Dualism within Progressive Pedagogies: Dynamic Nature of ...



Dualism within Progressive Pedagogies: The Dynamic Nature

of Democratic Education

by

Dr. Kweku M. Smith

Education, therefore, is a process of living and not a process

for future living. John Dewey

Abstract

Psychology, epistemology, ethics, philosophical pragmatism, dualism, criticism, and conscious progressive pedagogy are some of the inspirations that encourage and define the social role of public education and its significance as preparation for citizenship in a progressive democratic society. This paper stresses democracy’s associated life, classroom practice and communal aspects, maintaining that conscious, directed education which is necessary to establish these participatory conditions and to cultivate democratic character in students. Growth, commitment, capacity, connection, experience, and classroom activities are the critical factors. I explore and characterize the connection between student learning and the variety of social and communicative activities that foster thriving democratic communities. Students who have experienced democracy in their school lives are transformed to become better citizens in society.

Dynamic Nature of Building Democratic Education

Building democratic education requires more than frequent elections and two or more political parties. Ultimately, government is about power. Democracy is about the equal distribution of power. To that extent, elections as the primary definition of democracy disconnect parents in poor communities from real power and hide the manner in which many communities, abandoned and impoverished by the new economy, are losing their power. While the voting public has become increasingly cynical about elections, parents in these communities care very much about their children. As you will read in this paper, teachers can promote democracy by engaging students and parents as equals in real-world dialogue. Teachers and parents should be encouraged to foster friendship, work together on, and learn from each other about, schools, students’ achievement, reflections, and educational reform. Citizens, as we know, create community by working together to solve real problems such as hunger, unemployment, and homelessness. Students in schools should be introduced to the building democracy by working together to solve problems in their own lives.

A fundamental purpose of schools is to prepare our future citizens to be stakeholders in society. Arnstine (1995) was correct in saying that young people should become active participants in building a democratic community. For example, public schools are the primary institutions designed to produce a public, civic community. Schools distribute knowledge. And in many ways and by unfortunate means, unequal schools distribute knowledge unequally. When schools distribute knowledge unequally, they contribute to the decline of democratic opportunity and the continuing oppression of marginalized citizens.

Transformative goals of a public education can be summarized as the education a “good citizen”. The purpose of social studies is “to provide children and youth with knowledge, values, critical thinking skills, and experiences they require to become active participants in our society (Maker and Mehlinger, 1992, p.831).” Educating a good citizen and cultivating active participation are the goals of democratic education. In these transformative thoughts, we can say that democratic citizenship education is at the core of a public education. However, teaching about democracy or citizenship often fails to arouse students’ interest and may be perceived as unimportant. For example, democratic values are usually studied in the formal curriculum of social studies. Our commitment to developing democracy derives from ideological proposals espoused by Thomas Jefferson, John Dewey, and many others. We believe that democracy is good.

Some students may think of democratic education as an abstract area that is something far from their personal lives. This attitude reflects a situation in which a democratic education remains more a theory than a reality.

In this paper, I will attempt to explore and investigate the nature of democratic education and try to explain why teachers do not approach democratic education with ease and why students often are not interested in it. I will also suggest meritorious solutions for these unique problems in the dynamic nature of democratic education. Accessing a wide range of complexities, I will also introduce procedures that can be used in a classroom to promote the active participation of children and to cultivate a democratic way of thinking as a model for associated living.

Pedagogies and Nature of Democratic Education

In the first part of this article, I will attempt to explore seven natures of democratic education which teachers may have difficulty implementing: Teaching about commitment, teaching about capacity, teaching about connection, teaching about politics, teaching democracy by active participation, teaching democratic values and behaviors, and teaching controversial issues. I will demonstrate the problems in practicing democratic education by critically exploring the nature of democratic education and also its importance for social justice.

Teaching About Commitments, Capacity, and Connections

Pedagogical and curricular strategies for supporting the development of democratic citizens are numerous and range from leadership courses, to courses in history, to such experiences as participation in a Model United Nations (Billig, 2000). I looked for common features of the successful programs I studied. Three broad priorities emerged: promoting democratic commitments, capacities, and connections to other similar goals. In the case of commitments, students asked why they should be committed to actively engaging issues in their communities and beyond. Teachers must demonstrate to student that society needs improving and provide positive experiences seeking solutions within the community. In all probability, students will be encouraged to commit to conscious civil engagements within their communities for social justice.

As for capacity, students asked: how can we engage issues? Teachers must engage students in real–world projects, teach civil skills and provide knowledge through workshops and simulations for purposeful and meaningful engagement of students as citizens in their communities. Students will thus be encouraged to maintain the skills, knowledge, and networks they need to act positively for social changes within their communities and beyond.

Regarding connections, students asked who was going to engage in these issues with them. Teachers must provide a supportive community of peers and connections to role models. It is likely that students will reflect and admire people who have made a difference in the past and feel connected to those who want to make a difference now, and they will want to work with them in good spirit (Kahn, J., 2003).

Teaching About Politics and Process

Democratic education includes associated life itself. It includes teaching about politics and the process which is difficult for many students to understand. Knowledge of the working of political institutions and processes is a part of democratic civic education (Butts, 1980). However, teaching the art of democratic politics is extraordinarily difficult and complex; it demands more of learners than others subjects require. In short, democratic education cannot be easy because it deals with politic and social justice (Gagnon, 1996).

Democratic education in elementary school, however, needs to be consciously focused on the understanding of complex and dynamic principles of democracy and promotion of political attitudes rather than on teaching knowledge of political systems. The approach to politics that instructors should teach elementary school students is neither the complex construction of the political system nor the complicated and incomprehensible politics which function outside of children’s own lives. Political knowledge should be translated into the children’s own language at their own level. For an example, the concept of a government can be explained as that of parents in a family. The Center for Civic Education (1994) states that:

Understanding what government does may be initiated in early

grades by having students look at the governance of the family

and school as analogous to the governance of the larger

community and the nation. In the family, for example, parents

make rules governing the behavior of their children. They also

are responsible for enforcing these rules and for settling disputes

when conflicts arise about them (p.15).

Another critical approach to teaching politics is providing students with activities that make them experience the principles of democracy. A social education staff (2005) suggested that teachers “avoid teaching rote facts about dry procedures (p.414).” For example, instead of teaching the knowledge itself, teachers can use simulation activities for getting students actively involved in the study of civic issues. Simulation activities can provides students with exciting and creative experiences by putting them in the roles of those who conduct important civic activities, such as members of the legislature, diplomats, judges, juries and political candidates. In addition, “teachers can create appropriate activities related to civic conversation, deliberation on public issues, civic journalism, democratic decision making and problem solving, and participation in community affairs” (Parker, 1994, p.11). Teachers should when possible connect students’ lives to politics and show how politics affect the students’ lives and their communities. Teachers should help students understand that “there is a strongly personal initial bond between the child and the representatives of structures of authority (Apple, 1996, p.193). As children grow up and their experience becomes broad and diverse, they can discover relationships between the functions of Congress or political activities such as voting and their own lives. Teachers should serve as guides to the discovery of these critical connections.

Participatory Democracy and Teaching Democracy

Teaching democracy as a political system is often thought of from the traditional point of view. Teachers often think democratic citizenship education is mainly about teaching and learning the ‘office of citizen’—one who votes, develops interest in matters of public concern, and has a deep understanding of what happens in democratic government, from its three branches to its protection of individual rights (Parker, 1994). This is close to teaching politics, which I mentioned above.

In essence, however, democratic education should include students’ democratic actions and participations. Carpenter (1996) argues, “we praise democracy and we teach about it but we do not make enough allowances for students to participate in it (p.46).” Teaching democratic knowledge is only a part of a democratic education. We cannot realize the goal of democratic education only by teaching textbook knowledge in our diverse classrooms. Students need to practice, participate, and experience democratic principles to understand how they function in a society and to internalize them as principles which are working in their own lives. For example, if students in diverse classrooms learn that respecting various opinions in a society is an important principle of democracy, they should be able to put that principle into practice in their own lives. If these connections are made in a student’s learning process, his/her learning of democracy will be active and inspired.

Standard or traditional democratic education fails to arouse students’ interest and is often perceived as unimportant. That is because democratic education remains more theory than reality. Even though most of the topics in democratic education are issues that occur in the students’ daily lives and affect them directly and/or indirectly, they don’t recognize this fact. It is not easy to provide students with meaningful activities that will allow them to directly experience democracy. The teacher needs creativity and passion. It is crucial for elementary school children to be provided learning opportunities based on lived experiences and participation because the core of democratic education in elementary school is the cultivation of a democratic mind and attitude. For students, democratic education through practice could attain its ultimate goal as well as create passion and interest. Noddings (as cited in Yeager & Silva, 2002) states children can learn that democracy concerns fairness and social justices, and develop a sense of social responsibility by participating in age-appropriate activities.

Involving students in school governance is one way to promote their experiences in democracy. Students who have participated in school governance will have a more active sense of participation in democratic actions such as voting (Social Studies staff, 2005). Students can experience the democratic principles and acquire the sense of democratic ways of thinking by participatory activities. Minority/ majority students can also experience democratic principles by conducting their own projects on issues of democracy. Students can use participatory skills, which bridge theory and practice, in doing their project (Carpenter, 1996, p. 49). Carpenter (1996) explains in detail the process of projects in which his students participated in government class:

Students can choose the topics by their own interests. In doing

the project in groups, they are animated and involved. They

leave the classroom to conduct interviews or go to the library

to get more information. They even go to neighboring schools on

time to do a comparative analysis. Sometimes they experience

that an administrator whom they were trying to interview

stonewalled them. However, an active teaching approach that

promotes students’ involvement can provide students with

authentic knowledge about democracy and citizenship (p.48).

Teaching Values and Behaviors in Democracy

There is a thread of connection between what I mentioned above and what I will discuss in this section. In the paragraphs above I said that students need to experience and practice democracy in order to understand the authentic meaning of democratic knowledge and internalize its principles. Here I will discuss students’ need to experience democratic values through participation and activities to change their ways of thinking and behaving.

A teacher who practices democratic education would be confronted with a fundamental difficulty. Black (2005) states, “Citizenship and democratic practice is inexorably intertwined with ethics, morals, and education for character” (p.35). Such complexity is a conscious and unique feature of democratic education, particularly when democratic education is compared with many other areas in public education that deal mainly with factual and neutral knowledge within our social construction. One of the major purposes of democratic education is for students not only to develop cognitive ability, but also to cultivate their democratic ways of thinking critically and taking action to change their lives. Therefore, the aims of democratic citizenship education are by their nature sharply different in style and in the dynamic modes of teaching they require. Students need to practice and experience a democratic ways of life to realize the goal of democratic educations—that is, being a good citizen. Democratic education should emphasize the all the ways people can behave in the role of citizen, not only by being a legislator or voting and campaigning for or against a legislator (Boyte, 1994). Ultimately, democratic education aims to transform the ways a student conducts his/her life when it is based on democratic values (Gagnon, 1996).

What then are democratic values? One can get insights about democratic values by considering the character of a good citizen. With a new understanding of democratic citizenship, democracy can become more viable. One can understand democracy in depth by thinking “beyond the current American experience of citizens as simply voters and taxpayers” (Guarasci, Cornwell, and Associates, 1997, p.18. A democratic citizen should be one whose thoughts and behaviors are based on democratic values. She or he is the one concerned about the matters of his or her community, society, country, and the world beyond and then actively participates in the area of his or her own concern; one who fulfills his or her responsibility beyond performing civic duties actively, and tries to practice justice; one who listens carefully and respects diverse opinions; and who can make a reasonable decision following a discussion. In addition, equality, liberty, tolerance of difference, respect for human rights, protection for weaker groups, and the rule of law are the democratic values that one should pursue (Ahmad and Szpara, 2005: Lockyer, 2003).

Dewey was correct when he said, “education is of, by, and experience” (1938, p.29). Students learn through their experiences and many factors interact in different sequences in the process of their learning. An education whose goal is to change students’ way of thinking and behavior into a more desirable path cannot be achieved by giving them some lectures. In this sense, if a teacher has the goal of transforming students from self-interested to democratic citizens, he or she should create a democratic environment through classroom management. For example, when there is a matter to decide related to the class, a teacher can model the democratic process by discussing the problem with the class rather than making the decision him/herself. The teacher can show an example of equality and fairness by treating all the students without bias or unfairness. Instead of explaining the principles and values of democracy, it is important to show the students these democratic values.

Teaching Controversial Issues

Thoughtful visions of good education are necessarily rooted in the vision of a good society (Goodman, J. 1992, xix). To build a democratic society we should not only practice democratic values but also work to resolve social problems and conflicts. Therefore, controversial topics inevitably become a part of democratic education. Dealing with conflicts is difficult. However, it is possible for teachers to involve the students’ own interests by discussing the topics of their conflicts in classes, since some of the students are experiencing these conflicts. For example, there might be conflicts between students from middle class families and working class families. Teachers can help students understand what causes such conflicts between students and resolve them by changing their points of view. In addition, the discussion of students’ controversial topics in a democratic education class can show them that democratic processes are strongly connected to their own lives. Since a society has consistent conflicts, democratic resolution of conflict is an important part of democratic education. According to Apple (1975), “social conflicts have positive and even essential functions (p.176).” He states that:

Conflicts are the systematic products of the changing structure of a society and by their very nature tend to lead to progress. The thoughtful “reality” [is one] of conflict and flux, not a closed functional system. … In essence, therefore, conflicts must be looked at as a basic and often beneficial dimension of the dialectic for negotiating activity we label society…. Yet one is hard pressed to find anything akin to this orientation in most of the materials and teaching exhibited in schools. The basic rules of activity that govern our perception tend to cause us to picture conflict as primarily a negative quality in a collectivity. However, “happy cooperation” and conflict are two sides of the society coin, neither of which is wholly positive nor negative (p.189).

The topic of conflict is crucial because how it is dealt with helps to sharpen a student’s “sense of the legitimate means of gaining recourse within societies” (Apple, 1975, p.174). Conflict is not something to avoid. Rather we can learn from it. The conflicts in the society demonstrate the genuine aspects of the reality. Students’ ability to understand and handle the current issues are yardsticks for the future of our society. Raising questions, thinking critically, and finding solutions in the discussions of controversial issues can promote students’ abilities to solve their future problems and advance to a democratic society (Social studies staff, 2005). Dealing with controversial issues is not easy. Sometimes it involves serious disagreements and arguments. In many cases, teachers choose to teach students in an “objective factual, and neutral manner” (Zevin, 1994, p. 24). As a result, “the curriculum is easily taught and non-controversial but tends to offer little in the way of problem-solving or critical thinking opportunities” (Zevin, 1994, p.21). However, the process of the realization of democracy is the process of solving controversial problems.

Democratic education inevitably deals with sensitive topics such as gender, race, and social rights of minority groups. Because we can establish a democratic society on the basis of a social agreement on those issues (MacLaughlin, 2003), “many of the questions surrounding the teaching of controversial issues in citizenship education can only be adequately dealt with by inquiring into matters of contextual detail, and in particular into what is actually happening in classrooms” (p.149). In elementary schools, for instance, teachers can approach the gender issue from the gender role in a classroom or through experiences in which they may have been treated unfairly by their families.

Democratic Education as Potentiality

In the second part of this paper, I will examine the critical dynamic nature of democratic education. Based on my classroom observations and research in the field, I will also introduce some programs and activities that will permit elementary students to practice the dynamic nature of education.

Dewey demonstrated that democracy is not a “static” notion but a “dynamic” conception (Noddings, 2005, p.164). Even though democratic education has several problems, at the same time, it is by nature active and interesting when a dynamic manner of learning is provided. It is completely different from other theoretical subjects such as math and science. This is because democracy, by its very nature, is premised on participation and thoughtful action. The society in which students live is operating based on democratic principles, values, and actions. Thus, many of the topics in democratic education are issues which occur in the students’ daily lives, or affect them directly and /or indirectly, even if they do not recognize it. The theory of democratic citizenship and the practice of it are not set apart but interdependent each other (Carpenter, 1996).

Learning democracy in a dynamic manner means conscious, firsthand participation in activities which are based on democratic principles acquired through students’ learning processes. Carpenter (1996) states, “Learning democracy in an experiential and participatory manner allows students to see firsthand what citizenship involves” (p.49). For students to learn democratic participation, they should engage in democratic activities. To improve discussion skills and cultivate the attitude of good discussants, they should experience taking part in a real discussion of their own issues in class. To think critically, and internalize the attitude of fulfilling a responsibility, students should practice being responsible by their roles in classroom activities.

Maxim (2000) states, “Knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for informed and thoughtful participation in society require an active, enjoyable, and rewarding system of instruction that results in meaningful and substantial learning” (p.19). If the children of our democratic nation are to be educated as good and thoughtful citizens, then democratic education must be delivered in a developmentally appropriate way during the elementary years (Maxim, 2005).

Teachers have the responsibility to critically connect democratic theory to its practice. They need to train themselves to see with a critical lens in order to create appropriate activities which children are willing to participate in various capacities. Practical experiences that students are given in the classroom can be valuable in promoting democratic value, skills and knowledge for the future.

Democratic classroom activities and associated programs

❑ Suggested weekly discussion meetings

Teachers must respect diverse views, opinions, and experiences which are critical values of democratic principles. When different views, opinions, and experience exist, it is also important for students to practice reaching an agreement through democratic discussions or dialogue. These strategies should include goals of clarification and the establishment of clear measures of progress. For example, immigrant students want to acquire fluent English, but many give up and accept low levels of language learning. Their failure is not from lack of goals or experience. Failure develops from school’s and teachers’ lack of democratic principles in the classroom that would frequently confirm measurable progress toward language mastery. Language acquisition program participations fails when there is no empowerment to negotiate meaningful democratic values. Positive experience through empowerment leads to reflective clarifications about cultural and democratic value assimilation and encourages students to stay in school and continue toward graduation. Hunt and Metcalf (1996) argue that “an apt term for describing the unique task of education in democracy is creative resolution of conflict” (p.109). In diverse classrooms, students should practice listening carefully to what their friends say, think critically about what they have heard, and engage in democratic decision-making. Preskill (1997) states that:

Open, thoughtful, and highly participatory conversation is a critical feature of democratic society. Discussion or dialogue, deliberation, and individual and group decision-making are not only at the heart of participatory democracy; they are an important source of learning and a key to self-development and continuous growth (p.317).

I have been able to observe and experience teachers and students promoting democratic decision making through weekly classroom discussion meetings. Through such observation and experience, I have come to believe that in any given classroom situation, democracy will be best realized by the most appropriate embodiment of the school’s values of freedom, social justice, and respect for personal autonomy in context. As James Banks, a leader in the field of multicultural education, argues (1997),

A fundamental premise of a democratic society is that citizens will participate in the governing of the nation and that the nation-state will reflect the hopes, dreams, and possibilities of its people. People are not born democrats. Consequently, an important goal of the schools in a democratic society is to help student acquire the knowledge, values, and skills needed to participate effectively in public communities. Educating students to be democrats is a challenge in any kind of society. It is a serious challenge in a society characterized by cultural, ethnic, racial, and language diversity, especially when these variable are used to privilege some individuals from some groups and to deny other equal opportunities to participate” (p.1).

❑ Classroom activities and participation

To facilitate students’ interactions with classmates and encourage a sense of participation, teachers can use various kind student groups. In the beginning of a semester, each student decides in which group he/she will participate. The groups can be study helpers, event planners, health and physical education helpers, library and media helpers. For example, a study helper group provides students with some information relating to what they were learning in classes. The students prepare materials required in a particular class, and they help students understand a math problem, much as a tutor would do. The special event planners could plan a birthday party and other events for classmates. The health and PE helpers lead warming up exercises at the beginning of PE class and plan a presentation related to students’ health. The library and media helpers can take charge of a class library and the class website. Ideally, each group will create activities based on the group’s characters and goals. Students practice creative participation and are involved in their community through these group activities.

Democratic citizenship education starts by encouraging students to be concerned about community issues. There is a trend for students to be individualistic and concerned only about matters their own or of people close to them. Writing a class diary can cultivate students’ concerns about community. Every student is responsible for writing in the class diary for a day; a student who must write in the class diary should keep his/her eye on and mind on every classmate and observe carefully what is happening in class for the day. The teacher emphasizes that the dairy is a history and therefore plays a very important role. Students write in detail about what happens during the day in the classroom, adding their critical thoughts. The next morning, the writer reads his or her entry aloud in front of the class. Through this program, students can extend their concern to their community and think critically about community interactions. Since students have an equal opportunity to write, even an introspective student can have a chance to present his/her opinions in front of the class.

Inclusion as Conclusion

As we know, human nature is not static, but dynamic. Democratic education is inherently dynamic. In writing this paper, I do not wish to be neutral in emphasizing the critical importance of empowering and promoting democratic society. I have presented encouraging ideas for teachers and students, especially immigrant students. I have tried to be fair to opposing ideas. But the reader should know that what appears in this paper is based on my own observations and classroom experiences in the United States, Latin America and Africa.

I do want to influence the elementary school teachers and students in their processes of experiencing democratic education and living the virtues of democratic values. Elementary school children are eager to participate in thoughtful classroom activities. When they learn democracy through participatory activities, they will enjoy learning democracy. In addition, teachers should connect democracy with students’ personal lives, and their own concerns. When students learn democracy in connection with their own experiences, they will realize that democracy is a part of their lives, and that they, themselves, are democracy. Democratic education is not exercising in advance the democracy they will experience when they become adults in the future. Rather, it is experiencing a democratic way of life through their current experiences in a classroom, enabled by a thoughtful teacher’s management of a democratic classroom.

“The quality of civic education in schools is the foundation of the future health of our democracy (Social studies staff, 2005, p.414).” Practicing democracy with students is exciting. If and when the teach has a conscious belief in democracy and makes an effort to practice democracy in his or her own classroom, s/he can see a small democratic society building. The student, who has experienced democracy in his/her school life, can be a better and thoughtful citizen in our society.

Reference

Ahmad, I., & Szpara, M.Y. (2005). Education for democratic citizenship and peace: Proposal foe a cosmopolitan model. Education Studies, 38(1), 8-23.

Apple, M. W. (1975). The hidden curriculum and the nature of conflict. In W.C. Parker (Ed.), Educating the democratic mind (pp.. 173-199). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Arnot, M. (2003) Citizenship education and gender. In Lockyer, A., Crick, B., & Annette, J. (Ed.). Education for democratic citizenship: Issues of theory and practice (pp.103-119). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.

Arnstin, D. (1995) Democracy and the art of schooling. Albany, NY: State University of New York press.

Banks, J.A. (1989), Multicultural education: Characteristic and goals. In J.A. Banks & C.A. McGee Banks (Eds.) , Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (pp. 2-3). Needham Heights, MA: Ally & Bacon.

Black, P.F. (2005). Democratic practices as manisfested through charater education. In Pearl, A. & Pryor, C.R. (Ed.), Democratic practices in education (pp.31-39). Lanham, MD: A Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Carpenter, J.J. (1996). Democratic education in practice: Teaching participation in government. Social Science Record, 33 (2), 46-51.

Center for civic education (1994). National standard for civics and government. Calabasas, CA: Center for civic education.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Gagnon, P. (1989). History’s role in civic education: the precondition for political intelligence. In W.C. Parker (Ed.), Educating the democratic mind (pp.241-262). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Goodman.J. (1992). Elementary schooling for critical democratic. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Guarasci, R., Cornwell, G. H. & Associates. (1997). Democratic education in an age of difference. San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bas Inc., Publishers.

Hunt, M.P. & Metcalf, L.E. (1951/1968). Rational inquiry on society’s closed areas. In W.C. Parker (Ed.), Educating the democratic mind (pp. 97-116). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Lockyer, A. (2003). Introduction and review. In Lockyer, A., Crick, B. &., Annette, J. (Ed.) Educating for democratic citizenship: Issues of theory and practice (pp. 1-14). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.

MacLaughlin, T. (2003). Teaching controversial issues in citizenship education. In Lockyer, A., Crick, B., & Annette, J. (Ed.), Educating for democratic citizenship: issues of theory and practice (pp. 149-160). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.

Marker, G. & Mehling, H. (1992). Social studies. In American educational research association (Ed.). Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 830-851). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company

Maxim, G.W. (2005). Dynamic social studies for constructivist classrooms: Inspiring tomorrow’s social scientist (8th ed.) Saddle river, NJ: Pearson Education.

Noddings, N. (2005). The challenge to car in schools: An alternative approach to education (2nd ed.) New York, NY Teachers College Press.

Oliver, D. W. & Shaver, J. P. (1966). Using a jurisprudential framework in the teaching public issues.

Parker, W.C. (2003) Teaching democracy: Unity and diversity in public life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Parker, W.C. (2004). “Advanced “ ideas about democracy: toward a pluralist conception of citizenship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the council for the social studies, Phoenix, AZ.

Billig, Shelley, H. (May 200) “Research on School-Based Service-Learning: The Evidence Builds”, Phi Delta Kappan.

Marker, G. & Mehlinger, H. (1992). Social studies. In America educational research association. (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp.830-851). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Khan, J, Chi,B., and Middaugh,E,.(May 2003) “Democratic Education: The Untapped potential of High School Government Courses,” Unpublished paper.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download