Dashboard - UIowa Wiki



EurydiceBy Sarah RuhlOrpheus and Eurydice, Christian Kratzenstein-Stub (1783-1816)University of IowaSpring 2010Mainstage ProductionResearch compiled by Christine Scarfuto and Justin DeweyTable of ContentsBio of Sarah Ruhl....3Variations on the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice4The Greek Underworld...6Principle Greek Gods and their Attributes.8Geneology of the Gods...9Hero’s Journey....11Archetypes.....13Production History....15Reviews.....15Guide to Helpful Resources...21Bibliography.....22About the Playwright: Sarah Ruhl-3683033655Sarah Ruhl was born in Wilmette, Illinois. She studied under Paula Vogel at Brown University and did graduate work at Pembroke College, Oxford. Ruhl gained widespread recognition for her play The Clean House, a romantic comedy about a physician who cannot convince her depressed Brazilian maid to clean her house. It won the Susan Smith Blackburn Prize in 2004. It was a Pulitzer Prize finalist in 2005. Her play Eurydice was produced off-Broadway at New York's Second Stage Theatre in June-July 2007. Prior to that it had been staged at Yale Rep (2006), Berkeley Rep (2004), Georgetown University, and Circle X Theatre. Ruhl is also known for her Passion Play cycle that opened at Washington's Arena Stage in 2005, and subsequently was produced by the Goodman Theatre and Yale Rep. The Passion Play is scheduled to make its New York City premiere in spring 2010 in a production by the Epic Theatre Ensemble in Brooklyn, New York. Her play Dead Man's Cell Phone premiered in New York City at Playwrights Horizons in 2008 in a production starring Mary-Louise Parker. It had its world premiere at Washington D.C.'s Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company in 2007. It was produced at Oregon Shakespeare Festival in 2009. Other plays include Orlando, Late: A Cowboy Song and Demeter in the City. In September 2006, she received a MacArthur Fellowship. The announcement of that award stated: "Sarah Ruhl, 32, playwright, New York City. Playwright creating vivid and adventurous theatrical works that poignantly juxtapose the mundane aspects of daily life with mythic themes of love and war." In February 2009, her play In the Next Room (or The Vibrator Play) premiered at Berkeley Rep. The play is scheduled to open on Broadway at the Lyceum Theatre with previews starting on October 22, 2009 and an official opening in November 2009. This marks Ruhl's Broadway debut. John Lahr gives a brief review of Ruhl’s work in The New Yorker: “But if Ruhl’s demeanor is unassuming, her plays are bold. Her nonlinear form of realism—full of astonishments, surprises, and mysteries—is low on exposition and psychology. “I try to interpret how people subjectively experience life,” she has said. “Everyone has a great, horrible opera inside him. I feel that my plays, in a way, are very old-fashioned. They’re pre-Freudian in the sense that the Greeks and Shakespeare worked with similar assumptions. Catharsis isn’t a wound being excavated from childhood.”Plays by Sarah Ruhl:The Melancholy Play (2001)Lady with the Lap Dog, and Anna around the Neck (2001)Virtual Meditations #1 (2002)Orlando (2003)Eurydice (2003)Late: A Cowboy Song (2003)Passion Play (2003-2004, Helen Hayes Awards nomination for Best New Play)The Clean House (2004, Susan Smith Blackburn Prize, Pulitzer Prize Finalist)Demeter in the City (2006)Dead Man’s Cell Phone (2007)In the Next Room (or the Vibrator Play) (2009)Variations on the Myth of Orpheus and EurydiceAs classicist M. Owen Lee said in his book entitled Virgil as Orpheus, “A great artist never touches a myth without developing, expanding, and sometimes radically changing it.” There have been many different interpretations of the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice; the first versions harkening back to Ancient Greek myths and frescoes, which parlayed themselves into poems, songs, operas, and paintings for centuries. Sarah Ruhl’s Eurydice is unique among these, in that instead of focusing on the story of Orpheus, the great demigod and musician with legendary powers of reincarnation, it focuses on the story of Eurydice, whose action in the play (calling out to Orpheus as they ascend into the world) is what causes her return back to the underworld. She is given both more agency and a more poignant dilemma than in most other variations on the myth, the most drastic of which is the relationship she cultivates with her dead father. But to further understand these differences, we should first take a look at the origin of the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice, found in its first complete version in Virgil’s Georgics, and a generation later in Ovid’s Metamorphoses.To understand the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice, we first must fully comprehend the story of Persephone. Persephone, goddess of the Underworld, was the beautiful daughter of Demeter and Zeus. One day when she was a young maiden, she was out picking flowers with some Nymphs when Hades rose up from a cleft in the earth and stole her away to be his bride. Demeter searched everywhere for her lost daughter, and eventually Helios, the Sun, told her what happened. Zeus forced Hades to return Persephone to the upper world; however, Hades tricked Persephone into eating pomegranate seeds (and those who eat and drink in the underworld must stay there for eternity). Therefore, Persephone was able to be reunited with her mother, but had to return to the underworld for one season each year. This myth originally explained the seasons. It is vital to understand this story because Persephone’s sympathy for Orpheus for having lost a loved one is part of what allows her to give him permission to regain his bride.Virgil’s GeorgicsIn this version of the myth, Eurydice was fleeing from the shepherd Aristaeus, a demigod in his adolescence, not yet fully matured who tended to cause trouble. She fled, headlong along a river, and didn’t see the poisonous snake that lurked in the high grass. It bit her, and she died. Orpheus, son of Apollo (sometimes of the Thracian river god Oeagrus) and the muse Calliope, was famous for his beautiful music and was married to Eurydice. When she died, his song made the whole world weap: the stones, the trees, and the waters. He went through the gates of hell to find Hades to get his love back. He played his sad music and Cerebrus (the three headed dog) was silenced, the snakes in the Furies’ hair were transfixed, and Ixion’s wheel stopped turning. Persephone, goddess of the underworld, commanded that he go back the way he came and that Eurydice was to follow behind, unseen.Just as they were coming on the brink of the upper world (light was in sight), Orpheus was seized by what Virgil describes as “the madness of love,” and turned to look back at Eurydice. Virgil claims that those in hell would forgive him if they only knew the madness of love. Eurydice cried “What is it, what madness, Orpheus, was it that has destroyed us, you and me, oh look!” Sleep begins to cover her swimming eyes, and she reaches her hands out, towards him, forevermore as she falls back into the depths of hell.For seven months afterwards, he lay beside the river Strymon and wept, and charming the trees with his sad songs. One day, the Ciconian Bacchantes in a nocturnal orgy tore his body to pieces and scattered them everywhere. He is never to see his love again. However, his lute plays the saddest songs as it floats down the river, and though he is beheaded, he still sings his sad songs.Ovid’s MetamorphosesOrpheus is a musician and poet of Thrace, the son of Apollo and Calliope, who is in love with and marrying Eurydice. Their wedding doesn’t go as planned: Hymen didn’t bring the usual joyous fervor he brought to weddings, and the torch he held sputtered throughout the ceremony. Later that day, she was roaming in a field with nymphs when she got bit by a poisonous snake and died. Orpheus played a sad song that made the whole world weap. He went to Hades to ask for his wife back, and played him his sad song. The song stopped the waters of hell, Ixion’s wheel, the eating of the vultures, and the Furies even wept. Sisyphus sat rapt on his rock. At the urging of Persephone, Hades allowed for Eurydice to return to the upper world on the condition that Orpheus not look back at her throughout their trek out of the Underworld. The two made it almost all the way to the upper world—the light was in sight—when Orpheus, fearing Eurydice would faint, looked back. Eurydice fell back into the depths of the Underworld, making no complaint—for she was loved.Orpheus was not allowed to cross the river Styx a second time, and he fasted on the banks of the river in anguish for seven days. For three years after, he held himself aloof from women, though they burned in passion for him. He eventually took to living in the forests near the river, castrated himself, and sang his sad songs to the trees, which were charmed by him. One day, a group of Thracian women found him singing on the banks of the river and beat him to death for scorning their love. Orpheus travelled back to the Underworld and found Eurydice in the Elysian fields, where they stroll together and he can look back at her with no danger. Bacchus punished the women by turning them into gnarly trees.Significant Differences in these InterpretationsOf the most significant differences in these interpretations is that Ovid’s version seems on the whole kinder than Virgil’s. The mischievous shepherd, Aristaeus (perhaps seen in Ruhl’s version as the Nasty Interesting Man) doesn’t exist, it is entirely the fault of Orpheus’s temporary madness that he is torn from his love forever (instead of, in Ovid’s, how he is simply concerned his wife may faint). And importantly, in Ovid’s telling of the tale, the lovers are eventually reunited in the Underworld, while in Virgil’s they are not. Below are some further interpretations of the myth from around this time period.Other Interpretations of the MythEURIPIDES: In his earliest surviving play, Euripides tells the story of Admetus, King of Thassaly, who allowed his wife to die in his place. He claims that if he only had the song of Orpheus, he would be able to move the powers of hell to get his wife back.PLATO: In this version, Orpheus was only given a phantom version of his wife. According to Plato, because he was a musician he didn’t want to die for his love, so he died at the hands of women. It should be pointed out that Plato was against music making.ISOCRATES: In Busiris, Isocrates (an ancient Greek Rhetorician and orator) wrote that Orpheus successfully got out of the Underworld with Eurydice, and implied he was the leader of a cult that promised reincarnation. Other versions of the myth also imply that Orpheus held secrets about the afterlife, and was descending into the Underworld to find them.The Greek Underworld There are several interpretations and descriptions of the Greek Underworld. The most important thing to remember is that with the Greek Underworld, like most Greek Myths, to the Underworld also differs according to context. Below are examples of the Underworld as told by specific people, as well as some excerpts of different aspects of the Greek Underworld that seem to be common among authors.Homer’s Underworld: A brief OverviewTraveling to the Underworld : Step 1: Sail to the edge of the world, arriving on the beach of the ocean that encompasses existence. Step 2: Arrive at the spot where the two rivers of the Underworld, Pyriphlegethon (Fire) and Kokytos (Lamentation) converge into the River Acheron (Groaning).Step 3: Sacrifice a ram and a ewe. Collect the blood in a vessel to attract the souls of the dead, who upon drinking the blood will gain the ability to speak with living humans. Homer describes the Underworld in the story of Odysseus. When in the Underworld, Odysseus sees many examples of punishment, most of which are now told as common stories in mythology. Some examples include: Tityos having his liver pecked out by vultures, a punishment for raping the goddess Leto, or Sisyphos who pushes a boulder up a hill for eternity for trying to escape death. One thing that is important about these punishments, is that the crimes are explicitly crimes against the honor of the gods. Aristophanes’ Underworld: A brief OverviewAristophanes provides a look into the Underworld in his satirical farce, Frogs. This view of the Underworld starts to provide a look into the geographical landscape of the Underworld. There is an account of Dionysus having to take Charon’s Ferry across a bottomless lake. Charon, being the fisherman of the dead. Another important aspect of Aristophanes’ Underworld is the idea that there are different groups of people in different areas of the Underworld. Also, the dead do not lose their identity in the Underworld, according to this account. In fact, the philosophers in the Underworld are fully capable of debating as if they never died. Rivers of the UnderworldIn Sarah Ruhl’s Eurydice, there are many references to ‘the river’. In Greek Myth, there are three common rivers found in the Underworld, however, the River Styx is the river most people associate with the underworld. Plato said that the River Styx flowed into a massive lake. It is a common thought that Charon, the fisherman of the dead, rowed the dead souls over the River Styx to the underworld. Another river, the River Acheron, is also common, and is said by Euripides to be the place where Charon rowed the dead soul of Alkestis. This River, while common, is thought of by less to be Charon’s River of choice. In both cases, the River is something very sacred that shifts within the context of the myth. Both rivers, according to myth, both had locations in the real world. Styx was located in Northern Arcadia, and Acheron was located in the Thesprotian Mountains of Northern Greece. Ideas differ among myths and authors on whether or not one loses their memory and identity when entering the underworld. For example, in The Odyssey, the dead fully retain their identities and memories, in Sarah Ruhl’s Eurydice, the dead are supposed to forget their memories when dipped in “the river”. This river is referring to the River Lethe. This was the river that would cause souls to forget their existence if dipped in or drank from. In the overall geography of the underworld, this river was located near the Asphodel Meadows, or the place where the ordinary souls spent eternity. ErebusThe Greek Underworld was separated into two major parts. The first part was called Erebus, this is where dead souls first went after death. Charon would ferry the souls across the River Styx to the Gates of Erebus. Then the Souls would proceed to Tartarus. This is also the place where the unburied souls spent eternity, they weren’t allowed to proceed into Tatarus, as the gate was guarded by Cerberus, a three-headed dog. TartarusThis is the place in the underworld where the rest of the dead would spend eternity, based upon their judgment. According to myth, there were three judges of the dead, who would sentence the soul upon arrival. Tartarus was divided into three parts, The Fields of Punishment, Asphodel Meadows, and the Elysium. Fields of PunishmentAfter judgment, those souls who had committed crimes against the Gods would be sent here. This is the place in Tartarus where people like Sisyphus, Tantulus, and Tityos would be found. Asphodel MeadowsThe place where ordinary or indifferent souls went to spend eternity after judgment. These souls did not commit any crimes that would send them to the Fields of Punishment, and they also did not achieve greatness or any other recognition that would set them apart and earn themselves a place in the Elysium.Odysseus on the Asphodel MeadowsThere are Meadows that I can’t describe,the landscape as level as see indreams, or visions where nothing is thought of but the moment. It is not clear, and memory exhausts itself, omittingsomething. Silence is a part of it,and distance reaching in a small space.Since there are few instances in the world of such a thing, it fills our sleepwith a pattern for Elysium.Our friend Achilles walked in these samefields. There in the whiteness of flowerswhere we could not go he thought of us,pained by death beyond our speaking. Elysium (Or Elysian Fields)This is part of Tartarus where the virtuous or heroic souls went to rest. It is said that the Ruler of the Elysium is Kronos, Zeus’ Father. Inside the Elysium there is said to be a lake, and in the middle of the lake there was the Isle of the Blest. The Isle of the Blest is where distinguished souls went to spend eternity. Achilles is an example of the type of soul that was destined for the Isle of the Blest.GODActivity/AttributesZeusSky, Weather, Father of Gods and MortalsHeraWife of Zeus, Integrity of MarriagePoseidonSea, Earthquake, Raw energy of Bull and HorseHadesLord of the UnderworldAphroditeSex, LoveDemeterCorn, Fertility of the Land, ArtemisHunting, wild animals, Aid of Women in ChildbirthApolloMusic, divination of prophecy, purification, healing (later- Sun)AtheneCraftsmanship, warfareAresThe fury of WarHephaistosPhysical lameness, metalwork and artisan PersephoneBride of Hades, Queen of Underworld, daughter of DemeterHestia(fire of) HearthHermesDivine intermediary, messenger, guide of souls to Hades, bringer of fertility to flocksDionysusEcstasy, madness of intoxication, wine, exuberance (later- theatre)PanGod of lonely, rustic wilderness, induces ‘panic’ErosSexual desirePrinciple Greek Gods and Their Main AttributesThe Hero’s Journey Being that we are dealing with a re-creation of a myth, it is important that we examine Joseph Campbell’s idea of the Hero’s Journey. Campbell (1904-1987) was a mythologist, best known for his work in comparative mythology and religion. His work The Hero with a Thousand Faces is arguably his best known work for introducing the idea of the Hero’s Journey into popular thinking. The hero’s journey is a helpful tool for observing and analyzing the progression of myths and stories from the beginning of time, all around the world. Campbell observed that many of the myths and religious stories from around the world followed the same basic structural pattern, and utilized similar archetypal characters. Below is an extremely simplified version of the hero’s journey:A hero ventures forth from the world of common day into a region of supernatural wonder: fabulous forces are there encountered and a decisive victory is won: the hero comes back from this mysterious adventure with the power to bestow boons on his fellow man.The different possible steps of the hero’s journey are outlined on the following page. However, it is important to remember that a hero may not follow each of these steps: each story is different, and this outline can be molded and edited based on the story. It is also important to realize that the hero’s journey can be constructed from different character’s points of view. For example, in Ruhl’s Eurydice, you could argue that Orpheus is never able to “return with the Elixir,” because he is unable to bring Eurydice out of the Underworld and back to the “known” world. If we were to look at this from Eurydice’s point of view, however, we could argue that she refuses to return to the ordinary world, and therefore gets stuck in the “unknown” world (the Underworld). It’s important to remember, however, that the myth can be analyzed in a number of different ways in relation to the hero’s journey—ultimately, it is a helpful tool for looking at the journeys taken by the characters in this play. Below is one example of an illustration of the hero’s journey; on the following page is another.ArchetypesJoseph Campbell was heavily influenced by psychologist Carl Jung’s idea of archetypes. An archetype is an original ideal of a person, or an ideal model of something. It is a prototype from which other things are copied, emulated, or compared. According to Jung, the human race has a collective unconscious, and in that unconscious are certain archetypal personalities which we can all recognize and identify. Symbols are also part of this collective unconscious that Jung has introduced: just as there are archetypal characters, there are archetypal symbols that appear in myths and religious stories, in addition to our dreams and in our subconscious. Our loathing of snakes, symbolizing evil and temptation, is one of these symbols. The following page is a sheet containing many of the typical archetypes found both in Ruhl’s Eurydice and other myths. Below are some visual examples of these archetypes. Again, it is important to recognize that one character can fulfill more than one archetype at one…for example, The Nasty Interesting Man could be seen as both a shape shifter and a herald. Ultimately, looking at archetypes is just another helpful way of analyzing this play and its characters.19050-2602 An example of a Shape shifterAn example of the Wise Old WizardProduction HistoryMadison Repertory Theatre, September 2003Berkeley Repertory Theatre, October 15- November 21, 2004Yale Repertory Theatre, September 22, 2006Second Stage Theatre, June 18th, 2007 September 16, 2008 - October 26, Artist Repertory Theatre, September 16, 2008 - October 26, 2008Alliance Theatre, March 2008 to April 2008ACT (Seattle), September 2008, to October 2008Yale University, November 2009Ithaca College, December 2009Production Information and ReviewsMadison Repertory Theatre, September 2003Director: Richard CorleySet Design: Narelle SissonsLighting Design: Rand RyanCostume Design: Murell HortonSound Design: Darron L. WestCastEurydice – Laura HeislerHer Father - John LenertzOrpheus- David Andrew McMahonA Nasty Interesting Man-Scot MortonGrandmother-Diane DorseyBig Stone-Jody ReissLittle Stone-Polly NoonanLoud Stone-Karlie NurseBerkeley Repertory Theatre, October 15- November 21, 2004Director: Les WatersReview:San Francisco ChronicleRobert Hurwitt, Chronicle Theater CriticFriday, October 22, 2004Awash in a young writer's bracing, lucid 'Eurydice'"Love is strong as death," sings the sage sensuality of "The Song of Solomon." No, answers the earthly wisdom of ancient Greek mythology in the tale of Orpheus and Eurydice, once death claims a mortal, even the inspired musician cannot retrieve his beloved bride from the Underworld. Ah, says Sarah Ruhl in the shimmering "Eurydice" at Berkeley Repertory Theatre, it's a little more complicated than that. Touching, inventive, invigoratingly compact and luminously liquid in its rhythms and design, "Eurydice" reframes the ancient myth of ill-fated love to focus not on the bereaved musician but on his dead bride -- and on her struggle with love beyond the grave as both wife and daughter. Yes, daughter. In Ruhl's wondrously rich, timelessly contemporary reimagining, Eurydice's relationship with her dead father is as vital as and in some respects more touching than her love for the heartbroken husband who almost succeeds in rescuing her from death. It's a local debut that provides good evidence why Ruhl has rapidly gained a reputation as a young writer to watch. "Eurydice" premiered last year at Wisconsin's Madison Repertory Theatre and is receiving its West Coast premiere in the production that opened Wednesday in Berkeley. It's movingly and gracefully brought to life by a terrific cast in Associate Artistic Director Les Water's lucid and visually astonishing underground bathhouse staging on the Rep's versatile Thrust Stage. Water oozes down the vast green-tiled walls and across the similarly covered floor of Scott Bradley's richly evocative set. Its drips fill the spaces between wonderfully eclectic rock and classical snippets in Bray Poor's compelling soundscape. It gushes from the vibrant blue antique pump that stands in for Lethe, the mythic river of forgetfulness in Hades, and it pours down in a heavy rain inside the ingenious elevator that serves as the River Styx. Water plays a large part in death in "Eurydice," and in life as well. Maria Dizzia's glowing, enthusiastic Eurydice and Daniel Talbott's vibrant Orpheus -- energetically abstracted as his mind keeps wandering to his music -- bask on a beach in the opening scene. They're young, full of life and head over heels in love, even if -- in Ruhl's playfully canny, poetic dialogue -- they can't help noticing certain defects in each other. Orpheus isn't nearly as interested in words or ideas as she is. Eurydice can't really carry a tune. Even as the young lovers prepare for their wedding, images of the Underworld begin to make themselves felt. A gentle, almost achingly genteel and thoughtful Charles Shaw Robinson -- fresh from playing another ancient ghost in "The Persians" next door at the Aurora Theatre -- appears and delivers lovely thoughts on being the father of the bride at a wedding he can't attend; he's dead. He's an atypical denizen of Hades, though, having kept his memory and a yearning desire to communicate with his daughter. Tiles on the wall become letters from the Underworld. A remarkable, mock- Beckett-ian funny Chorus of Stones -- the wonderfully mournful Ramiz Monsef, creepy T. Edward Webster and stentorian Aimée Guillot, zombie-pale in Meg Neville's ghostly Edwardian costumes -- sings the rules and pleasures of after-death oblivion. An eerily insistent, dangerously nerdy Mark Zeisler introduces a whiff of brimstone as the Nasty Interesting Man who starts stalking Eurydice. The tale unfolds with classical precision in a delightfully creative postmodern mix. Eurydice dies at the wedding. The heartbroken Orpheus searches for her, singing so mournfully -- as the legend has it -- that the very stones weep (and the Stones do). He wins the Lord of the Underworld's (Zeisler) grudging concession to let him retrieve Eurydice on the condition that he never look back to see if she's following him on the long trek back to life. Which, of course, he does. Ruhl follows the essential outline of the tale as faithfully as most tellers have from Ovid to Monteverdi to Cocteau to Marcel Camus' "Black Orpheus." But she tells it from Eurydice's point of view and blends in elements of everything from "Alice in Wonderland" and the Big Bad Wolf to the myth of Persephone, "Don't Sit Under the Apple Tree," "King Lear" and the Gershwins' "I Got Rhythm." She depicts the seductiveness of oblivion and mocks evil, turning the Lord of the Underworld into a dangerously spoiled brat. Waters' sumptuously staged and musically paced production mirrors the script's playfulness at every turn. Bradley's stunning and versatile set is full of surprises reminiscent of the ingenious productions of Mary Zimmerman, for whom he's designed several shows. The whole piece is packed with delightful grace notes, small and large, from the slash of a fluorescent blue tube and the flickering of the elevator's descent in Russell Champa's lighting design to the headphone logo on the music-obsessed Orpheus' shirt, the ephemeral house of string Eurydice's father builds for her or the intimations of torment in the ferocious fangs of a stuffed baboon. Waters and his cast create a pregnant tension between comedy and pathos that serves the text well. They vividly contrast the passion of the distressed Orpheus with the timeless serenity of the Underworld. No matter how well we know what's bound to happen, Orpheus and Eurydice's attempt to return above ground attains its dramatic suspense amid a cacophony of sound and lowering lights. More than anything else, Ruhl's "Eurydice" derives emotional depth from its multilayered depiction of a woman torn between her lover and her father. Robinson and Dizzia vividly bring the father-daughter bond to life just in the deeply touching way in which he walks her down the aisle -- once, by himself, in imagining her wedding, and again when he leads her to Orpheus in the Underworld. Their scenes in Hades, as he patiently restores the memories she's lost, are rich in beautifully observed tenderness. In some respects, Dizzia's and Talbott's passion isn't as fully realized, but that's partly because of their and Ruhl's success in depicting the complexities of love. Ruhl's Orpheus and Eurydice have their moments of doubt and recriminations, which leaven their romance with some reality. Once separated, though, their pangs of longing strike heartbreaking chords. And Orpheus' proposal is so delightfully depicted that their love is well established early on. Not that their love proves as strong as death in the end. "Many waters cannot quench love," Solomon continues, "neither can the floods drown it." He wasn't considering the waters of Lethe, though. Ruhl is, and she uses its waters of oblivion to bring "Eurydice" to a conclusion that's as poignantly rewarding as it is luminously ambiguous. Yale Repertory Theatre, September 22, 2006Director: Les WatersSet Design: Scott BradleyLighting Design: Russel H. ChampaCostume Design: Meg NevilleSound Design: Bray PoorCastEurydice – Maria DizziaEurydice’s Father - Charles Shaw RobinsonOrpheus- Joseph ParksA Nasty Interesting Man/Lord of the Underworld-Mark ZeislerBig Stone-Ramiz MonsefLittle Stone-Carla HartingLoud Stone-Gian-Murray GianinoReview:New York TimesAnita GatesOctober 8, 2006CRITIC'S NOTEBOOK; Love and Loss, in This Life and the NextI cry at the theater, sometimes even when the play isn't very good. But normally I know when it's coming; it starts with a little mistiness, allowing me time to dig out the Kleenex. But on Tuesday night, as I watched the final minutes of the Yale Rep's knockout production of Sarah Ruhl's ''Eurydice,'' the tears came with the suddenness of grief. Ms. Ruhl is dealing with the big subjects here. ''Eurydice'' is the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice told from the woman's point of view. Orpheus, a brilliant lyre player, is heartbroken when his new bride, Eurydice, is bitten by a snake and dies. He appeals to the Furies with his seductive music, and the Lord of the Underworld agrees to return Eurydice to life. On one condition: Orpheus must come to Hades and lead her out without ever looking back at her. But a man in love can't resist stealing a glance, and he loses her again, this time forever. In Ms. Ruhl's version, things happen in much the same way -- instead of being bitten by a snake, this heroine takes a fatal fall from a high-rise apartment -- but rather than focusing on Orpheus' grief, the play spends most of its time in Hades, where Eurydice is adjusting to the afterlife. Writing in The New York Times last week, Charles Isherwood pronounced the production ''devastatingly lovely -- and just plain devastating,'' and possibly ''the most moving exploration of the theme of loss that the American theater has produced since the events of Sept. 11, 2001.'' As Mr. Isherwood points out, Ms. Ruhl began work on the play before the terrorist attacks. That isn't surprising, because while ''Eurydice'' is certainly a play for our fearful times, it is about every death, every loss, every paralyzing pang of grief. When Eurydice (Maria Dizzia) meets her father (Charles Shaw Robinson) in the underworld, their reunion is agonizingly sweet. He recognizes her only because he has not dipped into the river of forgetting as he was supposed to (apparently the after-death version of hiding your medication under your tongue). The realization that you can always change your mind, kill the pain by choosing to forget and curl up into a semiconscious fetal ball is a horrible lesson on this side and the other. The playwright who has looked into the heart of darkness and found an awful beauty is a young human being, if clearly an old soul. Ms. Ruhl, 32, grew up in suburban Chicago, studied with Paula Vogel at Brown University and now lives in Southern California. She was one of this year's winners of the MacArthur Foundation's ''genius'' grants. Her work has been bouncing around the country's finest regional theaters for a few years, and she is finally having her New York moment. ''The Clean House,'' a Pulitzer Prize finalist in 2003, began previews at the Mitzi E. Newhouse Theater at Lincoln Center on Thursday and is scheduled to open on Oct. 30. In it, Ms. Ruhl finds unexpected meaning in the story of a doctor (Blair Brown) whose Brazilian maid (Vanessa Aspillaga) would rather be a stand-up comic. It should be mentioned that Ms. Ruhl's work is very funny, sometimes in a low-key way (''All the interesting people I know are dead or speak French,'' the living Eurydice says at her wedding reception) and sometimes verging on vaudeville (the Lord of the Underworld rides a tricycle). Neither laughter nor the flawless production is what most audiences will praise about ''Eurydice.'' The heroine's arrival in Hades (by elevator, accompanied by a stunning surge of rain) is memorable for technical reasons, but it wouldn't mean a thing without this playwright's singular voice. 327660022606004105275622300Photos from Second Stage Theatre, June 18th, 2007Director: Les WatersSet Design: Scott BradleyLighting Design: Russel H. ChampaCostume Design: Meg NevilleSound Design: Bray PoorCastEurydice – Maria DizziaEurydice’s Father - Charles Shaw RobinsonOrpheus- Joseph ParksA Nasty Interesting Man/Lord of the Underworld-Mark ZeislerBig Stone-Ramiz MonsefLittle Stone-Carla HartingLoud Stone-Gian-Murray GianinoReview: New York TimesCharles IsherwoodJune 19, 2007The Power of Memory to Triumph Over DeathThe most famous unheeded advice in the history of Western literature may be the admonition given by the ruler of the underworld to Orpheus, when that grieving youth went down to retrieve his wife, Eurydice, from the depths, and the lovers began their journey back upward. It was something along these lines: “Hey, fella, remember: Don’t look back.” Spoiler alert! He did. From this woeful act of disobedience a whole universe of art has been spun over the last couple of millenniums, poems and operas and ballets in the double digits by now, even a classic movie or two. No doubt somewhere on YouTube, a Greek-myth-loving geek with a Webcam has done a two-minute goof on the tale.In her weird and wonderful new play, “Eurydice,” the gifted young writer Sarah Ruhl has adapted this mournful legend with a fresh eye, concentrating not on the passionate pilgrimage of Orpheus to retrieve his bride but on Eurydice’s descent into the jaws of death. What she finds there, and what she learns about love, loss and the pleasures and pains of memory, is the subject of Ms. Ruhl’s tender-hearted comedy, which opened last night at the Second Stage Theater in a rhapsodically beautiful production directed by Les Waters.I suspect that “Eurydice” will get under your skin either in all the right ways or all the wrong ones. I first saw the play, in this production, at Yale Repertory Theater last fall, and its hallucinatory imagery and emotional allure have remained with me. Encountering it again, I staggered out of the theater in the same state of sad-happy disorientation that I recall from my initial viewing.Ms. Ruhl’s theatrical vision is an idiosyncratic one. She is not a journalist of domestic life, as so many playwrights today seem to be, but an adventurer who is not afraid to blend the quotidian and the fantastic, deep feeling and airy whimsy. The plot of Ms. Ruhl’s surreal comedy “The Clean House,” seen at Lincoln Center Theater earlier this year, sometimes turned on jokes told in Portuguese that were left untranslated. Likewise, much in “Eurydice” could mystify theatergoers used to reclining on the comforting cushions of linear narrative and naturalistic dialogue.The fabled creatures of “Eurydice” may look like people you’ve seen on the subway, but they speak in images plucked from the blue sky of their mythic imaginations. You might almost wish there were subtitles here, alerting you to the inner meaning of the lyrical, illogical and, yes, sometimes overly quirky dialogue. (The most sensibly spoken characters onstage are probably the blunt-spoken chorus of stones, strange creatures with pea-green faces, in Victorian garb, who keep telling Eurydice to shut up and get used to being dead.) But to be moved by “Eurydice,” you just need to tune in to the play’s insistent heartbeat, the rhythmic threnody woven by its language, its subterranean feeling and its strangely potent imagery. Ms. Ruhl sees her plays as much as she hears them — a rare gift among playwrights — and some of the most striking moments in the play are wordless ones. Take, for instance, the tender, wrenchingly sad vision of Eurydice’s dead father, who can watch his daughter’s progress from the underworld below, miming the act of walking her down the aisle on her wedding day. He nods proudly at the guests on either side, gives her an encouraging smile, offers her up with a mixture of resignation and worry and joy. And he is utterly alone. As performed with impeccable simplicity and grace by Charles Shaw Robinson, this small vignette is among the most desolate and moving moments I can remember seeing on a stage.Eurydice, played with radiant open-heartedness by Maria Dizzia, falls to her death just after marrying Orpheus. She descends in an elevator to the underworld, but her reunion with her father is bittersweet. The dead are dipped in the waters of forgetfulness, and Eurydice has lost all that she once knew, her husband’s name, much of her own history, language itself. She takes Dad for a hotel porter.The helpful stones, played with pop-eyed intensity by Gian-Murray Gianino, Carla Harting and Ramiz Monsef, insistently bray at Eurydice that death is much easier if you take refuge in the easy solace of forgetting. (Life is that way, too, of course.) But “Eurydice” movingly suggests that commemorating life, its pleasures and problems, its transience and pain, is the only way to triumph over death and loss. Eurydice’s father helps restore her memory, anecdote by anecdote, and her vocabulary, word by word, rebuilding the universe of the world they have lost in the prison of death. At one point he reads to her from “King Lear”: “We two alone will sing like birds in the cage.” “Eurydice” is on one level an ode to the sustaining power of the love between father and daughter. (Ms. Ruhl wrote it after the death of her father.) It considers, too, how hard it is for two human beings to achieve the harmony of perfect romantic love.Orpheus, played with a fine, fierce ardor by Joseph Parks, is, of course, a composer; Eurydice hears music mostly in words. When he descends to fetch her back, Eurydice faces a painful choice: to re-enter the world above, where imperfect human love and the potential for pain awaits, or remain below where she is beyond its reach? Either choice involves risk and loss. Mr. Waters and his design collaborators have framed Ms. Ruhl’s play with uncommon sensitivity and stylistic sympathy. (In a less felicitous production, I can imagine the play cloying into preciousness.) Scott Bradley’s tilted vision of the underworld as a slightly dilapidated spa, wallpapered in letters written from the dead to the living, perfectly matches the writing’s off-kilter tone. The shimmery, dank lighting by Russell H. Champa echoes the quicksilver changes in tenor. And the selection of music likewise parallels the emotional currents without overwhelming the breezy playfulness of the dialogue. (Arvo P?rt’s haunting “Spiegel im Spiegel,” for piano and violin, is used to particularly fine effect.)“What happiness it would be to cry,” Eurydice says when she enters the underworld and discovers that she’s lost her grasp on emotional response, along with her memory. Perhaps more than anything else, the eerie wonderland of “Eurydice” evokes the discombobulating experience of grief and loss, the desperate need to move on and the overwhelming desire never to let go — to turn and look back just one more time.Guide to Helpful ResourcesBelow is a list of helpful resources and their descriptions that the dramaturgs will have in rehearsal at all times:Virgil’s Georgics: The complete original myth of Orpheus and Eurydice.Ovid’s Metamorphoses: Second generation interpretation of the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice.Virgil as Orpheus by M. Owen Lee: A companion book to Virgil’s Georgics, going in depth about further history of the myth and meanings within Virgil’s poem.Greek Myths by Robert Graves: Gives a basic, easy to understand background information about Greek mythology.The Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph Campbell: Further in depth information on the hero’s journey and descriptions of archetypes.BibliographyBuxton, R. G. A. 2004.?The complete world of greek mythology. London : Thames & Hudson.Campbell, Joseph. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Pantheon Books, New York: 1949.Ferry, David. The Georgics of Virgil. Farber, Straus, and Giroux, New York: 2003.Graves, Robert,. 1988.?The greek myths / robert graves. Vol. Complete and unabridged ed. in one volume, 1st ed. Mt. Kisco, N.Y. : Moyer Bell.Koehler, Stanley. 1982. Odysseus speaks of asphodel. The Massachusetts Review 23, (2) (Summer): 277.Melville, A.D. (trans). Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 1986.Pfister, Friedrich,. 1961.?Greek gods and heroes.. G?tter- und heldensagen der griechen. english. London,: Macgibbon & Kee.Review Websites ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download