SHEPARD, Chief Justice

United States Gypsum, Inc. v. Indiana Gas Co., 705 N.E.2d 1017 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998). It concluded that ProLiance’s index-based pricing arrangement was an attempt by the Utilities to circumvent traditional regulation and that their failure to offer a proposal under the Alternative Utility Regulation Act, Indiana Code Chapter 8-1-2.5, required ... ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.