Training Evaluation Report SUMMARY OF COURSE RESULTS

[Pages:4]1

Training Evaluation Report SUMMARY OF COURSE RESULTS

1. TRAINING COURSE PROFILE

Course Title: Sub-regional workshop for North-African and Sahel countries on the judicial response to terrorism and other transnational crimes in the region, Alger, Algeria, 15 ? 17 February 2011

Training Type: Seminar Managing Office: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Terrorism Prevention Branch

Course Manager(s): Piera Barzano', Terrorism Prevention Expert, UNODC/TPB Arianna Lepore, Consultant, UNODC/TPB

Training Venue: Alger

Course Language:

French/Arabic/English

Duration of the training: 3 days

No. of Participants: 23 No. of Respondents to the Evaluation Questionnaire: 18

Funding Source:

Canada

Implementing Partner:

CAERT - African Center for Studies and Research on Terrorism

2. COURSE EVALUATION RESULTS

Section I : Satisfaction with the training course

AVG

Min

Max

1

2

3

4

5

1. Do you feel that the workshop reached its objectives?

#

0%

0%

13%

44%

44%

0%

2. Were the topics appropriate with respect to what you specifically needed to learn for your current work or functions?

#

0%

6%

19%

38%

38%

0%

3. Was the course relevant to your organization's/employer's needs?

#

0%

6%

6%

44%

44%

0%

4. Was the course effective in providing networking opportunities?

#

6%

6%

31%

38%

19%

0%

5. Did you find the composition of the group appropriate to favor exchange of knowledge / information?

#

0%

0%

25%

44%

31%

0%

Not Applicable

N o Answer

Below is a list of all the modules delivered during the course. How valuable for your work was each module?

AVG

Not Valuable

0

Valuable 1

Very Valuable

2

General presentation of the security problems in North African and Sahel

(a) countries, in particular the threats posed by terrorism and possible

#

0%

31%

69%

0%

connections with other forms of transnational crime

(b) International cooperation in criminal matters from a national perspective

#

0%

50%

50%

0%

(c)

International cooperation in criminal matters from a Comparative Law perspective

#

0%

44%

56%

0%

(d)

Tools to facilitate international cooperation in criminal matters: "Tools of Interpol for the fight against terrorism"

#

0%

38%

56%

6%

(e)

Tools to facilitate international cooperation in criminal matters: "The universal legal framework, legal tools and practices"

#

0%

31%

63%

6%

6. Do you have any additional comments on your overall satisfaction with the training course?

A presentation on new investigating techniques could have been included in the workshop. (e.g. "infiltration techniques" as a very efficient investigation technique and the problems related to this) More emphasis should be put on money laundering.

Training Satisfaction (Satisfaction rating min 1/ max 5)

1 60

2 50

3 40

4 30

5 20

10

0

1. Do you feel that the workshop reached its

objectives? 2. Werethetopics appropriatewith respect to what you specifically needed to learn for your current work or functions? 3. 3. Was thecourse

relevant to your organization's/employer's

needs? 4. Was thecourseeffective

in providing networking opportunities?

5. 5. Did you find the composition of thegroup

appropriateto favor exchangeof knowledge/

information?

Page 2 of 4

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

General presentation

Inte rna ti ona l

of the security

cooperation from a

problems

national perspective

International cooperation from a Comparative Law

perspective

"Tools of Interpol for the fight against te rroris m"

"The universal legal framework, legal

tools and practices"

Very Valuable Va l ua bl e Not Valuable

Modules Satisfaction

Section II : Self assessment of knowledge and skills gained

7. Please rate your level of knowledge and skills before and after the course

1. Knowledge

(a) Before the course (b) After the course

2. Skills

(a) Before the course (b) After the course

AVG

None

Proficient

1

2

3

4

5

#

0%

13%

60%

20%

7%

#

0%

0%

27%

47%

27%

#

0%

14%

71%

7%

7%

#

0%

0%

29%

50%

21%

Knowledge (Rating min 1/ max 5)

60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

0%

Before the cours e

After the cours e

1 None 2 3 4 5 Profi ci ent

Page 3 of 4

Skills (Rating min 1/ max 5)

80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

0%

Before the cours e

After the cours e

1 None 2 3 4 5 Profi ci ent

3. ANTICIPATED BENEFITS TO PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE

1.Please indicate how you anticipate putting the knowledge and skills learned in this course into practice:

1. Advocate for policy reform 2. Contribute to improving or creating legislative texts 3. Contribute to effective implementation of legislative texts 4. Contribute to effective enforcement of a regulatory framework 5. Provide advice and assistance to stakeholders 6. Write a publication 7. Participate in other professional networks/associations 8. Other

% of participants 50% 56% 31% 56% 44% 13% 25% 25%

2. Do you foresee that you will share the skills or knowledge that you have acquired with others? If yes, how?:

1. Organizing an informal briefing for my work colleagues 2. Organizing a formal training for my work colleagues 3. Advising or assisting work colleagues 4. Sharing the documentation with others inside my organization 5. Sharing the documentation with others outside my organization 6. Publishing an article on a topic learned during the course 7. Organizing conferences / seminars / academic courses outside my organization 8. Participating in radio / TV programmes 9. Other 3 Additional comment:

% of participants 63% 31% 50% 75% 69% 6% 19% 19% 0%

Further anticipated benefits: a. Information and awareness raising among OPJ (Officers of Judicial Police) on the results of the workshop b. Awareness raising among the population and relevant entities c. Promote the Platform of Sahel countries

Page 4 of 4

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download