Draft Agenda for the Chairman’s Conference on Sexual …
STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JUNE 17, 2003, 9:00 AM
Board of Supervisors North Chamber
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 310, San Diego, California
MORNING SESSION: - Meeting was called to order at 9:05 a.m.
Present: Supervisors Greg Cox, Chairman; Dianne Jacob, Vice Chairwoman; Pam Slater; Ron Roberts; Bill Horn; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.
Invocation by Rabbi Rafael Goldstein.
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag led by Hiram Sarabaki.
|Category |Agenda No. |Subject |
|Land Use & Environment |1. |CREATING CONSUMER AWARENESS ABOUT SCANNER ACCURACY |
| | | |
|Community Services |2. |BONITA-SUNNYSIDE LIBRARY AND MUSEUM |
| | | |
| |3. |CEDAR/KETTNER PROJECT – FUNDING AUTHORIZATION INCREASE FOR KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES |
| | |CONSULTATION CONTRACT |
| | | |
|Public Safety |4. |ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION FOR THE NORTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES ADULT EX-OFFENDER |
| | |RE-ENTRY PROGRAM |
| | | |
| |5. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING LIABILITY ON SOCIAL HOSTS WHO ALLOW MINORS TO |
| | |OBTAIN, POSSESS, OR CONSUME ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT PARTIES |
| | | |
| |6. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 365 TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY |
| | |ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ESTABLISHING DISTRICT ATTORNEY FEES AND CHARGES |
| | | |
| |7. |DISTRICT ATTORNEY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE STALKING GRANT – SIXTH YEAR |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING ($138,812) AND |
| | |A REQUIRED MATCH SUPPORTED BY PRIOR YEAR DISTRICT ATTORNEY FUND BALANCE ($46,271)] |
| | | |
| |8. |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – VICTIM SERVICES CONTRACTS WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VICTIM |
| | |COMPENSATION AND GOVERNMENT CLAIMS BOARD |
| | | |
| |9. |DISTRICT ATTORNEY REVENUE CONTRACT WITH UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT |
| | |CONCERNING CRIMINAL HISTORY REQUESTS |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT] |
| | | |
| |10. |MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SUPERIOR COURT AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO |
| | |REGARDING THE PROVISION OF SERVICES AND PAYMENT OF COSTS |
| | | |
| |11. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT’S PROCUREMENT OF INMATE IDENTIFICATION WRISTBANDS |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT FY 2003/2005 PROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLAN] |
| | | |
| |12. |SHERIFF 800 MHZ REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (RCS) CUSTOMER AGENCIES AGREEMENTS; |
| | |CITY OF DEL MAR, RCS COUNTY SERVICE AREA (CSA) 135 APPROPRIATIONS |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | | |
| |13. |PROBATION CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SERVICE CONTRACT |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): GENERAL FUND] |
| | | |
|Health & Human Services |14. |BIOTERRORISM PREPAREDNESS TRAINING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT |
| | | |
| |15. |SENIOR SERVICES REVENUE AGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): THE STATE GENERAL FUND ($817,947), TITLES III, VII OF THE OLDER |
| | |AMERICANS ACT AND THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ($8,362,976), TITLE V OF|
| | |THE OLDER AMERICANS ACT ($629,637), TITLE XIX MEDICAID ($2,167,092), TITLE IIA |
| | |CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL SERVICE ($122,777), AND THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO ($358,314)] |
| | | |
| |16. |RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC |
| | |AUTHORITY TO ACCESS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): SOCIAL SERVICES REALIGNMENT ($66, 652) AND FEDERAL MATCH |
| | |($33,727)] |
| | | |
| |17. |HIV/AIDS-RELATED RYAN WHITE CARE ACT -- REVENUES AND SERVICES |
| | |(4 VOTES) |
| | | |
| |18. |PHARMACEUTICAL PURCHASING GROUP |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): REALIGNMENT AND SHORT DOYLE MEDI-CAL] |
| | | |
| |19. |PROCUREMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY SUPPLIES |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): GENERAL PURPOSE REVENUE] |
| | | |
| |20. |MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES PERFORMANCE CONTRACT, AND STATE HOSPITAL BED PURCHASE AND USAGE|
| | |AGREEMENT |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): MEDI-CAL, EPSDT, MAA/TCM MEDICAID, MENTAL HEALTH MANAGED CARE, |
| | |STATE GRANTS, FEDERAL GRANTS, SB90, MINOR CONSENT, TOBACCO, REALIGNMENT, AND |
| | |INSTITUTIONAL CARE HOSPITAL] |
| | | |
| |21. |ADVERTISING AND AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS FOR FINAL ENHANCEMENT TO GYMNASIUM |
| | |(KK2992) AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER (KK3430) AT SAN PASQUAL |
| | |ACADEMY |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND IN CAPITAL PROJECT KK2992, SAN PASQUAL ACADEMY|
| | |GYMNASIUM RENOVATION AND KK3430, HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER] |
| | | |
| |22. |CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO COMMUNITY ACTION BOARD |
| | | |
|Financial & General Government |23. |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS |
| | | |
| |24. |CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL OLBIGATION BONDS, SERIES E |
| | | |
| |25. |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS |
| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): COMMUNITY PROJECT BUDGET (0265)] |
| | | |
|Appointments |26. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM |
| | |APPOINTMENT |
| | | |
|Communications Received |27. |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED |
| | | |
|Closed Session |28. |CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| | | |
|Financial & General Government |29. |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS |
| | | |
|Public Safety |30. |OUT OF COUNTRY BUSINESS |
| | | |
|Community Services |31. |REQUEST TO AWARD CONTRACTS FOR BOOK WHOLESALER AND LIBRARY AUTOMATION SYSTEM |
| | |(CARRYOVER FROM 6/10/03 ITEM NO. 10) |
| | | |
|Public Safety |32. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: |
| | |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT – SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO |
| | |TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO PROHIBIT SPECTATORS AT ILLEGAL SPEED|
| | |CONTESTS |
| | | |
|Financial & General Government |33. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: |
| | |RATIFIED AGREEMENT - PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY (PDA) – PUBLIC |
| | |DEFENDER (PD) AND PUBLIC DEFENDER MANAGEMENT (PM) BARGAINING UNITS |
| | | |
| |34. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: |
| | |RATIFIED AGREEMENT - DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS’ ASSOCIATION (DDAA) – CHILD SUPPORT |
| | |PROGRAM ATTORNEY UNIT (AS), CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM ATTORNEY MANAGEMENT UNIT (AM), AND |
| | |DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNIT (DA) |
| | | |
| |35. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: |
| | |AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND CIVIL SERVICE RULES |
| | | |
|Presentations/Awards |36. |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |
| | | |
|Public Communications |37. |PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS |
| | | |
|Closed Session |38. |OFF-DOCKET |
| | |CLOSED SESSION |
|1. |SUBJECT: |CREATING CONSUMER AWARENESS ABOUT SCANNER ACCURACY (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Recent projections by San Diego County’s Department of Agriculture, Weights, and Measures estimate that automated price scanner |
| |overcharges could be costing this region’s consumers in excess of $100 million annually. |
| | |
| |This action proposes steps that will empower the consumer with information that will protect them from point of sale scanning |
| |errors and overcharges through a program designed to publicly identify those stores that fail scanner inspections and to also |
| |recognize those stores that do pass scanner inspections. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |VICE CHAIRWOMAN JACOB: |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to create a program to post, in each store with overcharges, a sign notifying the |
| |consumers of a failed scanner inspection. |
| | |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to create a voluntary program to post, in each store showing no overcharges, a sign |
| |notifying the consumers of a positive scanner inspection. |
| | |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to create a public notification program for consumers notifying them of their rights at |
| |every scanner location in the region. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors directed the Chief Administrative Officer |
| |to: 1) work with industry to create a program to post, in each store with overcharges, a sign notifying the consumers of a failed|
| |scanner inspection; 2) to work with industry to create a voluntary program to post, in each store showing no overcharges, a sign |
| |that would notify the consumers of a positive scanner inspection; 3) to work with industry to create a public notification program|
| |for consumers notifying them of their rights at every scanner location in the region; and 4) to return to the Board of |
| |Supervisors within 60 days with a proposal. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Horn |
| |NOES: Roberts |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|2. |SUBJECT: |BONITA-SUNNYSIDE LIBRARY AND MUSEUM |
| | |(DISTRICT: 1) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On April 27, 1999 (21) the Board approved a Five-Year Library Facility Capital Improvement Plan that identified 12 priority |
| |projects for the replacement of out-dated library facilities. Although the Bonita-Sunnyside branch library was listed first on |
| |the priority list, the construction of a new library in Bonita-Sunnyside has yet to begin. |
| | |
| |On December 3, 2002 (13) the Board approved entering into preliminary negotiations with the City of Chula Vista to determine the |
| |feasibility of constructing an 8,000 square foot County library with an additional 2,000 square foot community space for the |
| |community of Bonita-Sunnyside on a vacant City-owned parcel adjacent to the Chula Vista Golf Course. |
| | |
| |On March 11, 2003 (5) the Board approved a Letter of Intent with the City of Chula Vista, providing the framework for a future |
| |ground lease agreement for the construction of a new County library to serve the Bonita-Sunnyside community and authorized the due|
| |diligence investigation, environmental assessment, and ground lease negotiation with the City of Chula Vista for the site and |
| |preliminary architectural design for the library project, which at that time did not include the relocation of the Bonita Museum |
| |and Cultural Center. |
| | |
| |The construction of a Bonita-Sunnyside Library and community space offers the opportunity to relocate the existing Bonita Museum |
| |and Cultural Center, thereby providing a tremendous educational, cultural and community resource for the residents of |
| |Bonita-Sunnyside, in one central location. |
| | |
| |Today’s action will authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to add the Bonita Museum and Cultural Center to the |
| |Bonita-Sunnyside Library Project, subject to review and approval by the Chula Vista City Council, and execute the necessary |
| |contracts to develop design and construction documents for the complete project. Today’s action also allocates $50,000 for the |
| |design of the new Bonita Museum and Cultural Center, extends the architectural contract for preparation of construction documents |
| |for the library, and provides $250,000, subject to a dollar-for-dollar match from community fundraising, as a challenge grant |
| |earmarked for the construction of the Museum. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The fiscal impact of the proposed recommendations is $300,000 from District 1 Community Projects Fund. This action will result in|
| |the addition of no staff years. Funds for preparation of the library construction documents are budgeted in KL9540 |
| |Bonita-Sunnyside Library. It is anticipated that the total cost of the construction of the new Bonita Museum and Cultural Center |
| |will exceed $500,000. Funds for the remaining costs associated with museum construction are intended to be allocated from |
| |District 1 Community Projects Fund in FY 03-04, subject to Board of Supervisors approval. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHAIRMAN COX: |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to add the design and development of a new facility to house the Bonita Museum and |
| |Cultural Center as part of the Bonita-Sunnyside Library Project, subject to review and approval by the Chula Vista City Council. |
| |Allocate $50,000 from Community Projects Budget (0261) to Contributions to Capital Outlay Fund (Operating Transfer Out) for the |
| |design of the new Bonita Museum and Cultural Center. |
| |Allocate $250,000 from Community Projects Budget (0261) to Capital Outlay Fund (Operating Transfer Out) earmarked for the |
| |construction of the new Bonita Museum and Cultural Center contingent upon verification of $250,000 in matching funds from the |
| |Bonita Historical Society. |
| |Establish appropriations of $300,000 in the Capital Outlay Fund for Capital Project KK3458, Bonita Historical Museum, based on an |
| |Operating Transfer from the General Fund. |
| |In accordance with Board Policy F-40, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into negotiations|
| |to increase existing Contract Number 45648 in an amount not to exceed $50,000, for architectural design and related engineering of|
| |the Bonita Museum and Cultural Center. |
| |In accordance with Board Policy F-40, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into negotiations|
| |to increase existing Contract Number 45648 in an amount not to exceed $288,000 for full professional services in the preparation |
| |of construction documents for the Bonita-Sunnyside Library. |
| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to designate a County Officer responsible for administering all awarded contracts. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|3. |SUBJECT: |CEDAR/KETTNER PROJECT – FUNDING AUTHORIZATION INCREASE FOR KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES CONSULTATION |
| | |CONTRACT (DISTRICT: 4) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On December 10, 2002 (14), the Board selected Lambert Development, LLC as developer of the Cedar/Kettner site, and authorized the |
| |Clerk of the Board to execute an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Lambert. The Board also authorized and directed the |
| |Director of the Department of General Services to negotiate the business points of a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) |
| |and return to the Board with a tentative agreement, or alternatively, to report that negotiations were unsuccessful and recommend |
| |that the Board authorize negotiations with one of the other qualified developers. |
| | |
| |General Services retained Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) to negotiate the DDA on behalf of the County due to the complexity of |
| |the transaction. Today's request would increase the sole-source contract authorization amount with KMA by $133,265 for additional|
| |real estate consulting services that are needed to complete the Cedar/Kettner negotiations. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for the Keyser Marston contract amendment are not included in the Fiscal Year 2002-2003 Operational Plan. Additional funds |
| |of $133,265 from Community Services Group Management Reserves are required to fund this proposal in the current year. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Find, in accordance with Section 15061(b) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, that the increase in sole-source|
| |contract authorization amount with Keyser Marston Associates is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act|
| |because it can be seen with certainty that this activity will not have a significant effect on the environment. |
| | |
| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, |
| |to amend Contract No. 45609 with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., real estate consultants, to add the provision of additional |
| |developer negotiation time, Board approval process advice, entitlement processing advice, disposition consultation, and |
| |independent consultant review of Lambert's proposed layout for County parking; and to amend the contract as required to reflect |
| |changes to services and funding allocations, subject to the approval of the Director, Department of General Services. Waive the |
| |advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |
| | |
| |Transfer appropriations of $133,265 from Community Services Group Management Reserves to Services & Supplies to fund the |
| |Cedar/Kettner project. |
| | |
| |Amend the General Services Facilities Management Internal Service Fund Spending Plan in the amount of $133,265 in Professional and|
| |Specialized Services based on charges in the Community Services Group Executive Office. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|4. |SUBJECT: |ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION FOR THE NORTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES ADULT EX-OFFENDER RE-ENTRY PROGRAM |
| | |(DISTRICT 5) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |North County Community Services Adult Ex-Offender Re-Entry program has been in operation for approximately 15 years. NCCS |
| |conducts pre-release classes weekly at the Vista Detention Facility, and monthly at the Las Colinas detention facility. |
| |Participants are provided with valuable information to help them transition back into North County neighborhoods. Participants |
| |are encouraged to visit the NCCS office in Oceanside upon their release. At the NCCS facility in Oceanside, participants are |
| |provided with job search assistance, personal coaching and limited emergency assistance in the form of money orders for ID, |
| |clothing and food. Referrals to rehabilitation facilities are also made by NCCS. NCCS also provides information and moral |
| |support needed by these clients and their families to help them find solutions for rebuilding their lives. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |If approved, these recommendations will result in the acceptance of $35,000 in unanticipated revenue from Warren J. Pederson. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR HORN: |
| |Accept $35,000 of donor contributions from Warren J. Pederson. |
| |Direct the CAO to establish an appropriate accounting mechanism for distribution of $35,000 to North County Community Services for|
| |their Ex-Offender Re-Entry Program, based on unanticipated revenue. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|5. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING LIABILITY ON SOCIAL HOSTS WHO ALLOW MINORS TO OBTAIN, POSSESS, OR |
| | |CONSUME ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT PARTIES (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On May 6, 2003, your Board, at the recommendation of Vice Chairwoman Dianne Jacob and Chairman Greg Cox, directed the CAO to draft|
| |a social host ordinance. The resulting proposed ordinance imposes civil and criminal liability on adults who own or control a |
| |private residence or private premises and fail to properly supervise or stop minors from obtaining, possessing, or consuming |
| |alcoholic beverages. An adult who violates this ordinance would be guilty of a misdemeanor. Punishments could include a fine of up|
| |to one thousand dollars ($1,000), community service, and/or imprisonment in a county jail. The provisions of this ordinance will |
| |not apply to legally protected religious activities or gatherings of family members. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact associated with this recommendation, and no additional staff years will be required to implement this |
| |ordinance. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Read title and waive further reading of the following ordinance: |
| | |
| |AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 15, COMMENCING WITH SECTION 32.1501, TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES IMPOSING |
| |LIABILITY ON SOCIAL HOSTS WHO ALLOW MINORS TO OBTAIN, POSSESS, OR CONSUME ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT PARTIES |
| | |
| |Submit the Ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption on July 8, 2003. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, introducing |
| |Ordinance for further Board consideration on July 8, 2003. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|6. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |
| | |CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 365 TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ESTABLISHING|
| | |DISTRICT ATTORNEY FEES AND CHARGES (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This is a request to adopt an ordinance establishing fees and charges imposed by the Office of the District Attorney. The |
| |proposed fee and cost schedule represents the costs incurred by the Office of the District Attorney in conducting a level one |
| |background investigation of attorneys who provide pro bono legal services under the supervision of the District Attorney's Office.|
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are not included in the Adopted Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. Approval of this request will |
| |increase current year revenue by $0 and annual revenues by $3,550. Additional staff years are not required. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY |
| |Read the title and waive further reading of the Ordinance. |
| | |
| |AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 365 TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ESTABLISHING DISTRICT ATTORNEY FEES AND CHARGES |
| | |
| |Submit the Ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption on July 8, 2003. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, |
| |introducing Ordinance for further Board consideration on July 8, 2003. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|7. |SUBJECT: |DISTRICT ATTORNEY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE STALKING GRANT – SIXTH YEAR (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On June 18, 2002 (2), your Board approved submission of the Fifth Year Domestic Violence Stalking (Violence Against Women Vertical|
| |Prosecution) grant application. This is a request to approve the submission of the sixth year Domestic Violence Stalking grant |
| |application to the Governor’s Office of Criminal Justice Planning (OCJP) in the amount of $138,812 for the period July 1, 2003 |
| |through June 30, 2004. The grant will support the District Attorney's efforts to vertically prosecute violent crimes against |
| |women, including sexual assault, domestic violence, and stalking. The grant requires a local match, which totals $46,271 and is |
| |supported by prior year District Attorney Fund Balance. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are included in the District Attorney’s Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Proposed Operational Plan. The funding |
| |sources are the Governor’s Office of Criminal Justice Planning ($138,812) and a required match supported by prior year District |
| |Attorney Fund Balance ($46,271). If approved, this request will result in direct costs and revenue of $185,083 and will require |
| |the addition of no staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY |
| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts – Department responsibility for cost recovery, which requires full cost |
| |recovery for grants. |
| | |
| |Adopt the resolution approving the submission of the Domestic Violence Stalking grant application in the amount of $138,812 for |
| |the period July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004 and authorize execution of the attached grant documents by the Clerk of the Board, |
| |including any extensions or amendments thereof that do not materially impact or alter either the grant program or funding level. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, |
| |adopting Resolution No. 03-103, entitled: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION |
| |FOR A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE STALKING (VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN VERTICAL PROSECUTION PROGRAM) GRANT. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|8. |SUBJECT: |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – VICTIM SERVICES CONTRACTS WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION AND |
| | |GOVERNMENT CLAIMS BOARD (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This request is to approve Joint Powers Agreement (JPA), Criminal Restitution Compact (CRC) and the Funeral/Burial and Domestic |
| |Violence Relocation Emergency Fund (FBDVR) contracts with the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board in the |
| |amount of $806,395 for Fiscal Year 2003-2004. If approved, this request will support the continuation and enhancement of the |
| |District Attorney’s restitution enforcement program and will facilitate the achievement of county-wide restitution objectives. |
| | |
| |Your Board approved the (JPA) and (CRC) contracts on June 11, 2002 (13) and the (FBDVR) contract on September 12, 2000 (21). Each|
| |of these contracts are funded by the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board and support the purpose of the |
| |Restitution Enforcement & Victim Services Division which is to restore damages incurred to crime victims and to return what was |
| |taken from them as the result of a crime. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The funds for the JPA and CRC contracts are included in the FY 2003-2004 Proposed Operational Plan and the funds for FBDVR are |
| |held in a trust fund for the sole purpose of the agreement. The State of California Victim Compensation and Government Claims |
| |Board is the funding source for each of the contracts and neither the Governor’s proposed budget nor the May revision of the |
| |proposed State Budget impacted this funding source. There is no required local match for these programs. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY |
| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants, and Revenue Contracts – Department responsibility for cost recovery, which requires full |
| |cost recovery for grants. |
| | |
| |Adopt the resolution approving the Criminal Restitution Compact with the State of California Victim Compensation and Government |
| |Claims Board in the amount of $242,333 for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 and authorize execution of the Agreement by the Clerk of the |
| |Board, including extensions and amendments that do not materially impact or alter either the grant program or funding level. |
| | |
| |Adopt the resolution approving the Joint Powers Agreement with the State of California Victim Compensation and Government Claims |
| |Board in the amount of $564,062 for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 and authorize execution of the Agreement by the Clerk of the Board, |
| |including extensions and amendments that do not materially impact or alter either the grant program or funding level. |
| | |
| |Adopt the resolution approving the Funeral/Burial Domestic Violence Relocation Emergency Fund Contract with the State of |
| |California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board in the amount of $100,000 for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 and authorize |
| |execution of the Agreement by the Clerk of the Board, including extensions and amendments that do not materially impact or alter |
| |either the grant program or funding level. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, |
| |adopting Resolution No. 03-104, entitled: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO SUBMIT APPLICATION FOR|
| |FUNERAL/BURIAL AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELOCATION EMERGENCY FUND; Resolution No. 03-105, entitled: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SAN |
| |DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION AND GOVERNMENT CLAIMS BOARD; and |
| |Resolution No. 03-106, entitled: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CRIMINL RESTITUTION COMPACT WITH |
| |CALIFORNIA VICTIM COMPENSATION AND GOVERNMENT CLAIMS BOARD. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|9. |SUBJECT: |DISTRICT ATTORNEY REVENUE CONTRACT WITH UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT CONCERNING CRIMINAL |
| | |HISTORY REQUESTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Office of the District Attorney seeks authorization to enter into a contract with the United States Office of Personnel |
| |Management (OPM) to provide criminal history information on prospective employees of OPM who at one time resided in San Diego |
| |County. OPM will use this information as part of a pre-employment background investigation. The revenue agreement with OPM |
| |ensures that the Office of the District Attorney is reimbursed for costs associated with providing this report. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are not included in the Adopted Operational Plan for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. If approved, this request will|
| |allow the District Attorney to receive unanticipated revenue of at least $100,000, which recovers costs associated with conducting|
| |OPM criminal history requests. These funds will be used to offset future possible reductions in State funded programs. The |
| |funding source for this proposal is the United States Office of Personnel Management. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY |
| |Approve and authorize the District Attorney to execute a revenue agreement between the United States Office of Personnel |
| |Management (OPM) and the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office in an amount which will exceed $100,000 for the period of |
| |October 1, 2002 through September 30, 2003 for reimbursement of the costs associated with the completion of OPM criminal history |
| |requests. |
| | |
| |Approve and authorize the District Attorney to execute future revenue agreements between the United States Office of Personnel |
| |Management and the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office for reimbursement of the costs associated with completion of |
| |criminal history requests. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|10. |SUBJECT: |MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SUPERIOR COURT AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO REGARDING THE |
| | |PROVISION OF SERVICES AND PAYMENT OF COSTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Government Code Section 77212 (d) provides that “if a trial court desires to receive or continue to receive a specific service |
| |from a county… and the county desires to provide or continue to provide that service … the presiding judge of that court and the |
| |county shall enter into a contract for that service. The contract shall identify the scope of service, method of service delivery,|
| |term of agreement, anticipated service outcomes and the costs of the service. The court and the county shall cooperate in |
| |developing and implementing the contract.” |
| | |
| |On July 14, 1998 (#9), your Board approved the Lockyer-Isenberg Trial Court Funding Act (AB-233): Coordinated Trial Courts of San |
| |Diego County and County of San Diego Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). This MOU clearly defines the responsibilities of both the |
| |County and the Courts. However, the MOU must be amended every year to reflect the new costs. |
| | |
| |The Superior Court and the County have concluded a dialogue exploring the complex relationship and services that exist. That |
| |effort has resulted in a successful agreement on the services rendered by the County to the Superior Court for Fiscal Year |
| |2002-2003. Both parties have agreed to changes to the agreement, and it is currently pending signature by the appropriate Court |
| |and County staff. This letter requests approval of the Chief Administrative Officer’s execution of the Memorandum of Understanding|
| |between the County and the Superior Court for Fiscal Year 2002-2003. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for the services provided as a result of this Fiscal Year 2002-2003 request are budgeted. The fiscal impact for the County |
| |of San Diego is an estimated $42.8 million in expenditures and revenues. This request will result in no additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Approve and authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to execute the Memorandum of |
| | |
| |Understanding between the San Diego Superior Court and the County of San Diego for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 upon receipt of the final|
| |document. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|11. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT’S PROCUREMENT OF INMATE IDENTIFICATION WRISTBANDS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Sheriff’s Department routinely purchases Inmate Identification Wristbands for use in the Department’s seven detention |
| |facilities. Over the years, this wristband has been tested and standardized in order to provide the best quality inmate |
| |identification. No other comparable product is available on the market. This request is for approval of a multi-year sole source|
| |contract with Precision Dynamics, Inc. for Clincher wristbands. This will allow the Sheriff’s Department to procure top quality |
| |wristbands and maintain compatibility and standardization. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are budgeted. The funding source is the Sheriff’s Department FY 2003/2005 proposed Operational Plan. If |
| |approved, this request will result in $0 in current year costs, $70,000 annual costs each fiscal year, $210,000 over a three-year |
| |period, and will require the addition of no staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SHERIFF |
| |Allow an exception to Board Policy A-87’s competitive procurement requirements based on the unique circumstances of the |
| |procurement; and |
| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87 Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting |
| |Department to enter into negotiations with Precision Dynamics, Inc., for Clincher wristbands and, subject to successful |
| |negotiations and the determination of a fair and reasonable price, award three one-year contracts with two one-year renewable |
| |options for the procurement of Clincher V or an upgraded Clincher version of Inmate Identification Wristbands. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|12. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF 800 MHZ REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (RCS) CUSTOMER AGENCIES AGREEMENTS; CITY OF DEL MAR, RCS |
| | |COUNTY SERVICE AREA (CSA) 135 APPROPRIATIONS (DISTRICTS: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |At the direction of the RCS Board of Directors, agreements have been developed to formalize the use of the RCS network by San |
| |Diego State University (SDSU), Ocean Hills Country Club Homeowners Association, Borrego Sun Newspaper, East County Fire Protection|
| |District (ECFPD), El Cajon Police Department and RCS console maintenance for Heartland Fire Communications Joint Powers Authority |
| |(HFCJPA). On August 13, 2002 (9), the Board of Supervisors approved the partnership of the California Highway Patrol (CHP, El |
| |Cajon) in the RCS. The CHP was to pay ongoing RCS Network Operating Costs (NOC) of approximately $52,152 per year, based on 164 |
| |radios. Additionally, the CHP was to pay $760,500 as a buy-in RCS cost. These funds were to be deposited into the RCS Trust |
| |Fund. Subsequently, the CHP experienced a delay with their financing to pay for their membership in the RCS. The financing is |
| |now in place and their contract has been revised to reflect the current contract period. The City of Del Mar requires additional |
| |appropriations of $15,000 from their RCS, CSA 135 Zone B unappropriated fund balance to pay for their FY 02-03 NOC. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are not budgeted. If approved, this request will increase costs within the Sheriff’s Department by |
| |$24,181, offset by estimated FY 02-03 monthly RCS NOC revenue from the four new customer agencies. It will also increase costs |
| |within the City of Del Mar’s CSA 135 by $15,000, offset by unappropriated fund balance. Subsequent years’ increased NOC and |
| |console maintenance revenue as a result of this action is estimated to be $94,060 (SDSU - $38,719, Ocean Hills Country Club |
| |Homeowners Association - $807, Borrego Sun Newspaper - $318; ECFPD data network revenue $9,000; El Cajon Police Department data |
| |network revenue $30,000; HFCJPA console maintenance revenue $15,216). This revenue was not included in the FY 2003-05 Proposed |
| |budget and will be added to the Sheriff’s Department budget in the first quarter of the fiscal year. Additionally, the CHP will |
| |pay $760,500 as a buy-in RCS cost. These funds will be deposited into the RCS Trust Fund per Board action on August 13, 2002 (9).|
| | |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SHERIFF |
| |Waive Board Policy A-91, Mid-Year Budget Changes. |
| |Ratify the revised CHP agreement to join the RCS and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, their revised |
| |agreement with the County of San Diego. |
| |Ratify the five RCS non-partner customer agency agreements with SDSU, Ocean Hills Country Club Homeowners Association, Borrego Sun|
| |Newspaper, ECFPD, HFCJPA and the RCS partner agreement with El Cajon Police Department. Authorize the Clerk of the Board to |
| |receive and execute their agreements with the County of San Diego. |
| |Establish appropriations of $24,181 within the Sheriff’s Department, for RCS operating costs in support of four new non-partner |
| |customer agencies, offset by annual RCS NOC and console maintenance revenue from these new agencies (4 Votes). |
| |Establish appropriations of $15,000 in the City of Del Mar’s RCS, CSA 135 fund to pay for their remaining FY02-03 NOC, based on |
| |unappropriated fund balance (4 Votes). |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|13. |SUBJECT: |PROBATION CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SERVICE CONTRACT (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This item is a request for approval of a sole source service contract with Clear Wave Incorporated for approximately 3,874 hours |
| |of Information technology services at a cost of $130 per hour for correction of deficiencies, completion, acceptance testing, and |
| |system maintenance of the Probation Case Management System (PCMS) at a total cost of approximately $503,620. This action is |
| |necessary due to the financial insolvency of the previous vendor (Synovation Inc.). The PCMS is a major Criminal Justice |
| |Information System involving the Probation Department, the District Attorney’s Office and the Superior Court. System development |
| |had progressed to the point of testing, acceptance and implementation. Approval of this action will result in providing the |
| |technical resources to correct deficiencies, test, accept, and implement the Caseload Management System. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are budgeted. The funding source is the General Fund. If approved, this request will result in $95,000 in|
| |current year cost, $503,620 in FY 2003-04 costs and will not require the addition of staff. Funding for FY 2003-04 have been |
| |included in the FY 2003-05 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting to |
| |enter into negotiations with Clear Wave Incorporated and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |
| |reasonable price, award a contract for information technology services to complete the development, implementation and system |
| |maintenance of the Probation Case Management System (PCMS) from June 17, 2003 through December 31, 2003 and an additional six |
| |months if needed, and to amend the contracts as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to approval of the |
| |Chief Information Technology Officer and the Chief Probation Officer. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|14. |SUBJECT: |BIOTERRORISM PREPAREDNESS TRAINING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Board of Supervisors has placed a priority on strengthening emergency preparedness for acts of terrorism and other disasters. |
| |On October 29, 2002 (5), the Board approved a revenue agreement with the State to provide $2,828,445 in federal funding for |
| |bioterrorism preparedness and approved a Local Bioterrorism Preparedness Funding Plan that included 23 projects spread among six |
| |federally-mandated focus areas. |
| | |
| |Today’s recommendations include several contract actions to implement the Local Bioterrorism Preparedness Plan in accordance with |
| |federal mandates for Focus Areas A (Preparedness Planning and Readiness Assessment), B (Surveillance and Epidemiology Capacity) |
| |and G (Education and Training). To support Focus Area A, authority is requested to enter into a contract with the Council of |
| |Community Clinics to assess the Council of Community Clinics’ and community health centers’ information technology infrastructure,|
| |current capacity and needs for enhanced electronic disease and surveillance reporting. To support Focus Area B, authority is |
| |requested to enter into a contract with Voxiva, Inc. to purchase and maintain an electronic health surveillance system that |
| |monitors school absenteeism in order to provide early detection of outbreaks of infectious diseases within participating schools. |
| |In support of Focus Area G, the final recommendation is an extension and expansion of bioterrorism preparedness training provided |
| |by the Council of Community Clinics to help assure that the community’s healthcare providers have been trained and are prepared to|
| |identify and manage any bioterrorism or public health emergency. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The FY 2002-2004 Operational Plan includes $585,000 in current year and $15,000 in subsequent year costs and revenue based on |
| |federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding, via the California Department of Health Services. The current |
| |year costs and revenue are $300,000 for the Council of Community Clinics’ IT contract, $235,000 for the Voxiva, Inc. contract and |
| |$50,000 for the Council of Community Clinics’ training amendment. The Voxiva, Inc. contract includes subsequent year costs and |
| |revenue of $15,000 with no subsequent year costs for the Council of Community Clinics. If approved, this request will result in |
| |no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, |
| |to enter into negotiations with the Council of Community Clinics for the assessment of current and future information technology |
| |capacities and disease reporting procedures; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable |
| |price, enter into a contract with the Council of Community Clinics for a period of June 20, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and up|
| |to an additional six months, if necessary; and to amend the contract as required to reflect changes to services and funding |
| |allocations, subject to the approval of the Director, Health and Human Services Agency. Waive the advertising requirement of |
| |A-87. |
| | |
| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, |
| |to enter into negotiations with Voxiva, Inc. to purchase and maintain a school based electronic health surveillance system and |
| |subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, enter into a contract with Voxiva, Inc. from |
| |June 20, 2003 through June 30, 2008, and up to an additional six months, if necessary; and to amend the contract as required to |
| |reflect changes to services and funding allocations, subject to the approval of the Director, Health and Human Services Agency. |
| |Waive the advertising requirement of A-87. |
| | |
| | |
| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, |
| |to enter into negotiations with the Council of Community Clinics to provide additional bioterrorism preparedness training within |
| |the healthcare provider community; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, extend|
| |existing contract #45762 from July 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and up to an additional six months, if necessary; and to |
| |amend the contract as required to reflect changes to services and funding allocations, subject to the approval of the Director, |
| |Health and Human Services Agency. Waive the advertising requirement of A-87. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|15. |SUBJECT: |SENIOR SERVICES REVENUE AGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The Health and Human Services Agency’s Aging & Independence Services division administers programs that benefit senior citizens. |
| |On June 18, 2002 (8), the Board approved revenue agreements for senior programs for Fiscal Year 2002-03. The recommended actions |
| |in this item will authorize the annual revenue agreements for various programs funded by local, State, and federal sources, for |
| |Fiscal Year 2003-04. The agreements will continue the funding for the following ongoing services: nutrition, information and |
| |assistance, case management, in-home, respite, health promotion, employment, and interpretation/translation for nutrition |
| |counseling. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |These funds are included in the Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in Fiscal |
| |Year 2003-2004 costs of $12,801,443, revenue of $12,458,743 and an estimated $342,700 in County General Revenue matching costs. |
| |The funding sources are the State General Fund ($817,947), Titles III, VII of the Older Americans Act and the United States |
| |Department of Agriculture ($8,362,976), Title V of the Older Americans Act ($629,637), Title XIX Medicaid ($2,167,092), Title IIa |
| |Corporation for National Service ($122,777), and the City of San Diego ($358,314). There will be no change in net General Fund |
| |cost and no additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Waive Board Policy B-29: Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts - Department Responsibility for Full Cost Recovery. |
| | |
| |Authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, the following revenue agreements: |
| | |
| |Description Agreement # Amount Period |
| |State Department of Aging: |
| |CBSP CB-0304-23 $ 817,947 7/1/03 – 6/30/04 |
| |USDA, Title III/VII FF-0304-23 $8,362,976 7/1/03 – 6/30/04 |
| |Title V TV-0304-23 $ 629,637 7/1/03 – 6/30/04 |
| |MSSP MS-0304-07 $2,167,092 7/1/03 – 6/30/04 |
| | |
| |Corp for National Service N/A $ 122,777 7/1/03 – 6/30/04 |
| | |
| |City of San Diego |
| |Nutrition N/A $ 325,598 7/1/03 – 6/30/04 |
| |Counseling N/A $ 32,716 7/1/03 – 6/30/04 |
| | |
| |Authorize the Clerk of the Board, subject to the approval of the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency or his designee,|
| |to execute subsequent amendments and renewals to the grant awards in Recommendation 2 when those documents are received from the |
| |funding sources and they do not materially impact either the grant programs or funding level. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|16. |SUBJECT: |RESOLUTION AND ORDINANCE FOR COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY TO ACCESS |
| | |DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County of San Diego In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority was created through Board action on June 19, 2001. |
| |Today’s item requests adoption of a resolution and approval of an ordinance amending the San Diego County Administrative Code. |
| |These actions are needed to meet Department of Justice specifications for accessing criminal history information for IHSS |
| |individual providers listed on the IHSS Public Authority Registry. Criminal background clearances through the Department of |
| |Justice will supplement reference checks already being conducted before providers are added to the Registry. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds totaling $100,379 for this request are included in the FY 2003-05 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. The funding sources are |
| |Social Services Realignment ($66, 652) and federal match ($33,727). If approved, this request would result in no increase in |
| |costs and revenue for FY 2003-04 and subsequent years. There will be no change in net General Fund costs and no additional staff |
| |years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Adopt the Resolution Relating to Providing for Criminal History Clearances for In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority |
| |Employees. |
| | |
| |Approve the introduction of an Ordinance (first reading), read title and waive further reading of the Ordinance. |
| | |
| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 82.208 OF ARTICLE IIIb OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE RELATING TO THE FUNCTIONS OF THE |
| |COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY |
| | |
| |Submit the Ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption (second reading) on July 8, 2003. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent; |
| |adopting Resolution No. 03-107, entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RELATING TO PROVIDING|
| |FOR CRIMINAL HISTORY CLEARANCES FOR IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES; and introducing Ordinance for further |
| |Board consideration on July 8, 2003. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|17. |SUBJECT: |HIV/AIDS-RELATED RYAN WHITE CARE ACT -- REVENUES AND SERVICES (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County has provided HIV care and treatment services to persons with HIV and AIDS disease for the past twelve years. These |
| |services are funded by multiple revenue sources, including The Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resource Emergency (CARE) Act Title I|
| |and Title II. On February 13, 2001 (11) the Board of Supervisors authorized acceptance of $10,577,352 in Title I funding for the |
| |term of March 1, 2001 to February 28, 2002, and those funds were included in the Fiscal Year 2001-03 Operational Plan, and used |
| |primarily for contracted services. The federal Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) allows counties to utilize any|
| |previous years’ unexpended amounts in a future year. Today’s request is for Board approval to appropriate an additional $535,740 |
| |of previously accepted, but unexpended Ryan White Title I funds, as authorized by HRSA. These funds will be used to augment |
| |HIV/AIDS care and treatment for contracted specialty medical and dental services, which have been subject to an expenditure |
| |increase during the past two years. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The Fiscal Year 2002-03 Operational Plan includes $10,172,330 in CARE Act Title I revenue. If approved, this proposal will result|
| |in additional current year costs and revenues of $535,740. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional |
| |staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Establish appropriations of $535,740 in the Health and Human Services Agency, Public Health Services, for HIV/AIDS-related care |
| |and treatment based on unanticipated prior years’ unexpended revenues from the Health Resources and Services Administration. (4 |
| |VOTES) |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|18. |SUBJECT: |PHARMACEUTICAL PURCHASING GROUP |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Since 1990, the County Pharmacy has purchased pharmaceuticals at wholesale prices through a purchasing consortium of ten |
| |California counties. From 1990 to 1998, the purchasing consortium was the Health Services Purchasing Group. On June 9, 1998 |
| |(48), the Board authorized a sole source agreement (for a term not to exceed five years) with Cardinal Health, the designated |
| |wholesaler for the University Health Consortium, the County’s current provider. Today’s action will authorize the Director, |
| |Purchasing and Contracting, to extend the current agreement with Cardinal Health for a period of up to six (6) months in order to |
| |ensure continuity of drug supplies to clients. Board action is also requested to authorize the Department of Purchasing and |
| |Contracting to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for pharmacy purchases from a prime vendor. |
| | |
| | |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds are included in the FY 2003-2004 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in FY 2003-04 cost and revenue of |
| |$13,440,000 and subsequent year cost and revenue of $15,052,800. The funding sources are Realignment and Short Doyle Medi-Cal. |
| |There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting, to extend the current agreement with Cardinal Health for a period of up to six|
| |(6) months, beginning July 1, 2003, in order to ensure continuity of drugs supplied to clients in the Sheriff’s detention |
| |facilities, Edgemoor Geriatric Hospital, the County Psychiatric Hospital, and Mental Health and Public Health outpatient clinics. |
| | |
| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing |
| |and Contracting to issue a Competitive Solicitation to establish a membership in a Group Purchasing Organization, and to acquire a|
| |wholesaler to provide discounted prices for pharmaceuticals and value added services, and upon successful negotiations and |
| |determination of a fair and reasonable price, award contracts for a initial term of October 1, 2003 through June 30, 2006, with |
| |three (3) one-year renewal options, and up to an additional six (6) months if needed, and to amend the contracts as needed to |
| |reflect changes to services and funding, subject to the availability of funds and a need for the service. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|19. |SUBJECT: |PROCUREMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY SUPPLIES (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On June 11, 2002 (18), the Board approved a purchase order with Abbott Laboratories for supplies needed for gonorrhea and |
| |chlamydia testing. At that time, Abbott was the only manufacturer of the supplies compatible with the equipment used by the Public|
| |Health Laboratory. In February 2003, Abbott Laboratories announced that they would discontinue the manufacturing of these supplies|
| |effective in June 2003. |
| | |
| |The Health and Human Services Agency has determined that Gen-Probe offers the most cost effective combination gonorrhea and |
| |chlamydia test kit available to meet the Public Health Laboratory needs. The Gen-Probe equipment required to perform the testing |
| |was installed in the Public Health Laboratory in March 2003 and the test was validated for use. Board authorization is requested |
| |to procure supplies for gonorrhea and chlamydia testing from Gen-Probe for one year with four additional County option years. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this proposal are included in the FY 2003-2004 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in FY 2003-2004 |
| |and subsequent year costs of $235,000. The funding source is General Purpose Revenue. There will be no change in net General Fund|
| |costs and no addition of staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |In accordance with Board Policies A-87, approve and authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting to enter into|
| |negotiations with Gen-Probe; and, subject to successful negotiations and determination of fair and reasonable price, award an |
| |agreement for laboratory supplies and test kits, for one year with four additional County option years, subject to approval of the|
| |Director, Health and Human Services Agency. Waive the advertising requirement of A-87. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|20. |SUBJECT: |MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES PERFORMANCE CONTRACT, AND STATE HOSPITAL BED PURCHASE AND USAGE AGREEMENT |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Annually, the California State Department of Mental Health, under the provisions of Section 5602 of the California Welfare and |
| |Institutions Code, enters into an agreement with San Diego County through a Performance Contract to provide public mental health |
| |services throughout the county, using Mental Health Realignment and State funding for those services. The Performance Contract |
| |establishes the County’s responsibility to provide an integrated and coordinated range of services appropriate to the needs of |
| |clients and establishes the County’s responsibility to implement system-wide performance outcome measurements for State |
| |Short-Doyle/Medi-Cal and Medi-Cal Specialty Mental Health and Realignment funded services provided in San Diego. This year, and |
| |historically, the performance contracts have been received and ratified during the contract term. In prior years, the terms, |
| |rates and conditions for the County to contract with the State for State Hospital beds were included in the Performance Contract. |
| |However, in Fiscal Year 2002-03, the State separated the State Hospital Bed Purchase and Usage portion and issued it as a |
| |freestanding agreement. The State has also added performance conditions for five State-administered revenue grants to the |
| |Performance Contract. Also added is a provision requiring the County to provide mental health services to pupils with |
| |disabilities in accordance with the California Government Code. |
| | |
| |Today’s action, if approved, ratifies the Fiscal Year 2002-03 Performance Contract and State Hospital Bed Purchase and Usage |
| |Agreement with the California Department of Mental Health, authorizes their execution by the Clerk of the Board, and also seeks |
| |authorization for the Clerk of the Board, subject to the approval of the Director, Health and Human Services Agency, to execute |
| |ongoing Performance Contracts and State Hospital Bed Purchase and Usage Agreements with the State when there are no material |
| |changes to terms and conditions. In addition, the proposed action would authorize staff to use the dispute process delineated in|
| |the Performance Contract to formally contest the State’s requirement that counties provide mental health services to children |
| |under the California Government Code during a period when the State has declared a moratorium on reimbursing counties for those |
| |services. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are included in the FY 2002-03 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in $222,680,697 |
| |costs and $217,567,832 in revenue for FY 2002-03 and $209,286,493 in costs and $193,463,157 in revenue for FY 2003-04. The |
| |funding sources are Medi-Cal, EPSDT, MAA/TCM Medicaid, Mental Health Managed Care, State Grants, Federal Grants, SB90, Minor |
| |Consent, Tobacco, Realignment, and Institutional Care Hospital. There is no change in net general fund cost and no additional |
| |staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Ratify and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute the FY 2002-03 Performance Contract with the California Department of |
| |Mental Health, and further authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute amendments and the annual renewal of the Performance |
| |Contract when there are no significant changes to terms and conditions. |
| | |
| |Ratify and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute the FY 2002-03 State Hospital Bed Purchase and Usage Agreement with the |
| |California Department of Mental Health, and further authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute amendments and the annual renewal |
| |of this agreement when there are no significant changes to terms and conditions. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |Authorize the HHSA Director, with County Counsel review, to send a letter to the California Department of Mental Health invoking |
| |the dispute resolution process regarding the requirement that each county will provide assurances that it will comply with all |
| |requirements to provide mental health services to pupils receiving Chapter 26.5, Division 7, Title 1 services during the State |
| |moratorium on SB 90 reimbursement. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended; and directed the|
| |Chief Administrative Officer to also send copies of the letter to the Members of the San Diego Legislative Delegation; and |
| |directed County Counsel to address the issue in a future Closed Session, as appropriate. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|21. |SUBJECT: |ADVERTISING AND AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS FOR FINAL ENHANCEMENT TO GYMNASIUM (KK2992) AND |
| | |CONSTRUCTION OF THE HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER (KK3430) AT SAN PASQUAL ACADEMY (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Under the leadership of Supervisors Cox and Roberts, with unanimous support from all Board members, the San Pasqual Academy opened|
| |in October 2001 as a residential education campus for adolescent foster youth. |
| | |
| |One of the core facilities at the Academy is a gymnasium. Improvement of the gymnasium was planned in two phases. Phase One, |
| |which provided for repair of the existing structure to allow temporary court play and grading, irrigation, and landscaping of the |
| |football field, has been completed. Phase Two will improve the facility, making it eligible for use in CIF competition, with |
| |complete lighting, mechanical and plumbing systems and provide showers, a locker room area, storage and interim ticket booth/snack|
| |bar areas. On November 12, 2002, the Board approved appropriation of funds for Phase Two of the San Pasqual Academy Gymnasium |
| |renovation. |
| | |
| |Creating a “culture of wellness” has been an integral part of the vision for San Pasqual Academy since its inception. A private |
| |donor has made a generous commitment to the foster youth at San Pasqual Academy and will be providing $500,000 through the Child |
| |Abuse Prevention Foundation (CAPF) for the construction of a Health and Wellness Center. The County of San Diego will construct |
| |the Health and Wellness Center on the Academy grounds, and New Alternatives, Incorporated, the non-profit organization that |
| |operates the residential component of the Academy, has committed to obtaining the funding to implement program services. On |
| |December 10, 2002, the Board acknowledged the donor pledge and approved appropriation of funds for the Health and Wellness Center.|
| | |
| |Today’s action recommends approval to proceed with solicitation of bids and award of construction contracts to the successful |
| |bidder(s) for phase two of the San Pasqual Academy Gymnasium renovation and construction of the Health and Wellness Center. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for these projects are budgeted. Funds for this request are included in the FY 02-03 Operational Plan. The funding source |
| |is the Capital Outlay Fund in Capital Project KK2992, San Pasqual Academy Gymnasium renovation and KK3430, Health and Wellness |
| |Center. The cost of the Gymnasium renovation is $1,450,000 and for construction of the Health and Wellness Center is $500,000. |
| |This action will result in no change in the General Fund cost and revenue and no additional staff years. |
| |
| |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Find that in accordance with Section 15301 of the State CEQA guidelines, that the San Pasqual Academy Gynmasium renovation project|
| |is categorically exempt, in that it will involve the continuation of an existing use, or activities that involve a negligible |
| |expansion of that use; and find that in accordance with Section 15302 of the State CEQA guidelines, that the San Pasqual Academy |
| |Health and Wellness Center project is categorically exempt, in that it will involve the replacement or reconstruction of existing |
| |structures and facilities where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have |
| |substantially the same purpose and capacity. |
| | |
| |Authorize the Director of the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to take any action authorized by Section 401 et seq. of the|
| |Administrative Code, with respect to contracting for the subject public works projects, San Pasqual Academy Gymnasium renovation |
| |and construction of the Health and Wellness Center. |
| | |
| |Designate the Director of General Services as the County Officer responsible for administering all awarded contracts. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|22. |SUBJECT: |CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO COMMUNITY ACTION BOARD (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County of San Diego is the region’s designated Community Action Agency. Community Action Agencies administer and operate |
| |anti-poverty programs on the local level. The Board of Supervisors established the Community Action Board as the governing body |
| |for the Community Action program. In accordance with State law, the Community Action Board is made up of members representing |
| |three sectors of the community – the public sector, the private sector, and the low-income sector. It includes five members who |
| |represent the Board of Supervisors, six members who represent economically disadvantaged persons throughout the county and four |
| |members who represent the private sector. |
| | |
| |The Community Action Board recently selected four new members to fill vacant or expired terms. Action by the Board of Supervisors|
| |is requested to confirm the appointment of these members to the Community Action Board. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |There is no fiscal impact as a result of this proposal. If approved, this recommendation will result in no current year costs, no|
| |annual cost, and will require the addition of no staff years. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Confirm the selection of the following candidates, as members of the Community Action Board: |
| |Leta Jones, Economically Disadvantaged Sector representative, Central Region |
| |Caroline Olok, Economically Disadvantaged Sector representative, East Region |
| |Eduardo Lee, Economically Disadvantaged Sector representative, South Region |
| |Meals-on-Wheels, Greater San Diego, Inc., Roger Bailey, CEO, Private Sector representative |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|23. |SUBJECT: |LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS (DISTRICT: 1) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County of San Diego is fortunate to have an opportunity to reinvest taxpayer money into our communities for the benefit of the|
| |public. This action today will assist several community-based organizations in meeting the needs of individuals and families. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The fiscal impact of the proposed recommendations is $275,375. This action will result in the addition of no staff years and no |
| |future costs. |
| | |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHAIRMAN COX: |
| |Allocate $1,000 from the Community Projects Budget (0261) to the Bronze Triangle for a community mural. |
| |Find that the allocation to Tradition One is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA |
| |Guidelines section 15301. |
| |Allocate $15,000 from the Community Projects Budget (0261) to Tradition One for ADA improvements and minor renovations at their |
| |rehabilitation facility located at 4104 Delta Street, San Diego. |
| |Transfer $50,000 from the Community Projects Budget (0261) to the Health and Human Services Agency, Agency wide Financing (7008) |
| |for an infant immunization outreach and education campaign. |
| |Transfer $200,000 from the Community Projects Budget (0261) to Capital Project KN2996, Account 4996 to augment a non-motorized |
| |Trails Program grant for an equestrian bridge in the Tijuana River Valley Regional Park. |
| |Allocate $2,000 from the Community Projects Budget (0261) to the Ocean Blue Foundation to maintain the plastic bag dispensers in |
| |Imperial Beach for pet owners to clean up after their dogs. |
| |Allocate $3,500 from the Community Projects Budget (0261) to SANDAG for the design and production of signs for the Sweetwater |
| |River Bikeway. |
| |Transfer $2,000 from the Community Projects Budget (0261) to the Department of Public Works Org 5897 (Account 2340, Activity |
| |31005P) for the purchase of traffic-calming signs. |
| |Allocate $1,875 from the Community Projects Budget (0261) to People for Trees for the purchase of trees. |
| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute agreements with the organizations listed above establishing the terms for receipt|
| |of the funds described above. |
| |Find that all of the grants described above have a public purpose. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|24. |SUBJECT: |CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL OLBIGATION BONDS, SERIES E |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On November 3, 1998, an election was held in the Chula Vista Elementary School District, San Diego County, California (the |
| |“District”), whereby more than two-thirds of the voters casting ballots in the district approved the issuance of $95 million in |
| |general obligation bonds. Proceeds from the sale of the bonds will be used to finance the repair and rehabilitation of schools |
| |and the construction and acquisition of new classrooms and school facilities. |
| | |
| |At this time, the governing board of the District requests the County Board to issue the fifth series of such bonds in an |
| |aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $12,000,000, designated as “Chula Vista Elementary School District General Obligation |
| |Bonds, 1998 Election, Series E (the ”Bonds”). The District previously issued general obligation bonds Series A in the amount of |
| |$25,000,000 in March 1999, Series B in the amount of $10,000,000 in March 2000, Series C in the amount of $7,500,000 in March 2001|
| |and Series D in the amount of $10,500,000 in April 2002. After the issuance of the Bonds, the District will have $30,000,000 in |
| |authorized but unissued general obligation bonds. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |These bonds are general obligations of the District to be paid from ad valorem property taxes and do not constitute an obligation |
| |of the County. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND DEBT ADVISORY COMMITTEE |
| |Adopt the resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of the Chula Vista Elementary School District General Obligation Bonds, |
| |1998 Election, Series E in the amount not to exceed $12 million. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, |
| |adopting Resolution No. 03-108, entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, |
| |AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES E, OF THE CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|25. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 5) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |This action today will assist several organizations in providing essential services to citizens of San Diego County. The |
| |opportunity to reinvest taxpayer money into North County Communities is a benefit to the public. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The cost of the proposed recommendation totals $675,054.00 The funding source is Community Project budget (0265). This action |
| |will result in the addition of no staff years and no future costs. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR HORN: |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to The Boys & Girls Club of San Marcos for the Career Development |
| |Program for the Teen Center. |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Project Budget (0265) to The Boys & Girls Club of North County for the purchase of KidTrax |
| |membership management software. |
| |Find that the allocations to the Boys and Girls Club of Oceanside, the Montezuma Valley Volunteer Fire Department, the Reche Club |
| |of Fallbrook, and the Flying Leatherneck Historical Foundation are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) |
| |pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301. |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to The Boys & Girls Club of Oceanside for improvements to the lunchroom |
| |and existing facilities. |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Boys & Girls Club of Carlsbad for supplies for their Project |
| |Learn Program, Fine Arts Program and Sports & Fitness Program. |
| | |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Friends of the Fallbrook Branch Library contingent on the Friends|
| |first raising matching funds of $10,000.00 for furnishings, books, CD’s, a computer and computer software. |
| |Allocate up to $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Friends of the Borrego Springs Library contingent on the |
| |Friends first raising matching funds of up to $10,000.00 for the Children’s Reading Program, Books on tape and multicultural |
| |library materials. |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Rancho Santa Fe Library Guild contingent on the Guild first |
| |raising matching funds of $10,000.00 for programming in the Youth Services Department and refurbishment of furnishings throughout |
| |the library. |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community projects Budget (0265) to the Friends of the Valley Center Branch Library contingent on the |
| |Friends first raising matching funds of $10,000.00 for Adult and Children’s programs, equipment for the community room and |
| |children’s room, locking display cases, books and outside benches. |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Friends of the Vista Branch Library continent on the Friends |
| |first raising matching funds of $10,000.00 for Adult and Children’s Reading Program, books, books on tape, Spanish language |
| |library material, refurbishment of furnishings. |
| |Allocate $3,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Reche Club of Fallbrook for the refurbishment of bathrooms and a |
| |sprinkler system for plants. |
| |Allocate $60,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Elfin Forest/Harmony Grove Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. for a |
| |4X4 Crew cab pickup with rescue cabinets to tow a rescue trailer and transport fire personnel, Wildland Safety Clothing and |
| |additional firefighting equipment. |
| |Allocate $90,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Palomar Mountain Volunteer Fire Department for a training |
| |installation for new fire engines, firefighter turnouts and additional firefighting equipment. |
| |Allocate $50,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the De Luz Volunteer Fire Department for an Extrication Equipment |
| |Power Unit, operational safety equipment and Wildland clothing and equipment for firefighters. |
| |Allocate $16,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Montezuma Valley Volunteer Fire Department for station |
| |maintenance, electrical and roof repair. |
| |Allocate $67,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Sunshine Summit Volunteer Fire Department for four portable |
| |radios, two storage containers, SCBA bottles and metal cabinet for fire engine. |
| |Allocate $20,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Aqua Hedondia Lagoon Foundation for landscaping, plants and |
| |irrigation for the Discovery Center. |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to MainStreet Oceanside for promotional material for community events. |
| |Allocate $15,590.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to North County Inland Prevention Program for direct program office and |
| |printing expenses for the Fallbrook Prevention Coalition Branch. |
| |Allocate $10,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to Save Our Heritage Organization to help in the restoration of the |
| |Warner’s Ranch House in Warner Springs. |
| |Allocate $8985.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to North County Disabled Services, Inc. for hand cycles made especially |
| |for the disabled. |
| |Allocate $15,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Flying Leatherneck Historical Foundation for the installation of |
| |a direct entry gate to the Museum, which is located aboard Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar. |
| |Allocate $5,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to Reins for scholarships for low income disabled. |
| |Allocate $3,000.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) to the Fallbrook Music Society for the Concert on the Green event. |
| |Allocate $211,479.00 from Community Projects Budget (0265) for improvements to Cougar Pass Road in Hidden Meadows in North County.|
| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with the organizations listed above establishing the terms for |
| |receipt of the funds described above. |
| |Find that all of the grant awards described above have a public purpose. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|26. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |APPOINTMENT (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |These appointments are in accordance with applicable Board Policy A–74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions and |
| |Committees, and Policy I–1, Planning and Sponsor Group Policies and Procedures. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |N/A |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHAIRMAN COX: |
| |Waive Board Policy A–74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions, and Committees, and re-appoint Patricia Cochran to a|
| |seventh term on the Fly Abatement and Appeals Board, for a term to expire June 17, 2006. |
| | |
| |SUPERVISOR HORN: |
| |Appoint Donald E. Phelps to Seat No. 2 vacated by Frank C. Tecca on the Hidden Meadows Sponsor Group, for a term to expire January|
| |2, 2006. |
| | |
| |Appoint Robert H. Frey to Seat No. 6 vacated by Don Harington on the Hidden Meadows Sponsor Group, for a term to expire January 2,|
| |2006. |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Appoint Donna Goldsmith for a first term as the representative from the League of California Cities replacing Patricia Nunez on |
| |the Emergency Medical Care Committee, for a term to expire June 30, 2006. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|27. |SUBJECT: |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |Board Policy A-72, Board of Supervisors Agenda and Related Process, authorizes the Clerk of the Board to prepare a Communications |
| |Received for Board of Supervisors' Official Records. Routine informational reports, which need to be brought to the attention of |
| |the Board of Supervisors yet not requiring action, are listed on this document. Communications Received documents are on file in |
| |the Office of the Clerk of the Board. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Not Applicable. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |
| |Note and file. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
|28. |SUBJECT: |CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION |
| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |
| |San Diego County Public Defenders Association, et al. v. Board of Retirement, et al.; San Diego County Superior Court No. GIC |
| |782445 (consolidated with GIC 787872) |
| | |
| |B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION |
| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |
| |William Bandt, et al. v. Board of Retirement of the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association, et al.; San Diego County |
| |Superior Court No. GIC 810546 |
| | |
| |C. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS |
| |(Government Code section 54957.6) |
| |Designated Representatives: Carlos Arauz and Mike Kolb |
| |Employee Organizations: Deputy Sheriffs Association |
| | |
| |D. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS |
| |Property: That real property which, individually and collectively, comprises the Edgemoor Property bordered by San Diego River |
| |Floodway, Magnolia Avenue, Mission Gorge Road, and Cuyamaca Street in Santee, California |
| | |
| |Negotiating Parties: |
| |County: Ron Hicks, John Kross, Gary Page, Gerald Trimble and Glenn Wasserman |
| | |
| |Proposers: Ryan Companies US, Inc. and the City of Santee |
| | |
| |Under Negotiations: Price and Terms |
| |ACTION: |
| |Any reportable matters will be announced on Wednesday, June 18, 2003, prior to the Board of Supervisors Planning and Land Use |
| |meeting. |
| |
| |
|29. |SUBJECT: |ALLOCATION OF COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS (DISTRICT: 4) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |The County’s fiscal condition has enabled it to reinvest taxpayer money back into our communities for the benefit of the public. |
| |This recommended action proposes that several projects of great benefit to San Diego County be funded using Community Project |
| |Funds. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |The total combined cost of the proposed recommendation is $218,308. Appropriations are available in the Community Projects budget|
| |unit (0264). This action will result in the addition of no staff years and no future costs. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR ROBERTS: |
| |Find that the allocation listed below in item 3 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA |
| |Guidelines section 15303 and that the allocation listed below in item 5 is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section |
| |15301. |
| | |
| |Allocate $48,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the City of San Diego for use by the Fire-Rescue Department |
| |to aid with costs associated with funding the Regional Helicopter Program. |
| | |
| |Allocate $75,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to Mission Valley YMCA to fund the construction of a full-size |
| |roller hockey arena. |
| | |
| |Allocate $25,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to Scripps Mercy Trauma to provide funding for their injury |
| |prevention and outreach program. |
| | |
| |Allocate $15,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to Project Wildlife to provide design and consultant fees in |
| |expanding the central Project Wildlife care center. |
| | |
| |Allocate $5,308 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the Mission Hills Business Association to purchase equipment and|
| |supplies. |
| | |
| |Allocate $50,000 from the Community Projects Budget unit (0264) to the San Pasqual Foundation to provide funding for equipment, |
| |supplies and program needs. |
| | |
| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to execute grant agreements with the organizations listed above establishing the terms for |
| |receipt of the funds described above. |
| | |
| |Find that all the grant awards described above have a public purpose. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|30. |SUBJECT: |OUT OF COUNTRY BUSINESS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |In accordance with Board of Supervisor’s Policy D-7, this is a request for one District Attorney Investigator to travel to Mexico |
| |to serve as a trainer at the Police Motorcycle Tactics training course. The only cost will be the participant’s salary. All |
| |other costs are being paid by the Mexican Government. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this request are included in the District Attorney’s Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Proposed Operational Plan. All travel and |
| |accommodation costs will be paid for by the Mexican Government. There will be no paid overtime as a result of this request. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Approve salary only travel to Mexico for one District Attorney Investigator for the period of July 6, 2003 to July 12, 2003. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|31. |SUBJECT: |REQUEST TO AWARD CONTRACTS FOR BOOK WHOLESALER AND LIBRARY AUTOMATION SYSTEM (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| | |(CARRYOVER FROM 6/10/03 ITEM NO. 10) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On June 10, 2003 (10), the Board continued this item to June 17, 2003. |
| | |
| |On July 31, 2001 (17), the Board of Supervisors gave approval to award a sole source contract for a one-year period, on a |
| |month-to-month basis, with a one-year option period with book wholesaler, Baker & Taylor, to provide library materials until a new|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |automation contract was in place. The County Library was to report back to the Board of Supervisors about the status of the |
| |library automation system, which is 12 years old and will no longer be supported in the near future. |
| | |
| |The County Library issued RFP 30141 on March 26, 2003 for book wholesaler services. The successful responder is Baker & Taylor, |
| |Inc. The contract term is from July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004, with three, one-year renewal option periods. The estimated |
| |value of the contract is $1,000,000 annually. |
| | |
| |The County Library issued all-inclusive RFP 30097 on March 25, 2003 for a new commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) library automation |
| |system for the period July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2006, with two, three-year renewal option periods. Oracle compatibility, to |
| |meet County technology goals, was identified as a desirable feature in the specifications. Costs for the automation system are |
| |budgeted and are not anticipated to exceed $1,055,000 for software, hardware, installation, network integration, and the first |
| |year of system maintenance. Due on April 21, 2003, the automation RFP responses have been evaluated. The preferred provider has |
| |been identified. Negotiations are about to begin with the successful responder, with anticipated contract award by June 30, 2003.|
| | |
| |Today’s request is for Board approval to award a contract to the successful responder, Baker and Taylor, Inc., for book wholesaler|
| |services, and to award, subject to successful negotiation, a contract to the successful library automation system vendor. |
| |FISCAL IMPACT: |
| |Funds for this proposal are budgeted. Funding for the library books and materials contract is included in the CAO Proposed FY |
| |2003-05 Operational Plan. The level of expenditures is anticipated to be approximately $1,000,000 but will be dependent upon |
| |approval of the FY 2003-04 Operational Plan for books and library materials, and the level to which donations are received for |
| |book and library materials purchases. The automation system replacement funding of $1,055,000 has been identified in the FY |
| |2002-03 County Library Management Reserve and will be used to fund the system, which includes software, hardware, installation, |
| |network integration, and the first year of system maintenance provided by the software vendor. Current maintenance costs on the |
| |existing system are $266,000, which includes software vendor and Pennant Alliance support, plus VAX storage costs (which will no |
| |longer be required with the new system). The new, more efficient system will have first year maintenance costs anticipated to be |
| |$179,000 for maintenance provided by the Pennant Alliance, with software vendor support provided at no charge. Future ongoing |
| |system maintenance costs are estimated to be $273,000 annually, which includes software vendor support and Pennant Alliance |
| |support costs. This amount is included in the CAO Proposed FY 2003-05 Operational Plan. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing |
| |and Contracting to award a contract, subject to determination of fair and reasonable price, to acquire an automated library |
| |acquisitions, ordering, and fund tracking system; books; and audiovisual materials for a period of one year, with three, one-year |
| |renewal option periods, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to approval of the|
| |County Library Director/County Librarian. |
| | |
| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code, authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing |
| |and Contracting to award a contract, subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, for the |
| |period July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2006, with two, three-year renewal option periods, to replace the County Library automation |
| |system and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes to services and funding, subject to approval of the County Library |
| |Director/County Librarian. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|32. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT – SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF |
| | |REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO PROHIBIT SPECTATORS |
| | |AT ILLEGAL SPEED CONTESTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On June 10, 2003 (3), the Board introduced Ordinance for further Board consideration on June 17, 2003. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |SUPERVISOR DIANNE JACOB AND SHERIFF |
| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |
| |AN ORDINANCE ADDING DIVISION 10 TO TITLE 7 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS |
| |IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO PROHIBIT SPECTATORS AT ILLEGAL SPEED CONTESTS |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, |
| |adopting Ordinance No. 9559 (N.S.), entitled: AN ORDINANCE ADDING DIVISION 10 TO TITLE 7 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF |
| |REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO PROHIBIT SPECTATORS AT ILLEGAL SPEED CONTESTS.|
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|33. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: RATIFIED AGREEMENT - PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF SAN |
| | |DIEGO COUNTY (PDA) – PUBLIC DEFENDER (PD) AND PUBLIC DEFENDER MANAGEMENT (PM) BARGAINING UNITS. |
| | |(DISTRICT: All) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On June 10, 2003 (17), the Board introduced Ordinance for further Board consideration on June 17, 2003. |
| | |
| |Tentative agreement was reached on May 14, 2003 by County Representatives with the Public Defender Association of San Diego |
| |County. The agreement was ratified on May 19, 2003 and is for a three-year term. |
| | |
| |The agreement includes wage increases, flexible credit enhancements and other benefits. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Adopt ordinance entitled: |
| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND OTHER PROVISIONS FOR THE PD AND PM UNITS. |
| |Consider and approve the ratified Memorandum of Agreement between the County and the Public Defender Association of San Diego |
| |County. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, |
| |adopting Ordinance No. 9560 (N.S.), entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND |
| |OTHER PROVISIONS FOR THE PD AND PM UNITS. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|34. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: RATIFIED AGREEMENT - DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS’ |
| | |ASSOCIATION (DDAA) – CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM ATTORNEY UNIT (AS), CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM ATTORNEY MANAGEMENT |
| | |UNIT (AM), AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNIT (DA) |
| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On June 10, 2003 (18), the Board introduced Ordinance for further Board consideration on June 17, 2003. |
| | |
| |Tentative agreement was reached on May 9, 2003, by County Representatives with the Deputy District Attorneys’ Association. The |
| |agreement was ratified on May 16, 2003, and is for a three-year term. |
| | |
| |The agreement includes wage increases, flexible credit enhancements and other benefits. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |
| | |
| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND OTHER PROVISIONS FOR THE AM, AS AND DA UNITS |
| | |
| |Consider and approve the ratified Memorandum of Agreement between the County and the Deputy District Attorneys’ Association. |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, |
| |adopting Ordinance No. 9561 (N.S.), entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND |
| |OTHER PROVISIONS FOR THE AM, AS AND DA UNITS. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|35. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |
| | |SECOND CONSIDERATION AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE: |
| | |AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND CIVIL SERVICE RULES (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |On June 10, 2003 (19), the Board introduced Ordinance for further Board consideration on June 17, 2003. |
| |RECOMMENDATION: |
| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |
| |Adopt Ordinance entitled: |
| | |
| |AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND COMPENSATION |
| |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent, |
| |adopting Ordinance No. 9562 (N.S.), entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPENSATION ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING AUTHORIZED |
| |CLASSIFICATIONS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND COMPENSATION. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
| |
| |
|36. |SUBJECT: |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |
| |Chairman Greg Cox presented a proclamation, honoring Watershed Awareness Week, to Bruce Reznik of San Diego Baykeeper. |
| |
| |
|37. |SUBJECT: |PUBLIC COMMUNICATION |
| |Thomas Hobbs addressed the Board regarding the Probation Department. |
| |Wayne Freeman addressed the Board regarding the Probation Department. |
| |Leonard Smith addressed the Board regarding the Probation Department. |
| |Ivy Westmoreland addressed the Board regarding the Probation Department. |
| |ACTION: |
| |Heard; referred to the Chief Administrative Officer. |
| |
| |
|38. |SUBJECT: |OFF-DOCKET |
| | |CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICT: ALL) |
| |OVERVIEW: |
| |CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Government Code |
| |Section 54956.9: (Number of Cases – 1) |
|38.1 |ACTION: |
| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater, Seconded by Supervisor Horn, the Board of Supervisors found that the need to take action arose |
| |subsequent to the Agenda being posted, and placed the item on the agenda. |
| | |
| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater, Roberts, Horn |
|38.2 |ACTION: |
| |Any reportable matters will be announced on Wednesday, June 18, 2003, prior to the Board of Supervisors Planning and Land Use |
| |meeting. |
There being no further business, the Board adjourned at 12:05 p.m. in memory of Reverend Paul Veenstra, Andy Anderson, Charles Perkins, Jr., Authur Flechsig, Paul Stuart, and Tony Zeppetella.
THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
County of San Diego, State of California
Notes by: Gomez
NOTE: This Statement of Proceedings sets forth all actions taken by the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up.
-----------------------
1
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- what s going on in the world today
- what s going on in the world
- san diego writer s conference 2020
- what s going on around the world
- what s trending on the internet
- extraordinary women s conference 2020
- extraordinary women s conference 2020 tulsa
- women s conference lynchburg va
- international women s conference 2018
- judaism s impact on the world
- christianity s impact on the world
- international alzheimer s conference 2020