How long have you known the applicant and in what context



[pic]

Applicant’s Name: Catherine Durbin Approximate Dates of Employment: Summer 2008 – Summer 2009

Your Name: Marko Papic Title: Analyst/Director of Personnel Development Company: S T R A T F O R

1. How long have you known the applicant and in what context? How long did he or she work for you? If part-time, how often did he or she work?

I have known Catherine for 1.5 years now. She worked for me for about a year first as an intern and then as a Junior Analyst. This was full time employment. I was her direct superior in the Eurasia Area of Responsibulity (AOR)

2. What duties did the applicant perform? 

A lot of research, mainly on security/political/economic risks in Western Europe.

3. What observations are you able to make with regard to the applicant's work ethic, intellect, degree of motivation for professional achievement, and potential for professional growth? 

 

 

Work ethic is extraordinary, as is motivation. She has a lot of room to grow, especially in leadership capacity. Her intellect is definitely there, but she can sometimes be reserved and not let it come out as much as she could.

4. What can you tell us about the applicant's character and personal qualities?  Are there special strengths and weaknesses that we should consider?

Nothing to really say about her character other than she is extremely hard working and committed to professional advancement. A very warm and decent person. Can be reserved and shy.

5. Please comment on the applicant’s ability to work with a team. If given a choice, do you believe he or she would prefer to work independently or as part of a group?

She is a great team player, but rarely does she take the leadership role. I think she is fine working either in a team or independently. Independently she can focus on a task and excel without problems, but in a team she can play the role of the facilitator, so she is really good either way.

6. To the best of your knowledge, can the applicant be trusted with confidential information?

STRATFOR is a global intelligence organization that works for a number of Fortune 500 clients and handles a lot of confidential information, much more than most private/legal businesses. If Catherine was unable to handle confidential information, she would not have passed our thorough background checks, or earned the trust of analysts at the company.

7. Please rank the following on a scale of 1 to 5, one being below average and five being excellent:

• Verbal Communication skills: 4 (shy) Organizational skills: 5

• Attention to detail: 5 Written Communication skills: 5

• Self-confidence: 2 (way too hard on herself) Motivation: 5

• Punctuality: 5 Ability to meet deadlines: 5

• Trustworthiness: 5 Work product: 5

8. If the applicant were eligible for rehire, would you rehire him or her?

YES

9. Please indicate below any additional thoughts, comments, or observations that you believe to be relevant for LEGALSOURCE® when evaluating the applicant for employment:

Thank you!

LEGALSOURCE® values your candid evaluation and thus keeps your assessment of the applicant strictly confidential.

-----------------------

CONFIDENTIAL

Applicant Evaluation

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download