What makes a good proposal: possible proposal template
Title1:
Running title:
Key words:
Authors:
Corresponding author:
Corresponding author e-mail:
Is the proposed review already written:
Proposed submission due date:
Manuscript type: Narrative / Systematic2 (with or without meta-analysis)
Table of contents:
Abstract3 (300-400 words)
i) Narrative review
Introduction: provide a brief background, define the research question and substantiate the need for the proposed review
Methods: define search terms, time period searched and databases interrogated
Results4: provide a summary of the review findings
Conclusion4: summarise how the update impacts clinical practice and/or what significance it has for reproductive clinicians and scientists.
ii) Systematic review (with or without meta-analysis)
Introduction: provide a brief background, define the research question and substantiate the need for the proposed review
Methods: define search terms, time period searched & databases interrogated; list exclusion/inclusion criteria (including assessment of manuscript quality and analysis of bias)
Results4: briefly summarise primary outcome(s) assessed and provide a summary of the review findings
Conclusion4: summarise how the update impacts clinical practice and/or what significance it has for reproductive clinicians and scientists.
1PRISMA guidelines should be followed for titles of systematic reviews (without or without meta-analysis).
2Human Reproduction Update recommends that all systematic reviews are registered with PROSPERO ()
3The abstract format varies for (i) narrative review or (ii) systematic review (with or without meta-analysis).
4Provide a summary of the anticipated findings and impact to the field if proposed review is not yet written
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.