying area in a catch pen property (hereafter referred to for convenience as a "ravine").

On April, 20, 1993, the first remains of the Branch Davidian decedents was received at the TCMEO. TCMEO personnel went to the fire scene on April 21, 1993, to help in planning and carrying out the recovery of other decedents. TCMEO personnel were later supplemented at the scene by anthropology personnel from the Smithsonian Institute and the FBI . Surface and excavation recoveries including documentation, evidence recovery/preservation, body recovery, transport and storage were carried out using standard accepted techniques. Remains were recovered from the areas of the stage at the rear of chapel, stage stairways, communications room, kitchen/serving area, kitchen?stairways, front of concrete bunker, hallways, top of concrete bunker and concrete bunker (surface and excavated). In addition, bodies that had been buried within the complex after the initial confrontation on February 28, 1993, were exhumed from grave sites near the front of the complex (1) and from a concrete tornado shelter (4).

Page 4 of 151

2. The remains were processed and examined by a multi-agency multi-disciplinary team of experts and support personnel under the overall supervision of Nizam Peerwani, M.D. (forensic pathologist and Tarrant County Chief Medical Examiner). The processing/examining personnel consisted of forensic pathologists, dentists, anthropologists, latent print examiners, toxicologists, criminalists, photographers, radiology technician and support personnel. Additional anthropology assistance was rendered by personnel from the University of Tennessee (Knoxville).

Prior to examination, each single body was fluoroscoped, radiographed and photographed. Evidentiary material accompanying the bodies, including a large amount of munitions, was removed and packaged. Co-mingled remains were separated by the anthropology personnel. Clothing on the bodies was inventoried and preserved. The bodies underwent full autopsy examination by a forensic pathologist. Examinations, when applicable, were also carried out by the anthropologists. The dental examinations were carried out by the dentists.

The identifications of the bodies were established scientifically using dental, fingerprint, radiographic and DNA techniques. The identities of some bodies were confirmed using a combination of methods.

The repatriated remains of 10 Davidian decedents (MC 2, 21, 22, 23, 27, 37, 61, 74, 75, 77) underwent second postmortem examinations in the UK by Home Office forensic pathologists assisted by other personnel including individuals with expertise in odontology and firearms. It appears that the UK pathologists did not have access to all the information in the original examination autopsy reports, with the exception of Rosemary Morrison (MC 75). Some documentation, including the TCMEO-determined causes of the deaths, was available.

The examinations by the UK pathologists were complicated by the presence of decomposition, fire effects and alterations incurred during the previous examinations. The UK pathologists did not recover any bullets that had been discharged through a firearm barrel.

A UK firearms expert does indicate he reviewed a variety of investigative reports. He speculated about the nature of some of the wounds and ammunition, apparently without knowledge of pertinent findings made during the TCMEO autopsies (MC 37, 21, 77), which are critical to the proper interpretation of the injuries, contradict his statements and demonstrate them to be incorrect. In addition, the firearms expert's statements about MC 37 appear erroneous and contradictory to both the TCMEO and the UK autopsy pathologists' observations.

In general, the UK examinations did not add any significant new observations regarding the injuries or causes of the deaths. Specific comments about the UK examinations and conclusions are included in the individual case summaries. The causes of a few inconsistencies between the TCMEO and UK observations are not readily apparent (see MC 22 case synopsis).

Page 5 of 151

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download