TEA 2018 Accountability Overview
TEA 2018 Accountability Overview Based on the proposed 2018 Accountability Manual
Student Achievement
Domain
STAAR? Component
(100% Elementary, Middle, or HS without CCMR/grad) (40% HS, K?12, Districts) All Students group All STAAR? assessments
% Approaches and above % Meets and above + % Masters and above
100% 40%
Total ? 3 = STAAR? Component Score
College, Career, Military Readiness
(40%) All Students group
40%
AP/IB, Dual Credit, TSI, Associate's Degree
Industry certification, CTE-aligned course completed (one-half point), IEP workforce-readiness graduate, enlist in the military
Number of graduates who accomplish at least one of the CCMR indicators
Number of 2017 Annual Graduates
Graduation Rates
(20%) All Students group
20%
Best of the 4-year, 5-year, or 6-year graduation rate
Number of graduates in the class
Number of students in the class (Graduates + Continuers + TxCHSE Recipients
+ Dropouts)
Inclusion of English Learners:
? First year in U.S. schools: Excluded from accountability calculations ? STAAR? Alternate 2 assessment results will be included regardless of an EL's years in U.S. schools. ? Unschooled asylees, unschooled refugees, and SIFEs are not included in state accountability until their sixth year of enrollment in U.S. schools.
School Progress Domain
100% Better of Part A or Part B
Part A: Academic Growth No ELL Progress Measure
100%
All Students group All assessments with a STAAR? progress measure (4?8 reading, English II, 4?8 math, algebra I)
Total STAAR? Progress Points Earned Maximum STAAR? Progress Points Possible
1 point Meet/Exceed growth measure
Achieve Masters in current year
.5 point
No growth, but achieves Does Not Meet to Approaches, Approaches to Approaches, or Meets to Meets
0 point
No growth and drops one or more proficiency levels or maintains Does Not Meet
Resources: 2018 Accountability Rating System (TEA)
Part B: Relative Performance
100%
All Students group
STAAR?-only campus/district:
? STAAR? Component Score (Domain I) ? Percent of Economically Disadvantaged students
or ? Refer to School Progress, Part B Lookup Table to
determine score.
STAAR? and CCMR campus/district:
? Average STAAR? and CCMR (Domain I) ? Percent of Economically Disadvantaged students ? Refer to School Progress, Part B Lookup Table to
determine score.
Contact Information: Regional Accountability and Assessment Angel Lozano, Program Coordinator / 713.744.6596 / angel.lozano@ Nancy Webster, Senior Specialist / 713.744.8186 / nancy.webster@
Closing the Gaps Domain
Minimum Size: All Students = 10 Student Groups = 25 For each component: Number of Indicators Met (Y) Number of Eligible Indicators
Overall Grade
Each domain score will be converted to a scaled score. 2018 Ratings (each domain and overall rating) Districts: A, B, C, D, or F Campuses: Met Standard or
Improvement Required
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- 2020 accountability updates texas education agency
- chapter 1—2019 accountability overview
- memorandum october 10 2007
- 2018 accountability development frequently asked
- texas education agency 1 office of academics
- 2019 results driven accountability
- overview of 2018 accountability
- tea s accountability reporting overview
- tea 2018 accountability overview
Related searches
- tea accountability ratings 2018
- tea accountability reports
- mde accountability scorecard
- tea report card 2018 2019
- 2018 tea accountability reports
- tea accountability results
- tea 2019 accountability ratings
- 2018 accountability rating system
- tea accountability 2019
- tea accountability ratings
- tea accountability ratings 2019
- tea district accountability rating