CAUCUS CALENDAR



ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESFifty-third Legislature - Second Regular SessionMAJORITY CAUCUS CALENDAR #8March 6, 2018Bill NumberShort TitleCommitteeDateActionCommittee on Banking and InsuranceChairman:John M. Allen, LD15Vice Chairman:Eddie Farnsworth, LD12Analyst:Paul BennyIntern:Lauren KinzleSB 1112insurance; surplus lines; exemptionSPONSOR:FANN, LD1SENATE1/29/2018(30-0-0-0)BI2/26DP(8-0-0-0-0)SB 1251PSPRS; CORP; modificationsSPONSOR:FARNSWORTH D, LD16SENATE2/12/2018(29-0-1-0)(NV: FARNSWORTH D)BI2/26DP(8-0-0-0-0)Committee on CommerceChairman:Jeff Weninger, LD17Vice Chairman:Jill Norgaard, LD18Analyst:Diana ClayIntern:Josefina TorresHB 2154personal information; data security breachesSPONSOR:SHOPE, LD8HOUSECOM2/13DP(9-0-0-0-0)SB 1009insurance; corporations; directorsSPONSOR:FANN, LD1SENATE1/30/2018(28-2-0-0)(No: CAJERO BEDFORD,FARLEY)COM2/27DP(7-0-0-2-0)(Abs: ESPINOZA,CLODFELTER)SB 1163credit security freezes; fees; prohibitionSPONSOR:BROPHY MCGEE, LD28SENATE2/15/2018(29-0-1-0)(NV: MIRANDA)COM2/27DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: ESPINOZA) HYPERLINK \l "sb1205" SB 1205unemployment insurance; educational employers; interestSPONSOR:FANN, LD1SENATE2/8/2018(30-0-0-0)COM2/27DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: ESPINOZA)Committee on EducationChairman:Paul Boyer, LD20Vice Chairman:Douglas Coleman, LD16Analyst:Aaron WondersIntern:Ileen Younan HYPERLINK \l "sb1057" SB 1057county school superintendent; report; approvalSPONSOR:BURGES, LD22SENATE1/29/2018(30-0-0-0)ED2/26DP(8-0-0-2-0)(Abs: BOLDING,BOWERS) HYPERLINK \l "sb1082" SB 1082full-day kindergarten; instruction requirementsSPONSOR:ALLEN S, LD6SENATE2/12/2018(28-1-1-0)(No: QUEZADA; NV: FARNSWORTH D)ED2/26DP(9-0-0-1-0)(Abs: BOLDING) HYPERLINK \l "sb1083" SB 1083schools; recess periodsSPONSOR:ALLEN S, LD6SENATE2/12/2018(26-3-1-0)(No: BARTO,MENDEZ,QUEZADA; NV: FARNSWORTH D)ED2/26DP(9-0-0-1-0)(Abs: BOLDING) HYPERLINK \l "sb1215" SB 1215WICHE; continuation.SPONSOR:ALLEN S, LD6SENATE2/1/2018(25-3-2-0)(No: PETERSEN,FARNSWORTH D,BURGES; NV: PESHLAKAI,YEE)ED2/26DP(8-0-0-2-0)(Abs: BOLDING,BOWERS)Committee on Federalism, Property Rights and Public PolicyChairman:Bob Thorpe, LD6Vice Chairman:Becky A. Nutt, LD14Analyst:Brittany GreenIntern:Amanda Higby HYPERLINK \l "sb1355" SB 1355border security trust fund; repealSPONSOR:GRIFFIN, LD14SENATE2/15/2018(26-3-1-0)(No: CONTRERAS,MENDEZ,QUEZADA; NV: MIRANDA)FPRPP2/27DP(8-1-0-0-0)(No: BLANC)Committee on GovernmentChairman:Douglas Coleman, LD16Vice Chairman:Bob Thorpe, LD6Analyst:Michael HansIntern:Stiv Fico HYPERLINK \l "sb1118" SB 1118expenditure reporting; fair market valueSPONSOR:KAVANAGH, LD23SENATE2/19/2018(29-0-1-0)(NV: BRADLEY)GOV3/1DP(6-2-0-0-0)(No: CLARK,SALMAN) HYPERLINK \l "sb1162" SB 1162silver alert notification; developmental disabilitySPONSOR:BROPHY MCGEE, LD28SENATE2/8/2018(30-0-0-0)GOV3/1DP(8-0-0-0-0) HYPERLINK \l "sb1209" SB 1209scrap metal dealers; DPS reportSPONSOR:BORRELLI, LD5SENATE2/8/2018(30-0-0-0)GOV3/1DP(8-0-0-0-0) HYPERLINK \l "sb1249" SB 1249campaign finance violations; appealsSPONSOR:BURGES, LD22SENATE2/21/2018(30-0-0-0)GOV3/1DP(8-0-0-0-0) HYPERLINK \l "sb1281" SB 1281street lighting improvement districts; consolidationSPONSOR:KAVANAGH, LD23SENATE2/15/2018(29-0-1-0)(NV: MIRANDA)GOV3/1DP(7-1-0-0-0)(No: UGENTI-RITA)Committee on HealthChairman:Heather Carter, LD15Vice Chairman:Regina E. Cobb, LD5Analyst:Rick HazeltonIntern:Tyler Stephens HYPERLINK \l "hb2398" HB 2398health education; marijuana; opioids; alcohol (HEALTH S/E: illegal substances education; partnership)SPONSOR:THORPE, LD6HOUSEHEALTH2/15DPA/SE(9-0-0-0-0) HYPERLINK \l "sb1072" SB 1072DCS; contractor employees; fingerprint requirementSPONSOR:BROPHY MCGEE, LD28SENATE1/29/2018(30-0-0-0)HEALTH3/1DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: RIVERO) HYPERLINK \l "sb1164" SB 1164DES; fingerprint card; tax informationSPONSOR:BROPHY MCGEE, LD28SENATE2/8/2018(30-0-0-0)HEALTH3/1DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: RIVERO) HYPERLINK \l "sb1165" SB 1165child care assistance; ratesSPONSOR:BROPHY MCGEE, LD28SENATE2/19/2018(29-0-1-0)(NV: BRADLEY)HEALTH3/1DPA(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: RIVERO) HYPERLINK \l "sb1246" SB 1246behavioral health boardSPONSOR:BARTO, LD15SENATE2/20/2018(30-0-0-0)HEALTH3/1DP(7-0-0-2-0)(Abs: CARTER,RIVERO)Committee on Judiciary and Public SafetyChairman:Eddie Farnsworth, LD12Vice Chairman:Anthony T. Kern, LD20Analyst:Katy ProctorIntern:Samantha Cox HYPERLINK \l "sb1041" SB 1041residency restrictions; sex offenders; victimsSPONSOR:KAVANAGH, LD23SENATE1/30/2018(17-13-0-0)(No: DALESSANDRO,CAJERO BEDFORD,OTONDO,PESHLAKAI,FARLEY,BRADLEY,BOWIE,CONTRERAS,HOBBS,MENDEZ,MIRANDA,QUEZADA,MEZA)JPS2/28DPA(6-3-0-0-0)(No: GONZALES,STRINGER,ENGEL) HYPERLINK \l "sb1076" SB 1076assault; public safety contractors; workersSPONSOR:BARTO, LD15SENATE1/29/2018(30-0-0-0)JPS2/28DP(9-0-0-0-0) HYPERLINK \l "sb1110" SB 1110photo radar; review; penaltySPONSOR:BORRELLI, LD5SENATE2/1/2018(28-0-2-0)(NV: PESHLAKAI,YEE)JPS2/28DP(7-1-0-1-0)(No: GONZALES; Abs: BOYER) HYPERLINK \l "sb1211" SB 1211sentence; life imprisonment; parole eligibilitySPONSOR:BURGES, LD22SENATE2/8/2018(30-0-0-0)JPS2/28DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: BOYER) HYPERLINK \l "sb1447" SB 1447juror questionnaire; investigationsSPONSOR:GRIFFIN, LD14SENATE2/15/2018(17-12-1-0)(No: DALESSANDRO,CAJERO BEDFORD,OTONDO,PESHLAKAI,FARLEY,BRADLEY,BOWIE,CONTRERAS,HOBBS,MENDEZ,QUEZADA,MEZA; NV: MIRANDA)JPS2/28DP(5-4-0-0-0)(No: GONZALES,STRINGER,HERNANDEZ,ENGEL)Committee on Land, Agriculture and Rural AffairsChairman:Brenda Barton, LD6Vice Chairman:Darin Mitchell, LD13Analyst:Sharon CarpenterIntern:Adrienne Austill HYPERLINK \l "sb1038" SB 1038state land sales; payment methodSPONSOR:GRIFFIN, LD14SENATE1/30/2018(30-0-0-0)LARA3/1DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: GABALD?N) HYPERLINK \l "sb1042" SB 1042backflow prevention; state fire codeSPONSOR:KAVANAGH, LD23SENATE1/29/2018(22-8-0-0)(No: BORRELLI,ALLEN S,PETERSEN,GRIFFIN,BARTO,FARNSWORTH D,BURGES,KERR)LARA3/1DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: GABALD?N) HYPERLINK \l "sb1052" SB 1052county flood control districts; easementsSPONSOR:GRIFFIN, LD14SENATE2/5/2018(30-0-0-0)LARA3/1DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: GABALD?N) HYPERLINK \l "sb1144" SB 1144conservation easements; notice; valuationSPONSOR:GRIFFIN, LD14SENATE2/12/2018(29-0-1-0)(NV: FARNSWORTH D)LARA3/1DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: GABALD?N) HYPERLINK \l "sb1432" SB 1432ranchers; landowners; fire trainingSPONSOR:GRIFFIN, LD14SENATE2/15/2018(29-0-1-0)(NV: MIRANDA)LARA3/1DP(8-0-0-1-0)(Abs: GABALD?N)Committee on Local and International AffairsChairman:Tony Rivero, LD21Vice Chairman:Todd A. Clodfelter, LD10Analyst:Michael HansIntern:Stiv Fico HYPERLINK \l "sb1014" SB 1014municipal zoning; rezoning protestsSPONSOR:KAVANAGH, LD23SENATE1/29/2018(23-7-0-0)(No: ALLEN S,PETERSEN,GRIFFIN,BARTO,FARNSWORTH D,BURGES,KERR)LIA2/28DPA(5-0-0-2-0)(Abs: GABALD?N,CH?VEZ) HYPERLINK \l "sb1043" SB 1043county recorder; recording feesSPONSOR:KAVANAGH, LD23SENATE2/1/2018(23-5-2-0)(No: ALLEN S,SMITH,PETERSEN,FARNSWORTH D,BURGES; NV: PESHLAKAI,YEE)LIA2/28DPA(5-0-0-2-0)(Abs: GABALD?N,CH?VEZ) HYPERLINK \l "sb1113" SB 1113zoning violations; notice; serviceSPONSOR:FANN, LD1SENATE2/1/2018(23-5-2-0)(No: ALLEN S,SMITH,PETERSEN,FARNSWORTH D,BURGES; NV: PESHLAKAI,YEE)LIA2/28DPA(5-0-0-2-0)(Abs: GABALD?N,CH?VEZ) HYPERLINK \l "sb1114" SB 1114joint power authorities; fingerprintingSPONSOR:FANN, LD1SENATE2/15/2018(29-0-1-0)(NV: MIRANDA)LIA2/28DP(5-0-0-2-0)(Abs: GABALD?N,CH?VEZ)Committee on Military, Veterans and Regulatory AffairsChairman:Jay Lawrence, LD23Vice Chairman:Mark Finchem, LD11Analyst:Brittany GreenIntern:Amanda Higby HYPERLINK \l "hcm2003" HCM 2003deported veterans; medical treatmentSPONSOR:ESPINOZA, LD19HOUSEMVRA1/29DP(9-0-0-0-0) HYPERLINK \l "sb1089" SB 1089purple heart daySPONSOR:BORRELLI, LD5SENATE2/1/2018(28-0-2-0)(NV: PESHLAKAI,YEE)MVRA2/26DP(7-0-0-2-0)(Abs: CAMPBELL,DESCHEENIE) HYPERLINK \l "sb1090" SB 1090Beirut barracks bombing remembrance daySPONSOR:BORRELLI, LD5SENATE2/1/2018(28-0-2-0)(NV: PESHLAKAI,YEE)MVRA2/26DPA(7-0-0-2-0)(Abs: CAMPBELL,DESCHEENIE) HYPERLINK \l "scr1004" SCR 1004Beirut bombing; remembrance daySPONSOR:BORRELLI, LD5SENATE2/1/2018(28-0-2-0)(NV: PESHLAKAI,YEE)MVRA2/26DP(7-0-0-2-0)(Abs: CAMPBELL,DESCHEENIE)Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureChairman:Noel W. Campbell, LD1Vice Chairman:Drew John, LD14Analyst:Liam MaherIntern:Samuel Rosenberg HYPERLINK \l "sb1200" SB 1200transportation revisionsSPONSOR:WORSLEY, LD25SENATE2/5/2018(30-0-0-0)TI2/28DPA(8-0-0-0-0) HYPERLINK \l "sb1203" SB 1203vehicle towingSPONSOR:WORSLEY, LD25SENATE2/1/2018(28-0-2-0)(NV: PESHLAKAI,YEE)TI2/28DPA(8-0-0-0-0) HYPERLINK \l "sb1207" SB 1207lease authority; airports; air terminalsSPONSOR:PRATT, LD8SENATE2/12/2018(27-2-1-0)(No: MENDEZ,QUEZADA; NV: FARNSWORTH D)TI2/28DP(7-1-0-0-0)(No: ANDRADE) HYPERLINK \l "sb1208" SB 1208ATVs; off-highway vehiclesSPONSOR:PRATT, LD8SENATE2/12/2018(18-11-1-0)(No: DALESSANDRO,CAJERO BEDFORD,PESHLAKAI,FARLEY,BRADLEY,BOWIE,CONTRERAS,HOBBS,MENDEZ,QUEZADA,MEZA; NV: FARNSWORTH D)TI2/28DP(7-1-0-0-0)(No: ANDRADE)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1112: insurance; surplus lines; exemptionPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Fann, LD 1BILL STATUS: HYPERLINK "" \o "Bill Status Inquiry" Caucus & COW BI: DP 8-0-0-0317566040Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to surplus lines insurance.ProvisionsIncludes insurance for federally recognized Indian tribes and their members on subjects of insurance located on federally recognized Indian reservations to the insurance types exempt from surplus lines requirements. (Sec. 1)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1) Current LawAn insurance coverage or type that is not readily procurable from authorized insurers is recognized as surplus lines (A.R.S. § 20-409). Surplus lines insurance may be procured from an unauthorized insurer through a licensed surplus lines broker (A.R.S. § 20-407). Insurance obtained through a surplus lines broker is not protected under the Insurance Guaranty Fund (A.R.S. § 20-410). Statutory requirements for surplus lines do not apply to reinsurance or to the following insurance classes:Ocean marine and foreign trade insurance; Insurance on subjects that are located, resident or to be performed wholly outside of Arizona; Insurance on vehicles or aircrafts owned and principally garaged outside Arizona; and Insurance on property or operations of railroads engaged in interstate commerce (A.R.S. § 20-420). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1251: PSPRS; CORP; modificationsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Farnsworth D, LD 16BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWBI: DP 8-0-0-01651009525Legend:CORP – Corrections Officer Retirement PlanDROP – Deferred Retirement Option PlanPSPRS – Public Safety Personnel Retirement SystemAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:CORP – Corrections Officer Retirement PlanDROP – Deferred Retirement Option PlanPSPRS – Public Safety Personnel Retirement SystemAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to PSPRS and CORP.ProvisionsClarifies an employer's requirement to make contributions on behalf of an employee participating in the PSPRS Define Contribution Plan based on the employee's Social Security coverage. (Sec. 1, 10)Extends the time for which Indian tribes may opt out of participating in the public safety employer risk pool to January 1, 2019. (Sec. 2)Applies the opt out extension for Indian tribes retroactively to January 1, 2018. (Sec. 15)Clarifies a PSPRS member who is subsequently reemployed is not required to deposit monies that have been withdrawn from a severance refund in order to be subject to the benefits and duties in effect for specified situations. (Sec. 3)Provides full vesting for participants in the PSPRS Define Contribution Plan who are eligible for an accidental or disability pension. (Sec. 8)Stipulates a probation or surveillance officer who, within the first 90 days of employment, dies in the line of duty is considered to have been enrolled in CORP and the surviving spouse is eligible for survivor benefits. (Sec. 11)Allows a current or retired member of a PSPRS or CORP employer to rollover contributions from a qualified plan or an Individual Retirement Account into a separate rollover account under the PSPRS Define Contribution Plan.Monies in the separate rollover account may be withdrawn or transferred to an eligible retirement plan. (Sec. 9)Directs the lump sum payment from a reverse DROP be deposited into a separate rollover account under the PSPRS Define Contribution Plan.Allows the member to withdraw all or any portion of the lump sum or transfer all or any portion to an eligible retirement plan. (Sec. 12, 13)Adds the local board of the Judiciary may specify a designated position as a nondesignated position, provided certain conditions are met. (Sec. 14)Clarifies that the position of a deputy administrator is equivalent to the position of an assistant administrator. (Sec. 4) Makes conforming changes. (Sec. 4, 5, 6, 7, 11)Contains a conditional enactment clause. (Sec. 16)Current LawPSPRS was created for the purpose of providing a uniform, consistent and equitable statewide program for public safety personnel who are regularly assigned to hazardous duty. The Board governs and administers the retirement system for police and firefighters. Additionally, the Board administers the retirement plans for correctional officers (CORP) (A.R.S Title 38, Chapter 5).CORP is a multi‐employer public employee retirement plan which provides benefits for prison and jail employees of certain state, county and local governments (A.R.S. Title 38, Chapter 5, Article 6). A member may not borrow from, take a loan against or remove contributions from the member’s account before termination of membership in CORP or receipt of a pension (A.R.S. § 38-891). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESHB 2154: personal information; data security breachesPRIME SPONSOR: Representative Shope, LD 8BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWCOM: DP 9-0-0-0317566675Legend:AG- Attorney GeneralBreach- Security System BreachCRA- Consumer Reporting AgencyData- Unencrypted or Unredacted Computerized DataAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:AG- Attorney GeneralBreach- Security System BreachCRA- Consumer Reporting AgencyData- Unencrypted or Unredacted Computerized DataAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to data security breaches and notification requirements. ProvisionsAdds Article 4 (Data Security Breaches) to Title 18 (Information Technology), Chapter 5 (Network Security) statutes. (Sec. 1) Requires a person who owns or licenses Data to notify the AG in writing and the individuals affected, pending the needs of law enforcement, in the event of a Breach within 30 days. Notification must be made to law enforcement and CRA's promptly and without unreasonable delay if more than 1,000 Arizona residents are affected by the Breach. Instructs a person who maintains Data to immediately inform the owner in the event of a Breach and follow protocol as outlined. States that the person who maintains Data is not required to provide notice to affected individuals or CRA's unless an agreement between the person and the owner of the Data stipulate otherwise. (Sec. 2) Requires the notification of a Breach to include the following:The approximate date of the Breach;A brief description of the personal information included in the Breach;The toll-free numbers and addresses for the three largest CRA's; andThe toll-free number, address and website address for the Federal Trade Commission or any federal agency that assists consumers with identity theft. (Sec. 2) Requires direct telephonic contact with an affected individual of a Breach, rather than a prerecorded message. (Sec. 2)Allows substitute notification of a Breach if the cost of providing notice would exceed $250,000. (Sec. 2)Stipulates that a Breach is not required to be disclosed if an independent third-party forensic auditor has determined that a Breach has not occurred. (Sec. 2) Removes the AG's ability to impose a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 per Breach or series of Breaches that are discovered during an investigation. (Sec. 2)Defines pertinent terms. (Sec. 1)Makes technical changes and conforming changes. (Sec. 2-4)Current LawA person who owns or licenses Data is required to investigate a potential Breach. If the investigation determines that here has been a breach, the person must notify the individuals affected. The notification must be made, pending the needs of law enforcement, in the most expedient manner possible. A person that maintains Data must notify and cooperate with the owner or licensee of the Data in the event of a Breach. Cooperation includes sharing information relevant to the Breach. Any notification may be delayed if a law enforcement agency determines that it will compromise a criminal investigation. Notifications must be made using the following methods: written, electronic, telephonic, or substitute notice. Substitute notice can only be used if the cost of providing notice would exceed $50,000 or the affected individuals exceeds 100,000. A person is not required to disclose a breach if it is determined by the person or a law enforcement agency that a Breach did not occur. Only the AG can enforce this section. The AG may impose a civil penalty not to exceed $10,000 per Breach or series of Breaches that are discovered during an investigation. (A.R.S. § 18-545)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1009: insurance; corporations; directorsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Fann, LD 1BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWCOM: DP 7-0-0-2317566675Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to directors of hospital and medical service corporations.ProvisionsRemoves the requirement for the directors of a corporation to have a representative for administrators or trustees of hospitals contracted with a hospital service corporation or a hospital and medical service corporation to provide hospital services. (Sec. 1)Eliminates the requirement for the directors of a corporation to include a representative for licensed physicians and surgeons who have a contract with a medical service corporation or a hospital and medical service corporation to provide hospital services. (Sec. 1)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawA Hospital service corporation, medical service corporation, dental service corporation, optometric service corporation or hospital, medical dental and optometric corporation are organized under statute for the purpose of establishing, maintaining and operating nonprofit hospital, medical, dental, or optometric services by a hospital and may include extended care facilities, home health agencies or professional and technical personnel that provide services. (A.R.S. § 20-822)The directors of the above-mentioned corporations must always have a representative for:Administrators or trustees of hospitals that contract to provide hospital services with a hospital service corporation or a hospital and medical service corporation;Physicians and surgeons licensed to practice in the state who are contracted with a medical service corporation or a hospital and medical service corporation to render medical services;Dentists licensed to practice in Arizona who are contracted with the dental service corporation to provide dental services; Optometrists licensed to practice in Arizona who are contracted with an optometric service corporation to provide optometric services; andThe general public. (A.R.S. § 20-829)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1163: credit security freezes; fees; prohibitionPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Brophy McGee, LD 28BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWCOM: DP 8-0-0-1698567310Legend:CRA- Consumer Reporting AgencyPIN- Personal Identification NumberSSN- Social Security NumberAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:CRA- Consumer Reporting AgencyPIN- Personal Identification NumberSSN- Social Security NumberAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to credit security fees.ProvisionsProhibits a CRA from charging a fee for:Placing a security freeze, removal or temporary lift of a security freeze on a consumer's credit report. (Sec. 1)Reissuing a new PIN or password. (Sec. 1)Conforms the section by striking current law that prohibits a CRA from charging a fee to: The victim of identity theft who submits a valid police report. (Sec. 1)A protected person who is a victim of identity theft and submits a valid police report. (Sec. 2)A protected person under 16 years and the CRA has a credit report on the person. (Sec. 2)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1, 2)Current LawA consumer is defined as an individual and a CRA is defined as any person who engages in the practice of assembling or evaluating consumer credit information to transfer to third parties. (A.R.S. 44-1691)A security freeze is a notice that is placed on the consumer's credit report that prohibits the CRA from releasing the credit report without prior authorization from the consumer. (A.R.S. § 44-1698)A protected person is defined as an individual who is under 16 years of age at the time of the security freeze request or is an incapacitated person or has a guardian. (A.R.S. § 44-1698.02) A consumer may request in writing that he or she wants to place a security freeze on the consumer's credit report. A CRA has no more than 10 days after receiving the request to place a security freeze on the credit report and send confirmation to the consumer. The CRA must provide the consumer with a PIN or password that is not the consumer's SSN and is used to authorize the release of the consumer's credit report or to remove the security freeze. A security freeze remains in effect until the consumer requests the removal or temporary lift of the security freeze. The CRA may charge a $5 fee for each security freeze, removal or temporary lift of the freeze when requested by the consumer, but may not charge a fee to a victim of identity theft who submits a valid police report. The CRA may charge a $5 fee if the consumer forgets the PIN or password and requests a new one. The CRA may not make changes to the consumer's credit report while there is a security freeze. The security freeze also stops the CRA from releasing the consumer's credit report to a third party without consent of the consumer, but does not prevent the CRA from informing a third party of the security freeze. (A.R.S. § 44-1698)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1205: unemployment insurance; educational employers; interestPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Fann, LD 1BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWCOM: DP 8-0-0-1317567945Legend:DES – Department of Economic SecurityUI – Unemployment InsuranceAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:DES – Department of Economic SecurityUI – Unemployment InsuranceAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to payments for UI benefits. Provisions For individuals who provide services to multiple educational employers, UI benefits are only payable if there is no contract or reasonable assurance of work between or within terms of service. (Sec. 1) Directs the waived interest on an overpayment involving fraud to be treated as though it was recovered. (Sec. 2) Clarifies that DES cannot waive any fraud overpayments and penalties, except as noted. (Sec. 2) States that DES cannot collect any overpayments or interest that DES waives. (Sec. 2) Permits DES to accept voluntary payments. (Sec. 2) Removes archaic language. (Sec. 1) Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1, 2) Current Law Persons who are unemployed through no fault of their own may qualify for UI benefits, which are based on a formula outlined in statute and calculated according to earned wages. The weekly UI benefits are calculated according to wages earned from employers who paid unemployment taxes to the State of Arizona. The benefit amount is 4% of the wages paid in the highest quarter of the worker's base period, with the current maximum set at $240 per week. (A.R.S. § 23-779) Statute requires any overpayment of benefits to a UI recipient to be repaid, with DES having the option to deduct all or any portion of the amount from future UI benefits. If DES determines a person received benefits through fraud, DES must assess a penalty of 15% of the amount erroneously paid out. The person is ineligible for benefits until the total amount is repaid, including all penalties and interest. Monies are deposited into the UI Fund. (A.R.S. § 23-787) Interest is 10% on any benefit overpayment debts, including those through court judgment, but DES may waive a portion for good cause shown. For overpayments of UI benefits that involve fraud, statute caps the interest that DES may waive at 25%. (A.R.S. § 23-787)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1057: county school superintendent; report; approvalPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Burges, LD 22BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWED: DP 8-0-0-2317569850Legend:ADE – Arizona Department of EducationSBE – State Board of EducationSPI – Superintendent of Public InstructionAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADE – Arizona Department of EducationSBE – State Board of EducationSPI – Superintendent of Public InstructionAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to annual financial reports.ProvisionsRemoves the requirement that county school superintendents approve school district annual financial reports. (Sec. 1)Removes the exemption from sending annual financial reports to the county school superintendent for school districts that SBE has assumed accounting responsibility for. (Sec. 1)Makes a technical change. (Sec. 1)Current LawSchool district governing boards are required to publish annual financial reports that contain budgeted and actual expenditures for the preceding FY by November 15. Annual financial reports must be submitted electronically to the SPI and distributed to the county school superintendent by October 15, except that school districts who have had SBE assume accounting responsibility are not required to send a copy to the county school superintendent. School superintendents approve annual financial reports in an electronic procedure prescribe by ADE. Annual financial reports are published in a newspaper of general circulation, by electronic submission to ADE for posting on the website or in the official county newspaper or instead may be mailed to each household in the school district (A.R.S. § 15-904). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1082: full-day kindergarten; instruction requirementsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Allen S, LD 6BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWED: DP 9-0-0-1698573025Legend:ADE – Arizona Department of EducationLEA – Local Education AgencySBE – State Board of EducationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADE – Arizona Department of EducationLEA – Local Education AgencySBE – State Board of EducationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to requirements for full-day kindergarten.ProvisionsRequires voluntary tuition-free kindergarten instruction offered by a LEA for at least 2.5 hours per school day to:Meet or exceed the academic standards prescribed by SBE;Incorporate play as an instructional strategy; Be academically meaningful; and Provide active learning enrichment. (Sec. 1)Permits the parent of a kindergarten student to choose either half-day or full-day kindergarten instruction. (Sec. 1)Makes a conforming change. (Sec. 1)Current LawElementary and unified school districts are required to establish kindergarten programs unless the district governing board files an exemption with ADE. A district that has a kindergarten program is required to offer half-day kindergarten that provides academically meaningful instruction in each of the academic standards adopted by SBE. LEAs may offer full-day kindergarten for eligible students, but must allow parents to choose either half-day or full-day kindergarten. A district that offers full-day kindergarten is required to provide academically meaningful half-day kindergarten instruction in every school in the district that has enough students to fill a half-day kindergarten class (A.R.S. §§ 15-703 and 15-901.02).2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1083: schools; recess periodsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Allen S, LD 6BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW317566675Legend:AOI – Arizona Online InstructionPE – Physical EducationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:AOI – Arizona Online InstructionPE – Physical EducationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to recess requirements.ProvisionsRequires public schools to provide at least two recess periods for students in grades K-5. (Sec. 1)Requires half-day kindergarten programs to provide at least one recess period. (Sec. 1)Allows P.E. to qualify as one of the required recess periods. (Sec. 1)Specifies public schools are not required to extend the school day to meet the recess requirements. (Sec. 1)Exempts middle schools, junior high schools, high schools, A.O.I or schools in which the lowest grade of instruction offered is grade 5. (Sec. 1)Defines recess. (Sec. 1)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1215: WICHE; continuation.PRIME SPONSOR: Senator Allen S, LD 6BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW317569850Legend:ABOR – Arizona Board of Regents WICHE – Western Interstate Commission for Higher EducationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ABOR – Arizona Board of Regents WICHE – Western Interstate Commission for Higher EducationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to WICHE continuation.ProvisionsContinues WICHE until July 1, 2026. (Sec. 1-4)Repeals the Compact for Western Regional Cooperation in Higher Education on January 1, 2027. (Sec. 2)Current LawIn 1952, Arizona entered a compact to establish WICHE for regional cooperation in higher education. WICHE oversees student exchange programs, research and regional initiatives. ABOR administers WICHE programs in Arizona, including the Western Undergraduate Exchange, Western Regional Graduate Program and the Professional Student Exchange Program. The Western Undergraduate Exchange and Western Regional Graduate Program are exchange programs that allow students to receive reduced out-of-state tuition at participating institutions. The Professional Student Exchange Program allows students enrolled in select healthcare degree programs to receive tuition subsidies funded by the student's home state legislature. In Arizona, graduates who received tuition subsidies are required to practice one year in Arizona, or six months in an under-served Arizona community, for each year of WICHE support. Students who fail to meet the service requirements must repay 100% of their subsidies plus interest. (A.R.S. § 15-1742)WICHE is scheduled to sunset on July 1, 2018. (A.R.S. § 41-3018.10)Additional InformationIn FY 2018, the Arizona Legislature appropriated $145,000 to ABOR for the WesternInterstate Commission Office administrative expenditures and approximately $4.1 million for WICHE student subsidies (2018 Appropriations Report). The House Education and Senate Education Committee of Reference met on December 14, 2017 and recommended a 8 year continuation for WICHE.2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1355: border security trust fund; repealPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Griffin, LD 14BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW FPRPP: DP 8-1-0-0317566675Legend:JBSAC – Joint Border Security Advisory CommitteeAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:JBSAC – Joint Border Security Advisory CommitteeAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to the Border Security Trust Fund.ProvisionsEliminates the Border Security Trust Fund. (Sec. 1)Removes the condition that the state may still construct and maintain a physical or virtual border fence if the state does not enter into an authorized compact. (Sec. 1)Contains a legislative intent clause. (Sec. 2)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawThe Governor is permitted to enter into a compact with other states for the construction and maintenance of a physical or virtual fence along the Arizona-Mexico border. A compact must contain specified provisions that include: 1) the establishment of an organization to administer and manage construction and maintenance of the border fence and any money obtained for that purpose and 2) provide for a state to develop its own funding mechanism to construct and maintain the border fence through private or public donations. If the state does not enter into a compact, it may still construct and maintain a border fence along the Arizona-Mexico border. JBSAC is established and permitted to: 1) take testimony and other evidence regarding the border with Mexico; 2) analyze border crossing and related crime statistics; 3) make recommendations to increase border security or that the committee deems essential and 4) administer and manage the border fence using technology to the maximum extent practicable. JBSAC sunsets on July 1, 2020. The Border Security Trust Fund is established consisting of money collected for the construction and maintenance of a border fence. The trust fund is administered by the State Treasurer who must invest and divest deposited money. Beneficiaries of the trust fund money must use it for the outlined purposes of constructing and maintaining a border fence, subject to legislative appropriation (A.R.S. § 41-113). Additional InformationJBSAC met on December 12, 2017 and recommended that the Legislature adopt legislation to eliminate JBSAC and the Border Security Trust Fund. 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1118: expenditure reporting; fair market valuePRIME SPONSOR: Senator Kavanagh, LD 23BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWGOV: DP 6-2-0-0317567945Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to lobbyist expenditure reporting. ProvisionsSpecifies that the reportable expenditures of a principal or lobbyist for special events are:Based on the fair market value of food, beverage and other tangible benefits received by state officers or employees; andNot based on the overall sponsorship amount that benefits the hosting organization. (Sec. 1)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawEach principal and lobbyist is required to report expenditures, which must be itemized separately. The itemization must include: 1) the date, amount and category of each expenditure; 2) the name of each state officer or employee receiving the expenditure; and 3) either the name of the lobbyist who made the expenditure on behalf of the principal or the principal on whose behalf the expenditure was made, whichever is applicable. Additionally, each principal or lobbyist is required to report the aggregate of all expenditures of $20 or less. A principal is required to file an annual report by March 1st and a lobbyist is required to file a quarterly report by the last day of the month following the end of the calendar quarter. All expenditures incurred by a principal or lobbyist for special events to which all members of the Legislature, either house of the Legislature or any committee of the Legislature are invited are required to be reported. Expenditures are not required to be allocated to individual legislators, but the report must include the date, location and name of the legislative body invited, a description of the event and total expenditures incurred (A.R.S. § 41-1232.02). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1162: silver alert notification; developmental disabilityPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Brophy McGee, LD 28BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWGOV: DP 8-0-0-0317566675Legend:ADPS- Arizona Department of Public SafetyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADPS- Arizona Department of Public SafetyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to silver alert notifications. ProvisionsPermits a silver alert notification to be issued for a missing person who has a developmental disability. (Sec. 1) Defines developmental disability. (Sec. 1)Current LawA silver alert notification system is a quick response system designed to issue and coordinate alerts for missing persons who are of 65 years or older in age or who suffer from Alzheimer's Disease or dementia. ADPS is responsible for the establishment SB 1162and use of the silver alert notification system. (A.R.S § 41-1728).2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1209: scrap metal dealers; DPS reportPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Borrelli, LD 5BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWGOV: DP 8-0-0-0698571755Legend:ADPS- Arizona Department of Public Safety Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADPS- Arizona Department of Public Safety Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelated to scrap metal dealer reports. ProvisionsRepeals the requirement that ADPS submit a biennial report identifying all registered scrap metal dealers to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. (Sec. 1)Current LawAll scrap metal dealers in the state must register with ADPS. The registration must include: name and address, name of anyone who owns at least a 10% share of the business, personal identification of each owner, the main locations of where the dealer will conduct business in the state and the name and address of any wholly owned subsidiary of the scrap metal dealer (A.R.S § 44-1641.03). ADPS must submit a biennial report identifying all registered scrap metal dealers to the legislature (A.R.S. § 44-1641.01). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1249: campaign finance violations; appealsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Burges, LD 22BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWGOV: DP 8-0-0-0317566675Legend:AG – Attorney GeneralOAH – Office of Administrative Hearings Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:AG – Attorney GeneralOAH – Office of Administrative Hearings Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to campaign finance violation appeals. ProvisionsPermits penalties imposed for campaign finance violations to be appealed directly to the Superior Court, rather than through OAH. (Sec. 1)Requires the alleged violator to provide a copy of the notice of appeal to the enforcement officer. (Sec. 1)Asserts that the enforcement officer has the burden of proving any alleged violation by a preponderance of the evidence. (Sec. 1)Requires the Superior Court to conduct a trial de novo for campaign finance violation appeal hearings. (Sec. 1)Contains a delayed effective date of January 1, 2019. (Sec. 2)Current LawThe filing officer is charged with investigating alleged violations relating to campaign finance requirements. If the filing officer has reasonable cause to believe a violation occurred, they must refer the matter to the AG, county attorney or city or town attorney, depending upon the office sought by the candidate. The enforcement officer may conduct an investigation using their subpoena powers and serve the alleged violator with a notice of violation, which must specify the imposed penalty and require compliance within 20 days. If the alleged violator does not take corrective action within 20 days, the enforcement officer must impose the penalty. The alleged violator may request a hearing with OAH pursuant to Uniform Administrative Hearing procedures. After the conclusion of the administrative appeal process, the alleged violator may appeal to the Superior Court for judicial review of the administrative decision (A.R.S. § 16-938). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1281: street lighting improvement districts; consolidationPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Kavanagh, LD 23BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWGOV: DP 7-1-0-0317566675Legend:ADOR – Arizona Department of RevenueAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADOR – Arizona Department of RevenueAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract08086725? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to street lighting improvement district consolidation.ProvisionsPermits a municipality to consolidate two or more streetlight improvement districts by ordinance or resolution if: A majority of the property owners in each district signs a petition for consolidation; andThe municipality holds a public hearing to discuss the consolidation that includes an opportunity for public comment. (Sec. 1)Requires districts proposed for consolidation to be contiguous and prohibits any new territory from being included.Specifies that districts are contiguous if they have a common boundary and are separated by a public right-of-way. (Sec. 1)Requires the governing body to publish notice of the hearing in a newspaper at least 10 days before the date of the hearing. (Sec. 1)Requires the hearing notice to include: The date, time, place and purpose of the hearing;A description of where information regarding the consolidation can be obtained; An estimated assessment of the value of the district, An estimate of the change in property tax liability or liability for equal apportionment for a typical resident; andA list of benefits and injuries that may result from the consolidation. (Sec. 1)Requires the municipality to: Provide information regarding the name and boundaries of the district, including an accurate map Notify ADOR, the county treasurer and county assessor of the consolidated district by June 1st in order to be eligible to levy a tax.Specifies that the consolidation takes effect on July 1st. Pay all remaining liabilities of each separate district and transfer remaining monies to the account of the consolidated district. (Sec. 1)Permits new territory to be added to a streetlight improvement district by giving notice to the added territory in the same manner as required to create or consolidate a district.Specifies that protests and objections may only be filed by persons who own property within the proposed addition. (Sec. 1)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawAn improvement district may be formed for purchasing energy for the lighting of public streets and parks within the district. At the time of adoption of the resolution of intention to form the district, the governing body must determine the type of lighting facilities to be installed and consider the rate of payment for purchasing the energy. The majority of the real property owners in the district may petition the governing body to levy ad valorem or property taxes to pay for district expenses (A.R.S. §§ 48-616 & 48-617).To form the district, a petition signed by a majority of the real property owners in the proposed district must be submitted to the governing body of the municipality. Upon receipt and verification of the petition, the municipality must pass a resolution or ordinance of intention which briefly describes the improvement. The municipality must allow an opportunity for owners of the property fronting the improvement to submit any protest of the district formation (A.R.S. § 48-579) If no protest is filed or deemed sufficient, the municipality must submit a petition to form the district signed by the majority of the owners of taxable property and a majority of the owners of assessed valuation in the proposed district (A.R.S. § 48-576). Once the improvements are ordered, the street superintendent must publish notice of the passage of the resolution and invite sealed bids for the improvement (A.R.S. § 48-581). The work must be done under the direction of the street superintendent pursuant to rules and regulations adopted by the municipality (A.R.S. § 48-586).2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESHB 2398: S/E illegal substances educationPRIME SPONSOR: Representative Thorpe, LD 6BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW Health: DPA/SE 9-0-0-0317566675Legend:Office – Governor's Office of Youth, Faith and FamilyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Office – Governor's Office of Youth, Faith and FamilyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to illegal substances education.ProvisionsAllows the Office to partner with local education agencies to educate children about the dangers of illegal drugs. (Sec. 1)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB1072: DCS; contractor employees; fingerprint requirementPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Brophy McGee, LD 28BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW Health: DP 8-0-0-1317566675Legend:DCS – Department of Child SafetyIT – information technologyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:DCS – Department of Child SafetyIT – information technologyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to DCS and fingerprinting.ProvisionsClarifies that a DCS IT employee, contractor or subcontractor must have a level I fingerprint clearance card if the employee has access to DCS information as a part of their job duties. (Sec. 1)Current LawAn IT employee of a contractor or subcontractor must have, or applied for, a level I fingerprint clearance card in order to access DCS information in any state data system. The contractor or subcontractor is responsible for the costs of obtaining the employee's level I fingerprint clearance card and may charge these costs to the fingerprinted employee. DCS may allow the cost of obtaining a level I fingerprint clearance card to be included as an allowable cost in a contract. (A.R.S. § 8-463)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1164: DES; fingerprint card; tax informationPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Brophy McGee, LD 28BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW Health: DP 8-0-0-1317569850Legend:ADES- Arizona Department of Economic SecurityFPCC- Level One Fingerprint Clearance Card Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADES- Arizona Department of Economic SecurityFPCC- Level One Fingerprint Clearance Card Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to ADES and fingerprint requirements. ProvisionsRequires an employee or contractor who has access to federal tax information to obtain a FPCC. (Sec. 1)Requires an employee or contractor to certify on a notarized form that the person is not awaiting trial or been convicted of any criminal offense, in Arizona or another state, that would preclude them from acquiring a valid FPCC. (Sec 1)Defines federal tax information. (Sec. 1)Makes a technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawEmployees of ADES' IT department are required to have a valid FPCC or provide documentation of an application for a FPCC. (A.R.S. § 41-1969)The Fingerprinting Division under the Department of Public Safety must compare state and federal criminal history records with the list of criminal offenses that would prevent an individual from receiving a FPCC. (A.R.S. § 41-1758.07)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1165: child care assistance; ratesPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Brophy McGee, LD 28BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW Health: DPA 8-0-0-1698563500Legend:ADES- Arizona Department of Economic SecurityAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADES- Arizona Department of Economic SecurityAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to child care assistance rates and the sliding fee scale. ProvisionsRequires ADES to:Notify the Health and Human Services Committee and the Health Committee within 30 days after the federal government decides to no longer calculate and publish the federal poverty guidelines;Annually review and adjust the sliding fee scale and formula for determining child care assistance; andPost the payment rates and the most current sliding fee scale and formula for determining child care assistance on the ADES website. (Sec. 2) EXEMPTS CALCULATIONS MADE BY ADES REGARDING THE SLIDING FEE SCALE AND THE FORMULA FOR DETERMINING CHILD CARE ASSISTANCE FROM THE RULEMAKING PROCESS. (Sec. 1) (Health)Contains a conforming change. (Sec. 2)Current LawADES establishes child care assistance payment rates for eligible families. Payment rates may vary depending on: the national accreditation or other state approved quality standards of the child care provider, the age of the child, the geographical area and care costs for a special needs child. ADES uses a sliding fee schedule for determining child care assistance based on: Income and family earnings;Family size;Number of children receiving assistance; Child support from the parent living outside of the home; and Earnings of an adult family member or nonfamily member living in the home who claims a member of the family as a dependent on a federal or state income tax return. (A.R.S. § 46-805) 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1246: behavioral health boardPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Barto, LD 15BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW Health: DP 7-0-0-2317566675Legend:Board – Board of Behavioral Health ExaminersDCS – Department of Child SafetyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Board – Board of Behavioral Health ExaminersDCS – Department of Child SafetyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to the Board of Behavioral Health Examiners.ProvisionsPermits the Board to issue a license by endorsement if the person is licensed or certified by a federal jurisdiction. (Sec. 8)Requires an applicant for licensure by endorsement to be licensed or certified in another jurisdiction at a substantially equivalent or higher practice level. (Sec. 8)Removes the requirement that an applicant for licensure by endorsement must engage in the practice of behavioral health for at least 3600 hours during the five years preceding the application. (Sec. 8)Removes the requirement that an applicant for licensure by endorsement take a licensure examination. (Sec. 8)Removes the requirement that an applicant's listing of other licenses and certificates that is submitted to the Board be notarized. (Sec. 8)Requires an applicant for licensure by endorsement to submit any other procedural application requirements adopted by rule to the Board. (Sec. 8)Removes the requirement that an applicant for license renewal submit a full set of fingerprints for a criminal records check. (Sec. 11)Requires a Board motion to initiate an investigation to:Be made at an open and noticed meeting; Include the basis for the meeting and the name of the Board member who made the motion; andBe recorded. (Sec. 12)Permits required written communications or notices to be transmitted or received by mail, electronic transmission, fax or hand delivery.Prohibits communications or notices from being transmitted or received orally. (Sec. 1) Requires the Board to establish fees by rule, rather than by a formal vote at a regular Board meeting. (Sec. 2)Increases the time frame that a person may file a request for the Board to review the Director of the Board's actions regarding a complaint from 30 days to 35 days. (Sec. 3)Allow Academic Review Committees to have more than two members that are:Licensed in behavioral health; andThat have served as faculty at an accredited college or university within the previous 10 years. (Sec. 4)Exempts persons practicing social work, counseling and case management for an agency licensed by DCS from licensure requirements. (Sec. 5)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1-4, 6-13)Current LawThe Board is allowed to issue a license by endorsement to an individual who is licensed or certified in one or more states at an equivalent or higher level of practice and pays a Board prescribed fee. An applicant for licensure by endorsement must:Be currently licensed or certified and in good standing by the regulatory agency of one or more states;Have been licensed or certified in the same discipline for at least three years;Be engaged in providing behavioral health services for at least 3600 hours in the preceding five years prior to applying for a license by endorsement;Pass an examination;Meet statutory licensure requirements; andSubmit a notarized affidavit that lists every jurisdiction in which the applicant has been licensed or certified and every disciplinary action that has been taken against the applicant. (A.R.S. § 32-3274)2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1041: residency restrictions; sex offenders; victimsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Kavanagh, LD 23BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWJPS: DPA 6-3-0-03175635Legend:ADPS- Arizona Department of Public SafetyDCAC-dangerous crimes against childrenMVD-Motor Vehicle Division of the Arizona Department of TransportationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADPS- Arizona Department of Public SafetyDCAC-dangerous crimes against childrenMVD-Motor Vehicle Division of the Arizona Department of TransportationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to residency restrictions for specific sex offenders.ProvisionsProhibits a person convicted of a DCAC who is required to register as a sex offender from residing or establishing a residence within 1,000 feet of where the person's former victim lives. (Sec 1)Provides the following exceptions:A person convicted of an offense related to sex offender registration requirements.If the victim consents to the person establishing residence.Permits the parent/guardian to consent if the victim is a minor. (Sec 1)Provides a defense if the person:Established the residence without knowledge that the victim lived within 1,000 feet, andThe person moved within 30 days of learning that the victim lived there. (Sec 1)Makes a violation a Class 1 misdemeanor (up to 6 months/up to $2,500 plus surcharges). A second/subsequent violation is a Class 6 felony (1 year; up to $150,000 plus surcharges). (Sec 1) Current LawA.R.S. Title 13, Chapter 38, Article 3 governs sex offender registration. A.R.S. § 13-3821 outlines who must register as a sex offender and prescribes requirements for registration. Sex offender registration is a lifetime duty in Arizona, except in specific situations. Prior to release from ADC, an offender’s registration must be completed. Within three days of being released from custody, the offender’s registration information must be forwarded to ADPS and the county sheriff where the offender will reside. The offender has the duty to report to the sheriff within 72 hours of moving, changing names or changing any online identifier used to communicate on the internet (A.R.S. § 13-3822). Offenders must obtain a new driver license or non-operating license every year, verifying address and residence with the MVD. It is a Class 4 felony (2.5 years/$150,000 plus surcharges) to fail to comply with registration requirements (A.R.S. § 13-3824); failure to obtain the annual credential is a Class 6 felony (1 year/$150,000 plus surcharges).A.R.S. § 13-3727 prohibits a person who is convicted of a DCAC and required to register as a sex offender from living within 1,000 feet of a school or child care facility. Exceptions are provided in the statute. The calculation is made in a straight line in all directions from the nearest point on the property line of the parcel containing the residence to the nearest point on the property line of the parcel containing a school or child care facility. This section also prohibits a political subdivision from enacting a greater distance restriction. A violation is a Class 1 misdemeanor. DCAC offenses are outlined in A.R.S. § 13-705. 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1076: assault; public safety contractors; workersPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Barto, LD 15BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWJPS: DP 9-0-0-0317566675Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to disease testing for public safety employees or volunteers.ProvisionsExpands the definition of public safety employee or volunteer by adding:A contractor of a state or local law enforcement agency or correctional facility, orAny other person who is authorized to perform official duties or be present in a correctional facility. (Sec. 1)Makes a technical change. (Sec. 1)Current LawA.R.S. § 13-1210 states an exposure occurs if a person bit, scratched, spat or transferred blood or other bodily fluid on or through the skin or membranes of a public safety employee or volunteer and one of the following applies:The person is charged in any criminal complaint that alleges he or she interfered with official duties,There is probable cause to believe the person interfered with official duties and is deceased,There is probable cause to believe the public safety employee or volunteer was performing an official duty, orThe person is arrested, charged or in custody and the public safety employee or volunteer alleges he or she interfered with official duties.A public safety employee or volunteer, officer or entity may petition the court for an order authorizing testing of another person for diseases specified in the petition, if there are reasonable grounds to believe an exposure occurred.If the court finds that probable cause exists that a possible transfer of blood or other bodily fluids occurred, then the court must order:The person provide two specimens of blood for testing, orIf the person is deceased, the medical examiner draw two specimens for blood for testing.This section defines public safety employee or volunteer as a:Law enforcement officer, Any employee or volunteer of a state or local law enforcement agency,Probation officer, Surveillance officer, Detention officer, Juvenile or adult correctional service officer, Private prison security officer, Firefighter, or Emergency medical technician. 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1110: photo radar; review; penaltyPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Borrelli, LD 5BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWJPS: DP 7-1-0-1698563500Legend:NOV – Notice of violationPES – Photo enforcement systemAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:NOV – Notice of violationPES – Photo enforcement systemAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to reviewing photo enforcement violations.ProvisionsRequires a law enforcement agency to review evidence recorded by photo radar to determine whether a violation occurred before issuing a citation. (Sec. 1)Prohibits a photo enforcement company from determining whether a violation occurred.A violation of this is a Class 1 misdemeanor. (Sec. 1)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawA.R.S. § 28-601 defines a PES; A.R.S. § 28-1602 defines a NOV.If a person receives a NOV in the mail for a speeding or traffic statute or ordinance that is obtained using a PES, the person does not have to identify who is in the photo or respond to the NOV. The NOV must state:The notice is not a court issued document and the recipient is under no obligation to identify the person or respond to the notice; andFailure to respond to the notice may result in official service that may result in an additional fee being levied.Alternative service of process must be sent by certified mail with an additional copy by regular mail and a notice must be posted on the front door of the business or residence and a garage door. Service of the complaint is complete on filing the mailing receipt and proof of posting the violation in court. Failure to respond to the citation may result in the person being formally served.A.R.S. § 28-1593 allows a traffic complaint to be served by delivering a copy of the uniform traffic ticket and complaint to the person charged with the violation or by any means authorized by the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1211: sentence; life imprisonment; parole eligibilityPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Burges, LD 22BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWJPS: DP 8-0-0-1317564135Legend:ADC-Arizona Department of CorrectionsBOEC-Board of Executive ClemencyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADC-Arizona Department of CorrectionsBOEC-Board of Executive ClemencyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)AbstractRelating to parole eligibility for persons convicted of first degree murder.07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteProvisionsMakes a person eligible for parole after serving the minimum number of years of the person's sentence, if the person was: Convicted of first degree murder; Sentenced to life with the possibility of parole after serving a minimum number of years; and Sentenced under a plea agreement containing the stipulation to parole eligibility. (Sec 1)Requires a person granted parole under this law to remain on parole for life, unless parole is revoked. (Sec 1)3.??????Applies to defendants who:Enter into a plea agreement stipulating to parole eligibility; andAre sentenced between January 1, 1994 and the effective date of this bill. (Sec 1)4.???????Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec 2)Current LawA.R.S. § 13-751?outlines penalties for first degree murder. A defendant (over 18 years of age) may be sentenced to the following, depending on the circumstances of the offense:1) Death;2) Natural life (life in prison without any chance for release on any basis); or3) Life, which requires the person to serve at least 25 calendar years in prison before becoming eligible for release (35 years if the victim was under 15 years old).Prior to January 1, 1994, an additional option existed for sentencing persons convicted of first degree murder: ?life with the option of parole after serving 25 years.? This option was removed by?Laws 1993, Ch. 255, commonly referred to as "Truth in Sentencing."? Laws 1993, Ch. 255 eliminated parole as an option for all offenses committed after January 1, 1994 and created community supervision in its place.? Under the new sentencing rules, a person must serve 85% of the sentence to be eligible for community supervision; previously a person could become parole-eligible after serving 50%-66% of the sentence, depending on the offense (A.R.S. § 41-1604.07?and?A.R.S. § 41-1607.09).?A.R.S. Title 31, Ch. 3 outlines the duties and responsibilities of the BOEC.? Persons convicted after January 1, 1994 may apply to the BOEC for commutation of sentence (release).??A.R.S. § 31-402?provides that the BOEC may make recommendations to the Governor for commutation after finding by clear and convincing evidence that the sentence "is clearly excessive given the nature of the offense and the record of the offender and that there is a substantial probability that when released, the offender will conform the offender's conduct to the requirements of the law."? This process requires the BOEC to conduct a hearing where the victim, county attorney and presiding judge have an opportunity to be heard. If the BOEC recommends commutation, the recommendation goes to the Governor. If the Governor doesn't act on the recommendation within 90 days and the recommendation was unanimous from the BOEC, it automatically becomes effective. ?A person convicted of first degree murder cannot petition for commutation for five years following a denial from the BOEC (A.R.S. § 31-403).?Offenders convicted prior to January 1, 1994 fall under the old sentencing guidelines and may be eligible for parole.? Parole eligibility is determined by ADC (A.R.S. § 41-1604.09).? If an offender is deemed eligible for parole the BOEC must authorize the offender's release if it appears that:The offender will remain at liberty without violating the law; andRelease is in the best interests of the state (A.R.S. § 31-412).Parole decisions do not require gubernatorial action. ?While on parole, the person is under the control of ADC.? If there is reasonable cause that the offender has violated parole, a warrant may be issued to take the offender back into custody (A.R.S. § 31-415).Additional InformationMore information about the BOEC process can be found?here.2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1447: juror questionnaire; investigationsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Griffin, LD 14BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWJPS: DP 5-4-0-0317567945Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to juror questionnaires.ProvisionsAllows the juror commissioner to ask the county attorney to assist in an investigation on the accuracy of answers provided in a juror questionnaire. (Sec. 1)Current LawA.R.S. § 21-314 states the jury commissioner or jury manager:Must use a questionnaire to determine whether a person is qualified to serve or has valid grounds to be excused or postponed from service,May destroy the questionnaire 90-days after receival,May investigate the accuracy of the answers to the questionnaire,May call on law enforcement agencies for assistance in an investigation,Must notify a person who has valid grounds to be excused or postponed from jury service accordingly, andMay issue a subpoena or the presiding judge may issue an order for any person whose name appears on the master jury list to appear in court to testify under oath regarding the person's qualifications, any grounds for excuse or the completion of an unreturned questionnaire (A.R.S. § 21-315).2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1038: state land sales; payment methodPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Griffin, LD 14BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWLARA: DP 8-0-0-1317566675Legend:Commissioner – State Land CommissionerAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Commissioner – State Land CommissionerAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to payment method for state land.ProvisionsAuthorizes the Commissioner to approve other forms of payment for the purchase of state land at an auction. (Sec. 1)Makes technical changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawOn announcement of the successful bidder of state land at an auction, at least 10% but no more than 25% of the appraised value as stated in the auction notice must be paid by cashier's check (A.R.S. § 37-241). State land means any land owned for held in trust, or otherwise, by the state, including leased school or university land (A.R.S. § 37-101).2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1042: backflow prevention; state fire codePRIME SPONSOR: Senator Kavanagh, LD 23BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWLARA: DP 8-0-0-1-25400-10160Legend:ADFFM – Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire ManagementIFC – International Fire CodeNFPA 25 – National Fire Protection Association Publication 25Office – Office of the State Fire MarshalAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADFFM – Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire ManagementIFC – International Fire CodeNFPA 25 – National Fire Protection Association Publication 25Office – Office of the State Fire MarshalAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to the state fire code. ProvisionsConforms the regulation of check valve assemblies installed on class 1 and class 2 fire protection systems as backflow protection equipment to the state fire code. (Sec. 1)Allows a fire code authority to establish more stringent guidelines for the installation of backflow prevention equipment if the equipment is approved for use pursuant to the state fire code. (Sec. 1)Current LawThe Office is established within the ADFFM to promote public health and safety, and to reduce hazards to life, limb and property. The Office is required to perform inspections and fire investigations, provide public education and adopt fire protection codes (A.R.S. § 37-1381). The Office has adopted the IFC, 2012 Edition (R4-36-201). The IFC is a model code that regulates minimum fire safety requirements, addresses fire prevention, fire protection, life safety, and the safe storage and use of hazard materials in new and existing buildings, facilities and processes. All backflow prevention equipment installed on class 1 or class 2 fire protection systems must comply with state fire code standards. Installed check valve assemblies must be inspected and maintained in accordance with the procedures identified in the NFPA 25, 1992 Edition. Additionally, a fire code authority may establish guidelines that exceed the minimum standards established by the state fire code if the backflow prevention equipment is approved pursuant to § 1.102 of the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition (A.R.S. § 37-1391).2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1052: county flood control districts; easementsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Griffin, LD 14BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWLARA: DP 8-0-0-1317569850Legend:District – County Flood Control DistrictAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:District – County Flood Control DistrictAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to easements and leases by Districts. ProvisionsModifies the requirement regarding reimbursement for an easement or lease of District real property without a public auction to: address the reimbursement to the District, rather than to the county; andconsider the property value determined by the District, rather than by the county. (Sec. 1) Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawLaws 2017, Chapter 179 authorized a District to grant an easement on or lease of real property owned by the District without auction if: 1) the District posts notice at least 15 days before the execution of the easement or lease in a conspicuous place on the affected property, on the District's website and in the local newspaper; 2) the appraised rental value for a proposed lease is less than $5,000 per month; 3) the reimbursement to the county for the easement or lease is not less than the appraised value of the property, as determined by the county; and 4) the District establishes a process for an interested person to request in writing that the proposed easement or lease be submitted to public auction.2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1144: conservation easements; notice; valuationPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Griffin, LD 14BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWLARA: DP 8-0-0-1317567310Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to the conservation easement registry.ProvisionsRequires the holder of a conservation easement to provide:for the recording and acceptance of a conservation easement; andthe required registry information to the county assessor. (Sec. 1)Adds the following information to the conservation easement registry:the name of the holder and any governmental body, charitable corporation or trustee of a charitable trust having a third-party right of enforcement; andthe value of the real property as determined by an independent appraisal prior to the creation and recording of the conservation easement. (Sec. 2)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1, 2)Current LawClass two (c) property is real property and improvements to real property burdened by a conservation easement that has been created and is in effect (A.R.S. § 42-12002). A conservation easement is an agreement to restrict development on a property for conservation purposes or to preserve the historical, architectural, archaeological or cultural aspects of real property (A.R.S. § 33-271). Conservation easements are voluntarily created and unlimited in duration unless the instrument creating it otherwise provides (A.R.S. § 33-272). Each county assessor is required to maintain a public digital registry of all class two (c) property and periodically review and revise the registry to verify that the listed property should remain classified as class two (c). The registry must include: 1) the name of the owner or owners of the property; 2) the date the conservation easement was created or recorded; and 3) whether the conservation easement is perpetual or limited and, if limited, the date or conditions under which the conservation easement terminates (A.R.S. § 45-12058). Additional InformationOn November 29, 2017, the Study Committee on Private Land Acquisition recommended the adoption of legislation that requires the full disclosure of conservation easement records, including the property owner, easement holder, and the property value or appraisals prior to acquisition.2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1432: ranchers; landowners; fire trainingPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Griffin, LD 14BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWLARA: DP 8-0-0-1317566675Legend:ADFFM – Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire ManagementADOSH – Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and HealthNFPA – National Fire Protection AssociationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADFFM – Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire ManagementADOSH – Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and HealthNFPA – National Fire Protection AssociationAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to fire training by the ADFFM.ProvisionsRequires the ADFFM to provide training to ranchers and landowners to detect, prevent and suppress forest and range fires. (Sec. 1)Asserts the State is not liable for any claim based on the exercise to perform or failure to perform any fire detection, prevention or suppression activities as trained by the ADFFM. (Sec. 1)Current LawThe ADFFM was established to provide for land management and the prevention and suppression of wildland fires on state land and on private property located outside of cities and towns (A.R.S. § 37-1301). The ADFFM is required to monitor and conduct forestry projects and wildfire prevention, mitigation and suppression activities (A.R.S. § 37-1302). The State Forester is authorized to enter into cooperative agreements with other state and federal agencies, departments and political subdivisions, and any person for the prevention and suppression of wildfires. The agreements may include utilization of a private landowners' equipment and personnel if the fire is on or adjacent to the private landowner's property (A.R.S. § 37-1303). All training provided by the State Forester must comply with the safety standards prescribed by the NFPA and ADOSH (A.R.S. § 37-1390).2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB1014: municipal zoning; rezoning protestsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Kavanagh, LD 23BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWLIA: DPA 5-0-0-2317566675Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to municipal zoning protests.ProvisionsPermits a protest against a proposed zoning ordinance to be made by either:20% of persons living in the zoning area against the ordinance; or20% of persons living in the area within 150 feet of the zoning area. (LIA) (Sec. 1)Redefines zoning area to include solely the area of the proposed amendment or change. (Sec. 1)Currently, the zoning area consists of the area subject to the proposed zoning ordinance amendment and the area within 150 feet of the affected area (A.R.S 9-462.04).Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1) Current LawThe legislative body of any municipality may use ordinances to regulate the use of buildings, structures and land in order to conserve and promote public health, safety, and general welfare (A.R.S § 9-462.01)20% of persons living in a zoning area and the area within 150 feet of a zoning area may protest any zoning amendment. If a protest with sufficient signatures is filed, the amendment must receive a three-fourths vote by the governing body of the municipality in order to become effective. The protest must be signed by the property owners opposing the proposed amendment and filed in the office of the municipal clerk no later than 12:00 P.M. the day before the governing body is to vote on the proposed amendment (A.R.S 9-462.04). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1043: county recorder; recording feesPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Kavanagh, LD 23BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWLIA: DPA 5-0-0-2317566040Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to county recorder fees.ProvisionsRequires the county recorder to charge the following flat fees for recording papers, rather than per-page fees:$15 for papers to which the state, U.S. or a political subdivision is a party and is recorded at their request; or$30 for all other papers required or authorized to be recorded. (Sec. 1)Removes the following fee amounts and instead requires the county recorder to charge the $15 or $30 flat fees for recording:$15 for each deed that transfers, conveys or affects a real property interest;$25 for each deed of trust of mortgage; and$10 for each release of a deed of trust or mortgage. (Sec. 1)Stipulates the following fees are included in the $15 or $30 flat fee amounts:The $4 special recording surcharge assessed by a BOS for certain documents filed with the county recorder;The $2 fee for the recording of deeds or contracts relating to the sale or transfer or property; andThe $5 fee for recording affidavits of annual work or claim maintenance fee payments. (Sec. 2, 3, 4)Removes language permitting the state to pay recorder fees to the county recorder on a monthly basis. (Sec. 1)Removes the requirement that a person recording a deed of trust or mortgage for residential property constructed for one to four families include "residential 1-4" on each document. (Sec. 1)Eliminates the requirement that $3 be charged for each additional indexing or transaction on an instrument after the standard fee has been charged for the first indexing category, assignment, partial assignment, release, partial release or other modification of any index. (Sec. 1)Removes the requirement that the county recorder charge $1 for each instrument that the recorder is required to mail. CONTAINS A DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE OF JULY 1, 2019. (LIA) (Sec. 5)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1-4)Current LawThe county recorder is required to receive specified fees for the recording, preparing and issuing of certain documents and statements. Statute outlines specific fee amounts for the recording or preparing of certain documents, including those relating to deeds of trust, transfers of property and financial statements. For those documents in which specific fees are not outlined in statute, the county recorder may charge flat fees in an amount of $3 or $5 dollars, with a smaller per-page fee assessed after the first 5 pages. In addition to these amounts, the county recorder is required to assess specified filing and recording fees (A.R.S. §§ 11-475, 11-475.01, 11-1132 & 27-208). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB1113: zoning violations; notice; servicePRIME SPONSOR: Senator Fann, LD 1BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWLIA: DPA 5-0-0-2317566675Legend:BOS-Board of Supervisors Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:BOS-Board of Supervisors Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to notice of zoning violations.ProvisionsPermits authorized persons, in addition to the county zoning inspector, to serve personal notice of a hearing for zoning violations. (Sec. 1)Permits the county zoning inspector to use alternative methods to provide notice of a hearing for zoning violations, if personal service would be impracticable. (Sec. 1)Currently, the zoning inspector may only use alternative methods of service if they are unable to serve the notice personally (A.R.S § 11-815)PERMITS THE FEE ESTABLISHED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR WRITS TO BE CHARGED FOR EVERY WRIT THAT IS ISSUED, RATHER THAN SERVED, ON BEHALF OF A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE. (LIA)Defines impracticable. (Sec. 1)Makes technical changes. (Sec. 1)Current Law The BOS may adopt a zoning ordinance in order to conserve or promote public health, safety, convenience and general welfare (A.R.S § 11-811).A county zoning ordinance must provide enforcement of a zoned territory by withholding building permits. The BOS may appoint a zoning inspector in order to enforce the established rules of the of the zoned territory. After the position of zoning inspector is filled, it is unlawful to erect, construct, reconstruct, alter or use any building or other structure within a zoning district covered by the ordinance without receiving a permit from the zoning inspector. A county may impose civil penalties that do not exceed the maximum fine for a Class 2 Misdemeanor ($750 plus surcharges) for violations of the zoning ordinance. If a county establishes a civil penalty, it may appoint hearing officers to establish a hearing to determine the violations. The zoning inspector must serve a notice of hearing for zoning violations to the alleged violator five days prior to the hearing. If the zoning inspector is unable to serve the notice, the notice may be served in the same manner as alternative methods of service by the Arizona Rules of Procedure (A.R.S § 11-815). Additional InformationThe Arizona Rules of Procedure permit notice of service to be mailed to the last known business or residence address of the person if personal service proves impracticable. 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1114: joint power authorities; fingerprintingPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Fann, LD 1BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWLIA: DP 5-0-0-2317567945Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to the fingerprinting of employees of legal entities formed to exercise joint powers for municipalities. ProvisionsPermits legal entities formed by governing bodies for the purpose of jointly exercising common powers to require that all employees and volunteers submit a full set of fingerprints to the Joint Powers Authority for the purpose of obtaining a state and federal criminal records check. (Sec. 1)Contains an emergency clause. (Sec. 2)Makes technical changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawCities, towns, counties and fire districts may form separate legal entities for jointly exercising powers held in common by the contracting parties. Examples of powers that may be exercised by these entities include: fire protection, emergency medical services and medical ambulance services. The governing body of the entity is composed of officials elected to one or more of the governing bodies of the forming entity. These legal entities are considered political subdivisions of the state and have the governmental and proprietary powers in common to the contracting parties (A.R.S. § 48-805.01). Fire districts may require employees to submit a full set of fingerprints for the purpose of obtaining a state and federal criminal records check (A.R.S. § 48-805).2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESHCM 2003: deported veterans; medical treatmentPRIME SPONSOR: Representative Espinoza, LD 19BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWMVRA: DP 9-0-0-0698563500Legend:SOS – Secretary of StateAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:SOS – Secretary of StateAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to medical treatment and other benefits for veterans.ProvisionsUrges the US congress to enact legislation providing medical treatment and other benefits for all veterans of the US Armed Forces, including those who have been deported. Directs the SOS to transmit copies of the Memorial to the President of the US Senate, Speaker of the US House of Representatives and each Member of Congress from Arizona. Additional InformationInformation on veteran's benefits can be found on the US Department of Veteran's Affairs website. 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB1089: purple heart dayPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Borrelli, LD 5BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW MVRA: DP 7-0-0-2317566040Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to the Purple Heart Award.ProvisionsEstablishes August 7th of each year as Purple Heart Day. (Sec. 1)Specifies that Purple Heart Day is not a legal holiday. (Sec. 1)Additional InformationAccording to the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the Purple Heart was established as the Badge of Military Merit on August 7, 1782 by General George Washington. The Purple Heart is awarded by the US President to any member of the US Armed Forces who have been wounded or killed while serving. 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB1090: Beirut barracks bombing remembrance dayPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Borrelli, LD 5BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW MVRA: DPA 7-0-0-2317566040Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon.ProvisionsEstablishes October 23rd of each year as Beirut Marine Barracks Bombing Remembrance Day. (Sec. 1)Specifies that Beirut Marine Barracks Bombing Remembrance Day is not a legal holiday. (Sec. 1) MAKES A TECHNICAL CHANGE. (SEC. 1) (MVRA) 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSCR1004: Beirut bombing; remembrance dayPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Borrelli, LD 5BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW MVRA: DP 7-0-0-2698560960Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to the bombing of the US Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon.ProvisionsStates that the members of the Legislature:Proclaim October 23, 2018 as Beirut Bombing Remembrance Day.Honor the memory of American service personnel killed in the bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon.2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1200: transportation revisionsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Worsley, LD 25BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW TI: DPA 7-1-0-0317567310Legend:ADOT – Arizona Department of TransportationDirector – Director of the Arizona Department of Transportation Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADOT – Arizona Department of TransportationDirector – Director of the Arizona Department of Transportation Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to revisions in transportation law. ProvisionsScenic & Historic Highways Transfers the authority to acquire and establish land, scenic easements and parkways and historic or scenic roads from the State Board of Transportation to the State Board on Geographic and Historic Names. (Sec. 39)Removes designating and establishing scenic or historic highways from the powers of the State Transportation Board. (Sec. 1)Defines historic road, parkway and scenic road. (Sec. 38)Requires the State Board on Geographic and Historic Names to notify ADOT and the State Transportation Board when a parkway, historic road or scenic road is given a historic designation. (Sec. 39)Permits, as session law, the advisory committee to establish parkways and historical and scenic roadways to review only requests submitted before the effective date of this act. (Sec. 40) (TI)Modifies the definition of places of historical significance or historic place. (Sec. 38)Contains a delayed repeal date of January 1, 2019 JULY 1, 2019, relating to the establishment of parkways and historical and scenic roadways. (Sec. 37) (TI)Driver's Licenses Excludes a class D, class G or class M license from the three-attempt limit to pass the written or road examination within one-year. (Sec. 20)Requires ADOT, upon timely request of a summary review, to stay an administrative order of driver's license suspension issued for select driving under the influence offenses, rather than granting a 20-day driving permit. (Sec. 8)Requires the permanent address for an applicant of an instruction permit or driver's license be in Arizona. (Sec. 20)Repeals ADOT's ability to renew a class D, class G, or class M license by mail. (Sec. 23)Removes the requirement that an application for a driver's license or instruction permit include whether the license was suspended or revoked. (Sec. 20)Nonresident Daily CommuterRemoves the requirement that a nonresident daily commuter apply, obtain and display an identification indicia. (Sec. 12-15)Requires a nonresident daily commuter to always carry the nonresident identification card and present the card to any law enforcement officer, on demand. (Sec. 12)Contains a conditional enactment clause. (Sec. 41)RulemakingRemoves ADOT's rulemaking authority or necessary approval relating to:Approval of mechanical signal lamps for when a vehicle is stopping or turning; (Sec. 4)Approval of a uniform sign used by US postal vehicles; (Sec. 5)Approval of reflector units that are used while operating a motor truck, passenger bus, trailer, semitrailer or truck tractor; (Sec. 6-7)Administering alternative proportional registration agreements for fleets of commercial vehicles; (Sec. 11)Administering a credit or refund of taxes and fees relating to the transfer of license plates to another vehicle; (Sec. 16)Providing any tag, decal, plate in replace of a license plate indicating a moped has been properly registered; (Sec. 17)Criteria to issue a restricted driver license and vehicle registration; (Sec. 24)Standards for competent proof that a use fuel vendor's total use fuel has not been delivered; (Sec. 26)Evidence a supplier must provide to receive a tax credit for paid tax that is uncollectible from the purchaser; (Sec. 27)Performing inspections of fuel to determine coloration of diesel fuel or any shipping paper violations; (Sec. 28)Entering into a cooperative agreement with other jurisdictions to enforce the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991; (Sec. 29)Releasing the levy on property if the release is to facilitate the collection of the liability; (Sec. 32)Conduct of Highway Division employees; (Sec. 33)Implementing the State Certified Rest Area Program; (Sec. 34)Implementing the Rest Area Sponsorship Program; and (Sec. 35)Administering regulations on aviation, aeronautics and aircraft regulation and taxation to promote public safety and the best interests of aviation in Arizona. (Sec. 36)Repeals the requirement that the Director adopt rules relating to the enforcement and administering of unladen vehicle test license plates. (Sec. 25)MiscellaneousRemoves the annual reporting requirement relating to HURF and county transportation excise tax monies spent for the design, right-of-way purchase and construction of controlled access highways. (Sec. 2)Repeals statute relating to unblended gasoline shortages. (Sec. 3)Repeals ADOT's ability to enter into a Multistate Highway Transportation Agreement. (Sec. 9)Outlines the process for ADOT's refusal or revocation to issue a certificate of title or vehicle registration. (Sec. 10)Repeals the Medical Advisory Board within ADOT. (Sec. 18)Removes the additional penalty for unsatisfactorily reported or paid use fuel tax. (Sec. 30)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1-2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12-17, 20-22, 27)Current LawA.R.S. Title 41, Chapter 6 establishes the statutory requirement for an agency to conduct a rulemaking process. Requirements for rulemaking cover the timetable for rulemaking, public participation and a final review by the Governor's Regulatory Review Council. A nonresident daily commuter is a person who resides in a contiguous state who enters and leaves Arizona on a daily basis for the purpose of employment (A.R.S. § 28-2291). A nonresident daily commuter can apply to ADOT for an external vehicle identification indicia and an identification card (A.R.S. § 28-2293). The Parks, Historic and Scenic Roads Advisory Committee has 11 members that consist of the Director, the Director of the State Parks Board, representatives from the Office of Tourism and the Historical Society, members appointed by the Tourism Advisory Council and the Governor (A.R.S. § 41-514). The State Transportation Board has the authority to designate or establish a scenic or historic highway (A.R.S. § 28-305). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1203: vehicle towingPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Worsley, LD 25BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWTI: DPA 8-0-0-0317569850Legend:ADOT – Arizona Department of TransportationDPS – Arizona Department of Public SafetyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADOT – Arizona Department of TransportationDPS – Arizona Department of Public SafetyAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to vehicle towing requirements. ProvisionsTransfers vehicle towing requirements from Title 41, Chapter 12 to Title 28, Chapter 3 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. (Sec. 2)Prohibits the operation of a tow truck for towing vehicles without first registering the vehicle with ADOT. (Sec. 2) (TI) Removes RESTORES the requirement that a person register with the Director of DPS before operating a tow truck for the purpose of towing vehicles. (Sec. 4) (TI)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1, 3, 4). Current LawLaws 2015, Chapter 265 transferred statute relating to vehicle towing from Title 28, Chapter 3 to Title 41, Chapter 12 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Unless otherwise provided, a violation of Title 28, Chapter 3 is a civil traffic violation (A.R.S. § 28-121).A tow truck agent is required to register the tow truck company with DPS before operating a tow truck to tow a vehicle (A.A.C. R13-3-801). A tow truck company is required to register each tow truck by completing DPS' tow truck inspection application and obtaining an identification number and permit decal (A.A.C. R13-3-901).2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB1207: lease authority; airports; air terminalsPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Pratt, LD 8BILL STATUS: Caucus & COW TI: DP 7-1-0-0317566675Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:Amendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to airport terminal leasing.ProvisionsExtends the maximum period a city, town, county or ADOT may lease land to an airport for airport purposes to 50 years, rather than 40 years. (Sec. 1) Requires the governing body that is acting on the request for a second or subsequent lease extension to approve the request with a two-thirds majority vote. (Sec.1)Prohibits the combined period of the leasing and lease renewal from exceeding the maximum term of 100 years …if the lessor is:A city or town with a population of less than 40,000 people; ADOT; orA county. (Sec. 1)Requires a notice of intent to extend the lease be posted on the airport or airport terminal property and on the governing body's website. (Sec. 1)Prohibits the reimbursement rate to the city, town or county for the lease extension from being less than the appraised rental value except for any capital improvements that may be considered in the final reimbursement rate. (Sec. 1)Makes technical changes. (Sec. 1)Current LawAirports may lease government owned property for airport or air terminal purposes for 40 years and may renew the lease for an additional 40 years. The lessor must hold a public hearing before leasing to an airport. When considering an extension of a lease, the lessor must publish a notice of intent in the following locations within 30 days of the public hearing:Twice in a daily or weekly newspaper in the county; On the leasehold site; andIn five public places in the county.A public hearing must be held regarding the request, and the request may only be granted if the governing body decides it to be in the best interest of the associated area with a majority vote of the governing body acting on the request. A second and subsequent extension request may be considered after bids are received (A.R.S. §28-8425). 2362835-32258000ARIZONA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESSB 1208: ATVs; off-highway vehiclesPRIME SPONSOR: Senator Pratt, LD 8BILL STATUS: Caucus & COWTI: DP 7-1-0-0317569850Legend:ADOT – Arizona Department of TransportationATV – All-Terrain VehicleOHV – Off-Highway VehicleAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)00Legend:ADOT – Arizona Department of TransportationATV – All-Terrain VehicleOHV – Off-Highway VehicleAmendments – BOLD and Stricken (Committee)Abstract07981950? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal Note00? Prop 105 (45 votes) ? Prop 108 (40 votes) ? Emergency (40 votes)? Fiscal NoteRelating to OHV and ATV size requirements.ProvisionsIncreases the size of recreational OHVs that may qualify as ATVs by increasing the maximum:Width from 65 to 80 inches; andUnladen weight from 1,800 to 2,500 pounds. (Sec. 1)Requires a recreational OHV to have the following to qualify as an ATV:A steering wheel for steering control;A rollover protective structure; and An occupant retention system. (Sec. 1)Makes technical and conforming changes. (Sec. 1, 2)Current LawA vehicle is classified as an ATV if it is designed primarily for recreational nonhighway all-terrain travel and is either a: Motor vehicle that is up to 50 inches wide, has an unladen weight of up to 1,200 pounds, travels on 3 or more nonhighway tires, and is operated on a public highway; orRecreational OHV that is up to 65 inches wide, has an unladen weight of up to 1,800 pounds, and travels on 4 or more nonhighway tires (A.R.S. § 28-101). ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download