UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Shadd et al v. County Sacramento et al

Doc. 46

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11

12

13 MARVIN SHADD; ORLINDO MYLES; CARL C. Consolidated Case No. 2:12-cv-002834-MCE-KJN

RANDOLPH; VERNON TIDWELL; JOSEPH

14 ANTHONY NU?EZ; GAGE QUINONES,

ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME FOR

SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT

15

Plaintiffs,

[FRCP, Rule 4(m) and 6(b)]

16

vs.

17 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; VERNE L.

SPEIRS, Chief Probation Officer of Sacramento 18 County from 1993-2009, in his official and

19

individual capacities; ARROYO, in his official and individual capacities; BALLAS, in official and

20 individual capacities; RONALD EARP, in his official and individual capacities; GREENHALL,

21 in official and individual capacities; HEINZ, in

official and individual capacities; LOPEZ, in 22 official and individual capacities; SANCHEZ, in

23

her official and individual capacities; CARLOS SMITH, in his official and individual capacities;

24 TIARA, in her official and individual capacities; and DOES 1 TO 100, inclusive,

25

Defendants. 26

Courtroom: Ctrm. 7, 14th Floor

Judge:

Hon. Morrison C.

England, Jr.

Trial Date:

Not Yet Assigned.

Complaint Filed: November 19, 2012

2nd Amended Complaint Filed: 9/13/2013

27 TYLER COSTA; MARQUISE ZEIGLER; RENEE Closed Case No. 2:12-cv-02836-MCE-KJN

DELGADO; ROBERT REMEL; ANGELO

(Consolidated with Case No. 2:12-cv-002834-

28 MARTINEZ; STEPHEN BAUMANN; TONY

MCE-KJN)

30

1

31

Dockets.

1 JIMENEZ; SAGE LOPEZ,

2

Plaintiffs,

3

vs.

4 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; VERNE L.

SPEIRS, Chief Probation Officer of Sacramento

5 County from 1993-2009, in his official and

individual capacities; BARKER, in official and 6 individual capacities; BOSS, in his official and

7 individual capacities; JOSE CERVANTES, in his official and individual capacities; CHAVEZ, in his

8 official and individual capacities; MARCOS DIAZ,

in his official and individual capacities; FRAZIER, 9 in his official and individual capacities;

10

HACKETT, in his official and individual capacities; HILL, in official and individual

11 capacities; JOHNSTON, in official and individual capacities; JOSEPH KURYLLO, in his official and

12 individual capacities; MICHAEL OCAMPO, in his

official and individual capacities; RONALD 13 PARKER, in his official and individual capacities;

14

PERALTA, in her official and individual capacities; RESSINO, in his official and individual

15 capacities; JAMES TERRELL, in his official and individual capacities; DARLISHA WILBON, in

16 her official and individual capacities; ANDREW

YOUNG, in his official and individual capacities; 17 and DOES 1 TO 100, inclusive,

18

Defendants.

19

20 MELOSHA FIELDS; MELVIN FIELDS; DALE GROSSER; GUILLERMO RICHARD RUIZ;

21

Plaintiffs, 22

Closed Case No. 2:12-cv-02862-MCE-KJN (Consolidated with Case No. 2:12-cv-002834MCE-KJN)

23

vs.

24 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; VERNE L. SPEIRS, Chief Probation Officer of Sacramento

25 County from 1993-2009, in his official and

individual capacities;BALLS, in his official and 26 individual capacities; JOSE CERVANTES, in his

27 official and individual capacities; CHOW, in official and individual capacities; FRAZIER, in his

28 official and individual capacities; and DOES 1 TO

30

2

31

1 100, inclusive,

2

Defendants.

3

TRAVIS FORD; ALICIA KAFKA; QUIONA LIM; EMMANUEL RODRIGUEZ; ERIN

4 CRAWFORD; BILLY NELSON,

Closed Case No. 2:12-cv-02837-MCE-KJN (Consolidated with Case No. 2:12-cv-002834MCE-KJN)

5

Plaintiffs,

6

vs.

7 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; VERNE L.

8 SPEIRS, Chief Probation Officer of Sacramento County from 1993-2009, in his official and

9 individual capacities; BALLAS in his official and

individual capacities; JOSE CERVANTES, in his 10 official and individual capacities; LOPEZ in

11

official and individual capacities; PERALTA, in her official and individual capacities; SANCHEZ,

12 in her official and individual capacities;

DARLISHA WILBON, in her official and

13 individual capacities; and DOES 1 TO 100,

inclusive, 14

15

Defendants.

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

3

31

1

On July 17, 2013, plaintiffs in this consolidated action, by and through their respective counsels

2 of record, filed a Motion to Extend the Time for Service of the Complaints. (ECF Document No. 32.)

3 On August 8, 2013, defendant, County of Sacramento, Verne L. Speirs and Don Meyer filed a Statement

4 of Non Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion. (ECF Document No. 34.)

5

Based on the pleadings and good cause appearing, the Court hereby grants the Motion.

6 (Document No. 32.) It is hereby ORDERED that the time for service of the complaint on

7 defendants Barker, Hill, Johnston, Peralta, Ressino, Chavez, Boss, Hackett, Young, Ocampo,

8 Arroyo, Ballas, Greenhall, Heinz, Lopez, Sanchez, Tiara, Balls, and Rivera is extended for 120

9 days from the signing of this Order. Because the Court granted the parties' Motion to Extend

10 the Time for Service of the Complaints, the November 14, 2013 hearing is VACATED.

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 Dated: September 20, 2013

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

4

31

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download