Logical Fallacy Debate Bingo Card



Logical Fallacy Debate Bingo Card

()

| | | | | |

| | | | |THE |

|STRAWMAN |FALSE |APPEAL TO |APPEAL TO |FALLACY |

| |CAUSE |AUTHORITY |EMOTION |FALLACY |

| | | | | |

|Misrepresenting someone’s |Presuming that a real or |Saying that because an authority|Manipulating an emotional |Presuming a claim to be |

|argument to make it easier to |perceived relationship between |thinks something, then it must |response in place of a valid or|necessarily wrong because a |

|attack. |things means one is the cause |therefore be true. |compelling argument. |fallacy has been committed. |

| |of the other. | | | |

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|SLIPPERY |AD HOMINEM |APPEAL TO |TU QUOQUE |PERSONAL |

|SLOPE | |NATURE | |INCREDULITY |

| | | | | |

|Asserting that if A happens |Attacking your opponent’s |Making the argument that because|Avoiding having to engage with |Saying that because one finds |

|then Z will consequently |character or personal traits in|X is natural, it is therefore |criticism by turning it back on|it difficult to understand, it |

|happen, too. Therefore A should|an attempt to undermine their |valid, justified, inevitable, |the accuser, criticizing in |therefore is not true. |

|not happen. |argument, |good, or ideal. |return. | |

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|SPECIAL |LOADED |FREE |BURDEN OF |AMBIGUITY |

|PLEADING |QUESTION |SPACE |PROOF | |

| | | | | |

|Moving the goalposts or making |Asking a question that has an | |Saying that the burden of proof|Using double meaning or |

|up exceptions when a claim is |assumption built into it so it | |lies not with the one making |ambiguities in language to |

|shown to be false. |can’t be answered without | |the claim, but to others to |mislead or misrepresent the |

| |appearing guilty. | |disprove. |truth. |

| | | | | |

|THE | | | | |

|GAMBLER’S |BANDWAGON |COMPOSITION |NO TRUE |GENETIC |

|FALLACY | |/ DIVISION |SCOTSMAN | |

| | | | | |

|Believing that ‘runs’ occur in |Appealing to popularity or the |Assuming that what’s true about |Making what could be called an |Judging something as good or |

|statistically independent |fact that many people do X as |one part of X has to be applied |appeal to purity as a way to |bad on the basis of where or |

|phenomena like roulette wheel |an attempted form of |to all, or other parts of it. |dismiss relevant criticisms or |from whom it comes. |

|spins. |validation. | |flaws. | |

| | | | | |

|BLACK |BEGGING | | | |

|OR |THE |ANECDOTAL |THE TEXAS |MIDDLE |

|WHITE |QUESTION | |SHARPSHOOTER |GROUND |

| | | | | |

|Where two alternative states |A circular argument in which |Using personal experience or an |Cherry-picking data clusters to|Saying that a compromise, or |

|are presented as the only |the conclusion is included in |isolated example instead of a |suit an argument, or finding a |middle point, between two |

|possibilities, when more |the premise |valid argument, especially |pattern to fit a presumption |‘extremes’ must be the truth. |

|possibilities exist. | |against statistics. | | |

Logical Fallacy Debate Bingo Card

()

| | | | | |

|THE | | | |BLACK |

|FALLACY |PERSONAL |AMBIGUITY |GENETIC |OR |

|FALLACY |INCREDULITY | | |WHITE |

| | | | | |

|Presuming a claim to be |Saying that because one finds |Using double meaning or |Judging something as good or bad|Where two alternative states |

|necessarily wrong because a |it difficult to understand, it |ambiguities in language to |on the basis of where or from |are presented as the only |

|fallacy has been committed. |therefore is not true. |mislead or misrepresent the |whom it comes. |possibilities, when more |

| | |truth. | |possibilities exist. |

| | | | | |

| | | | |BEGGING |

|APPEAL TO |TU QUOQUE |BURDEN OF |NO TRUE |THE |

|EMOTION | |PROOF |SCOTSMAN |QUESTION |

| | | | | |

|Manipulating an emotional |Avoiding having to engage with |Saying that the burden of proof|Making what could be called an |A circular argument in which |

|response in place of a valid or|criticism by turning it back on|lies not with the one making |appeal to purity as a way to |the conclusion is included in |

|compelling argument |the accuser, criticizing in |the claim, but to others to |dismiss relevant criticisms or |the premise |

| |return, |disprove.. |flaws | |

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|APPEAL TO |APPEAL TO |FREE |COMPOSITION |ANECDOTAL |

|AUTHORITY |NATURE |SPACE |/ DIVISION | |

| | | | | |

|Saying that because an |Making the argument that | |Assuming that what’s true about |Using personal experience or an|

|authority thinks something, |because X is natural, it is | |one part of X has to be applied |isolated example instead of a |

|then it must therefore be true.|therefore valid, justified, | |to all, or other parts of it. |valid argument, especially |

| |inevitable, good, or ideal. | | |against statistics |

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|FALSE |AD HOMINEM |LOADED |BANDWAGON |THE TEXAS |

|CAUSE | |QUESTION | |SHARPSHOOTER |

| | | | | |

|Presuming that a real or |Attacking your opponent’s |Asking a question that has an |Appealing to popularity or the |Cherry-picking data clusters to|

|perceived relationship between |character or personal traits in|assumption built into it so it |fact that many people do X as an|suit an argument, or finding a |

|things means one is the cause |an attempt to undermine their |can’t be answered without |attempted form of validation.. |pattern to fit a presumption |

|of the other |argument, |appearing guilty | | |

| | | | | |

| | | |THE | |

|STRAWMAN |SLIPPERY |SPECIAL |GAMBLER’S |MIDDLE |

| |SLOPE |PLEADING |FALLACY |GROUND |

| | | | | |

|Misrepresenting someone’s |Asserting that if A happens |Moving the goalposts or making |Believing that ‘runs’ occur in |Saying that a compromise, or |

|argument to make it easier to |then Z will consequently |up exceptions when a claim is |statistically independent |middle point, between two |

|attack. |happen, too. Therefore A should|shown to be false. |phenomena like roulette wheel |‘extremes’ must be the truth. |

| |not happen mise | |spins.n | |

Logical Fallacy Debate Bingo Card

()

| | | | | |

|THE |BLACK | |BEGGING | |

|GAMBLER’S |OR |THE TEXAS |THE |ANECDOTAL |

|FALLACY |WHITE |SHARPSHOOTER |QUESTION | |

| | | | | |

|Believing that ‘runs’ occur in |Where two alternative states |Cherry-picking data clusters to|A circular argument in which the|Using personal experience or an|

|statistically independent |are presented as the only |suit an argument, or finding a |conclusion is included in the |isolated example instead of a |

|phenomena like roulette wheel |possibilities, when more |pattern to fit a presumption. |premise |valid argument, especially |

|spins |possibilities exist | | |against statistics |

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|SPECIAL |TU QUOQUE |BURDEN OF |NO TRUE |MIDDLE |

|PLEADING | |PROOF |SCOTSMAN |GROUND |

| | | | | |

|Moving the goalposts or making |Avoiding having to engage with |Saying that the burden of proof|Making what could be called an |Saying that a compromise, or |

|up exceptions when a claim is |criticism by turning it back on|lies not with the one making |appeal to purity as a way to |middle point, between two |

|shown to be false. |the accuser, criticizing in |the claim, but to others to |dismiss relevant criticisms or |‘extremes’ must be the truth. |

| |return, |disprove.. |flaws | |

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|SLIPPERY |APPEAL TO |FREE |COMPOSITION |TU QUOQUE |

|SLOPE |NATURE |SPACE |/ DIVISION | |

| | | | | |

|Asserting that if A happens |Making the argument that | |Assuming that what’s true about |Avoiding having to engage with |

|then Z will consequently |because X is natural, it is | |one part of X has to be applied |criticism by turning it back on|

|happen, too. Therefore A should|therefore valid, justified, | |to all, or other parts of it. |the accuser, criticizing in |

|not happen |inevitable, good, or ideal. | | |return |

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|STRAWMAN |AD HOMINEM |LOADED |BANDWAGON |GENETIC |

| | |QUESTION | | |

| | | | | |

|Misrepresenting someone’s |Attacking your opponent’s |Asking a question that has an |Appealing to popularity or the |Judging something as good or |

|argument to make it easier to |character or personal traits in|assumption built into it so it |fact that many people do X as an|bad on the basis of where or |

|attack |an attempt to undermine their |can’t be answered without |attempted form of validation.. |from whom it comes. |

| |argument, |appearing guilty | | |

| | | | | |

| | | |THE | |

|APPEAL TO |FALSE |APPEAL TO |FALLACY |PERSONAL |

|AUTHORITY |CAUSE |EMOTION |FALLACY |INCREDULITY |

| | | | | |

|Saying that because an |Presuming that a real or |Manipulating an emotional |Presuming a claim to be |Saying that because one finds |

|authority thinks something, |perceived relationship between |response in place of a valid or|necessarily wrong because a |it difficult to understand, it |

|then it must therefore be |things means one is the cause |compelling argument |fallacy has been committed..n |therefore is not true |

|true.. |of the other. | | | |

Logical Fallacy Debate Bingo Card

()

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|FALSE |AD HOMINEM |LOADED |BANDWAGON |THE TEXAS |

|CAUSE | |QUESTION | |SHARPSHOOTER |

| | | | | |

|Presuming that a real or |Attacking your opponent’s |Asking a question that has an |Appealing to popularity or the |Cherry-picking data clusters to|

|perceived relationship between |character or personal traits in |assumption built into it so it |fact that many people do X as an|suit an argument, or finding a |

|things means one is the cause of|an attempt to undermine their |can’t be answered without |attempted form of validation.. |pattern to fit a presumption |

|the other |argument, |appearing guilty | | |

| | | | | |

|THE | | | | |

|GAMBLER’S |MIDDLE |SPECIAL |STRAWMAN |SLIPPERY |

|FALLACY |GROUND |PLEADING | |SLOPE |

| | | | | |

|Believing that ‘runs’ occur in |Saying that a compromise, or |Moving the goalposts or making |Misrepresenting someone’s |Asserting that if A happens |

|statistically independent |middle point, between two |up exceptions when a claim is |argument to make it easier to |then Z will consequently |

|phenomena like roulette wheel |‘extremes’ must be the truth. |shown to be false. |attack. |happen, too. Therefore A should|

|spins.n | | | |not happen mise |

| | | | | |

| | | | | |

|PERSONAL |AMBIGUITY |FREE |APPEAL TO |APPEAL TO |

|INCREDULITY | |SPACE |AUTHORITY |NATURE |

| | | | | |

|Saying that because one finds it|Using double meaning or | |Saying that because an authority|Making the argument that |

|difficult to understand, it |ambiguities in language to | |thinks something, then it must |because X is natural, it is |

|therefore is not true. |mislead or misrepresent the | |therefore be true. |therefore valid, justified, |

| |truth. | | |inevitable, good, or ideal. |

| | | | | |

|THE | | | |BLACK |

|FALLACY |COMPOSITION |ANECDOTAL |GENETIC |OR |

|FALLACY |/ DIVISION | | |WHITE |

| | | | | |

|Presuming a claim to be |Assuming that what’s true about |Using personal experience or an|Judging something as good or bad|Where two alternative states |

|necessarily wrong because a |one part of X has to be applied |isolated example instead of a |on the basis of where or from |are presented as the only |

|fallacy has been committed. |to all, or other parts of it. |valid argument, especially |whom it comes. |possibilities, when more |

| | |against statistics | |possibilities exist. |

| | | | | |

| | | | |BEGGING |

|APPEAL TO |TU QUOQUE |BURDEN OF |NO TRUE |THE |

|EMOTION | |PROOF |SCOTSMAN |QUESTION |

| | | | | |

|Manipulating an emotional |Avoiding having to engage with |Saying that the burden of proof|Making what could be called an |A circular argument in which |

|response in place of a valid or |criticism by turning it back on |lies not with the one making |appeal to purity as a way to |the conclusion is included in |

|compelling argument |the accuser, criticizing in |the claim, but to others to |dismiss relevant criticisms or |the premise |

| |return, |disprove.. |flaws | |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download