The SEC fingers the government-backed mortgage buyers, not ...
[Pages:4]Peter Wallison: The Financial Crisis on Trial -
...
News, Quotes, Companies, Videos
SEARCH
Wednesday, December 21, 2011 As of 12:00 AM New York
OPINION
49? | 34?
U.S. Edition Home
Today's Paper Video Blogs Journal Community
World U.S. New York Business Markets Tech Personal Finance
Life & Culture
Opinion
Careers
Subscribe Log In Real Estate Small Business
Leisure & Arts Book Reviews Letters to the Editor Political Diary Columns
TOP STORIES IN
Opinion
1 of 12
Mitt Romney on Taxes, 'Modeling,' and the Vision Thing
2 of 12
David Yepsen: Iowa and the Future of the GOP
OPINION
DECEMBER 21, 2011
The Financial Crisis on Trial
The SEC fingers the government-backed mortgage buyers, not Wall Street greed.
3 of 12
Jenkins: What Merkel Is Thinking
In Hoc Anno Domini
Article
Comments (200)
MORE IN OPINION ?
Email
Print Save
Like 297
10
Tweet 36
By PETER J. WALLISON
The Securities and Exchange Commission's lawsuits against six top executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, announced last week, are a seminal event.
For the first time in a government report, the complaint has made it clear that the two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) played a major role in creating the demand for low-quality mortgages before the 2008 financial crisis. More importantly, the SEC is saying that Fannie and Freddie--the largest buyers and securitizers of subprime and other low-quality mortgages--hid the size of their purchases from the market. Through these alleged acts of securities fraud, they did not just mislead investors; they deprived analysts, risk managers, rating agencies and even financial regulators of vital data about market risks that could have prevented the crisis.
The lawsuit necessarily focuses on 2006 and 2007, the years that are still within the statute of limitations. But according to the SEC complaint, the behavior went on for many years: "Since the 1990s, Freddie Mac internally categorized loans as subprime or subprime-like as part of its loan acquisition program," while its senior officials continued to state publicly that it had little or no exposure to subprime loans.
The GSEs began acquiring large numbers of subprime and other low-quality loans in the mid-1990s, as they tried to comply with the government's affordable-housing requirements--quotas for mortgage purchases imposed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under legislation enacted by Congress in 1992.
These quotas initially required that, of all the loans bought by Fannie and Freddie in any year, 30% had to have been made to borrowers earning at or below the median income in their communities. The quotas, however, would increase--they rose to 40% in 1996, 50% in 2000, and 55% in 2007. HUD also added and raised quotas for "special affordable" loans that were to be made to borrowers with low or very low incomes (in some cases a mere 60% of the area median income).
It is certainly possible to find prime mortgages among borrowers whose incomes are below the median, but this becomes more difficult as the quota percentages increase. Indeed, by 2000 Fannie and Freddie were offering to buy zero-down payment loans and buying large numbers of subprime mortgages in order to meet the HUD quotas.
According to the SEC, for example, Fannie failed to disclose a low-quality loan known as an Expanded Approval (EA) mortgage--even though these loans had the highest rate of "serious delinquency"
Available to Subscribers
Egypt's Christians
South Carolina
Look to U.S. for Help Voter ID Law
Rejected
Views Dim on NYSE Tie-Up
Steel Prices Rise, Lifting Makers
Most Popular on Facebook
1 of 4
12/25/11 7:11 AM
Peter Wallison: The Financial Crisis on Trial -
...
(90 days past due, and almost certainly going to foreclosure) in Fannie's book. Those EA loans--as then-Chairman Daniel Mudd told the House Financial Services Committee in April 2007--"helped us meet our HUD affordable housing requirements."
Meeting these quotas made Fannie and
Freddie important factors in the financial
crisis. Relying on the research of my
colleague Edward Pinto at the American
Enlarge Image
Corbis
Enterprise Institute, I stated in my dissent from the majority report of the Financial
Crisis Inquiry Commission that there were
approximately 27 million subprime and other risky mortgages outstanding on June 30,
2008, and a lion's share was on Fannie and Freddie's books. That has now been largely
confirmed by the SEC's data.
The SEC also charges that Fannie and Freddie's disclosures grossly understated the number of subprime and other risky loans they were holding or securitizing. For example, Freddie's Information Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders, in March 2006, reported that for 2005 and 2004 the company's exposure to subprime loans was "not significant." According to the SEC complaint, subprime mortgages at this point constituted 10% of Freddie's exposures.
Similarly, Fannie held over $94 billion in EA loans in 2007, according to the SEC--"11 times greater than the 0.3% ($8.3 billion)" in subprime loans Fannie disclosed for that year. (According to an SEC press release, both GSEs have agreed with the commission's "Statement of Facts" about their disclosure failures, without admitting or denying liability. They also agreed to cooperate with the commission's litigation against the former executives.)
Fannie and Freddie were the dominant players in the U.S. mortgage markets, by far the largest buyers of mortgages and mortgage-backed securities of all kinds. Statements by these two firms that their exposure to subprime mortgages was "not significant" or ".03 percent" would be read by analysts and other mortgage market participants as strong indications that relatively few subprime and other low-quality mortgages were outstanding.
My own research, as a member of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (and a dissenter from its majority report), did not turn up any analyst report or other public statement before the 2008 crisis that came close to estimating the actual number of subprime or other low-quality mortgages outstanding.
These failures to disclose subprime holdings meant that banks and other financial institutions, risk managers, analysts, rating agencies and even regulators may well have underestimated the risks of continuing to acquire, hold and distribute mortgages and mortgage-backed securities. Thus, when the bubble deflated in 2007, the financial system, and particularly the largest financial institutions, were primed for immense losses.
Mr. Wallison is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Sign Up
Create an account or log in to see what your friends are recommending.
Forced Merriment: The True Spirit of Christmas 1,209 people recommend this.
How to Ace a Google Interview 509 people recommend this.
In Hoc Anno Domini 328 people recommend this.
Year's Best Movie Is From Iran 635 people recommend this.
Facebook social plugin
Most Popular Video
'Weed Wars' Stars on the Business of Marijuana 4:13
Why Now is the Time to Buy a BMW or Mercedes 5:15
The "Tiger Mother" Speaks 66:10
More in Opinion
Mitt Romney on Taxes, 'Modeling,' and the Vision Thing David Yepsen: Iowa and the Future of the GOP Jenkins: What Merkel Is Thinking In Hoc Anno Domini The ECB's Backdoor Bailout
Most Popular
Read Emailed Video Commented
1. Answers to Google Interview Questions
2. How to Ace a Google Interview 3. Forced Merriment: The True Spirit of Christmas 4. Gingrich, Perry to Miss Virginia Ballot 5. Opinion: Noonan: Jobs, Thatcher and the Force of Life
Most Read Articles Feed
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
200 Comments, add yours
MORE IN
Opinion ?
Like
Send
297 likes. Sign Up to see what your friends like.
Tweet 36
Share 1
10
Email
Print
Order Reprints
2 of 4
12/25/11 7:11 AM
Peter Wallison: The Financial Crisis on Trial -
...
Business Insurance Agents Find Business & Commercial Insurance Companies in Your Area.
DAILY Penny Stock Picks My email alerts may cause Insane gains for active traders!
Full Color Business Cards 14 -16pt Glossy, Matte, Recycled or Uncoated. Satisfaction Guaranteed!
Truth about Penny Stocks How to trade penny stocks from home, and profit from the Market.
Add a Comment
View All Comments (200) To add a comment please
Log in
Track replies to my comment
JOURNAL COMMUNITY Community rules
Create an Account
Your real name is required for commenting.
Login with Facebook
Related and Recommended
WSJ BLOGS
Yancoal in Talks With Gloucester
The Last Movie Maestro: John Williams
China's Yanzhou Coal Mining is in preliminary discussions with Gloucester Coal to create an 8 billion Australian dollar (US$7.9 billion) coal giant,...
Danube's Low Water Level Causes Problems
WSJ BLOGS
Tango Moves Beyond Video Calls Alone Doubts Arise in Euro's Birthplace Japan Car Makers Hail Tax Cut Weak Euro Gives Hope to Zone's Exporters
NFL Inks $27.9 Billion Deal with Networks Sony, Warner Join Web-Music Suit Facebook Takes Aim in Ad Fight Rivals Invade Southwest's Air Space RV Takes Justice to Streets
Elsewhere on the Web
Content from Sponsors What's This?
Think Rates Will Rise: Try Laddering You CD
Where to find the best saving account rates?
How much money does FDIC insurance protect?
Annuities vs Other Investments
"A - Rated" Annuities That Pay 4%
Investment Performance: Annuities
How to get a 3.5% Yield with a Savings Bond?
3 of 4
12/25/11 7:11 AM
Peter Wallison: The Financial Crisis on Trial -
Editors' Picks
...
Forced Merriment: The True Spirit of Christmas
Egypt's Christians Look to U.S. for Help
All Hail the Hunch--and Damn the Details
Would-Be Rescuers Still Haunted by Disaster
Military Families Soldier On
Customer Center: My Account My Subscriptions
Create an Account: Register for Limited Access Subscribe to Sign up for WSJ Professional
Help & Information Center: Help Customer Service Contact Us Global Support New on Take a Tour Print Subscriber Services
About: News Licensing Reprints Advertising Classifieds Advertise Locally Conferences About Dow Jones Privacy Policy - UPDATED 10/18/2011 Your Ad Choices Subscriber Agreement & Terms of Use - Updated Copyright Policy Jobs at
: Site Map Home World U.S. New York Business Markets Market Data Tech Personal Finance Life & Culture Opinion Autos Careers Real Estate Small Business Student Journal Corrections SafeHouse - Send Us Information
Copyright ?2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Tools & Formats: Today's Paper Video Center Graphics Columns Blogs Topics Guides Alerts Newsletters Mobile WSJ Social Tablet Edition Podcasts RSS Feeds Journal Community WSJ on Twitter WSJ on Facebook WSJ on Foursquare My Journal Portfolio WSJ Digital Downloads
BACK TO TOP
Digital Network FINS: Finance, IT jobs, Sales jobs Virtual Stock Exchange WSJ Radio Professor Journal WSJ U.S. Edition WSJ Asia Edition WSJ Europe Edition WSJ India Page Foreign Language Editions: WSJ Chinese WSJ Japanese WSJ Portuguese WSJ Spanish
4 of 4
12/25/11 7:11 AM
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
Related searches
- is the government a business
- should the government be involved in economy
- is the government necessary
- government assisted mortgage program
- government s mortgage relief program
- the government and the economy
- why is the government necessary
- why is the government important
- government refinancing mortgage loans
- should the government regulate businesses
- government backed refinance programs
- how to find the sec on calculator