Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices
For the full series of reports, visit
pubaffairs@ @theusscgov
Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices
In a recent series of reports, the United States Sentencing Commission re-examined the influence of the guidelines post-U.S. v. Booker, and whether differences in federal sentencing practices persist both regionally (e.g., inter-district) and within the same courthouse (e.g., intra-city). The Commission measured differences between average
guideline minimums and average sentences imposed over the three time periods spanning 2005 through 2017.
Booker Period
Jan 12, 2005 - Dec. 9, 2007
Gall Period
Dec. 10, 2007 - Sept. 30, 2011
Post-Report Period
Oct. 1, 2011 - Sept. 30, 2017
Guideline Influence
Click on any section to access the full report.
In the aggregate, the difference between the guideline minimum and the final sentence widened after Booker, and then stabilized over the most recent years studied. However, the guidelines' degree of influence on the sentence differed across crime types.1
Aggregrate
Fraud
Drug Trafficking
Firearms
% Difference
-15%
2005
-22% -9%
2017
-27% -17%
-4% -26%
-8%
These trend lines show the percent difference between the average
guideline minimum and the average sentence imposed.
A negative number indicates the average sentence was below the
average guideline minimum (e.g., in 2017, the average sentence
imposed was 22% below the average guideline minimum for
all cases in the aggregate).
Illegal Reentry
-10%
-5%
Child Pornography
-3% -27%
Career Offender
-20%
-32%
Inter-District Differences
Sentencing outcomes continue to depend, in part, upon the district in which the defendant is sentenced.2 These differences increased for each of the four major crime types analyzed following U.S. v. Booker and continued for some, but not all of these crime types through the most recent period studied.
Booker Period
Fraud
Gall Period
Post-Report Period
58
Total Spread
Drug Trafficking 57
Firearms 55
Illegal Reentry 58
Post-Report Period Districts Furthest Above and Below the
Overall Average
-29%
South Dakota
+30%
Texas North
Houston
-33%
Wisconsin East
+24%
NC East
Houston
-28%
Wisconsin East
Houston
+27%
Puerto Rico
-25%
Utah
+33%
Texas North
Houston
Total spread measures the difference between the districts furthest above and below the average for all districts.
Intra-City Differences
In most cities, a defendant's sentence length increasingly depends on which judge in the courthouse is assigned to the case.3 The Commission observed increasing variation among judges in 25 of the 30 cities studied from the Booker Period to the Post-Report Period.
Spread measures the difference between the judges furthest above and below the average
for all judges in a particular city.
Judge Furthest Above
25 Cities
out of 30 studied
*Spread Increase Among Judges
City Average
Spread
Judge Furthest Below
Houston
6.9
Oklahoma City
Smallest Spread Among Judges
63.8
Philadelphia
Largest Spread Among Judges
Demographic Differences
Sentence length continues to be associated with some demographic factors. In a related study published in 2017, the Commission found that Black male offenders continued to receive longer sentences in the most recent period studied than similarly situated White male offenders and non-government sponsored below range sentences appeared to contribute significantly to this finding.4
19%
longer sentences
21%
less likely to receive non-government sponsored below-range sentence
1 U.S. Sentencing Comm'n, The Influence of the Guidelines Range on Federal Sentencing (2020) 2 U.S. Sentencing Comm'n, Inter-District Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices (2020) 3 U.S. Sentencing Comm'n, Intra-City Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices (2018) 4 U.S. Sentencing Comm'n, Demographic Differences in Sentencing: An Update to the 2012 Booker Report (2017)
For more information The Commission has examined differences in federal sentencing practices and the effect of U.S. v. Booker in several reports. Visit to learn more about this and other topics.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- incarceration trends in louisiana
- differences in federal sentencing practices
- the opioid crisis and the black african
- the skin color paradox and the american racial order
- race and sentencing disparity
- racial disparities in the united states criminal justice
- racial disparities in the criminal justice system
- the color of punishment african americans skin tone and
- last fall i lost a friend
- ira sliver professor of sociology framingham state
Related searches
- amygdala differences in men and women
- gender differences in learning
- personality differences in the workplace
- differences in cultures
- cultural differences in america
- cultural differences in china and america
- cultural differences in healthcare examples
- cultural differences in the workplace
- respecting differences in people
- cultural differences in education systems
- differences in differences analysis
- linguistic differences in the classroom