Www.npsk12.com



LA council votes to shame hotels that refuse to house homeless—and may seize the propertiesReadability Score: 12.6By?THE NEW YORK POST?Thursday, May 7, 2020LA city council votes to name hotels that refuse to house the homelessBrie StimsonThe Los Angeles City Council Wednesday voted to identify hotels refusing to take in the homeless during the coronavirus pandemic and said they could possibly be “commandeered.”Only 1,582 people have been placed in hotels, far short of the city’s goal of housing 15,000, FOX 11 in Los Angeles reported.“Each hotel brings new hope, each room could save a life,” Mayor Eric Garcetti said of Project Roomkey, according to KABC-TV.“If hotels are making a distinction among people classifying housed and unhoused differently in terms of accommodations that they’re going to be repaid for, that the city and county will pay for with reimbursements, then I think there’s a potential civil rights violation,” Councilman Mike Bonin said. “If the problems are on the hotel end, the public should know why and then we should consider commandeering as they’ve talked about in other cities.”The council also plans to investigate if hotels refusing to house homeless have received tax breaks from the city recently.The motion, co-authored by Bonin, says, some hotels have been “unwilling to participate, reneged on initial interest, citing security concerns, liability issues, objections from corporate management or fear of lost revenue from being branded a ‘homeless hotel,'” according to KABC.“It would seem to me to be a complete justification that we expect something back especially during an emergency,” Councilman Mitch O’Farrel said of hotels that have received tax breaks.The Ritz Carlton in downtown Los Angeles, which has luxury condo residences, was among those resisting.The hotel has received millions of dollars in tax breaks from the city over the years, according to FOX 11.The condo residence’s homeowner’s association cited security, health and property value concerns in a letter to homeowners saying they would resist housing the homeless.Art Avaness, broker and owner of RE/MAX DTLA who manages six units in the building, told FOX 11 they were “shocked and offended” the hotel might be forced to participate.“In theory, it’s a great idea, I support the program but in practice specifically for this property, it just isn’t, because you want to house hundreds of homeless people in a structure that’s literally in the same building with 224 homeowners?” he told FOX 11. “Having it in your own home basically is just a little too much, in fact, it’s offensive.”Avaness told KABC the average price for a one-bedroom unit is around $1 million. “Minimum one million and goes all the way up to $40, $42 million,” he said.Bonin told KABC he doesn’t think “fancy hotels” should be exempt. “As we look to hotels to step up, those that have benefited from public investment and public largess – those are the first that we should be looking towards.”?Article SourceDiscussion QuestionsLA council votes to shame hotels that refuse to house homeless—and may seize the propertiesDefine commandeer, eminent domain, largess, reimbursement, renegeWhy is the LA City Council asking hotels to house the homeless?Who benefits (particularly now) by getting homeless people off the streets and into hotel rooms? How?Why do you think the city has fallen so short of its goal of 15,000 homeless people in hotel rooms?Other sources note that the city has offered to pay three-fourths of the hotel’s costs for opening their rooms in this way. Does that make you more or less likely to support the plan? Why?Mr. Bonin seems to be arguing that the civil rights of the homeless are being violated if hotels refuse to give them service. Do you agree? Are there other civil rights at stake here?Why do you think the city council has given these hotels tax breaks in the past? How might the city benefit from those breaks? Do you consider that ‘largess,’ as the councilman claims?Do you think those breaks mean the hotels now ‘owe’ the city? Why or why not?As business begins to open back up, why might hotels be hesitant to have rooms used by the homeless (“be branded a homeless hotel”)? Do you think such a reputation could hurt their business?Mr. Avaness, representing the Ritz-Carlton, notes that the hotel is ‘home’ to some luxury condo owners. Should that exempt the hotel from opening its doors to the homeless? Why or why not?Mr. Avaness in a separate article (National Review, reposted on Yahoo Sports), cited safety concerns for the residents. Do you think that is a valid objection? Explain.If a hotel does not wish to participate in this program, should the city council have the right to ‘commandeer’ the property? Why or why not?Why do you suppose the article title didn’t include information about seizing the property?Government does retain the right to seize private property in some cases, but it must pay fairly. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download