Chapter 10



Answers to End of Chapter 10 Questions1. Transaction versus Economic Exposure. Compare and contrast transaction exposure and economic exposure. Why would an MNC consider examining only its “net” cash flows in each currency when assessing its transaction exposure?ANSWER: Transaction exposure is due only to international transactions by a firm.? Economic exposure includes any form by which the firm’s cash flow will be affected.? Foreign competition may increase due to currency fluctuations.? This could affect the firm’s cash flow, but did not affect the value of any ongoing transactions.? Thus, it represents a form of economic exposure but not transaction exposure.? Transaction exposure is a subset of economic exposure.Consideration of all cash flows in a particular currency is not necessary when some inflows and outflows offset each other.? Only net cash flows are necessary.2.Assessing Transaction Exposure. Your employer, a large MNC, has asked you to assess its transaction exposure.? Its projected cash flows are as follows for the next year:CurrencyTotal InflowTotal OutflowCurrent Exchange Rate in U.S. DollarsDanish krone (DK)DK50,000,000DK40,000,000$.15British pound (?) ?2,000,000 ?1,000,000 $1.50Assume that the movements in the Danish krone and the pound are highly correlated. Provide your assessment as to your firm’s degree of transaction exposure (as to whether the exposure is high or low).? Substantiate your answer.? ANSWER: The net exposure to each currency in U.S. dollars is derived below:Foreign CurrencyNet Inflows in Foreign CurrencyCurrent Exchange RateValue of ExposureDanish krone (DK)+DK10,000,000 $.15 $1,500,000British pound (?) +?1,000,000$1.50 $1,500,000The krone and pound values move in tandem against the dollar.? Both the krone and the pound exposure show positive net inflows.? Thus, their exposure should be magnified if their exchange rates against the U.S. dollar continue to be highly correlated.? 3.Factors That Affect a Firm’s Transaction Exposure. What factors affect a firm’s degree of transaction exposure in a particular currency?? For each factor, explain the desirable characteristics that would reduce transaction exposure.ANSWER: Currency variability—low level is desirable.Currency correlations—low level is desirable for currencies that are net inflows, while a high level is desirable for pairs of currencies in which one currency shows future net inflows while the other currency shows future net outflows.4.Currency Correlations. Kopetsky Co. has net receivables in several currencies that are highly correlated with each other. What does this imply about the firm’s overall degree of transaction exposure? Are currency correlations perfectly stable over time?? What does your answer imply about Kopetsky Co. or any other firm using past data on correlations as an indicator for the future?ANSWER: Its exposure is high since all currencies move in tandem—no offsetting effect is likely.? If one of these currencies depreciates substantially against the firm’s local currency, all others will as well, and this reduces the value of these net receivables.No!? Thus, past correlations will not serve as perfect forecasts of future correlations.? Firms can not presume that past correlations will be perfectly accurate forecasts of future correlations. Yet, historical data may still be useful if the general ranking of correlations is somewhat stable.5.Currency Effects on Cash Flows. How should appreciation of a firm’s home currency generally affect its cash inflows?? How should depreciation of a firm’s home currency generally affect its cash outflows?? ANSWER: Appreciation of the firm’s home currency reduces inflows since the foreign demand for the firm’s goods is reduced and foreign competition is increased.Depreciation of the firm’s home currency should increase inflows since it will likely increase foreign demand for the firm’s goods and reduce foreign competition.6.Transaction Exposure. Fischer Inc., exports products from Florida to Europe. It obtains supplies and borrows funds locally.? How would appreciation of the euro likely affect its net cash flows?? Why?ANSWER: Fischer Inc. should benefit from the appreciation of the euro, because it should experience a strong demand for its products when the euro has more purchasing power (can obtain dollars at a low price). 7.Exposure of Domestic Firms. Why are the cash flows of a purely domestic firm exposed to exchange rate fluctuations?ANSWER: If the firm competes with foreign firms that also sell in a given market, the consumers may switch to foreign products if the local currency strengthens. 8.Measuring Economic Exposure. Memphis Co. hires you as a consultant to assess its degree of economic exposure to exchange rate fluctuations.? How would you handle this task?? Be specific.ANSWER: Regression analysis can be used to determine the relationship between the firm’s value and exchange rate fluctuations.? Stock returns can be used as a proxy for the change in the firm’s value.? The time period can be segmented into two subperiods so that regression analysis can be run for each subperiod.? The sign and magnitude of the regression coefficient will imply how the firm’s value is influenced by each currency.? Also, the coefficients can be compared among subperiods for each currency to determine how the impact of a currency is changing over time.? 9.Factors That Affect a Firm’s Translation Exposure. What factors affect a firm’s degree of translation exposure?? Explain how each factor influences translation exposure.ANSWER: The greater the percentage of business conducted by subsidiaries, the greater is the translation exposure.? The greater the variability of each relevant foreign currency relative to the headquarters’ home (reporting) currency, the greater is the translation exposure.? The type of accounting method employed can also affect translation exposure.10.Translation Exposure. Consider a period in which the U.S. dollar weakens against the euro.? How will this affect the reported earnings of a U.S.based MNC with European subsidiaries? Consider a period in which the U.S. dollar strengthens against most foreign currencies.? How will this affect the reported earnings of a U.S.-based MNC with subsidiaries all over the world?ANSWER: The consolidated earnings will be increased due to the strength of the subsidiaries’ local currency (the euro). The consolidated earnings will be reduced due to the weakness of the subsidiaries’ local currencies.11.Transaction Exposure. Aggie Co. produces chemicals.? It is a major exporter to Europe, where its main competition is from other U.S. exporters.? All of these companies invoice the products in U.S. dollars.? Is Aggie’s transaction exposure likely to be significantly affected if the euro strengthens or weakens?? Explain.? If the euro weakens for several years, can you think of any change that might occur in the global chemicals market?ANSWER: If the euro strengthens, European customers can purchase Aggie’s goods with fewer euros.? Since Aggie’s competitors also invoice their exports in dollars, Aggie Company will not gain a competitive advantage.? Nevertheless, the overall demand for the product could increase because the chemicals are now less expensive to European customers.If the euro weakens, European customers will need to pay more euros to purchase Aggie’s goods.? Since Aggie’s competitors also invoice their exports in dollars, Aggie Company may not necessarily lose some of its market share.? However, the overall European demand for chemicals could decline because the prices paid for them have increased.? If the euro remained weak for several years, some companies in Europe may begin to produce the chemicals, so that customers could avoid purchasing dollars with weak euros.? That is, the U.S. exporters could be priced out of the European market over time if the euro continually weakened.12.Economic Exposure. Longhorn Co. produces hospital equipment.? Most of its revenues are in the United States.? About half of its expenses require outflows in Philippine pesos (to pay for Philippine materials).? Most of Longhorn’s competition is from U.S. firms that have no international business at all.? How will Longhorn Co. be affected if the peso strengthens?ANSWER: If the peso strengthens, Longhorn will incur higher expenses when paying for the Philippine materials.? Because its competition is not affected in a similar manner, Longhorn Company is at a competitive disadvantage when the peso strengthens.13.Economic Exposure. Lubbock, Inc., produces furniture and has no international business.? Its major competitors import most of their furniture from Brazil and then sell it out of retail stores in the United States.? How will Lubbock, Inc., be affected if Brazil’s currency (the real) strengthens over time?ANSWER: If the Brazilian real strengthens, U.S. retail stores will likely have to pay higher prices for the furniture from Brazil, and may pass some or all of the higher cost on to customers.? Consequently, some customers may shift to furniture produced by Lubbock Inc.? Thus, Lubbock Inc. is expected to be favorably affected by a strong Brazilian real.14.Economic Exposure. Sooner Co. is a U.S. wholesale company that imports expensive highquality luggage and sells it to retail stores around the United States.? Its main competitors also import highquality luggage and sell it to retail stores.? None of these competitors hedge their exposure to exchange rate movements.? Why might Sooner’s market share be more volatile over time if it hedges its exposure?ANSWER: If Sooner Company hedged its imports, then it would have an advantage over the competition when the dollar weakened (since its competitors would pay higher prices for the luggage), and could possibly gain market share or would have a higher profit margin.? It would be at a disadvantage relative to the competition when the dollar strengthened and may lose market share or be forced to accept a lower profit margin.When Sooner Company does not hedge, the amount paid for imports would depend on exchange rate movements, but this is also true for all of its competitors.? Thus, Sooner is more likely to retain its existing market share.15.PPP and Economic Exposure. Boulder, Inc., exports chairs to Europe (invoiced in U.S. dollars) and competes against local European companies.? If purchasing power parity exists, why would Boulder not benefit from a stronger euro?ANSWER: If purchasing power parity exists, a stronger euro would occur only because the U.S. inflation is higher than European inflation.? Thus, the European demand for Boulder’s chairs may not be affected much since the inflated prices of U.S.made chairs would have offset the European consumer’s ability to obtain cheaper dollars.? The European consumer’s purchasing power of European chairs versus U.S. chairs is not affected by the change in the euro’s value. 16.Measuring Changes in Economic Exposure. Toyota Motor Corp. measures the sensitivity of its exports to the yen exchange rate (relative to the U.S. dollar).? Explain how regression analysis could be used for such a task.? Identify the expected sign of the regression coefficient if Toyota primarily exports to the United States.? If Toyota established plants in the United States, how might the regression coefficient on the exchange rate variable change?ANSWER: The dependent variable is a percentage change (from one period to the next) in Toyota’s export volume to the U.S.? The independent variables are (1) the percentage change in the yen’s value with respect to the dollar, (2) a measure of the strength of the U.S. economy, and (3) any other factors that could affect the volume of Toyota’s exports.? The regression coefficient related to the exchange rate variable (as defined here) would be negative, since a decrease in the yen’s value is likely to cause an increase in the U.S. demand for Toyotas built in Japan.If Toyota established plants in the U.S., dealers do not need to purchase Toyotas in Japan.? Thus, the demand for Toyotas is less sensitive to the exchange rate, which should cause the regression coefficient for the exchange rate variable to decrease. 17. Impact of Exchange Rates on Earnings. Cieplak, Inc., is a U.S.-based MNC that has expanded into Asia. Its U.S. parent exports to some Asian countries, with its exports denominated in the Asian currencies. It also has a large subsidiary in Malaysia that serves that market. Offer at least two reasons related to exposure to exchange rates why Cieplak's earnings were reduced during the Asian crisis.ANSWER: First, its receivables from its exports were converted to fewer dollars due to the depreciation of the Asian currencies. Second, any funds remitted by the Malaysian subsidiary converted to fewer dollars for the parent. Third, the earnings generated by the Malaysian subsidiary were translated to fewer dollars on the consolidated income statement (translation exposure) even if it did not remit any earnings to the parent.Advanced Questions18. Speculating Based on Exposure. During the Asian crisis in 1998, there were rumors that China would weaken its currency (the yuan) against the U.S. dollar and many European currencies. This caused investors to sell stocks in Asian countries such as Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore. Offer an intuitive explanation for such an effect. What types of Asian firms would have been affected the most?ANSWER: If China weakened its currency, importers of Asian products may purchase more Chinese products, which could have enhanced the performance of the Chinese exporters, but could have adversely affected the performance of the exporters in other Asian countries. Thus, there was concern that depreciation of the yuan would adversely affect the economies of the other countries.19. Comparing Transaction and Economic Exposure. Erie Co. has most of its business in the U.S.,except that it exports to Belgium. Its exports were invoiced in euros (Belgium’s currency) last year. It has no other economic exposure to exchange rate risk. Its main competition when selling to Belgium’s customers is a company in Belgium that sells similar products, denominated in euros. Starting today, Erie Co. plans to adjust its pricing strategy to invoice its exports in U.S. dollars instead of euros. Based on the new strategy, will Erie Co. be subject to economic exposure to exchange rate risk in the future? Briefly explain. ANSWER: Economic exposure still exists because a weak euro would encourage Belgian customers to switch to local competitors.20.Using Regression Analysis to Measure Exposure. a. How can a U.S. company use regression analysis to assess its economic exposure to fluctuations in the British pound? ANSWER: A U.S. company could quantify its performance by measuring the percentage change in earnings, stock price, or some other variable to be used as the dependent variable.? The independent variable is the percentage change in the British pound.? Lagged exchange rate variables could also be included as additional independent variables to capture any lagged impact of the pound’s movements on the firm.b. In using regression analysis to assess the sensitivity of cash flows to exchange rate movements, what is the purpose of breaking the database into sub periods?? ANSWER: Breaking the database into sub periods enables one to understand how the impact of the currency is changing over time.c. Assume the regression coefficient based on assessing economic exposure was much higher in the second sub period than in the first sub period.? What does this tell you about the firm’s degree of economic exposure over time?? Why might such results occur?? ANSWER: The firm is more exposed to change in currency values.? This could occur if the firm hedges currency positions less, or is simply increasing its degree of foreign business.21.Transaction Exposure. Vegas Corp. is a U.S. firm that exports most of its products to Canada. It historically invoiced its products in Canadian dollars to accommodate the importers. However, it was adversely affected when the Canadian dollar weakened against the U.S. dollar. Since Vegas did not hedge, its Canadian dollar receivables were converted into a relatively small amount of U.S. dollars. After a few more years of continual concern about possible exchange rate movements, Vegas called its customers and requested that they pay for future orders with U.S. dollars instead of Canadian dollars. At this time, the Canadian dollar was valued at $.81. The customers decided to oblige, since the number of Canadian dollars to be converted into U.S. dollars when importing the goods from Vegas was still slightly smaller than the number of Canadian dollars that would be needed to buy the product from a Canadian manufacturer. Based on this situation, has transaction exposure changed for Vegas Corp.? Has economic exposure changed? Explain.ANSWER: Transaction exposure is reduced since Vegas will have less receivables in Canadian dollars. However, the economic exposure will not necessarily be reduced because a weak Canadian dollar could cause a lower demand for its exports and will still affect cash flows.Measuring Economic Exposure. Using the following cost and revenue information shown for DeKalb, Inc., determine how the costs, revenue, and cash flow would be affected by three possible exchange rate scenarios for the New Zealand dollar (NZ$): (1) NZ$ = $.50, (2) NZ$ = $.55, and (3) NZ$ = $.60.? (Assume U.S. sales will be unaffected by the exchange rate.)? Assume that NZ$ earnings will be remitted to the U.S. parent at the end of the period. Ignore possible tax effects. Forecasted Net Cash Flows:? DeKalb Inc.(in millions of U.S. dollars and New Zealand dollars)New ZealandU.S. BusinessBusinessSales$800NZ$800Cost of Materials? 500? 100Operating Expenses? 300? 0Interest Expense? 100? 0Cash Flow –$100NZ$700ANSWER:(Figures are in millions) NZ$=$.50 NZ$=$.55 NZ$=$.60Sales? U.S.$800$800$800? New ZealandNZ$800 = 400NZ$800 = 440NZ$800 = 480? Total$1,200$1,240$1,280Cost of Materials ? U.S.$500$500$500? New ZealandNZ$100 = 50NZ$100 = 55NZ$100 =60? Total$550$555$560Operating expenses$300$300$300Interest expenses$100$100$100Cash flow$250$285$320The preceding table shows that DeKalb Inc. is adversely affected by a weaker New Zealand dollar value.? This should not be surprising since the New Zealand business has relatively high NZ$ revenue compared to NZ$ expenses.? This analysis assumes that the NZ$ received are converted to U.S. dollars at the end of the period.23.Changes in Economic Exposure. Walt Disney World built an amusement park in France that opened in 1992.? How do you think this project has affected Disney’s economic exposure to exchange rate movements?? Think carefully before you give your final answer. There is more than one way in which Disney’s cash flows may be affected. Explain.ANSWER: This is a good question for class discussion.? The typical first reaction is that Walt Disney Company’s exposure may increase, since this new park would generate revenue in French francs (now euros), which may someday be converted to dollars.? If the euro weakens against the dollar, the revenue will be converted to fewer dollars.When European currencies (or the euro) weakens against the dollar, tourism by Europeans decreases and Disney’s business in the U.S. declines.? By having a European amusement park, it may be able to offset the declining U.S. business during strong dollar cycles, since more European tourists may go to the Disney park in France during the periods.? Overall, Disney may be less exposed to exchange rate movements because of the park.24.Lagged Effects of Exchange Rate Movements. Cornhusker Co. is an exporter of products to Singapore.? It wants to know how its stock price is affected by changes in the Singapore dollar’s exchange rate.? It believes that the impact may occur with a lag of one to three quarters.? How could regression analysis be used to assess the impact?ANSWER: A possible regression model for this task is to regress percentage change in its stock price over quarter t (PSPt) against the percentage change in the Singapore dollar (PSD) in the three previous quarters, shown as follows.PSPt = a0 + a1PSDt–1 + a2PSDt–2 + a3PSDt–3 + utwhere ut is an error term.25. Potential Effects if the United Kingdom Adopted the Euro. The U.K. still has its own currency, the pound. The pound’s interest rate has historically been higher than the euros interest rate. The U.K. has considered adopting the euro as its currency. There have been many arguments about whether it should do so. Use your knowledge and intuition to discuss the likely effects if the United Kingdom adopts the euro. For each of the 10 statements below, insert either INCREASE or DECREASE and complete the statement by adding a clear short explanation (perhaps one to three sentences) of why the U.K.’s adoption of the euro would have that effect. To help you narrow your focus, follow these guidelines. Assume that the pound is more volatile than the euro. Do not base your answer on whether the pound would have been stronger than the euro in the future. Also, do not base your answer on an unusual change in economic growth in the U.K. or in the euro zone if the euro is adopted. ANSWERS:a. The economic exposure of British firms that are heavy exporters to the euro zone would decrease because no exchange of currencies would be needed.b. The translation exposure of firms based in the euro zone that have British subsidiaries would decrease because there would be no need to translate the British financial statements anymore. c. The economic exposure of U.S. firms that conduct substantial business in the U.K. and have no other international business would decrease because the euro should be less volatile than the pound. d. The translation exposure of U.S. firms with British subsidiaries would decrease because the euro should be less volatile than the pound. e. The economic exposure of U.S. firms that export to the U.K. and whose only other international business is importing from firms based in the euro zone would decrease because their euro outflows can offset some of the euro inflows. f. The forward discount on the forward rate paid by U.S. firms that periodically use the forward market to hedge payables of British imports would decline (or may even be a premium) because the euro’s interest rate is usually less than the pound’s interest rate. g. The earnings of a foreign exchange department of a British bank that executes foreign exchange transactions desired by its European clients would decrease because there would be a reduction in the foreign exchange needed. Assume that the Swiss franc is more highly correlated with the British pound than with the euro. A U.S. firm has substantial monthly exports to the U.K. denominated in the British currency, and also has substantial monthly imports of Swiss supplies (denominated in Swiss francs). The economic exposure of this firm would increase because it would replace the pound with the euro. The pound effects offset the Swiss franc effects because of the high correlation. The euro effects would not have as much of an offsetting effect because it was assumed that the correlation is not as high. i. Assume that the Swiss franc is more highly correlated with the British pound. A U.S. firm has substantial monthly exports to the U.K. denominated in the British currency, and also has substantial monthly exports to Switzerland (denominated in Swiss francs). The economic exposure of this firm would decrease because the cash inflows would now come from currencies that do not move in tandem as much as before. The British government’s reliance on monetary policy (as opposed to fiscal policy) as a means of fine-tuning the economy would decrease because it would no longer have control of the British money supply. The British money supply would be dictated by the European Central Bank. 26. Invoicing Policy to Reduce Exposure. Celtic Co. is a U.S. firm that exports its products to England. It faces competition from many firms in England. Its price to customers in England has generally been lower than those of the competitors, primarily because the British pound has been strong. It has priced its exports in pounds, and then converts the pound receivables into dollars. All of its expenses are in the U.S. and are paid with dollars. It is concerned about its economic exposure. It considers a change in its pricing policy, in which it will price its products in dollars instead of pounds. Offer your opinion on why this will or will not significantly reduce its economic exposure. ANSWER: If the pound weakens, demand for exports of Celtic Co. will decline as customers shift to the local competitors. Thus, this pricing policy would not significantly reduce its economic exposure. 27. Exposure to Cash Flows. Raton Co. is a U.S. company that has net inflows of 100 million Swissfrancs and net outflows of 100 million British pounds.? The present exchange rate of the Swiss franc is about $.70 while the present exchange rate of the pound is $1.90.? Raton Co. has not hedged these positions.? The Swiss franc and British pound are highly correlated in their movements against the dollar.? Explain whether Raton will be favorably or adversely affected if the dollar weakens against foreign currencies over time. ANSWER: Raton Co. will be favorably affected because dollar outflows and inflows will be reduced, but the dollar value of outflows is larger, and will be reduced to a greater degree than the dollar value of inflows. 28. Assessing Exchange Rate Risk. Washington Co. and Vermont Co. have no domestic business.They have a similar dollar equivalent amount of international exporting business. Washington Co. exports all of its products to Canada. Vermont Co. exports its products to Poland and Mexico, with about half of its business in each of these 2 countries. Each firm receives the currency of the country where it sends its exports. You obtain the end-of-month spot exchange rates of the currencies mentioned above during the end of each of the last 6 months. End of MonthCanadian DollarMexican PesoPolish Zloty1$0.8142$.09334$.2991420.8176.09437.2982930.8395.09241.3018740.8542.09263.308850.8501.09251.3027460.8556.09448.30312You want to assess the data in a logical manner to determine which firm has a higher degree of exchange rate risk. Show your work and write your conclusion. ANSWER: First, use an excel spreadsheet to determine the monthly percentage change in the exchange rate. The portfolio’s movements are equal to a weighted average of the movements of each component currency. The maximum expected one-month loss is l.65 x the standard deviation. The maximum expected one-month loss is lower for the portfolio of pesos and zloty. In this problem, the peso and zloty movements are negatively correlated, which is why the portfolio is less volatile than the Canadian dollar. Standard deviationMaximum expected loss = 1.65 x Std. Dev. Canadian $.01232.03%Mexican peso.01572.59%Polish zloty.01602.64%Equal-weighted portfolio of pesos and zloty.01001.65%29. Exposure to Pegged Currency System. Assume that the Mexican peso and the Braziliancurrency (called the “real”) have depreciated against the dollar recently, due to the high inflation rates in those countries. Assume that inflation in these two countries is expected to continue and that it will have a major effect on these currencies if they are still allowed to float. Assume that the government of Brazil decides to peg its currency to the dollar and will definitely maintain the peg for the next year. Milez Co. is based in Mexico. Its main business is to export supplies from Mexico to Brazil. It invoices its supplies in Mexican pesos. Its main competition is from firms in Brazil that produce similar supplies and sell them locally. How will the sales volume of Milez Co.be affected (if at all) by the Brazilian government’s actions? Explain. ANSWER: Its sales should increase because higher inflation in Mexico will cause the peso to weaken against the dollar, and therefore weaken against the real when real is pegged to $. So peso weakens against real and Brazilian customers buy more supplies from Mexico. 30. Assessing Currency Volatility. Zemart is a U.S. firm that plans to establish internationalbusiness in which it will export to Mexico (these exports will be denominated in pesos) and to Canada (these exports will be denominated in Canadian dollars) once a month and will therefore receive payments once a month. It is concerned about exchange rate risk. It wants to compare the standard deviation of exchange rate movements of these 2 currencies against the dollar on a monthly basis. For this reason, it asks you to estimate the standard deviation of the monthly movements in the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar over the last 12 months estimate the standard deviation of the monthly movements in the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar over the last 12 months. Determine which currency is less volatileYou can use the web site (or any legitimate web site that has currency data) to obtain the end of month direct exchange rate of the peso and the Canadian dollar in order to do your analysis. Show your work. You can use a calculator or a spreadsheet (like excel) to do the actual computations. ANSWER: This problem requires students to obtain exchange rates and use an Excel spreadsheet to derive the standard deviation of exchange rate movements, and to compare results. The comparison will likely show that the Canadian dollar’s movements are less volatile than the peso movements, but results vary over time. 31. Exposure of Net Cash Flows. Each of the following U.S. firms is expected to generate $40million in net cash flows (after including the estimated cash flows from international sales if there are any) over the next year. Ignore any tax effects. Each firm has the same level of expected earnings. None of the firms have taken any positions in exchange rate derivatives to hedge their exchange rate risk. All payments for the international trade by each firm will occur one year from today. Sunrise Co. has ordered imports from Austria, and its imports are invoiced in euros. The dollar value of the payables (based on today’s exchange rate) from its imports during this year is $10 million. It has no international sales. Copans Co. has ordered imports from Mexico, and its imports are invoiced in U.S. dollars. The dollar value of the payables from its imports during this year is $15 million. It has no international sales.Yamato Co. ordered imports from Italy, and its imports are invoiced in euros. The dollar value of the payables (based on today’s exchange rate) from its imports during this year is $12 million. In addition, Yamato exports to Portugal and its exports are denominated in euros. The dollar value of the receivables (based on today’s exchange rate) from its exports during this year is $8 million. Glades Co. ordered imports from Belgium, and these imports are invoiced in euros. The dollar value of the payables (based on today’s exchange rate) from its imports during this year is $7 million. Glades also ordered imports from Luxembourg and these imports are denominated in dollars. The dollar value of these payables is $30 million. Glades has no international sales.Based on this information, which firm is exposed to the most exchange rate risk? Explain. ANSWERCompanyAmount of Foreign Currency Net Cash Flows (measured in $)Sunrise$10 millionCopans$0Yamato$4 millionGlades $7 millionSunrise is exposed to the most exchange rate risk. 32. Cash Flow Sensitivity to Exchange Rate Movements. The Central Bank of Poland is about toengage in indirect intervention later today, in which it will lower Poland’s interest rates substantially. This will have an impact on the value of the Polish currency (zloty) against most currencies because it will immediately affect capital flows. Missouri Co. has a subsidiary in Poland that sells appliances. The demand for its appliances is not affected much by the local economy. Most of its appliances produced in Poland are typically invoiced in zloty and are purchased by consumers from Germany. The subsidiary’s main competition is from appliance producers in Portugal, Spain, and Italy that also export appliances to Germany. a. Explain how the impact on the zloty’s value will affect the sales of appliances by the Polish subsidiary.b. The subsidiary owes a British company 1 million British pounds for some technology that the British company provided. Explain how the impact on the zloty’s value will affect the cost of this technology to the subsidiary.c. The subsidiary plans to take 2 million zloty from its recent earnings, and will remit it to the U.S. parent in the near future. Explain how the impact on the zloty’s value will affect the amount of dollar cash flows received by the U.S. parent due to this remittance of earnings by the subsidiary. ANSWER a. The lower interest rate in Poland will reduce capital flows to Poland, which reduces the demand for zloty, which weakens the value of the zloty. Thus, sales of appliances by the Polish subsidiary to Germany should increase because German consumers can purchase appliances from the subsidiary at a lower price. b. The lower interest rate in Poland will reduce capital flows to Poland, which reduces the demand for zloty, which weakens the value of the zloty. The subsidiary’s cost will increase because it will take more zloty to purchase technology. c. The earnings will convert to less dollars because of the zloty’s depreciation against the dollar. 33. Applying the Value-at-Risk Method. You use today’s spot rate of the Brazilian real to forecastthe spot rate of the real for one month ahead. Today’s spot rate is $.4558. Use the value-at-risk method to determine the maximum percentage loss of the Brazilian real over the next month based on a 95 percent confidence level. Use the spot exchange rates at the end of each of the last 6 months as shown below to conduct your analysis. Forecast the exchange rate that would exist under these conditions. ANSWER:End of MonthValue ofBrazilian real1$.42512.42033.41964.45235.44176.4558The standard deviation is 4.09%. The maximum expected loss in the currency’s value is:1.65 x 4.09% = 6.75%. If this loss occurs, the exchange rate of the real in one month would be: $.4558 x (1 - .0675) = $.4250.34. Assessing Translation Exposure. Kanab Co. and Zion Co. are U.S. companies that engage inmuch business within the U.S. and are about the same size. They both conduct some international business as well. Kanab Co. has a subsidiary in Canada that will generate earnings of about C$20 million in each of the next 5 years. Kanab Co. also has a U.S. business that will also receive about C$1 million (after costs) in each of the next 5 years as a result of exporting products to Canada that are denominated in Canadian dollars. Zion Company has a subsidiary in Mexico that will generate earnings of about 1 million pesos in each of the next 5 years. Zion Co. also has a business in the U.S. that will receive about 300 million pesos (after costs) in each of the next 5 years as a result of exporting products to Mexico that are denominated in Mexican pesos. The salvage value of Kanab’s Canadian subsidiary and Zion’s Mexican subsidiary will be zero in 5 years. The spot rate of the Canadian dollar is $.60 while the spot rate of the Mexican peso is $.10. Assume the Canadian dollar could appreciate or depreciate against the U.S. dollar by about 8% in any given year, while the Mexican peso could appreciate or depreciate against the U.S. dollar by about 12% in any given year. Which company is subject to a higher degree of translation exposure? Explain. ANSWER: Kanab Co. has C$20,000,000 that is subject to translation exposure, as these are the subsidiary earnings. Its cash flows from exporting are not subject to translation exposure.Zion Co. has 1,000,000 pesos that is subject to translation exposure, as these are the subsidiary earnings. Its cash flows from exporting are not subject to translation exposure.The estimated dollar value of Kanab’s translated earnings is C$20,000,000 x .60 = $12,000,000. The estimated dollar value of Zion’s translated earnings is 1,000,000 pesos x .10 = $100,000. Since both companies are the same size, Kanab Co. has a much higher proportion of its business that is subject to translation exposure. While the peso is more volatile than the Canadian dollar, the potential adverse effect due to translation exposure is much larger for Kanab. 35. Cross-Currency Relationships. The Hong Kong dollar (HK$) is presently pegged to the U.S.dollar and is expected to remain pegged. Some Hong Kong firms export products to Australia that are denominated in Australian dollars and have no other business in Australia. The exports are not hedged. The Australian dollar is presently worth 0.50 U.S. dollars but you expect that it will be worth 0.45 U.S. dollars by the end of the year. Based on your expectations, will the Hong Kong exporters be affected favorably or unfavorably? Briefly explain. ANSWER: Hong Kong exporters are adversely affected. If the A$ depreciates against U.S. $, it will depreciate against the HK$, which means that the Australian importers will have to pay more for exports. 36. Interpreting Economic Exposure. Spratt Co. (a U.S. firm) attempts to determine its economicexposure to movements in the British pound, by applying regression analysis to data over the last 36 quarters:SP = b0 + b1e + u where SP represents the percentage change in Alabama’s stock price per quarter, e represents the percentage change in the pound value per quarter, and u is an error term. Based on the analysis, the b0 coefficient is zero and the b1 coefficient is -.4 and is statistically significant. Assume that interest rate parity exists. Today, the spot rate of the pound is $1.80, the 90-day British interest rate is 3%, and the 90-day U.S. interest rate is 2%. Assume that the 90-day forward rate is expected to be an accurate forecast of the future spot rate. Would you expect that Spratt’s value will be favorably affected, unfavorably affected, or not affected by its economic exposure over the next quarter? Explain. ANSWER: The forecast based on the forward rate (assuming interest rate parity) is depreciation of the pound, and Spratt’ value moves inversely with the movement in pound, so it will be favorably affected. 37. Assessing Translation Exposure. Assume the euro’s spot rate is presently equal to $1.00. All ofthe following firms are based in New York and are the same size. While these firms concentrate on business in the U.S., their entire foreign operations for this quarter are provided here. Company A expects its exports to cause cash inflows of 9 million euros and imports to cause cash outflows equal to 3 million euros. Company B has a subsidiary in Portugal that expects revenue of 5 million euros and has expenses of 1 million euros. Company C expects exports to cause cash inflows of 9 million euros and imports to cause cash outflows of 3 million euros, and will repay the balance of an existing loan equal to 2 million euros. Company D expects zero exports and imports to cause cash outflows of 11 million euros. Company E will repay the balance of an existing loan equal to 9 million euros. Which of the five companies described here has the highest degree of translation exposure? ANSWER: Company B has the greatest degree of translation exposure because it has a subsidiary whose financial statements must be consolidated with the U.S. operations. 38. Exchange Rates and Market Share. Minnesota Co. is a U.S. firm that exports computer parts toJapan. Its main competition is from firms that are based in Japan, which invoice their products in yen. Minnesota’s exports are invoiced in U.S. dollars. The prices charged by Minnesota and its competitors will not change during the next year. Will Minnesota’s revenue increase, decrease, or be unaffected if the spot rate of the yen appreciates over the next year? Briefly explain. ANSWER: The revenue will increase, since the demand by Japanese customers for Minnesota’s products should increase. Japanese customers can purchase dollars with fewer yen and therefore can purchase the products exported by Minnesota at a lower cost. 39. Exchange Rates and Market Share. Harz Co. (a U.S. firm) has an arrangement with a Chinesecompany in which it purchases the products from them every week at the prevailing spot rate, and then sells the products in the U.S. invoiced in dollars. All of its competition is from U.S. firms that have no international business. The prices charged by Harz and its competitors will not change over the next year. Will the net cash flows generated by Harz increase, decrease, or be unaffected if the Chinese yuan depreciates over the next year? Briefly explain. ANSWER: If the yuan depreciates, Harz will incur lower expenses when paying for the products from China. Because its competition is not affected in a similar manner, Harz Co. is at a competitive advantage when the yuan weakens.40. IFE and Exposure. Assume that Maine Co. (a U.S. firm) measures its economic exposure tomovements in the British pound by applying regression analysis to data over the last 36 quarters:SP = b0 + b1e + u where SP represents the percentage change in Maine’s stock price per quarter, e represents the percentage change in the British pound value per quarter, and u is an error term. Based on the analysis, the b0 coefficient is estimated to be zero and the b1 coefficient is estimated to be 0.3 and is statistically significant. Maine Co. believes that the movement in the value of the pound over the next quarter will be mostly driven by the international Fisher effect. The prevailing quarterly interest rate in the U.K. is lower than the prevailing quarterly interest rate in the U.S. Would you expect that Maine’s value will be favorably affected, unfavorably affected, or not affected by the pound’s movement over the next quarter? Explain. ANSWER: Based on the IFE, the pound’s value will rise during the next quarter. Since SP is positively related to the percentage change in the British pound value per quarter, it should be favorably affected by the pound’s movement over the next quarter. 41. PPP and Exposure. Layton Co. (a U.S. firm) attempts to determine its economic exposure tomovements in the Japanese yen, by applying regression analysis to data over the last 36 quarters:SP = b0 + b1e + u where SP represents the percentage change in Layton’s stock price per quarter, e represents the percentage change in the yen value per quarter, and u is an error term. Based on the analysis, the b0 coefficient is zero and the b1 coefficient is 0.4 and is statistically significant. Layton believes that the inflation differential has a major effect on the value of the yen (based on purchasing power parity). The inflation in Japan is expected to rise substantially while the U.S. inflation will remain at a low level. Would you expect that Layton’s value will be favorably affected, unfavorably affected, or not affected by its economic exposure over the next quarter? Explain. ANSWER: Based on purchasing power parity, the relatively high inflation in Japan will place downward pressure on the yen. Since the coefficient b1 is positive, the percentage change in Layton’s stock price is positively related to e. Since the percentage change in the exchange rate (e) is expected to be negative in the next quarter, the value of the stock will decrease as well. Thus, Layton’s value will be unfavorably affected. 42. Exposure to Cash Flows. Lance Co. is a U.S. company that has exposure to the Swiss francs (SF)and Danish kroner (DK). It has net inflows of SF100 million and net outflows of DK500 million.? The present exchange rate of the SF is about $.80 while the present exchange rate of the DK is $.10.? Lance Co. has not hedged these positions.? The SF and DK are highly correlated in their movements against the dollar.? Explain whether Lance will be favorably or adversely affected if the dollar strengthens against foreign currencies over time. ANSWER: Lance Co. will be adversely affected because the dollar value of its SF inflows exceeds the dollar value of its DK outflows. Thus, its dollar cash inflows from SF will be reduced by a greater degree than the dollar cash outflows needed to obtain DK. 43. Assessing Transaction Exposure. Zebra Co. is a U.S. firm that obtains products from a U.S.supplier and then exports them to Canadian firms. Its exports are denominated in U.S. dollars. Its main competitor is a local company in Canada that sells similar products denominated in Canadian dollars. Is Zebra subject to transaction exposure? Briefly explain.ANSWER: No, because Zebra’s cash flows are denominated in home currency. They will not be affected by exchange rate fluctuations. 44. Assessing Translation Exposure. Quartz Co. has its entire operations in Miami, Florida, and isan exporter of products to Eurozone countries. All of its earnings are derived from its exports. The exports are denominated in euros. Reed Co. (of the U.S.) is about the same size as Quartz Co. and generates about the same amount of earnings in a typical year. It has a subsidiary in Germany that typically generates about 40 percent of its total earnings. All earnings are reinvested in Germany and therefore not remitted. The rest of Reed’s business is in the U.S. Which company has a higher degree of translation exposure? Briefly explain. ANSWER: Reed Co. has a higher degree of translation exposure because its foreign subsidiary’s financial statements (including earnings) must be translated into U.S. dollars. Quartz does not have translation exposure.45. Estimating Value at Risk. Yazoo Inc. is a U.S. firm that has substantial international business inJapan and has cash inflows in Japanese yen. The spot rate of the yen today is $.01. The yen exchange rate was $.008 three months ago, $.0085 two months ago, and $.009 one month ago. Yazoo uses today’s spot rate of the yen as its forecast of the spot rate in one month. However, it wants to determine the maximum expected percentage decline in the value of the Japanese yen in one month based on the value at risk (VAR) method and a 95 percent probability. Use the exchange rate information provided to derive the maximum expected decline in the yen over the next month. ANSWER: Applying an electronic spreadsheet, the standard deviation of the yen movements is about .029185. Maximum expected percentage decline in yen is: = Forecasted % change – (1.65 x Standard Deviation of yen movements) = 0 – (1.65 x .029185) = -.048155 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download