Modern Wisdom

Modern Wisdom

Jimmy Rising

Philosophy is generally concerned with the nature of things: truths about reality, human nature, and why things are and do what they are and do. In this sense, philosophy fits its archaic name, "natural science." Philosophy can also be described as the "pursuit or love of wisdom" (this is the origin of the word) and it is imagined that the philosophical life, a life characterized by contemplation and inquiry, is necessary to attain true wisdom. Modern philosophy, with its emphasis on breaking down old beliefs even more than constructing new ones, is decidedly on the "science" side of philosophy. Nonetheless, I believe that all philosophers study the subject in part in hopes of understanding and gaining wisdom. Every "advance" in philosophy as the natural science is associated with a refinement or change in the view of wisdom. For example, George Berkeley proclaims that philosophy is "nothing else but the study of wisdom and truth" in the introduction to his Principles, and then speaks hardly another word of the nature of wisdom. What is the wisdom of modern philosophy? More to the point, what is wisdom, according to various branches of modern philosophy, and to modern philosophy as a whole?

1

1 Definition of Wisdom

To answer this question, even without trying to define wisdom before it's definition is sought, we need to specify what we are looking for? that is, the indications of wisdom.

Wisdom is:

Knowledge ? Wisdom, firstly, is a characteristic of the mind or the soul, not of the body. It is

a kind of knowledge, skill, sense, or intuition the affects who one thinks.

Wise Action ? In addition, wisdom is inseparable from the decisions that are made in the real

world (whatever the form of the real world is, according to the perception of the wise one). It is not just a matter of what is in one's mind, but how one uses it.

Judgment ? Wisdom is concerned with using thing in the mind to make right judgments and

decisions. Related to this is the ability to perceive the philosophical significance of things, which can naturally imply the judgment that is to be made.

Virtue ? Wisdom is known as the opposite of foolishness and means not just any thoughtful

action, but specifically those with moral character.

This essay will consider each of these aspect in the context of four modern philosopher's: Ren?e Descartes, George Berkeley, David Hume, and Immanuel Kant. However, first we will examine what aspects of wisdom seem most important to each of these different branches of modern philosophy.

2

2 Branches of Modern Philosophy

2.1 Descartes's Wisdom

For Descartes, father of modern philosophy, wisdom lies in two actions: doubting and thinking upon God, and these characteristics can be seen reflected in all of the later modern philosophers.

Doubting has two major implications. The first is that one must separate oneself from the world. In the meditations, Descartes notes "how little truth there is in our perceptions of corporeal objects." Wisdom, then, has a well-regulated connection to the world, where wisdom must come not from perceptions, but only what from what one knows.

The second is a drive toward knowing things self-evidently, that comes from a doubt of the processes of the mind. The only way to know the "certainty of truths which... are not immediate deductions from the first self-evident principles" is to pass over them again and again until no more doubt is possible (Rules). Wisdom, as knowledge, must be hard fought for.

In the Meditations, Descartes says that, "so long as I think only of God, and turn my attention wholly to him, I can discern no cause for error or falsehood." Confusion lies in the distractions and illusions of the world and the human senses. God is the only undistorted one.

3

2.2 Berkeley's Wisdom

For Berkeley, the nature of wisdom is less clear. Despite his introductory comment connecting wisdom and philosophy, he neglect the term almost entirely outside of references to "the wisdom of God." Berkeley conceives of the universe as the activity in God's mind. Our knowledge of the universe is from perceptions, which "occur" to us the same way as do memories and dreams. These ideas must come from somewhere, and that entity which generates them is Berkeley's God. God's wisdom Berkeley appears to take as an axiom, and it can mean nothing but exactly that thing which causes God to form the ideas that he forms, rather than others. Wisdom is something that God has, and perhaps can be used through Him. The context for wisdom is also different for Berkeley. For one, the world formed of the very ideas that bombard us as sensations. Because sensations and thoughts are so closely linked for Berkeley, the potential of a person to be wise or foolish is greatly diminished.

2.3 Hume's Wisdom

The first question that one must ask with respect to David Hume is whether he believed in wisdom at all. Hume speaks out against the philosophers who "give themselves airs of

4

superior wisdom," which implies both that he does not believe that these philosophers have that wisdom, and that that wisdom is there to have.

The first statement one can make is negative: wisdom is not to be found in abstract thought. In fact, if wisdom is to come from anywhere, it must come from the perceptions. However, it is nonetheless essential to be able to make appropriate judgments in the physical world, and it is clear that not all judgments (such as those of most philosopher's, according to Hume) are reasonable.

2.4 Kant's Wisdom

Kant's Critique of Practical Reason is laden with his view of wisdom. Practical Reason, for Kant, is exactly the ability of the mind to make judgments that relate to actions in the real world. Kant seems to have three major aspects which characterize the path to wisdom. They are the supremacy of reason, rule-based decisions, and universal rules.

Not only is the faculty of reason the most powerful tool of human life, it is the only mode by which we can make any decision, wise or foolish.

Secondly, we are always in situations where we cannot know all of the information sufficient for making a completely informed decision. However, when the decision-making process is divorced from the facticity of any particular situation, it is possible to come up with universal laws which are wise.

5

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download