Costs and Benefits in Vocational Education and Training
Costs and Benefits in Vocational Education and Training
Kathrin Hoeckel
EDU/EDPC/CERI(2008)3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COSTS AND BENEFITS IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING ........................................ 3 Tentative conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Context affects VET costs and benefits................................................................................................... 5 Methodological limitations...................................................................................................................... 5 Costs associated with vocational education and training ............................................................................ 6 Defining the costs of VET ....................................................................................................................... 6 Who pays for VET? ................................................................................................................................. 6 Forms of government intervention .......................................................................................................... 7 Employer engagement in VET ................................................................................................................ 8 Individual student contributions .............................................................................................................. 9 Benefits associated with vocational education and training...................................................................... 10 Defining the benefits of VET ................................................................................................................ 10 Determinants of VET benefits ............................................................................................................... 10 Employer perspective ............................................................................................................................ 11 Individual returns to VET...................................................................................................................... 12
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 15
2
EDU/EDPC/CERI(2008)3
COSTS AND BENEFITS IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Tentative conclusion
The evidence gathered in this VET cost benefit literature review leads to the following preliminary conclusions that will be used to inform subsequent research.
1. An aggregate cost-benefit analysis or general conclusions applicable to all OECD countries are hardly feasible for substantive and methodological reasons
? VET systems, their definition and forms of provision vary substantially across countries. ? Lack of standardized approach to data collection limits comparability; missing evidence.
2. Understanding the determinants of VET costs and benefits is as important as knowing the costs and benefits themselves
? Determinants include: Labour market regulations, influence of trade unions, nature of demand for skills, industry sector or occupation, types of VET provision, general versus specific training.
? Example: salaries of Swiss trainees are higher than those of their German counterparts but only Swiss firms reap net benefits; reason: unlike Germany, the flexible labour market in Switzerland does not inhibit turnover, therefore Swiss firms have to make sure trainees are productive.
3. Various direct and indirect costs to different stakeholders have to be taken into account
School based VET Individual Student fees
Charges for material/equipment
Employer Paid time off for staff/trainees Financial support for staff/trainees
State
Funding of education institutions
Scholarships, vouchers, grants and loans
Workplace training
Accept lower wages Opportunity costs (forgone earnings as unskilled worker)
Pay wages (and labour costs) higher than productivity Mistakes by inexperienced trainees, wasted resources and time of experienced workers In-house training courses (material, special clothing, teacher salary, administration)
Subsidies to training firms Financial concessions to employers (tax allowances)
3
EDU/EDPC/CERI(2008)3
4. An assessment of VET (as investment) should consider both short- and long-term benefits
? While costs are typically expected up front, benefits might arise at different points in time. ? Benefits may be difficult to quantify and hard to disentangle from other variables affecting
performance and productivity.
Individual*
Employer
Society
Short-term benefits
Employment chances
Earning levels Work satisfaction
Drop out less likely from vocational than general courses (US data)
Higher productivity from well trained workforce
Saved costs from recruiting external skilled workers (incl. time for integration and risk of hiring a person not known to the company)
Saved expenses for social benefits (unemployment as consequence of failed transition from education to work)
Long-term benefits
Flexibility and mobility
Lifelong learning (more likely to receive training and upgrade skills later in life)
Supply benefits (e.g. image improvement)
Less turnover (no need for retraining of new workers)
Externalities from productivity gain due to better education
Increase in tax income from higher earnings
*VET students' abilities differ systematically from academic students ? what is the right counterfactual?
5. The question `Is it worthwhile to invest in VET?' remains open at this stage ? VET is costly compared to general education. ? However: blue-collar workers (i.e. VET graduates) are still needed in today's economies.
A more suitable question could be: How can the provision of VET be made most cost-effective? This general question translates into concrete guiding questions for further analytical work on VET and country visits such as:
? Who should pay for VET? ? Where and how should VET be provided? ? Can context variables determining the cost-benefit relationship be influenced?
4
EDU/EDPC/CERI(2008)3
Introduction
1.
This paper has been prepared as part of the analytical phase of the OECD policy review on
vocational education and training (VET). Its purpose is to identify the different costs and benefits involved in the provision of initial VET1 and the difficulties involved in assessing them from a comparative point of
view. At this stage the paper is provisional and makes no claims to present exhaustive information on a
subject of such broad scope. During the course of the VET policy review, it will be updated and evidence
from other elements of the project, in particular the international questionnaire incorporated. Countries are
invited to provide feedback and contribute additional research and data to the evidence base.
2.
The paper draws from different approaches to the analysis of VET costs and benefits using
evidence from OECD countries. It underlines the importance of examining the background factors which
determine the cost-benefit relationship and discusses some methodological limitations. The remainder of
the paper is divided into two parts. The first deals with VET costs and their distribution between different
stakeholders. The second sets out the different types of benefits and their determinants and sheds light on
the evidence regarding both the employer and individual returns to VET.
Context affects VET costs and benefits
3.
The definition and provision of VET varies substantially across OECD countries. VET systems
range from highly regulated structures in the dual system countries to situations like in the UK, where
vocational education is highly fragmented and apprenticeships do not have a legally defined identity
(Steedman, 2001). Costs and benefits of alternative forms of provision differ accordingly. As a
consequence, it is difficult to carry out an aggregate cost-benefit assessment or to come up with general
conclusions valid for all OECD countries.
4.
VET systems are embedded in national economic structures which add to their heterogeneity.
Flexibility or rigidity of the labour market has an impact on employee turnover and on employers' capacity
to protect themselves against free-riding and poaching. Regulations such as minimum wages as well as the
impact of unions and involvement of employers are crucial in shaping the wage structure and hence
training costs and benefits. In the standard theoretical model of human capital with perfect labour markets,
workers capture all the returns to their general human capital and employers have no incentive to pay for
general training. However, when labour market frictions compress wages (increasing the wages of less
skilled workers), firms may invest in the general skills of their employees. The reason according to
Acemoglu and Pischke (1998) is that labour market imperfections restrict mobility of workers. This
implies that trained workers do not get paid their full marginal product when they change jobs and general
skills are turned into de facto specific skills. As a consequence, they argue, regulated labour markets in
Europe and Japan generate more firm sponsored general training than for instance the US.
5.
Other factors adding to the complexity of cost-benefit analysis include the nature of vocational
education and training (in vocational schools or work-based) and the specific occupation or industry.
Characteristics of the students, their age and level of prior schooling (Bernier, 2006) the time it takes them
to complete a VET programme and to find an apprenticeship place (Steedman, 2001) are also relevant.
Methodological limitations
6.
The comparative study of VET costs and benefits is further complicated by the fact that there is
no standardized approach to VET data collection across OECD countries (Kath, 1998; Moy and
1 Adult learning and training has been excluded to focus the present study and because it has recently been dealt with in the OECD study Promoting Adult Learning, OECD, 2005.
5
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- 09 11 see business plan final sonoma state university
- no high school diploma you ve got options
- costs and benefits in vocational education and training
- the building trades multi craft core curriculum
- vocational education in the united states toward the year
- virginia board for contractors approved
- approved air traffic collegiate training initiative at
- projections of education statistics to 2027
- u s department of education
- 501 c 3 organizations what qualifies as educational
Related searches
- education and training requirements
- features and benefits in sales
- ethiopian education and training policy
- technical and vocational education pdf
- costs and benefits of outsourcing
- dementia education and training handouts
- technical vocational education and training
- security education and training programs
- benefits of vocational training programs
- department of education and training victoria
- security education and training program
- adult education and training certification