IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MISSOURI – KANSAS CITY MUNICIPAL ...
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MISSOURI – KANSAS CITY MUNICIPAL DIVISION – COURT ROOM A
CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI )
Plaintiff )
Vs ) case # 2243354-4 and 2243355-1 and ) 2243356-9
William Duff )
Defendant )
DEFENDANT ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF, CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MO., CASE #’s 2243354-4 and 2243355-1 and 2243356-9
COMES HERE NOW, William Duff, pro per, (hereinafter he, his, defendant or Duff), One of the People within Missouri, sui juris, without assistance of counsel, appearing specially for the express limited purpose of challenging the competence of complaint # 2243354-4 and 2243355-1 and 2243356-9 and of this Courts lawful standing to hear said matter, and demonstrating that this complaint fails to provide this court with jurisdiction of the subject matter or the person due to defendant’s affirmative defense of Sovereign Immunity From all restraint by every government department or agency respecting said complaints , does answer said complaints as follows;
1. William Duff is a mature adult Missourian and is sufficiently knowledgeable of the facts and law applicable to the instant matter to testify as follows;
Duff Avers that;
2. All actions herein complained of by agents of Kansas City, Mo were actions that took place upon the public right of way in Clay County, Missouri;
3. The complaints/information above referenced comprehend no intentional or unintentional injury to any others person or property;
4. At no time relevant to this action did Duff ever exit his own private domain and enter into the public domain or any others private domain nor act in anything other than his own private capacity in accordance with his own private Right of action as is authorized by his Birthright and comprehended and secured to him by the controlling constitutions.
5. Duff avers that; and takes cognizance that two distinct status of citizen exist. Included here as if written in full is the “offer of proof of two distinct citizenship status”(exhibit B)
6. William Duff avers that; having rejected the federal declaration that he is a United States citizen as comprehended by section 1 of the 14th amendment; having rescinded all powers of appointment with the Federal and State Governments therewith associated respecting his Right of Action taken within his own private domain and all previous admissions to the contrary informs this court and every other government entity that he is not a federal citizen residing in Missouri but has taken back his rightful status as a Missourian who is expressly not a United States citizen as comprehended by the 14th Amendment and revised Missouri Constitutions subsequent to 1820 in comprehension thereof and is therefore not subject to the regulatory scheme(s) arising there from (See Exhibit A, Affidavit of Truth of Citizenship Status);
7. Duff avers that there are, in fact, one of the two distinct status of citizen in America probably can legally be compelled or prohibited respecting the actions herein complained of but that William Duff is expressly not such federal citizen (United States citizen) residing in Missouri (see offer of proof of citizenship status’ Exhibit B). Duff is a Missourian, one of the people, and therefore could not possibly be restricted or restrained by any law, statute, or ordinance in support of the instant charges although Duff does recognize that they may have the capacity to restrain the U.S. citizen in some circumstances.
8. William Duff avers that complaint # 2243354-4 and 2243355-1 and 2243356-9 is an attempt by City of Kansas City, Mo (a government sub-division) to initiate an unlawful restraint upon his person and property;
9. William Duff avers that said complaint is civil in nature and does not comprehend a criminal act sufficient to invoke the “reasonable search and seizure” clause 2 of the 4th Amendment or the equivalent expression in the 1820 Missouri Constitution;
10. William Duff avers that City of Kansas City, Mo has failed to bring an action for which this court can lawfully provide a remedy in that the action complained of is an individually retained prerogative right of action protected by the controlling constitutions because the action exists and is performed solely at the prerogative Right of William Duff upon which no government entity was or even could be granted authority to compel or prohibit;
a. AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE; William Duff, not being a federal citizen residing in Missouri, possesses Sovereign Immunity from all restraint initiated by any government department, sub division, agency and/or agent unless probable cause that a “mala in se” crime or damage to the Public owned property is a causation attendant to that initiation of restraint upon William Duff’s person, house, papers and effects pursuant to Rights retained by the individual people as expressed and secured in the Constitution for the United States of America at Article 4 section 2 and enforced upon the States without their consent as a condition of Statehood by Article 6 clause 2 (supremacy clause) and acknowledged by the Constitution of Missouri 1820 at Article XIII section 13;
11. William Duff avers that the State can be granted only those powers that the collective people possess and can grant or that individual people consent to and that all Rights of the people held individually, inclusive of, but not limited to, prerogative rights and rights of action are strictly held by the individual unless by the individuals consent he grants the state use thereof or by his act that injures another;
12. William Duff avers that he does not consent to any government prohibition or compulsion in the use of his individually held rights and rights of action which exist solely within his individual domain and no other than William Duff can exercise them or compel their exercise or prohibit their exercise without that consent. Included here as if written in full: “Affidavit of truth of status”(exhibit A)
WHEREFORE; William Duff, sui juris, appearing specially, moves this court to dismiss case # 2243354-4 and 2243355-1 and 2243356-9 in comprehension of defendants affirmative defense, exhibits and affidavits; or in the alternative to convene an evidentiary hearing, on the record, to determine if in fact defendants claim of immunity from this attempted restraint is accurate in light of the exculpatory nature of the affirmative defense; or in the alternative should this court fail to take one of these two actions, to provide the following due process and other protections for defendant;
1. That this court convenes an adversarial hearing, with a competent record, thereof to determine the validity of the exculpatory evidence herein provided;
2. That this court provide this defendant with a jury of his peers for the adjudication of this matter should this court fail to dismiss as requested;
3. That this court provide this defendant with counsel to advise defendant with respect to the courts demand for specific adherence to, pleadings and procedure;
4. That this court proceeds upon a competent court of record in all proceedings associated with this action or should this court not be a court of record as that phrase is judicially understood in the controlling constitution of 1820 that it certify this case to such a court of record without delay;
5. That this court compel its agents to return all Duff’s property to him at 108 NW 101 Pl Kansas City, Mo 64155 today.
6. That this court, today, whether it dismisses the Cities action or not, issue a declaratory judgment, in favor of William Duff, to all agencies within its venue Declaring that William Duff is not to be further harassed, restrained or bothered by any agent of City of Kansas City, Missouri respecting the charges associated herein unless probable cause that an intentional injury has resulted from Duff’s act and there is an injured party ready and willing to seek remedy for same.
With all due Respect
William D Duff Friday, June 22, 2007
Email williamduff@
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- occasion kansas city wedding dj
- in the circuit court of jackson county missouri
- exercise objectives create a venue for agencies to test
- memorandum to whom it may concern greater kansas city
- for immediate release american hereford association
- in the circuit court of missouri kansas city municipal
- to fellow configuration management practitioners
- kansas city ewri chapter
- 0 dwf wholesale
- centerplate dinner menu s ezplanit
Related searches
- kansas city missouri school district
- kansas city missouri restaurants
- kansas city missouri restaurant guide
- kansas city missouri downtown
- kansas city missouri weather
- downtown kansas city missouri map
- downtown kansas city missouri hotels
- kansas city missouri street guide
- kansas city missouri reopening
- kansas city missouri charter schools
- kansas circuit court access
- kansas city missouri attractions