Something for you anti-African “Israelites” to think about:



[pic]

The Race Doctrine

If a video in this project is no longer available at the link given, go here or here and search for it by its title, or search Youtube by its title.

If a link to a webpage becomes unavailable go here, enter the address in the search bar, and then select a date when you get to the calendar screen.

Many of these Israelite camps have dislike and even hate for Africans, the children of Ham. And they teach others to have the same.

For an example of this madness, watch from 8:36 – end

The Hebrews Going Hard At The Africans



GENESIS

CHAPTER 9

18 ¶ And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were

Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of

Canaan.

19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the

whole earth overspread.

GENESIS

CHAPTER 10

6 ¶ And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut,

and Canaan.

Cush – Nubia/Sudan

Mizraim – Egypt

Phut – Libya

Canaan – the land of Israel

The sons of Ham populated these areas.

15 ¶ And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth,

16 And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite,

17 And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,

18 And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite:

and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread

abroad.

19 And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as

thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto

Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto

Lasha.

20 These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after

their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.

The father of the Africans was the father of the majority of the nations who inhabited the land the Israelites later conquered and settled in – the land of Canaan.

Many years later:

EXODUS

CHAPTER 3

7 ¶ And the LORD said, I have surely seen the affliction of

my people which are in Egypt, and have heard their cry by

reason of their taskmasters; for I know their sorrows;

8 And I am come down to deliver them out of the hand of

the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land unto a

good land and a large, unto a land flowing with milk and

honey; unto the place of the Canaanites, and the Hittites,

and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and

the Jebusites.

At the time of conquering the land of Canaan and settling into their inheritance:

JUDGES

CHAPTER 2

20 ¶ And the anger of the LORD was hot against Israel; and

he said, Because that this people hath transgressed my

covenant which I commanded their fathers, and have not

hearkened unto my voice;

21 I also will not henceforth drive out any from before them

of the nations which Joshua left when he died:

JUDGES

CHAPTER 3

5 ¶ And the children of Israel dwelt among the Canaanites,

Hittites, and Amorites, and Perizzites, and Hivites, and

Jebusites:

6 And they took their daughters to be their wives, and gave

their daughters to their sons, and served their gods.

Here you have Israelites taking wives from the sons of Ham. So, Israelites are mixed with the children of Ham – “Africans”. And this is not the only time they mixed with the children of Ham.

These so-called Israelites bash Africans, but when Israelites and Africans were placed into the slave market and sold to Europeans; then put on slave ships and taken into other lands, there was mixing between the two in the lands they were held captive. There was probably mixing before that in the lands they were taken from. And these so-called Israelites who bash Africans came from that! (You should find some pictures of Nigerian women and see how much they look like black American women.)

And then there are the laws of the Torah that forbid having this sort of attitude towards non-Israelites, “strangers”. And regardless, the Israelites were NOT 100% Shem/Semitic, and these Israelites today are not 100% Shem/Semitic. They are definitely mixed with the seed of Ham. With that being the case, how can you as an Israelite discriminate against anyone, especially the children of Ham? Furthermore, you are probably more Ham than Shem! And not only that, you’re made up of several nations of Ham! A black American who hates Africans … imagine mentioning that to a black person in the 1960’s.

And if your gripe with them stems from their ancestor’s involvement in the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade you might want to do some research into the Jewish involvement, then the much earlier and larger Arab slave trade which enslaved Africans and Israelites also.

This next video is from 2018. With this type of mindset, you would think it was from the 1960’s, and from the Nation of Islam.

Watch from 8:38 - the end

IUIC 365: Y'all Racist



- 10:00 - 11:15 – After explaining how every race was originally black, Umar Jr. (my name for him) goes on to explain how we got “the white man”. “Two nations mean two separate people, two nationalities is in one womb.” And “two manner of people” means two different types of people. Later on you’ll see that he means two different types of human beings.

GENESIS

CHAPTER 25

19 ¶ And these are the generations of Isaac, Abraham’s

son: Abraham begat Isaac:

20 And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah to

wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padan-aram, the

sister to Laban the Syrian.

21 And Isaac intreated the LORD for his wife, because she

was barren: and the LORD was intreated of him, and

Rebekah his wife conceived.

22 And the children struggled together within her; and she

said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to inquire of

the LORD.

23 And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy

womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from

thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the

other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.

The King James translation adds something that can cause confusion, “two manner of people”. Look at Genesis 25:23 in Hebrew, or in other translations.

Somehow, according to him and others who teach this doctrine, black and white people began is Rebekah’s womb. Or, according to others, only white people did. So, white people came from Isaac? Most people date Jacob’s birth to sometime in 1800 B.C. There were no Europeans before this time? No sons of Kittim?

GENESIS

CHAPTER 6

9 ¶ These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just

man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with

God.

10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.

13 In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham,

and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah’s wife, and the

three wives of his sons with them, into the ark;

Noah and his wife, the new Adam and Eve.

GENESIS

CHAPTER 9

18 ¶ And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were

Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of

Canaan.

19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the

whole earth overspread.

GENESIS

CHAPTER 10

NOW these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem,

Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the

flood.

2 The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and

Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.

6 ¶ And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut,

and Canaan.

21 ¶ Unto Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber,

the brother of Japheth the elder, even to him were children

born.

22 The children of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad,

and Lud, and Aram.

Further down this line of Shem, Isaac was born.

Now look at these verses and look for Strong’s number 1471, the word in the verse he’s using to make it seem as though Jacob and Esau, blacks and whites (according to him), are so different.















The following was stated during the time of the Roman Empire, in the 1st century A.D.

ACTS

CHAPTER 17

24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing

that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples

made with hands;

25 Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, as though he

needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath,

and all things;

26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to

dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the

times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;

- 11:13 - 11:26 – “Two different type of people. So we gotta throw that whole human race, human garbage … the Bible said that we are two different people. And we know that to be fact. Do the white man act like you? We are total opposites.” Do I even need to point to Acts 17:26? His words are the total opposite of the Bible. He said we’re not a human race, blacks and white are two different types of humans (the lie of race). The way he’s using the Bible, and what he’s using it for, is exactly what the KKK used to do (and probably still do). So, why should he and others like him be looked at any differently, especially when they’re calling for the murder of another people?

“Do the white man act like you?” How can there be such ignorance in 2018? So, we can gather up all “white people” and you won’t be able to find one that “acts like you,” and vice versa?

- 13:54 - 14:00 – “That don’t sound right to you? Because the white man ain’t being praised over here? Sista, look what he did to us.” There it is.

- 14:37 – “God is racist.” “That’s right!” That is saying that Yah is a liar. That is saying that Yah is partial. That is saying that Yah perverts justice. Blasphemy!

- 16:00 - 16:15 – “He made everybody on the earth, but he chose us. Is God wrong for choosing blacks and Hispanics? You’re the chosen people. To make it plain, you are better than them.” “That’s right!” There it is. Black supremacy.

- 16:38 - 17:03 – Straight out of the Umar playbook.

Stockholm syndrome

a mental and emotional response in which a captive (e.g., a hostage) displays seeming loyalty to—even affection for—the captor. The captive may come to see law enforcement or rescuers as the enemy because they endanger the captor. The name derives from the case of a woman who was held hostage in 1973 during a bank robbery in Stockholm, Sweden, and became so emotionally attached to one of the robbers that she broke her engagement to another man and remained faithful to her former captor during his prison term. [term coined by Swedish psychiatrist and criminologist Nils Bejerot (1921–1988)]

Source:

Guess what? In order for you to have Stockholm Syndrome you, yourself, would have to be held captive now, or been held captive in the past! And there would have to be, or would have had to have been, a captor holding you, yourself, captive! You … not your ancestors!

Let me address another one out of the Umar playbook, the attempt to shame a person into being racist/for not being racist (If you’re not racist, you’re a coon or sellout. If you’re not racist, you love your oppressor.)

A comment from this video:

[pic]

1. Who is your enemy? You determine your enemy by the color they have on? Is this gangbanging? “Your enemy,” who you believe to be your enemy, was implanted in your mind by your true enemy who you know nothing of (the same way the average American got brainwashed into believing Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban, and Muslims were there enemies). Making it an issue of color, think about this: If you could walk down each white neighborhood, what do you think would happen to you? If you could walk down each black neighborhood, what do you think would happen to you? Who’s your enemy?

2. If you’re not racist, they’ll say you hate your own people, and exalt or love the “white man”. Nearly everyone who states things like this got it from black puppets like Umar Johnson. Malcolm X used to say the same types of things, but then he woke up. And who did Malcolm X get it from?

I’m not a fan of Snopes, but since they do have the full quote, take a look at this:

Hermann Goering: War Games

Later in the conversation, Gilbert recorded Goering’s observations that the common people can always be manipulated into supporting and fighting wars by their political leaders:

We got around to the subject of war again and I said that, contrary to his attitude, I did not think that the common people are very thankful for leaders who bring them war and destruction.

“Why, of course, the people don’t want war,” Goering shrugged. “Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.”

“There is one difference,” I pointed out. “In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.”

“Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

Source:

And these puppets speak and act based on the false reality given by the rest of the Matrix System – the news media, Facebook, Youtube, etc. The result? War – race war.

And let me address that “love your oppressor” thing for Umar (the real one) and others like him, and because of this guy and IUIC (so that’s who you can blame for “bringing this out” right now). When I look at the current state of things, that is, when I look at true reality (not what’s presented on screens) I see black men and women oppressing black people, and doing so because of things the powers that be created. Average white citizens are not doing a thing (generally speaking). In the past, yes, most of them were out of control, but now, it’s black people (generally speaking). Your mind is in the wrong time period. You’re seeing a reality that was created for you (a mixture of the past with hoaxes and brainwashing). In the true reality black men sell drugs to black people, creating black drug addicts and sustaining black drug addiction; destroying countless lives, minds, spirits, etc. while the money/wealth/income the black community spends on those drugs goes to black drug dealers who don’t spend that money at black businesses or create black businesses … oppression of black people. Black men rob black people, (and if they steal money, that money is not spent at black businesses) … oppression of black people. Black men kill black people … oppression of black people (even terrorizing the good people in black communities). Black women (mostly those younger than mid-forties) treat black men like children, like a lesser being, a “nigger” or a “boy,” talking to them in a tone and with words that are exactly the same as racist whites of the past (to the point where black men should be holding up signs that say “I am a man”) … oppressing black people. Black girls refuse to “keep their legs closed,” with much help from black males who literally hunt them/prey on them with ways of a pimp, car salesman, or Army recruiter (I used to be chief), resulting in teen pregnancy and children being born out of wedlock; and all that comes with that including the abortion of hundreds of thousands of black children each year … oppression of black people. Black girls and women, mostly those who had sex outside of marriage, take child support from black men according to rates determined by the courts, taking money from the already small amount of income he is bringing in … oppressing black people. Black men and women feed black people false information of all types, even to hype them up to die facing the police or white citizens, while charging them and collecting donations … oppressing black people. Black men and women entertainers, especially black men, take money in exchange for allowing themselves to be used as tools to produce “entertainment” (from music to movies) that everyone knows is designed to corrupt and destroy black people, especially the youth … oppressing black people. Black men and women entertainers take money to convince other black people that they too can be rich and famous entertainers if they never give up on their dreams, having them chase a “pipe dream” (i.e. having a huge portion of the male population focus on being rappers instead of trying to heal, support or build their families and communities) … oppressing black people. Black men and women entertainers, especially black men, take money in exchange for allowing themselves to be used as tools to promote materialism to the blacks, causing blacks to spend money on petty wants … oppressing black people. And there’s more, but I’ll stop there. Now, name off something white citizens do to black citizens that’s comparable. Show me some ways they are oppressing you, being the oppressor. Can you think of something? I’ll help you. There are some who discriminate in hiring. But it may not be as bad, or as racist, as you think considering the type of people you’ve become, and the fact that East Indians mostly hire East Indians; Mexicans, Mexicans; Arabs, Arabs; Asians, Asians; and so on. Why don’t you have or want your own businesses in black neighborhoods where you can hire black people? All of those circumstances I named above. And all of those circumstances I named off concerning black people came from plots created by the powers that be. Every single one. And I can show you. But there is another interesting angle to all of this, the powers that be target white citizens more than they do blacks in some cases. From vaccines, man-made viruses, poisonous foods and products; war, all sorts of drugs, and the New World Order the average white citizen is a larger target, and always has been. (I can remember when the media never showed poor white people, giving black people the illusion that all whites were well-off. This aiding in how most black people saw life in America.) And clearly, the average white citizen and the powers that be are not on the same team (“white people” … “the white man”). In conclusion, yes, I love my oppressor – I love black people.

The powers that be consist of the FBI. What has the FBI done to black people? Unbelievable harm! The very definition of oppression and suppression. Assassination after assassination. Any type of rise, they put done – a person, group, a thought … anything. Their job, which they stated, is to maintain the status quo – oppress and suppress black people! The powers that be consist of the CIA. What has the CIA done to black people? Unbelievable harm! The first thing that comes to mind is flooding black neighborhoods, poor and oppressed people, with heroin and cocaine (chemical warfare). And then guns, gangs, rap music, and a war on “drugs” were added to it. How sick can you get? How evil can you get? How racist can you get? This was/is a genocidal plot, and yet, where are all of the movies, news stories, and Facebook memes on what the CIA has done? Where are all of the movies, news stories, and Facebook memes on what the FBI has done? I thought this was the era of “look at what they did to you black people”? And where’s all the talk about what Jews have done to black people? Understand this: If there’s a race war a portion of all white citizens will be killed while all blacks citizens will be killed. The CIA will remain. The FBI will remain. Jews will remain. All of the Elite, the government, and Hollywood will remain. So what will you have accomplished? All of the most guilty people, all of the people and groups that have done the most evil to blacks will still be here! That’s where Umar and others had you headed.

Understand this: White citizens were intentionally made racist by the powers that be so that they would do their dirty work. Racism amongst average white citizens was on the decline, especially since the 1960’s. In the 1980’s the brainwashing of the powers that be against white America turned whites into a people that feared blacks (war on “drugs” propaganda). After a couple of decades whites began to see there was nothing to fear. After this, racism really began to subside. Then a time came when many white children, and black, actually didn’t know what racism was. And then came the racial tension agenda. The powers that be lit the fire once again.

- End of Commentary -

Building on what was stated

“Do the white man act like you?”

Define “white people” and “black people”. You, the reader, stop reading this and take about 30 seconds to define them. Could you define them? Did you already have a definition in your head, or did you have to “cook one up”? (Shouldn’t it have already been in your head?) Did you define them by looks, genetic traits that are not specific to any people – skin tone (which can even change with sun exposure), eye color, facial features, or hair color and texture? You do know there are “white people” who look like “black people” and other people, and “black people” who look like “white people” and other people? Or maybe you said, “White people are people whose ancestors can be traced back to Europe; black people, Africa.” So, you do a genetic test or ask for a family tree before you label someone “white” or “black”? And if a white person is someone whose ancestors came from Europe, where did those ancestor’s ancestors come from before that? Africa? So, what is a “white person”?

Being that everyone came from Africa (according to him) what’s his (or their) claim to fame? What makes him so special, so different and superior, that he can wave this around like a badge of honor? “I am the original man.” No, everybody is “the original man”. You just look more like the original man (according to your theory), the original family, and the people/families of the original location than others who left that location. So, your looks are your claim to fame? The genes which happened to express themselves in you, making your outward appearance somehow made you better? Really? Now consider this: If an identical twin of yours, a black person, moved from his birthplace to another country with a totally different climate and customs; then came back looking lighter or darker, speaking differently, dressing differently, acting differently, etc. would that make you superior? If there was something like a skin tone contest, who looks more like the original family, then yes. Would this twin of yours be a separate type of human being, a race? Can’t you breed animals to express a specific trait? But even if you bred groups of animals that looked extremely different from one another, or from the original stock you started with, they would all still be the same animal, correct? Understand this: There is actually no such thing as race (something I started “leaking out” on the internet years ago). At no point in human history did any human being branch off and become a type of human being. This is a lie that was spread to control populations (same as “you’re a Crip, and you’re a Blood”). And being that we’re all from Africa, how can he, or others like him, have more claim to Africa than a white person living today, especially one that’s older than him?

What is “black”?

One Race - Human Race: Black People With Blonde Hair, Blue Eyes



I'm Asian But My Culture is Black



Nations are usually identified by family and location, but doing so by family is the only way to remain correct in your observation. A DNA test, for example, might tell you that you’re 30% Egyptian. But what is Egyptian? The people who the samples were taken from are not the same people/family who has always been there. So, your results depends on which people the samples were taken from, not their location. Geographical locations are what’s tripping people up and distorting the truth.

What one, some, many, most, or almost all “white people” do or have done, all have done – are guilty of – right? You say “the white man,” meaning all “white people”. You also say that the first man and woman were black. So, all black people are responsible for the fall of mankind? Yes, according to you and others like you (based on your own standards). And now black people are going to bring in the New World Order, the fall of mankind in another way. (So maybe you’re right, maybe there is something to this “all” way of thinking.) Based on this, when all black people die, the world should be at peace. The “white man,” “white people,” are inherently evil, wicked, murderous, and racist? That means they are that way genetically. But you said you were the first man, which means they genetically came from you. So, what must you be then? You’re the father of evil, wickedness, murder, and racism. And in America, most blacks are mixed with “white” genes, but most whites are not mixed with “black” genes. So, not only are black Americans the father of evil, wickedness, murder, and racism; they’re part “white”! So, how wicked are you?! Is this why we see what we see coming from black Americans? This is what you’re saying! Some of you also say or believe that white people were in the Caucasus Mountains dumb and living like cave men, not producing anything relevant to civilization. So, when white people were in the caves doing nothing, black people were murdering, enslaving, and taking the lands and natural resources of other nations and each other? So, that goes back to what black people said about black people being the father of evil, wickedness, etc., right? Not until Alexander the Great do we really see “Europeans,” “white people,” conquering non-whites.

History of imperialism

Bronze and Iron Age empires

The earliest known empire appeared in Egypt when King Narmer of the Upper Valley conquered the Lower Valley circa 3000 BC and laid the foundations for the Old Kingdom. The Akkadian Empire, established by Sargon of Akkad (24th century BC), was an early all-Mesopotamian empire. This imperial achievement was repeated by Hammurabi of Babylon in the 17th century BC. In the 15th century BC, the New Kingdom of Ancient Egypt, ruled by Thutmose III, was ancient Africa's major force upon incorporating Nubia and the ancient city-states of the Levant.

Circa 1500 BC in China rose the Shang Empire which was succeeded by the Zhou Empire circa 1100 BC. Both surpassed in territory their contemporary Near Eastern empires. The Zhou Empire dissolved in 770 BC into feudal multi-state system which lasted for five and a half centuries until the universal conquest of Qin in 221 BC.

The first empire comparable to Rome in organization was the Neo-Assyrian Empire (916–612 BC). The Median Empire was the first empire within the territory of Persia. By the 6th century BC, after having allied with the Babylonians to defeat the Neo-Assyrian Empire, the Medes were able to establish their own empire, which was the largest of its day and lasted for about sixty years.

Classical period

The Axial Age (mid-First Millennium BC) witnessed unprecedented imperial expansion in the Indo-Mediterranean region and China.[15] The successful and extensive Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BC), also known as the first Persian Empire, covered Mesopotamia, Egypt, parts of Greece, Thrace, the Middle East, much of Central Asia, and North-Western India. It is considered the first great empire in history or the first "world empire."[16] It was overthrown and replaced by the short-lived empire of Alexander the Great. His Empire was succeeded by three Empires ruled by the Diadochi—the Seleucid, Ptolemaic, and Macedonian, which, despite being independent, are called the "Hellenistic Empire" by virtue of their similarities in culture and administration.

Meanwhile, in the western Mediterranean the Empires of Carthage and Rome began their rise. Having decisively defeated Carthage in 202 BC, Rome defeated Macedonia in 200 BC and the Seleucids in 190/189 BC to establish all-Mediterranean Empire. The Seleucid Empire broke apart and its former eastern part was absorbed by the Parthian Empire. In 30 BC Rome annexed the Ptolemaic Egypt.

In India during the Axial Age appeared the Maurya Empire—a geographically extensive and powerful empire, ruled by the Mauryan dynasty from 321–185 BC. The empire was founded in 322 BC by Chandragupta Maurya, who rapidly expanded his power westward across central and western India, taking advantage of the disruptions of local powers following the withdrawal by Alexander the Great. By 320 BC, the Maurya Empire had fully occupied northwestern India as well as defeating and conquering the satraps left by Alexander. Under Emperor Asoka the Great, the Maurya Empire became the first Indian empire to conquer the whole Indian Peninsula — an achievement repeated only twice, by the Gupta and Mughal Empires.

Source:

And what about the belief systems that are responsible for the mind state we see in ruling whites, “the oppressors”? They came from Babylon, Assyria, Egypt, and places like India. Were any of these people white?

“White people did this to you.” “White people did this to us.” “The white man did this to you.” “The white man did this to us.” So, are you saying you’re holding a grudge? And what percentage of Europeans, Europe included, were involved in capturing, selling, buying, or possessing slaves? Whatever the exact answer is you know that it’s nowhere close to 100%, but you still think and say all. That’s scary. You shouldn’t judge anything. You’re scale is absolute trash. The Torah condemns you. And of those people whose caused slavery to come to an end, white people made up the majority.

Slavery, by the Numbers



What percentage of white people alive today were involved in any racist acts of the 1900’s? What percentage of white people alive today were involved in any racist acts in the 2000’s? That equals all to you? But it’s not all. So, you’re accusing innocent people, against the Torah once again. You’re saying someone is guilty because they have the same name or came from the same family as someone else who committed a crime (“guilt by association”). That’s your idea of justice? How about finding out if each person is actually guilty of a crime, and the details of that crime, before establishing guilt based on a name, or the fact that they belong to a particular family (See: John 7:45-51). “Well, they do it to us.” Who is “they”? “They” means “white people,” right? But “white people” means “all white people”. One, a few, many, almost all equals all? One from “that team,” a member of “that team,” equals “they,” “that team”? I don’t want to go into details about the problem in your mind (I have a project on that), but people are individuals. There’s no team/group/gang called “white people”. There’s no team/group/gang called “black people.” White people were born white; they didn’t get up one day and join a gang or team called “white people” with full knowledge that black people would be their arch enemies. Black people were born black; they didn’t get up one day and join a gang or team called “black people” with full knowledge that white people would be their arch enemies. There is no “they” and “we”. When white people were dying for the rights of blacks, was there a “they” and “we”? When black people were helping to set up Martin Luther King and Malcolm X to be killed was there a “they” and “we”? You would have to be a fool to think like this, thinking you know someone based on their looks (when there are blacks who pass for whites; and whites who pass for blacks). Even most blacks who went through real racism (not racism from a screen) knew all whites weren’t racist. You would know this if you actually knew your own history. These “unconscious teachers” in the Black Unconscious Community and “Israeli-lites” in the Israeli-lite Community, with help from the System, have taught you lies about your own history, and you don’t even know it.

Within each human being is their very own courtroom, which consists of a scale (among other things). Just as an external scale used to weigh objects, each person has to be fair, just, or else their decision/judgment will be false/a lie. This is probably the most unknown and overlooked, yet highly valuable, qualities/aspects of man and Yah. I have a teaching on this which breaks it down in detail, but this is not the time or place for it. In the meantime, look for “just,” “justice” and related terms in the Bible the next time you read it. You’ll begin to see how important it is. You can also look at the judgments of the Law to gain a sense of how your decision making should be in life. And so you’ll know, He is the very definition of “just”. He is not like you at all. There are many times when you are not on the same page as He is, but you think you are. Let me give you an example. Your enemy, or someone you strongly dislike or hate, (someone you have an unfavorable/bad/- view of) commits a crime and is punished for it, depending on how just/fair you are, you may delight in this. If your mother, child, best friend, or spouse – someone you strongly like or love, (someone you have a favorable/good/+ view of) goes and commits the same crime under the same circumstances and has been declared to receive the same punishment as the previous person, depending on how just/fair you are, you’ll have a totally different reaction (a totally different ruling). All of a sudden it’s not fair. All of a sudden justifications arise. But while you’re seeing it this way, guess Who is NOT? When you read that He is not partial, it means just that, He is not partial, NEVER. [And this favorable/unfavorable element is what’s triggered in a bribe. A bribe increases favor. A bribe perverts justice/right ruling—a fair/just decision—a right decision/a true decision/the truth. Now, what do you think having a grudge would do?]

LEVITICUS

CHAPTER 19

15 ¶ Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt

not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of

the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy

neighbour.

35 ¶ Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in

meteyard, in weight, or in measure.

36 Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin,

shall ye have: I am the LORD your God, which brought you

out of the land of Egypt.

DEUTERONOMY

CHAPTER 25

13 ¶ Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights, a great

and a small.

14 Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a

great and a small.

15 But thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect

and just measure shalt thou have: that thy days may be

lengthened in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.

16 For all that do such things, and all that do unrighteously,

are an abomination unto the LORD thy God.

PROVERBS

CHAPTER 11

A FALSE balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just

weight is his delight.

PROVERBS

CHAPTER 16

11 A just weight and balance are the LORD’s: all the

weights of the bag are his work.

PROVERBS

CHAPTER 17

15 He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the

just, even they both are abomination to the LORD.

PROVERBS

CHAPTER 20

10 Divers weights, and divers measures, both of them are

alike abomination to the LORD.

23 Divers weights are an abomination unto the LORD; and a

false balance is not good.

MICAH

CHAPTER 6

11 Shall I count them pure with the wicked balances, and

with the bag of deceitful weights?

And it’s said by many people in the Israelite Community, and black community, that “they” have to pay for killing Israelites or blacks? What about you? You kill the most blacks. Aren’t black women the most homicidal, genocidal towards blacks? So, is it you or your children who are going to die for what black people have done to black people? This is what you’re saying. This is according to the standard that you created (the weight you created to weigh things against).

EZEKIEL

CHAPTER 18

THE word of the LORD came unto me again, saying,

2 What mean ye, that ye use this proverb concerning the

land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes,

and the children’s teeth are set on edge?

3 As I live, saith the Lord GOD, ye shall not have occasion

any more to use this proverb in Israel.

4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so

also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it

shall die.

5 ¶ But if a man be just, and do that which is lawful and

right,

6 And hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath lifted

up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, neither hath

defiled his neighbour’s wife, neither hath come near to a

menstruous woman,

7 And hath not oppressed any, but hath restored to the

debtor his pledge, hath spoiled none by violence, hath given

his bread to the hungry, and hath covered the naked with a

garment;

8 He that hath not given forth upon usury, neither hath

taken any increase, that hath withdrawn his hand from

iniquity, hath executed true judgment between man and

man,

9 Hath walked in my statutes, and hath kept my judgments,

to deal truly; he is just, he shall surely live, saith the Lord

GOD.

10 ¶ If he beget a son that is a robber, a shedder of blood,

and that doeth the like to any one of these things,

11 And that doeth not any of those duties, but even hath

eaten upon the mountains, and defiled his neighbour’s wife,

12 Hath oppressed the poor and needy, hath spoiled by

violence, hath not restored the pledge, and hath lifted up his

eyes to the idols, hath committed abomination,

13 Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase:

shall he then live? he shall not live: he hath done all these

abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon

him.

14 ¶ Now, lo, if he beget a son, that seeth all his father’s

sins which he hath done, and considereth, and doeth not

such like,

15 That hath not eaten upon the mountains, neither hath

lifted up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, hath not

defiled his neighbour’s wife,

16 Neither hath oppressed any, hath not withholden the

pledge, neither hath spoiled by violence, but hath given his

bread to the hungry, and hath covered the naked with a

garment,

17 That hath taken off his hand from the poor, that hath not

received usury nor increase, hath executed my judgments,

hath walked in my statutes; he shall not die for the iniquity

of his father, he shall surely live.

18 As for his father, because he cruelly oppressed, spoiled

his brother by violence, and did that which is not good

among his people, lo, even he shall die in his iniquity.

A righteous man will live. If that righteous man has a son who is wicked, that wicked son will die. If that wicked son has a son who is righteous, that righteous son will live. That’s going down the family tree, from one generation to the next. Here’s an interesting scenario: What if all white people were wicked in the 1960’s, while all black people were righteous in the 1960’s, and the wicked white people had children who were righteous, while the righteous black people had children were wicked, which group of children would die in the wrath that is currently right at the door? The group who is actually, and currently, wicked, right? Now imagine those wicked black children saying to those righteous white children that they were guilty of the wickedness of their fathers and were wicked because of what their fathers did. Imagine those same wicked black children attacking those righteous white children for being children of the wicked white fathers. That would be crazy, right? But I’m sure no scenario exists that’s even close to that.

19 ¶ Yet say ye, Why? doth not the son bear the iniquity of

the father? When the son hath done that which is lawful and

right, and hath kept all my statutes, and hath done them, he

shall surely live.

20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear

the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the

iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall

be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be

upon him.

21 But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath

committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is

lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die.

22 All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall

not be mentioned unto him: in his righteousness that he

hath done he shall live.

23 Have I any pleasure at all that the wicked should die?

saith the Lord GOD: and not that he should return from his

ways, and live?

24 ¶ But when the righteous turneth away from his

righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and doeth

according to all the abominations that the wicked man

doeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done

shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath

trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall

he die.

25 ¶ Yet ye say, The way of the Lord is not equal. Hear

now, O house of Israel; Is not my way equal? are not your

ways unequal?

26 When a righteous man turneth away from his

righteousness, and committeth iniquity, and dieth in them;

for his iniquity that he hath done shall he die.

27 Again, when the wicked man turneth away from his

wickedness that he hath committed, and doeth that which is

lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive.

28 Because he considereth, and turneth away from all his

transgressions that he hath committed, he shall surely live,

he shall not die.

29 Yet saith the house of Israel, The way of the Lord is not

equal. O house of Israel, are not my ways equal? are not

your ways unequal?

30 Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one

according to his ways, saith the Lord GOD. Repent, and turn

yourselves from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall

not be your ruin.

31 ¶ Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby

ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new

spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

32 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth,

saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn yourselves, and live ye.

ROMANS

CHAPTER 2

THEREFORE thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever

thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou

condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same

things.

2 But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to

truth against them which commit such things.

3 And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which

do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape

the judgment of God?

4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and

forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the

goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?

5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up

unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation

of the righteous judgment of God;

6 Who will render to every man according to his deeds:

7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek

for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:

8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the

truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,

9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that

doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile;

10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh

good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile:

11 For there is no respect of persons with God.

17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and

makest thy boast of God,

18 And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are

more excellent, being instructed out of the law;

19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the

blind, a light of them which are in darkness,

20 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which

hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law.

21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not

thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost

thou steal?

22 Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost

thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou

commit sacrilege?

You who show your disgust at racism towards blacks, are you racist?

23 Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking

the law dishonourest thou God?

24 For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles

through you, as it is written.

JAMES

CHAPTER 2

MY brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ,

the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.

….with partiality.

2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold

ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man

in vile raiment;

An example, one example, is given. This can also be seen as white and black, or black and white.

3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing,

and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to

the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:

4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become

judges of evil thoughts?

5 Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the

poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom

which he hath promised to them that love him?

6 But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress

you, and draw you before the judgment seats?

7 Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye

are called?

8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou

shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:

9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are

convinced of the law as transgressors.

EZEKIEL

CHAPTER 33

10 Therefore, O thou son of man, speak unto the house of

Israel; Thus ye speak, saying, If our transgressions and our

sins be upon us, and we pine away in them, how should we

then live?

11 Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no

pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn

from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways;

for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

He doesn’t have any pleasure in the death of the wicked (not even the wicked/guilty). It’s business. He does get pleasure when they turn from their wickedness.

12 Therefore, thou son of man, say unto the children of thy

people, The righteousness of the righteous shall not deliver

him in the day of his transgression: as for the wickedness of

the wicked, he shall not fall thereby in the day that he

turneth from his wickedness; neither shall the righteous be

able to live for his righteousness in the day that he sinneth.

13 When I shall say to the righteous, that he shall surely

live; if he trust to his own righteousness, and commit

iniquity, all his righteousnesses shall not be remembered;

but for his iniquity that he hath committed, he shall die for

it.

14 Again, when I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely

die; if he turn from his sin, and do that which is lawful and

right;

15 If the wicked restore the pledge, give again that he had

robbed, walk in the statutes of life, without committing

iniquity; he shall surely live, he shall not die.

16 None of his sins that he hath committed shall be

mentioned unto him: he hath done that which is lawful and

right; he shall surely live.

17 ¶ Yet the children of thy people say, The way of the

Lord is not equal: but as for them, their way is not equal.

18 When the righteous turneth from his righteousness, and

committeth iniquity, he shall even die thereby.

19 But if the wicked turn from his wickedness, and do that

which is lawful and right, he shall live thereby.

20 ¶ Yet ye say, The way of the Lord is not equal. O ye

house of Israel, I will judge you every one after his ways.

All of what you’ve just read reveals one of the major issues (negatives) with vengeance, you could end up taking vengeance out on someone who is actually innocent; and then you would have to be punished for what you just did to an innocent person/people.

Now, stop and think about what you were taught, who you learned it from, why you believed it, and where you were headed believing and maybe teaching it yourself. You were (maybe still are) on your way out of here. And then you would have been wondering why it was happening. And then you and others like you, and some of the people who like you, would have come up with all kinds of reasons why it was happening to you, reasons other than you (the guilty one, the reason). This is what false/untrue doctrine (information) does. It creates false beliefs, which in turn creates a false reality.

You know what a test is, right? Well, you got tested. You took the bait, now you’re caught. He knows what you’re made of and it’s been exposed as proof. And if racist, what you’re made of will not be in the Land. I wonder how he’s going to deal with you. Will it be the “scared straight program”; will He change you spiritually; will He bring you out and kill you; will He give you over to the New World Order; or will it be something else. You need to repent and get a whole new you or go look into the Black Conscious Community or Nation of Islam (while they’re still standing). That’s a better match for you. You don’t belong anywhere near Yah. You don’t know Him, and you’re going to get yourself killed. This is not a game, especially at this point in time.

Franklin Miller (Writeous1)



writeousservant@

writeous1@





................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download