Tspace.library.utoronto.ca



Appendix ATable A1: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which combination of factors such as sex, age class, and herd size (A) best describe the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of warble larvae (Hypoderma tarandi L., 1758) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) and to make comparisons among herds (B) during the late winter/early spring season (mid-February to April). Only the best model is presented.A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)4.551.104.15<0.001Males-1.000.56-1.770.08Yearlings0.131.450.090.93Adults-1.051.10-0.960.34High and increasing0.570.780.730.46Peak0.181.200.150.88High and decreasing0.170.680.240.81Low and decreasing-0.700.73-0.950.34????B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)2.770.525.38<0.001Beverly/Ahiak0.850.781.090.28Bluenose East0.451.140.390.70Rivière-George0.950.661.440.15Southampton Island-0.300.69-0.440.66Table A2: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which addition or combination of factors such as sex, age class, and herd size (A) best describe the intensity ? the average number of parasites per infected host ? of warble larvae (Hypoderma tarandi L., 1758) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) and to make comparisons among herds in adult females (B) during the late winter/early spring season (mid-February to April). Only the best model is presented.A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)4.750.865.55<0.001Males-0.240.02-11.48<0.001Yearlings-0.550.02-26.38<0.001Adults-0.830.01-66.53<0.001High and increasing0.230.900.250.80Peak0.350.980.360.72High and decreasing-0.280.92-0.300.76Low and decreasing-1.190.95-1.260.21Males*Yearlings0.850.0327.26<0.001Males*Adults1.170.0346.10<0.001B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)5.040.3913.06<0.001Bathurst-1.520.04-39.96<0.001Beverly/Ahiak-1.200.06-21.62<0.001Bluenose East-1.070.94-1.140.25Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut0.070.051.450.15Rivière-George-1.620.51-3.200.001Southampton Island-0.210.03-7.80<0.001Table A3: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values of pairwise comparisons of the intensity ? the average number of parasites per infected host ? of warble larvae (Hypoderma tarandi L., 1758) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) between sexes in interaction with age classes (A) and among herds in adult females (B) during the late winter/early spring season (mid-February to April).A???????EstimateSEzp-valueFemale calves?Male calves0.240.0211.48<0.001Female calves?Yearling females0.550.0226.38<0.001Female calves?Yearling males-0.060.02-2.770.06Female calves?Adult females0.830.0166.53<0.001Female calves?Adult males-0.090.02-5.13<0.001Male calves?Yearling females0.310.0212.45<0.001Male calves?Yearling males-0.300.03-11.77<0.001Male calves?Adult females0.590.0231.17<0.001Male calves?Adult males-0.330.02-14.57<0.001Yearling females?Yearling males-0.610.02-26.85<0.001Yearling females?Adult females0.280.0215.39<0.001Yearling females?Adult males-0.640.02-31.24<0.001Yearling males?Adult females0.890.0248.73<0.001Yearling males?Adult males0.030.02-1.860.43Adult females?Adult males-0.920.01-63.98<0.001B???????EstimateSEzp-valueAkia-Maniitsoq?Bathurst1.520.0439.96<0.001Akia-Maniitsoq?Beverly/Ahiak1.200.0621.62<0.001Akia-Maniitsoq?Bluenose East1.070.941.140.92Akia-Maniitsoq?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-0.070.05-1.450.77Akia-Maniitsoq?Rivière-George1.620.513.200.02Akia-Maniitsoq?Southampton Island0.210.037.80<0.001Bathurst?Beverly/Ahiak-0.330.04-8.18<0.001Bathurst?Bluenose East-0.450.94-0.481.00Bathurst?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-1.600.03-51.06<0.001Bathurst?Rivière-George0.100.510.201.00Bathurst?Southampton Island-1.320.04-30.83<0.001Beverly/Ahiak?Bluenose East-0.120.94-0.131.00Beverly/Ahiak?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-1.270.03-43.41<0.001Beverly/Ahiak?Rivière-George0.430.510.850.98Beverly/Ahiak?Southampton Island-0.990.06-16.88<0.001Bluenose East?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-1.150.94-1.220.89Bluenose East?Rivière-George0.550.920.601.00Bluenose East?Southampton Island-0.870.94-0.920.97Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut?Rivière-George1.700.513.350.01Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut?Southampton Island0.280.055.28<0.001Rivière-George?Southampton Island-1.420.51-2.790.08Table A4: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which combination of factors such as sex, age class herd size, and season (A) best describe the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of nose bot larvae (Cephenemyia trompe Modeer, 1786) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) and to make comparisons among herds in adults (B) during the late winter/early spring season (mid-February to April). Only the best model is presented.A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-4.522.57-1.760.08Males-0.250.78-0.320.75Yearlings3.281.412.320.02Adults1.760.642.740.01Peak3.753.371.110.27High and decreasing-0.813.18-0.250.80Low and decreasing-0.724.16-0.170.86???B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)2.220.534.23<0.001Bathurst-5.540.89-6.21<0.001Beverly/Ahiak-5.530.73-7.55<0.001Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-1.710.62-2.770.01Table A5: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values of pairwise comparisons of the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of nose bot larvae (Cephenemyia trompe Modeer, 1786) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) among age classes (A) and among herds in adults (B) during the late winter/early spring season (mid-February to April).A???????EstimateSEzp-valueCalves?Yearlings-3.281.41-2.320.05Calves?Adults-1.760.64-2.740.02Yearlings?Adults1.511.271.200.46????B???????EstimateSEzp-valueAkia-Maniitsoq?Bathurst 5.540.896.21<0.001Akia-Maniitsoq?Beverly/Ahiak5.530.737.55<0.001Akia-Maniitsoq?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut1.710.622.770.03Bathurst ?Beverly/Ahiak-0.010.880.011.00Bathurst ?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-3.820.79-4.84<0.001Beverly/Ahiak?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-3.820.60-6.31<0.001Table A6: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which combination of factors such as sex, age class herd size, and season (A) best describe the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of liver cysts (Taenia hydatigena Pallas, 1766) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) and to make comparisons among herds in adults and when the herd size was high and decreasing (B). Only the best model is presented. A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-1.890.99-1.900.06Males-0.0010.29-0.0031.00Yearlings-0.921.16-0.790.43Adults1.470.512.900.004High and increasing-0.390.80-0.490.63Peak-0.970.65-1.490.14High and decreasing-0.580.64-0.900.37Low and decreasing-2.040.82-2.500.01Spring migration0.100.440.220.83Late summer-0.530.36-1.470.14Fall migration-0.650.46-1.400.16????B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-3.150.77-4.10<0.001Beverly/Ahiak2.710.813.35<0.001Rivière-aux-Feuilles1.850.792.340.02Rivière-George1.930.942.070.04Teshekpuk4.771.034.65<0.001Western Arctic2.000.972.060.04Table A7: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values of pairwise comparisons of the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of liver cysts (Taenia hydatigena Pallas, 1766) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) among age classes (A), herd sizes (B) and among herds in adults and when the herd size was high and decreasing (C).A???????EstimateSEzp-valueCalves?Yearlings0.921.160.790.71Calves?Adults-1.470.51-2.900.01Yearlings?Adults-2.381.05-2.270.06B???????EstimateSEzp-valueLow and increasing?High and increasing0.39 0.800.480.99Low and increasing?Peak0.970.651.490.57Low and increasing?High and decreasing0.580.640.900.90Low and increasing?Low and decreasing2.040.822.500.09High and increasing?Peak0.590.700.830.92High and increasing?High and decreasing0.190.680.281.00High and increasing?Low and decreasing1.650.662.480.09Peak?High and decreasing-0.400.35-1.140.79Peak?Low and decreasing1.060.581.830.36High and decreasing?Low and decreasing1.460.532.740.048????C???????EstimateSEzp-valueAkia-Maniitsoq?Beverly/Ahiak-2.710.81-3.340.01Akia-Maniitsoq?Rivière-aux-Feuilles-1.850.79-2.340.18Akia-Maniitsoq?Rivière-George-1.930.94-2.070.31Akia-Maniitsoq?Teshekpuk-4.771.03-4.65<0.001Akia-Maniitsoq?Western Arctic-2.000.97-2.060.31Beverly/Ahiak?Rivière-aux-Feuilles0.850.372.280.20Beverly/Ahiak?Rivière-George0.780.601.300.78Beverly/Ahiak?Teshekpuk-2.070.71-2.900.04Beverly/Ahiak?Western Arctic0.700.631.110.88Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Rivière-George-0.080.61-0.131.00Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Teshekpuk-2.920.73-4.02<0.001Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Western Arctic-0.150.65-0.231.00Rivière-George?Teshekpuk-2.840.87-3.260.01Rivière-George?Western Arctic-0.070.80-0.091.00Teshekpuk?Western Arctic2.770.913.050.03Table A8: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which combination of factors such as sex, herd size, and season (A) best describe the intensity ? the average number of parasites per infected host ? of liver cysts (Taenia hydatigena Pallas, 1766) in adult caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) and to make comparisons among herds (B). Only the best model is presented.A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)0.860.243.57<0.001Males-0.090.16-0.570.57Peak-0.200.28-0.710.48High and decreasing-0.060.24-0.250.80Low and decreasing0.160.270.610.54Spring migration-0.090.17-0.500.62Late summer-0.360.17-2.080.04Fall migration-0.020.20-0.090.93????B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)0.990.0911.41<0.001Beverly/Ahiak-0.040.13-0.270.79Rivière-aux-Feuilles-0.130.14-0.950.34Rivière-George-0.320.18-1.780.08Teshekpuk-0.900.30-2.980.003Table A9: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values of pairwise comparisons of the intensity ? the average number of parasites per infected host ? of liver cysts (Taenia hydatigena Pallas, 1766) in adult caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) among seasons (A) and to make comparisons among herds (B).A??EstimateSEzp-valueLate winter?Spring migration0.090.170.500.96Late winter?Late summer0.360.172.080.16Late winter?Fall migration0.020.200.091.00Spring migration?Late summer0.270.221.220.61Spring migration?Fall migration-0.070.20-0.340.99Late summer?Fall migration-0.340.25-1.370.52?????B??EstimateSEzp-valueBathurst?Beverly/Ahiak0.040.130.271.00Bathurst?Rivière-aux-Feuilles0.130.140.950.88Bathurst?Rivière-George0.320.181.770.39Bathurst?Teshekpuk0.900.302.980.02Beverly/Ahiak?Rivière-aux-Feuilles0.090.150.630.97Beverly/Ahiak?Rivière-George0.280.191.490.57Beverly/Ahiak?Teshekpuk0.860.312.810.04Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Rivière-George0.190.190.980.86Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Teshekpuk0.770.312.490.09Rivière-George?Teshekpuk0.580.331.770.39Table A10: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which addition or combination of factors such as sex, herd size, and season (A) best describe the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of giant liver flukes (Fascioloides magna Bassi, 1875) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) of the Rivière-George herd and to make comparisons between this herd and the Rivière-aux-Feuilles herd in adults during the spring migration/calving grounds season (May to July) and when the herd size was around the peak (B). Only the best model is presented.A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-4.081.63-2.500.01Males0.470.720.650.51Yearlings2.200.912.420.02Adults3.260.615.38<0.001High and increasing2.721.302.100.04Peak5.491.823.020.003High and decreasing6.351.723.70<0.001Low and decreasing4.991.343.71<0.001Late winter-1.620.94-1.710.09Spring migration-1.550.99-1.580.12Late summer-1.810.91-1.990.046Fall migration-2.860.96-2.990.003Males*Yearlings0.121.310.090.93Males*Adults-0.640.89-0.720.47????B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-0.410.41-0.990.32Rivière-George3.351.103.030.002Table A11: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values of pairwise comparisons of the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of giant liver flukes (Fascioloides magna Bassi, 1875) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) of the Rivière-George herd among age classes (A); herd sizes (B); and seasons (C)A???????EstimateSEzp-valueCalves?Yearlings-2.260.71-3.210.004Calves?Adults-2.940.49-6.00<0.001Yearlings?Adults-0.670.63-1.070.53B???????EstimateSEzp-valueLow and increasing?High and increasing-2.721.30-2.100.22Low and increasing?Peak-5.491.82-3.020.02Low and increasing?High and decreasing-6.351.72-3.700.002Low and increasing?Low and decreasing-4.991.35-3.710.002High and increasing?Peak-2.771.39-2.000.27High and increasing?High and decreasing-3.631.20-3.020.02High and increasing?Low and decreasing-2.270.59-3.860.001Peak?High and decreasing-0.861.78-0.480.99Peak?Low and decreasing0.501.430.351.00High and decreasing?Low and decreasing1.361.221.120.80C???????EstimateSEzp-valueWinter?Late winter1.620.941.710.43Winter?Spring migration1.550.991.580.51Winter?Late summer1.810.911.990.27Winter?Fall migration2.870.962.990.02Late winter?Spring migration-0.070.39-0.171.00Late winter?Late summer0.200.640.311.00Late winter?Fall migration1.250.383.260.01Spring migration?Late summer0.260.690.381.00Spring migration?Fall migration1.310.423.120.02Late summer?Fall migration1.050.661.590.50????Table A12: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which combination of factors such as sex, herd size, and season (A) best describe the intensity ? the average number of parasites per infected host ? of giant liver flukes (Fascioloides magna Bassi, 1875) in adult female caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) of the Rivière-George herd and to make comparisons between this herd and the Rivière-aux-Feuilles herd during spring migration/calving grounds season (May to July) and when the herd size was around the peak (B). Only the best model is presented.A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)1.350.245.52<0.001Peak1.140.373.040.002High and decreasing1.240.373.37<0.001Low and decreasing1.280.294.45<0.001Spring migration0.310.103.220.001Late summer-0.160.08-2.050.04Fall migration-0.120.08-1.580.11B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)2.26 0.346.56<0.001Rivière-George0.540.580.940.35Table A13: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values of pairwise comparisons of the intensity ? the average number of parasites per infected host ? of giant liver flukes (Fascioloides magna Bassi, 1875) in adult female caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) of the Rivière-George herd among herd sizes (A) and seasons (B).A???????EstimateSEzp-valueHigh and increasing?Peak-1.140.37-3.040.01High and increasing?High and decreasing-1.240.37-3.370.004High and increasing?Low and decreasing-1.280.29-4.45<0.001Peak?High and decreasing-0.100.38-0.270.99Peak?Low and decreasing-0.140.30-0.470.97High and decreasing?Low and decreasing-0.040.30-0.121.00????B???????EstimateSEzp-valueLate winter?Spring migration-0.310.10-3.210.007Late winter?Late summer0.160.082.050.17Late winter?Fall migration0.120.081.580.39Spring migration?Late summer0.480.104.98<0.001Spring migration?Fall migration0.440.067.26<0.001Late summer?Fall migration-0.040.08-0.520.95Table A14: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which combination of factors such as sex, herd size, and season (A) best describe the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of hydatid cysts (Echinococcus canadensis Batsch, 1786) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) and to make comparisons among herds (B). Only the best model is presented.A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-3.561.54-2.320.02Males0.420.411.030.30Yearlings0.791.220.650.52Adults1.490.662.250.02High and increasing-0.100.83-0.120.91Peak-0.460.90-0.510.61High and decreasing-0.640.86-0.750.45Low and decreasing0.360.820.440.66Late winter-1.941.15-1.690.09Spring migration0.021.130.020.99Late summer-1.001.16-0.870.38Fall migration-0.371.12-0.330.74????B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-3.350.46-7.37<0.001Beverly/Ahiak-1.211.10-1.100.27Bluenose West2.170.732.980.003Rivière-aux-Feuilles0.500.540.920.36Rivière-George0.640.491.310.19Teshekpuk1.560.891.760.08Western Arctic0.411.120.360.72Table A15: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values of pairwise comparisons of the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of hydatid cysts (Echinococcus canadensis Batsch, 1786) caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) among age classes (A) and among herds (B).A???????EstimateSEzp-valueCalves?Yearlings-0.791.22-0.650.79Calves?Adults-1.490.66-2.250.06Yearlings?Adults-0.701.05-0.670.78????B???????EstimateSEzp-valueBathurst?Beverly/Ahiak1.211.101.100.93Bathurst?Bluenose West-2.170.73-2.980.046Bathurst?Rivière-aux-Feuilles-0.500.54-0.920.97Bathurst?Rivière-George-0.640.49-1.310.85Bathurst?Teshekpuk-1.560.89-1.760.58Bathurst?Western Arctic-0.411.12-0.361.00Beverly/Ahiak?Bluenose West-3.391.16-2.930.05Beverly/Ahiak?Rivière-aux-Feuilles-1.711.05-1.630.66Beverly/Ahiak?Rivière-George-1.851.02-1.810.54Beverly/Ahiak?Teshekpuk-2.771.26-2.200.30Beverly/Ahiak?Western Arctic-1.621.44-1.130.92Bluenose West?Rivière-aux-Feuilles1.670.642.600.13Bluenose West?Rivière-George1.530.602.560.14Bluenose West?Teshekpuk0.610.950.641.00Bluenose West?Western Arctic1.771.171.500.74Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Rivière-George-0.140.35-0.401.00Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Teshekpuk-1.060.82-1.290.85Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Western Arctic0.091.070.091.00Rivière-George?Teshekpuk-0.920.78-1.170.90Rivière-George?Western Arctic0.231.040.221.00Teshekpuk?Western Arctic1.151.280.900.97Table A16: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which combination of factors such as sex, herd size, and season (A) best describe the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of lungworms (Dictyocaulus eckerti Skrjabin, 1931) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) and to make comparisons among herds during the late winter/early spring season (mid-February to April) (B). Only the best model is presented.A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-3.421.15-2.980.003Males1.300.761.700.09Yearlings-2.491.63-1.530.13Adults-1.920.99-1.930.05High and decreasing0.131.510.090.93Low and decreasing-3.271.71-1.910.06Late summer3.551.212.940.003Fall migration1.191.490.800.43????B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-3.781.01-3.74<0.001Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-0.131.43-0.090.93Table A17: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values of pairwise comparisons of the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of lungworms (Dictyocaulus eckerti Skrjabin, 1931) caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) among seasons.???EstimateSEzp-valueLate winter?Late summer-3.551.21-2.940.009Late winter?Fall migration-1.191.49-0.800.71Late summer?Fall migration2.361.901.240.43Table A18: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values for variables used in a generalized linear mixed model to assess which combination of factors such as sex, herd size, and season (A) best describe the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of muscle cysts (Taenia krabbei Moniez, 1879) in caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) and to make comparisons among herds (B). Only the best model is presented.A?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-0.721.39-0.520.61Males-0.060.35-0.170.87Yearlings-0.560.75-0.750.45Adults-0.150.43-0.360.72Peak-2.191.34-1.640.10High and decreasing-0.710.69-1.040.30Low and decreasing-1.170.71-1.660.10Late winter-1.911.33-1.440.15Spring migration-0.691.36-0.500.61Late summer-0.701.29-0.540.59Fall migration-1.591.33-1.200.23B?????EstimateSEzp-value(Intercept)-3.280.65-5.07<0.001Beverly/Ahiak-0.220.89-0.240.81Bluenose East0.0081.250.0071.00Bluenose West1.540.971.580.12Cape Bathurst1.001.540.650.52Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut0.521.000.520.60Rivière-aux-Feuilles-0.220.65-0.340.73Rivière-George0.070.610.120.91Southampton Island0.040.770.060.96Teshekpuk1.161.240.930.35Western Arctic3.230.804.04<0.001Table A19: Parameter estimates, standard errors (SE), z-values, and p-values of pairwise comparisons of the prevalence ? the percentage of infected individuals in the host population ? of muscle cysts (Taenia krabbei Moniez, 1879) caribou (Rangifer tarandus L., 1758) among herds.???EstimateSEzp-valueBathurst?Beverly/Ahiak0.220.890.241.00Bathurst?Bluenose East-0.0081.25-0.0071.00Bathurst?Bluenose West-1.540.97-1.580.89Bathurst?Cape Bathurst-1.001.54-0.641.00Bathurst?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-0.521.00-0.521.00Bathurst?Rivière-aux-Feuilles0.220.650.341.00Bathurst?Rivière-George-0.070.61-0.111.00Bathurst?Southampton Island-0.040.77-0.051.00Bathurst?Teshekpuk-1.161.24-0.931.00Bathurst?Western Arctic-3.230.80-4.040.003Beverly/Ahiak?Bluenose East-0.231.29-0.171.00Beverly/Ahiak?Bluenose West-1.751.11-1.580.89Beverly/Ahiak?Cape Bathurst-1.211.47-0.821.00Beverly/Ahiak?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-0.731.07-0.691.00Beverly/Ahiak?Rivière-aux-Feuilles0.0070.850.0091.00Beverly/Ahiak?Rivière-George-0.290.79-0.361.00Beverly/Ahiak?Southampton Island-0.261.03-0.251.00Beverly/Ahiak?Teshekpuk-1.371.31-1.051.00Beverly/Ahiak?Western Arctic-3.450.86-4.020.003Bluenose East?Bluenose West-1.531.42-1.081.00Bluenose East?Cape Bathurst-0.991.78-0.561.00Bluenose East?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut-0.511.42-0.361.00Bluenose East?Rivière-aux-Feuilles0.231.210.191.00Bluenose East?Rivière-George-0.061.16-0.051.00Bluenose East?Southampton Island-0.031.34-0.021.00Bluenose East?Teshekpuk-1.151.60-0.721.00Bluenose East?Western Arctic-3.231.27-2.530.29Bluenose West?Cape Bathurst0.541.680.321.00Bluenose West?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut1.021.240.821.00Bluenose West?Rivière-aux-Feuilles1.760.951.850.75Bluenose West?Rivière-George1.470.911.600.88Bluenose West?Southampton Island1.491.121.330.96Bluenose West?Teshekpuk0.381.450.261.00Bluenose West?Western Arctic-1.700.94-1.800.78Cape Bathurst?Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut0.481.670.291.00Cape Bathurst?Rivière-aux-Feuilles1.221.520.801.00Cape Bathurst?Rivière-George0.931.480.631.00Cape Bathurst?Southampton Island0.951.620.591.00Cape Bathurst?Teshekpuk-0.161.83-0.091.00Cape Bathurst?Western Arctic-2.241.55-1.440.94Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut?Rivière-aux-Feuilles0.740.960.771.00Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut?Rivière-George0.450.920.491.00Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut?Southampton Island0.481.130.421.00Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut?Teshekpuk-0.641.27-0.501.00Kangerlussuaq-Sisimiut?Western Arctic-2.721.08-2.510.30Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Rivière-George-0.290.52-0.571.00Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Southampton Island-0.27 0.80-0.331.00Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Teshekpuk-1.381.21-1.140.99Rivière-aux-Feuilles?Western Arctic-3.460.77-4.51<0.001Rivière-George?Southampton Island0.030.770.041.00Rivière-George?Teshekpuk-1.091.19-0.921.00Rivière-George?Western Arctic-3.160.71-4.45<0.001Southampton Island?Teshekpuk-1.111.36-0.821.00Southampton Island?Western Arctic-3.190.97-3.290.04Teshekpuk?Western Arctic-2.081.32-1.580.89 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download