Pros and Cons on Judge Sotomayor being appointed to the ...
Pros and Cons on Judge Sotomayor being appointed to the Supreme Court
| |Pros |Cons |
|Judge’s role |“[t]he duty of a judge is to follow the law, not to |“Appeals Court is where policy is made” .Sonia|
| |question its plain terms. I do not believe that Congress |Sotomayor . .[1 2005] |
| |wishes us to disregard the plain language of any statute or| |
| |to invent exceptions to the statutes it has created. . . . | |
| |But even if Congress had doubts about the wisdom of | |
| |subjecting felony disenfranchisement laws to the results | |
| |test of § 2, I trust that Congress would prefer to make any| |
| |needed changes itself, rather than have courts do so for | |
| |it.” | |
| |Sonia Sotomayor in dissenting opinion of Hayden v. Pataki | |
| |.[8 2006] | |
|Qualifications |“More experience as a judge than any of current Supreme | |
| |court when they were first appointed” .[2 2009] President | |
| |Obama | |
|Abortion stance |Upheld Mexico City policy which limits federal funds for |Has never made an actual ruling on abortion |
| |overseas abortions.[3 2002] |rights.[5 2009] |
| | |(President Obama signed an executive order |
| | |rescinding the Mexico City policy) |
|Bi-partisan support |Appointed to Federal District Court in Southern NY by |Sonia was recommended for the federal |
| |Republican President Bush Sr (1992) and to 2nd Circuit |positionby Democratic New York Senator Daniel |
| |Court of appeals by Democratic President Clinton (1998) .[4|Patrick Moynihan.[6] Moynihan had an |
| |1992, 1998] |arrangement with his fellow New York Senator, |
| | |Republican Al D'Amato, whereby he would get to|
| | |choose roughly one out of every four New York |
| | |district court seats even though a Republican |
| | |was in the White House.[33][43][44] Moynihan |
| | |also wanted to fulfill a public promise he had|
| | |made to get a Hispanic judge appointed for New|
| | |York.[15] |
| | |.[12 1992] |
|Stance on 1st Amendment |Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush, 1st amendment rights |Dissenting opinion: Pappas v. Giuliani, Sonia |
| |not violated, based on earlier ruling in Planned Parenthood|validated free speech of employee on own time,|
| |Federation of America, Inc v. Agency for International |even though materials used were racist and |
| |Development |bigoted.[6 2009] |
| |****Kraham v. Lippman, an opinion holding that a rule |In a 2008 case known as Doe v. Mukasey, |
| |prohibiting high-ranking political party officials from |Sotomayor ruled that FBI "national-security |
| |receiving court fiduciary appointments in New York state |letters" asking electronic-communications |
| |courts did not violate the plaintiff’s right to freedom of |service providers to furnish the Bureau with |
| |political association. .[7 2009] |the records of a criminal or terrorist |
| | |suspect, violated the First Amendment |
|Stance on 2nd Amendment | |Sonia Sotomayor wrote in Maloney v. Cuomo: |
| | |"The Second Amendment applies only to |
| | |limitations the federal government seeks to |
| | |impose on this right . . . not upon that of |
| | |the state." .[9 2009] |
|Racial Discrimination | |Ricci v. DeStefano 2009 Upheld NYC right to |
| | |deny merit test based promotions to whites |
| | |since minorities didn’t pass the test.[10 |
| | |2009] |
| | | |
| | |"Our gender and national origins may and will |
| | |make a difference in our judging . . .I would |
| | |hope that a wise Latina woman with the |
| | |richness of her experience would more often |
| | |than not reach a better conclusion than a |
| | |white male who hasn't lived that life. . . our|
| | |gender and national origins may and will make |
| | |a difference in our judging…. Personal |
| | |experiences affect the facts that judges |
| | |choose to see.”" .[12 2001] |
| | |Sonia Sotomayor |
| | |Berkeley Law School 2001 |
|Circuit court Decisions | |‘5 of Sotomayor’s decisions have been |
|appealed to Supreme Ct | |appealed, and 3 have been overturned with one |
| | |more likely and one not filed yet: |
| | |*Granholm v. Heald |
| | |(Swedenburg v. Kelly) 2004 overturned |
| | | |
| | |*Malesko v. Correctional Services Corp 2000 |
| | |(overturned) |
| | | |
| | |*Riverkeeper v. EPA 2007—Overturned |
| | | |
| | |*Ricci v. DeStefano 2009(likely to be |
| | |overturned in June) |
| | | |
| | |*Maloney v. Cuomo (will be filed in June) .[11|
| | |2009] |
|Political Position |Democrat; June 1998, The Wall Street Journal editorial page denounced her as a left-wing judicial |
| |activist; Sotomayor's circuit court rulings have led to her being considered a political centrist by the |
| |American Bar Association Journal[36][62] and other sources and organizations.[36][49][62][63][64][65] |
| |Several lawyers, legal experts, and news organizations, however, identify her as someone who has liberal |
| |inclinations.[66][67][68] |
Compiled by Holly Craw 5/31/09
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- the revolutionary era midway isd
- second amendment
- pros and cons on judge sotomayor being appointed to the
- university of houston law center a nationally ranked
- united states court for the district of rhode island
- central bucks school district homepage
- central bucks school district
- falsity of notion that 2nd amendment was a compromise
- background university of houston law center
- liberals have second thoughts on the second amendment
Related searches
- pros and cons of annuities for retirement
- pros and cons of annuitizing
- pros and cons of college
- pros and cons of free college tuition
- pros and cons of target date funds
- pros and cons of owner financing
- pros and cons of year round school
- pros and cons of going to college
- pros and cons of being a lawyer
- pros and cons of being a doctor
- pros and cons of being a surgeon
- pros and cons to outsourcing