EVALUATION OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN



EVALUATION OF ATTENDING PHYSICIAN

Attending Physician: Service/Rotation:

Evaluator: Month/Year:

For each of the following criteria, please rate (3) the attending physician whose rotation you have just completed.

Not Observed Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Excellent

Availability:

• Was prompt θ θ θ θ θ

• Adhered to rounds and consult schedules θ θ θ θ θ

• Kept interruptions to a minimum θ θ θ θ θ

• Spent enough time on rounds; was unhurried θ θ θ θ θ

• Encouraged active housestaff participation θ θ θ θ θ

Comments:

Not Observed Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Excellent Teaching:

• Stated goals clearly and concisely θ θ θ θ θ

• Kept discussions focused on case or topic θ θ θ θ θ

• Asked questions in non-threatening way θ θ θ θ θ

• Used bedside teaching to demonstrate

history-taking and physical skills θ θ θ θ θ

• Emphasized problem-solving, (thought

processes leading to decisions) θ θ θ θ θ

• Integrated social/ethical aspects of medicine θ θ θ θ θ

• Stimulated team members to read, research, and

review pertinent topics θ θ θ θ θ

• Accommodated teaching to actively incorporate

all members of team θ θ θ θ θ

• Provided special help as needed to team members θ θ θ θ θ

Comments:

Not Observed Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Excellent

Patient Care and Professionalism:

• Placed the patient’s interests first θ θ θ θ θ

• Displayed sensitive, caring, respectful attitude

toward patients θ θ θ θ θ

• Established rapport with team members θ θ θ θ θ

• Showed respect for residents θ θ θ θ θ

• Served as a role model θ θ θ θ θ

• Was enthusiastic and stimulating θ θ θ θ θ

• Demonstrated gender sensitivity θ θ θ θ θ

• Recognized own limitations; was

appropriately self-critical θ θ θ θ θ

• Encouraged housestaff to bring up problems θ θ θ θ θ

Comments:

Not Observed Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Excellent

Medical Knowledge:

• Demonstrated broad knowledge of medicine θ θ θ θ θ

• Was up-to-date θ θ θ θ θ

• Identified important elements in case analysis θ θ θ θ θ

• Used relevant medical/scientific literature in

supporting clinical advice θ θ θ θ θ

• Discussed pertinent aspects of population and

evidence-based medicine θ θ θ θ θ

Comments:

Not Observed Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Excellent

Practice-Based Learning and Improvement:

• Explicitly encouraged further learning θ θ θ θ θ

• Motivated residents to self-learn θ θ θ θ θ

• Evaluated residents ability to analyze

or synthesize knowledge θ θ θ θ θ

Comments:

Not Observed Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Excellent

System-Based Practice:

• Reviewed expectations of each team member

at beginning of rotation θ θ θ θ θ

• Provided useful feedback including constructive

criticism to team members θ θ θ θ θ

• Balanced service responsibilities and

teaching functions θ θ θ θ θ

Comments:

Recommendations: Yes No

• Would you recommend that this faculty member continue to serve as an attending physician

for the training program? θ θ

• To further enhance professional development, would you recommend that this faculty member

receive formal training in teaching and faculty education? θ θ

Overall Comments:

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download