FACING UP TO POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION IN THE …



THE AFRICAN DIASPORA AND HOMELAND POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA

Prof. John O. Oucho

Marie Curie Chair

Centre for Research in Ethnic Relations

School of Health and Social Studies

University of Warwick

Coventry, CV4 7AL

United Kingdom

J.O.Oucho@warwick.ac.uk

Paper for Theme 4: Transnational Organisations in Post-conflict Reconstruction

CONFERENCE ON AFRICAN TRANSNATIONAL AND RETURN MIGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF NORTH-SOUTH RELATIONS

University of Warwick, United Kingdom

29-30 June 2009

INTRODUCTION

Any analysis of post-conflict reconstruction (PCR) must of necessity recognise how conflict erupted and what it left in its wake. In sub-Saharan Africa, this position can best be captured in the Van Gennip’s (2005: 57) statement that:

Triggering sustainable development in the wake of war itself obviously poses a daunting range of intellectual, political, economic, social and cultural challenges. Violent conflict inflicts appalling visible and invisible damage on developing societies. Vital economic infrastructure is ruined, state institutions often collapse, mistrust of the state soars, schooling is disrupted, refugees flood into cities, fear replaces confidence, skilled workers flee and war profiteers with a vested interest in conflict lurk in the shadows prepared to resurrect the very tensions that allowed them to flourish economically and politically at the expense of the society as a whole.

As the dust settles on the conflict scene in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), there is a surge in post-conflict reconstruction (PCR) which has involved the African diaspora in different countries. Nkurunziza (2008: 1) aptly observes that:

The African continent’s image as a war-prone region with bleak economic prospect is changing…as most of the conflicts that raged in the 1980s and 1990s have (sic) ended. For the first time in 50 years, there are currently more cases of post-conflict than conflict countries

(fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Knowledge/30754226-EN-2.4.3-NKURUNZIZA-TUNIS.PDF).

Much as post-conflict reconstruction has involved individuals remitting funds mainly to sustain household economies, it has also engaged the attention of groups or organisations targeting homeland communities and investment opportunities as well. Analysts of the diaspora’s participation in homeland development have concentrated on issues that seldom recognise the nature and scope, causes and consequences of the involvement of the African diaspora in post-conflict reconstruction as SSA consigns its violent past to the dustbin of a chequered post-colonial history. This positive development deserves analysis as African transnational and return migration gain prominence at a time that the (developed) “fortress” North and the major African countries of destination have intensified immigration-control measures. Moreover, victims of the violent past seem to embrace both transnationalism and return as “sweet home” becomes even more reassuring as the place to be after their sojourns.

It has become fashionable in recent times to hold conferences on the roles of African diaspora and transnational migration in homeland development including post-conflict reconstruction. For instance, on 7-8 November 2008, the University of Calgary, Canada held the Transnational Citizenship and the African Conference, consisting of five main sessions and a round table on fostering global citizenship in the context of transnationalism. The five sessions were: the new age of transantionalism from the perspective of long-distance nationalism, civil society and development; democracy, transnationalism and political belonging; transnationalism in Canada and Europe in terms of citizenship, multi-culturalism and social movements; African formations, identities and mobilisation encompassing cultural production, gender-class dynamics and rethinking “home”; and mobilisation of the for socio-economic development, capacity building at “home” and post-conflict reconstruction (University of Calgary, 2008). At the behest of the Rockefeller Foundation, a conference was held in Mexico in February 2007, culminating in the publication of Castles and Wise’s (2008) edited book, Migration and Development: Perspectives from the South. The present conference addresses African translational and return migration not only from a North-South perspective, but also with comparative insights from Latin America.

This paper seeks to analyse the participation of the African diaspora in homeland post-conflict reconstruction (HPCR). It begins by considering inter-linkages of diaspora, transnationalism and post-conflict reconstruction, among other things defining these terms. Thereafter, the paper analyses the role of the diaspora in post-conflict reconstruction of selected SSA countries which underwent various types of conflict. The fourth section of the paper examines some of the challenges facing, and opportunities for, the diapsora in their contribution to post-conflict reconstruction. Finally, the paper concludes by considering the way forward for better engagement of the diaspora in post-conflict reconstruction in various spheres of development, including improvements considered necessary in political economic, social and cultural spheres to enable SSA benefit from the virtues of globalisation.

DIASPORA-TRANSNATIONALISM-PCR INTER-LINKAGES

Contemporary literature on migration and development often dwells on the diaspora- conflict or diaspora-PCR so much that the two concepts are presumed to be clear when in fact they are sometimes misinterpreted. Therefore, it is important from the outset to define the concepts “diaspora”, “transnationalism”, “conflict” and “post-conflict reconstruction” that now occupy a central place in the burgeoning literature and that are used numerous times in this paper.

Origins, Definitions and Characterisation of the African Diaspora

Alpers (2001:5, quoted in Blakewell, 2008: 5-6) reports that the term “African diaspora” was first used in 1965 at the International Congress of African History held at the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania when George Shepperson drew two important parallels of the dispersal of Africans caused by slavery and imperialism to the experience of the Jews. Shepperson underlined the movement of slaves to Europe before the Atlantic and Islamic slave trade and the dispersal of Africans inside their continent as a result of slave trade and imperialism respectively.

Definitions and characterisation of diaspora vary by disciplines and by the diaspora’s expectations on the one hand, and the identified homeland on the other. A world-renowned diaspora scholar provides a taxonomy of consisting of nine features: (i) dispersed (often traumatic) from the homeland; (ii) self-exiles in search of work, trade or colonial ambitions; (iii) a collective memory and myth concerning the homeland; (iv) an idealisation of the homeland; (v) a return movement; (vi) a strong ethnic group consciousness sustained over a period of time; (vii) an uneasy relationship with the “host” society; (viii) a sense of solidarity with co-members of the in other states; and (ix) the possibility of a positive experience in the host country (Cohen, 1997: 180). Safran (1991, cited in the North-South Centre of the Council of Europe, 2006: 9) identifies four main characteristics of a diaspora as dispersal to two or more locations related to an original territory; collective mythology of homeland shared by the group and transmitted through generations to come; idealisation of return to the homeland; and ongoing relationship with the homeland. These characteristics relate to different significant diasporas that have dominated the diaspora discourse, such as the Jewish, Irish, Chinese and Indian.[1] Ionescu (2006) provides the most detailed analysis of diasporas as development partners for both countries of origin and countries of destination; the term “diaspora” conveys a collective dimension: as a community, a group or even as an organised network and association sharing common interests (see Table1). Conceding that there is no single accepted definition of the term “diaspora”, Ionescu (2006: 13) broadly defines it as “members of ethnic and national communities, who have left, but maintain links with, their homelands.”

Table 1 Typology of diaspora initiatives with SSA examples

|Type of initiative |SSA examples |

|Business networks |Nigerian, Ghanaian and Senegalese entrepreneurs |

|Chambers of Commerce |Sierra Leonean Diasporas Council with representatives in countries of destination |

|Professional networks | Ethiopian North American Health Professionals Association (ENAHPA), Ethiopians’ Action |

| |for Health, Education and Development (AHEAD), Ethiopians’ Association for Higher |

| |Education and Development (AHEAD), Ghanaian Doctors and Dentists Association (GDDA) in the|

| |UK, Association of Nigerian Physicians in Americas, South African Network of Skills Abroad|

| |(SANSA) |

|Scientific networks |African Scientific and Academic Network (ASAN), African Women Scientific Academic Network |

| |(ASN)1, Ethiopian Knowledge and Technology Transfer Society (EKKTS) |

|Skills Capacity |Directory of African Development Management Professionals, African Foundation for |

| |Development (AFFORD), African Axis (AFAX) |

|Community Initiatives |Many African Hometown (including ethnic) Associations in diaspora by nationals of |

| |different SSA countries |

|Migration and development |Association Migrations Solidarités & Exchanges pour le Développement (AMSED) in France |

|associations | |

|Gender and development |Many SSA women-only diaspora associations in the UK and France |

|Umbrella organisations |Many national and ethnic associations of African diaspora |

|Diaspora networking |Zimbabwean diaspora’s online discussion groups and newspapers, Ghanaians Abroad |

|Co-development initiatives |Developed between France on the one hand and Senegalese, Malian and Comorian diasporas on |

| |the other, Dutch-African diaspora organisations, AfroNeth Foundation (platform for African|

| |diaspora organisations |

|Finances |Somalis Xawilaad, microfinance institutions |

Notes: 1Rejects the term “brain drain” and adopts “brain mismanagement” and rejects “African diaspora”, stating that Africa is where Africans are

Source: Drawn from Dina Ionescu (2006), box 4, pp. 27-30.

Different countries have adopted different interpretations of diasporas.[2] Key issues defining modern diasporas now hinge on time (short-term versus long-time migrants), place of birth, which defines successive generations of diaspora, citizenship which could be at origin or destinations or dual, and identity and belonging (pp.13-14).

With advances in the cyberspace, virtual diasporas are becoming increasingly important in, in lieu of physical return for, homeland development. While some virtual diasporas contribute positively to PCR, others have become networks that facilitate transnational terrorist and criminal activity, financing wars in home countries and cultivating divisive as well as fragmenting nationalism through online communication (Nautilus Institute Information Tools). Laguerre (.n.d.) states that>

By virtual diaspora, we mean the use of cyberspace by immigrants or descendants of an immigrant group for the purpose of participating or engaging in online interactional transactions… with members of the diasporic group living in the same foreign country or in other countries, with individuals or entities in the homeland, or with non-members of the group in the hostland and elsewhere. No virtual diaspora can be sustained without real life diasporas and in this sense it is not a separate entity, but rather a pole of a continuum.

The African diaspora has been defined through different epochs underlining varying standpoints. It is not only often misunderstood, but is also too complex to interpret without exploring its nature, dimensions and changing configuration. Indeed, the notion that the African diaspora is homogeneous is both simplistic and unrealistic given both temporal and spatial dimensions of African emigration to the rest of the world. To the Old World of Asia went a large slave traffic which analysts have been unable to account for successfully, and to the New World was a much larger traffic of slaves who settled Latin America and the Caribbean, currently the largest African diaspora but with more remote links to Africa than their counterparts in the United States. Then a new wave of the African diaspora came with independence. As Africa looked to the developed North for educational opportunities for its citizens to attain higher qualifications and skilled training necessary for the continent’s development in the wake of colonialism, huge numbers of Africans remained overseas, some of them becoming yet another category of diaspora. Still another category consists of those who relocated overseas as workers, refugees and asylum seekers or winners of the US “green card” and similar opportunities. The first-generation immigrants’ children and grandchildren augmented the numbers as younger generations of Africans who had migrated overseas for higher education, work and security from repressive African regimes that have left in their wake untold political and economic crises.

African migrants are part of the diaspora who may be temporary in the countries of destination, may join the existing diaspora to stay permanently or may be transnational whenever they engage in circular migration. Ideally, they satisfy India’s definition of its diaspora as comprising Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) who hold Indian passports and reside abroad indefinitely and People of Indian Origin (PIOs) who consist of foreign citizens of Indian origin or descent, implying that “diasporas” can be a broader concept than “migrants” (Ionescu, 2006: 14-5). The African Union (AU) provides a broad definition:

The African diaspora consists of peoples of African origin living outside the continent, irrespective of their citizenship and nationality, and who are willing to contribute to the development of the continent and the building of the African Union.

Whether the African diaspora would be willing to participate in homeland development is open to question as it depends on the homeland situation and circumstances which compelled particular members of the diaspora community to leave it. Moreover, African countries’ nationals of European and Asian stock might not be as committed to the African homeland as their counterparts of African stock, and might be more amenable to becoming citizens of the countries of destination thereby curtailing their African roots.

In this paper, the term diaspora is used generically to denote people of African descent residing outside Africa or in countries other than their own within Africa as citizens and permanent or temporary residents engaging in circulation as well as transnational lifestyles. Different categories of the diaspora play roles by committing their skills and knowledge to homeland development and by sending remittances which stimulate development and influence poverty reduction. Drawing from the available evidence, the paper analyses the diaspora involved in post-conflict reconstruction of SSA countries where conflict had been occasioned by various circumstances, among them a spate of military coups which triggered strife, genocide and civil war, generating refugees who, still hopeful of return, became committed to homeland development; Mohan (2002, quoted in Mercer et al. (2008: 53-4) provides a threefold classification of diasporas’ involvement in as many brands of development: in the diaspora, denoting the benefits accruing to the country of destination locality due to the presence of international migrants; through the diaspora as a result of additional benefits experienced in the country of destination as a consequence of the ongoing transnational connections among groups; and by the diaspora bringing benefits to their countries of origin. Without the first two categories, it is inconceivable that the diaspora would participate in meaningful post-conflict reconstruction.

Transnationalism

The study of transnationalism, like that of diaspora, is not confined to anyone discipline as anthropologists, sociologists, political scientists, geographers and other scholars of world development/international relations analyse it from their respective disciplinary perspectives. Guarnizo and Smith (1998: 3) identify four main contemporary transnational flows, namely the globalisation of capitalism with its destabilising effects on developing countries; technological revolution in terms of transportation and communication; global political transformations, in particular decolonisation and universal human rights; and the expansion of social networks that enhance transnational migration, economic organisation and politics. The key developmental issues underpinned here include, globalisation, political evaluation, technological advances facilitating physical as well as virtual movement and international migration. The authors consider the nation-state under siege, that is, weakened “from above” by transnational capital, global media and emergent supra-national political institutions, and “from below” as it faces decentralising “local” resistance of the informal economy, ethnic nationalism and grassroots activism; thus “from above” these developments bring market rationality and liberalism and “from below” they create new liberatory practices and spaces, such as transnational migration and its attendant cultural hybridity (Guarnizo and Smith, 1998: 3). In Faist’s (2000: 12-3) three-generations typology, transnationalism corresponds to the third generation of migration theories which recognise migration practices connecting both countries of origin and of destination, considering migration not as singular journeys but an integral part of migrants’ lives blurring the distinction between origins and destinations. Thus the burgeoning transnational literature shifts migration away from linear models “to circular, fluctuating and dynamic ties built by movements across borders making conceptualisations of multiple ‘heres’ and ‘theres’ possible as opposed to origin and destination” (Sirkeci, 2009:4). In that schema, transnational migration renders irrelevant the origin-destination dichotomy.

Transition from Conflict to Post-conflict Reconstruction

The term “conflict” is itself complex and is defined differently in scholarship, particularly in sociological and political science literature. The Oxford Encyclopaedic Dictionary (p. 306) defines conflict as “a state of opposition or hostilities… a fight or struggle [or] …the clashing of opposed principles”. Its variants include hostility, insecurity, antagonism and competition or willingness to exert influence and inflict harm or damage; the fluidity of the concept explains why its origins are manifold, its causes varied and efforts to manage, resolve and find enduring solutions for it elusive (Oucho, 2002: 10).

In the trail of conflict are complex problems which the post-conflict government tries to resolve in cooperation with development partners and other well-wishers, and in which diasporas tend to be heavily involved. Post-conflict reconstruction is therefore a rebirth for some SSA nation-states, a new beginning for others and a completely new, unfamiliar moment for nation-states that, since independence, have never enjoyed peace. PCR bears features of peace, justice and reconciliation where their opposite numbers had reigned, and is a process which unfolds at different paces in equally different settings. A country’s nationals involved in PCR include those in the homeland vis-à-vis the diaspora, former perpetrators of violence and their victims, ex-combatants turned peace-setters and those who, though never part of the foregoing, feel obliged to change fortunes in their homeland. Their involvement encompasses compassion, patriotism and in some cases commercial interests to reap the most from an evolving situation of normalcy. Essentially, the post-conflict stage tries to realise three difficult tasks, or three “res”, namely reconstruction, reintegration and reconciliation (Sørensen, 1998), themselves important components of what could be a protracted process.

In SSA, conflict took different forms. First, in the vast majority of countries, coup d'état took place, leaving in its wake counter-overthrows of government, civil war, ethnic or even clan-based conflict. The exceptions are Senegal in Western African, Cameroun in Central Africa, Tanzania and Kenya (though a brief take-over occurred in August 1982) in Eastern Africa and Malawi, Zambia, Botswana, Namibia and South Africa in Southern Africa. Second, ethnic tensions sparked ethnic wars in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Burundi and Rwanda. Indeed, ethnicity has been a consistent trigger of conflict in virtually all SSA countries, causing internally displaced persons (IDPs) as well as refugees (Oucho, 1997). There seems to be a five-fold typology of post-conflict SSA countries: (a) post-genocide/indiscriminate murder countries comprising Burundi and Rwanda, as well as the two killing-fields of Liberia and Sierra Leone; (b) post-civil war Mozambique and Angola, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Uganda and Sudan; (c) post-military rule countries of Ghana, Nigeria, Mali, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Guinea and Guinea Bissau; (d) post-apartheid South Africa and Namibia; and (e) the two failed states of Somalia and Zimbabwe.

Inter-linkages

Smith and Stares’ (2007) book, Diasporas in Conflict: Peace-Makers of Peace-Wreckers? sheds light on different regions, in respect of SSA examining Eritrean diaspora (Koser, 2007). Smith (2007: 5) posits that as different parts of the same diaspora can and do have different interests defined by class, gender, generation, occupation or religion, they are rarely constituted by a single factor other than the broadest connections to specific homeland. Reviewing the book, a fervent scholar of diaspora makes three propositions: (i) shifts in the global opportunity structure will either accommodate diasporic interventions or inhibit them, (ii) the contours of diasporic politics will vary according to whether the diaspora is stateless or state-linked and (iii) leaders of diasporas may be imbedded in dominant state structures or may seek to remain free of state influence (Cohen, 2008). This categorisation suggests that the involvement of diasporas in post-conflict reconstruction varies considerably and eludes generalisation. Conceptualisation and research on transnationalism at the University of Oxford, courtesy of the ESRC funding, sought to explore three types of in new approaches to migration, namely “comparative diasporas” (Armenians, Hungarians, Soviet Jews and Aussiedler or returned ethnic Germans in Germany); “transversal migration”, personified by the expansion of transnational Chinese migration circuits; and “refugees and asylum-seekers”, represented by the role of exiles in Eritrean and Bosnian post-conflict reconstruction (Vertovec, 1999). The study clearly left out “brain drain” and “brain circulation” which have become extremely significant components of the new African diaspora.

In the Oxford study, Vertovec (1999) considers five strands of transnationalism as: (i) “social morphology”, conceived by sociologists and anthropologists a social formation spanning borders, involving networks and social organisations; (ii) “type of consciousness”, especially within cultural studies, with s in the age of cyberspace held together or recreated through the mind, cultural artefacts and shared imagination; (iii) “mode of cultural reproduction” often described in terms such as syncretism, creolisation, bricolage, cultural translation and hybridity – expressed among other things through fashion, music, film and visual arts; (iv) “avenue of capital” which many economists and geographers view in the form of transnational corporations (TNCs) or globe-spanning structures or networks; and (v) “site of political engagement” actualised largely through publishing and communications technologies and international non-governmental organisations (INGOs) – International Red Cross and Red Crescent (IRCRC) and United Nations agencies. Integration of diasporas in home-country development strategies can limit the costs of emigration and mitigate brain drain; improve the skills of emigrants abroad, which would be utilised on return; have a beneficial trickle-down effect for home countries; incorporate diaspora inputs in endogenous growth projects, to add value to the national economy; and include diasporas in existing development strategies (Ionescu, 2006: 21-4).

THE AFRICAN DIASPORA AND POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION

Given the diversity, orientation and challenges facing, as well as opportunities for, the African diaspora in post-conflict reconstruction, it is prudent to provide but samples of such engagement. In a briefing document, Mohamoud (2006: 4) identifies four critical areas through which the interact with homeland dynamics of policy interest, namely remittance and conflict in the homeland, political involvement in the homeland, civic-oriented involvement in the homeland and lobbying in the host country. Flores and Nooruddin (2006, quoting Collier et al., 2003) contend that governments have a triple challenge in post-conflict-reconstruction: reconstruction of physical capital destroyed during the conflict, diverting the citizens’ efforts away from unproductive activities brought about by conflict toward productive one that would reinvigorate human capital growth and reasserting citizens’ property rights; Korf, 2005). In doing all these, governments in SSA expect the diaspora to make their due contributions to their motherland. The diaspora no doubt constitute “social capital”, features of which include “social organisation such as networks, norms, and trust, that facilitate coordination and cooperation of mutual benefit” (Putnam, 1993: 36), or “some aspect of social structure that enables the achievement of certain ends that would not be attainable in its absence” (Coleman, 1990), including the socio-political environment.

Interested Parties

Organisations

Diaspora organisations have mushroomed over the last decade or so, serving the interests of members both in the countries of destination and their homelands. The website on African diaspora in Europe holds vital information on 38 African organisations.[3] They range from pan-African to national, student to borough-centred organisations or associations with commitments to activities in countries of destination vis-à-vis countries of origin. In the United Kingdom, for instance, the African Foundation for Development (AFFORD) has identified wide-ranging developmental organisations that are engaged in a variety of activities: hometown associations, ethnic associations, alumni associations, religious associations, professional associations, development NGOs, investment groups, political groups, national development groups, welfare/refugee groups, supplementary schools, and virtual organisations. Their activities include community-to-community transfers, identity building/awareness raising, lobbying in current home on issues relating to ancestral home, trade with and investment in ancestral home, transfers of intangible resources, support for development on a more ‘professional’ basis, payment of taxes in ancestral home (AFFORD, 2000, quoted in Mohan and Zack-Williams, 2002). These organisations lend credence to the importance of diasporic connections in countries identified with as homelands. They are run by a variety of diaspora groups with divergent orientations, interests and aspirations for homeland development.

Through organisations it is possible to entrench the role of African virtual diaspora in PCR provided the IT environment improves in SSA. In some IT well-served SSA countries, virtual diasporas hold much promise and should be integrated in homeland development as is already happening sporadically in the entertainment industry, services and business enterprises Zachary, n.d.).

Gender and Women

The place of gender, and particularly of women, is becoming increasingly important in post-conflict reconstruction. It has been recognised that, during conflict, women who fight, kill and lead both peace and development programmes do so because they are exceptional in leadership roles (Rehn and Shirleaf, 2002, quoted in Handrahan, 2004: 432). Greenberg and Zuckerman (2009: 6-4) argue that attention to gender relations recognises the role of conflict on socially-determined roles, responsibilities and access to power and resources, and that women may be proxies for understanding people who are poor, cynical, disenfranchised, vulnerable and at grassroots level. In Rwanda, some PCR programmes have included laudable women-focused approaches, with a women’s NGO umbrella organisation, the Pro-Femmes Twese-Hamwe training its members in leadership (p.6). In Eritrea, women have poor access to credit because, as ex-combatants living much of their lives in the bush, they had never handled money (Greenberg and Zuckerman, 2009: 6-13) and those who had access tended to develop micro-enterprises in urban areas rather than taking government or village allotted land (Kibreab, 2003, quoted in op.cit); the ex-combatant women who played a substantial role in the war were later granted the ACORD “Barefoot Bankers” credit programme (de Watteville, 2002, quoted in Greenberg and Zuckerman, 2009: 6-15). In Angola, PCR programmes would have achieved more equitable and sustainable results if they had targeted women who followed soldiers to perform non-military services as carriers, cooks, forced sexual partners and combatants (Greenberg et al., 1997, quoted in Greenberg and Zuckerman, 2009: 6-16). Although post-conflict reconstruction witnessed women’s increasing contribution, it engendered inequality among women and still rendered women subordinate to men.

However, Schoeman and Naude (2007: 2) caution about the tendency to view women as homogeneous, citing the case of post-conflict Rwanda where women are categorised as “old caseload returnees” (Tutsi exiles from the 1959 conflict), “new caseload returnees” (Hutu refugees who fled during and after the 1994 genocide) and “rescapes” (Tutsi survivors of the genocide). These categories of women certainly respond differently to Rwanda’s PCR which has involved an increasing share of women in all spheres of development.

Selected National Diasporas in Western Africa

This sub-region has witnessed some of the most protracted conflict situations which impelled population in different countries. The cases of Ghana (with the most difficult period in 1979-1992), Liberia and Sierra Leone illustrate the nature and extent of PCR by their respective diasporas.

Ghanaian Diaspora

With the overthrow of the founding President Kwame Nkrumah in 1965, Ghana entered the most depressing scenarios in its post-colonial history until the multi-party elections in 1992. The country’s huge diaspora runs through successive generations and resides in different world regions. Its diaspora operates through Ghanaian Pentecostal churches and ethnic associations (Akyeampong, 2000:208, quoted in Higazi, 2005: 13). Since the 1980s, the Ghanaian diaspora is known for its spatial spread in different parts of the world, residing in large numbers in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Hong Kong and Taiwan; by the mid-1990s, there were 20,000 Ghanaians in Toronto alone, 14,000 in Italy and 15,000 in the Netherlands (Van Dijk, quoted in Akyeampong, 2000: 208). The Ghanaian Pentecostal church has succeeded in establishing international branches (Van Dijk, quoted in Akyeampong, 2000: 208-9) and those in the Netherlands assist illegal Ghanaians to secure legal status; the church, appropriately substituting for kinship and family networks (p. 209). With dual citizenship now in full force in Ghana, the new Ghanaian Dutch definitely participate in their homeland’s PCR.

The Asante associations in the United States which sustain the traditional Asante political system of installing chiefs, kings and queen mothers, function as cultural and benevolent associations (Akyeampong, 2000: 210). From the United Kingdom, Ghanaian ethnic associations make contributions to their ancestral homes for projects through financial and material support (Higazi, 2005: 14). Henry and Mohan (2003: 611) found that bonds, obligations and reciprocity constitute the “ties that bind” for the Ghanaian diaspora in Milton Keynes in the United Kingdom that engages in developing homes. Both the Association of Ghanaians in Milton Keynes (AGMK) and the Ghanaian Union (GU) organise activities for their members. These associations were politically active, closely linked to opposition forces to help redress their past political persecution which had caused their flight from Ghana. As if that were all, the spirited engagement of the Ghanaian diaspora with the Ghana government has earned them dual citizenship and voting rights from their countries of residence. Ghanaians abroad, working closely with their diplomatic missions, have had several home-based activities aimed at stimulating the country’s development. In 2001, the “Homecoming Summit for Ghanaians Living Abroad” broke new ground for organised visits by the diaspora to their homeland for a variety of activities including exploring development opportunities.

Nigerian Diaspora

Nigeria has perhaps the biggest diaspora worldwide given that it is Africa’s most populous country with well-educated nationals and a history of successive military regimes which triggered large-scale voluntary emigration. Nigeria’s many diaspora organisations have made efforts to conduct skill audits in Europe, the Americas and other African countries with large concentrations of Nigerians; hold an annual summit of the Nigerian diaspora in the Federal capital of Abuja to transfer expertise in technology, in agro-business, IT and so on; and a group of Nigerian doctors in the United States has been setting up state-of-the-art hospitals in selected locations in the country (Adepoju, 2008: 34). Although Nigeria’s economy was not seriously destroyed by successive military regimes before the country re-embarked on the path of multi-party democracy in the late 1990s, its diaspora has utilised its inventiveness to transplant into the country all that development signifies in the developed North. Not even Nigerian beneficiaries of the US green card ever abandoned their country before it adopted a dual citizenship policy. Perhaps this is why Nigeria’s Dual Citizenship Act ensures that the birthright citizenship of either a Nigerian or non-Nigerian is not lost on the acquisition of a foreign or Nigerian citizenship.[4] Long before such developments, Nigerians in diaspora were some of the few SSA diasporas, since the colonial period, to initiate the formation of Home Improvement Unions The Latin American equivalent of “Home Town Association), which both served it in the countries of destination and carried out homeland development projects.[5]

Historically and in recent times, the Nigerian diaspora has been an integral part of the political process in their homeland. This goes back to the prominent nationalist leaders such as the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe (known in his days as “Zik of Africa) who led the country’s decolonisation struggle. In contemporary times, Nigerian politics has been influenced by the diaspora voices with powerful intellectual and financial might. Whether without, during and after conflict, the Nigerian diaspora has been in the forefront of events in its homeland.

Liberian Diaspora

After the volcano of ethnic hatred between Creoles and natives in Liberia exploded at the turn of the 1990s, the country underwent one of the most vicious ethnic killings and maiming in sub-Saharan Africa.[6] Among the features of Liberia’s “New Deal” are cultivation of democracy, the rule of law, accountability by elected and appointed leaders and decentralisation from political and economic standpoints (Sirleaf, 2004). The Liberian diaspora’s effective political involvement in the post-Charles Taylor rehabilitation and democratisation led to a contest of the presidency by two strongest candidates (an exiled intellectual versus an overseas-based world-famous footballer), with the country electing Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf as Africa’s first female president.

Sierra Leonean

Next door is Sierra Leone which witnessed the most outrageous act inhuman treatment of innocent citizens, including the perpetrators of violence maiming of able-bodied people by chopping off either their hands or legs. Like its neighbour, Liberia, the Creoles – descendants of retuned slaves – considered themselves superior to native Sierra Leoneans; a feud between the two groups had spanned successive generations and, with Liberia on fire, it was the turn of Sierra Leone to feel the pressure of the native majority.

The decade-long civil war in Sierra Leone left an indelible mark of devastation of a mineral-rich country that once was one of Western Africa’s most vibrant economies, causing emigration followed by sustainable post-conflict return (Maconachie et al., 2006). The Kono Development Union (KDU) in the United Kingdom has been collaborating with the Kono District Development Association (KDDA) to promote the twining and partnership of London’s Southwark Borough; so have been several “old boy” associations in the UK that are committed to help their former schools (Kent, 2005: 5-6), an undertaking which the “face book” on the Internet has enhanced. Other Sierra Leonean diaspora organisations include the African Community Empowerment, “The Young Shall Grow”, Women Empowerment and International Networking (WEIN) and the International Association of Sierra Leoneans Abroad (INASLA) with membership beyond the United Kingdom (Kent, 2005: 6).

Emulating South Africa post-apartheid healing, Sierra Leone established the Justice, Peace and Reconciliation Commission (Rodella, 2003) which concluded that bad governance, endemic corruption and denial of basic rights were the main triggers of conflict in the country (International Crisis Group, 2004: 8). That the country is back on the democratic path underscores the role of the diaspora in influencing homeland politics.

Diaspora in the conflict-devastated Great Lakes Region

The Great Lakes region has remained the epicentre of conflict since the independence of respective countries therein: Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Burundi and Rwanda. DRC has been a theatre of civil war since independence and the carving out of Burundi and Rwanda out of the Belgian colonially administered Ruanda-Urundi landed the two countries in incessant civil warfare since 1959.

Burundian Diaspora

Burundi is one of the few SSA countries which grant dual citizenship to its nationals which has been in force since 2005. In Burundi, PCR has involved the Mutualité des Grands Lacs (MGL), founded by three members of the Burundian diaspora in December 2001 as a non-profit organisation on the one hand “to support and promote projects of young migrants, to sensitise people to the emigration process and to promote cultural activities”, and on the other to resolve problems of remitting money and making in-kind transfers back home (de Bruyn and Wets (2006: 43). A few years after its inception, MGL created a co-operative known as the Coopérative de la Burundaise (CODIBU) which, together with Mutualité d’Epargne et de Crédit (MUTEC), opened an account in a Belgian bank and in Burundaise de Financement (SBF) in Burundi to facilitate members’ remittances. With CODIBU Agence Plus established in 2004, members were able to send material to Burundi at a much lower cost. In the Netherlands, Burundians established another foundation, Réseau des Organisations Paysannes au Burundi (ROPABU) for a similar undertaking (p.44). On a visit to drum support among the Burundian in Europe, Banque de Crédit de Bujumbura helped create Mobilisation de l’Epargne auprés des Burundais de l’Etranger in 2005. The Communaute Burundaise de Belgique (Burundi Community in Belgium) funds small-scale projects in Burundi (p. 45). All these efforts bolster PCR in Burundi.

Rwanda: the classical PCR case in SSA

Rwanda provides a classical case of PCR viewed through a multi-dimensional looking-glass. The establishment of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) by Rwandan Tutsi refugees in Uganda, who re-entered the country to topple the Hutu government in Kigali which had instigated the Rwandan genocide (Otunnu, 1999; Salehyan et al., 2006), set the stage for PCR that came in the wake of the 1994 genocide. The Rwandan Diaspora Global Network (RDGN), though based in South Africa, is heavily involved in its country’s economic, social and cultural development issues (de Bruyn and Wets, 2005: 54), including the construction of houses (p.62). Indeed Rwanda goes on record as one of the SSA countries to create the Department for the Diaspora in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation in 2001 to mobilise the diaspora for the development of Rwanda, gather information about it, set up a database and provide information about the situation in the country. Subsequently, the Rwanda Diaspora Global Convention met in December 2001 and December 2005 both to determine how best the diaspora could be involved in their country’s socio-economic development and to identify how the government could support the actions of the diaspora (p. 60). Such an overture was a rarity then but was subsequently embraced by Ghana and many more SSA countries.

Rwanda is currently a shining example of how repatriated and returned refugees have succeeded in rebuilding a country that had never before witnessed peace and which had been thought to be on the path of a failed state. Rwandan testimonies are held in the country’s cultural sociology which has become a source of increased tourist attraction to the country.

Ugandan Diaspora: East Africa’s Oddity

Uganda, unlike its two neighbours, Kenya and Tanzania, is the only East African country to have undergone military rule (Idi Amin’s repressive regime of 1971-1979), followed by a brief return to civilian government, which civil war soon swept out before uneasy peace settled in since 1986. Rebels still occupy northern part of the country and some regions are not comfortably in government hands. With Amin expelling huge numbers of Asian nationals in 1972, Uganda has an Asian diaspora which the current country’s president since 1986 has been wooing, without much success, to return and invest in their country.

The country has benefited immensely from its diaspora within and outside of Africa. In December 2008, Uganda Investment Authority (UIA) and the business community in Uganda organised a Diaspora Investment Summit, “Back to My Roots - Uganda My Home 2”, to explore possibilities of its investing in the country (UNBPA, 2008). The Presidential Standards Task Force has been leading a crusade to have the skilled Ugandan diaspora return to the country for short periods, the government providing them with free round trip air tickets, board and lodge, free tour of the country and other fringe benefits. In the conflict-ridden northern Uganda, the local diaspora started Kacoke Madit (KM or Luo for a “big meeting") initiative as a means of raising awareness about the conflict and finding a viable means of bringing the conflict to an end (Poblicks, 2002). These are important contributions of the Ugandan diaspora to PCR.

The Horn of Africa

Ethiopian Diaspora: Commitment to education, skills and health

Ethiopian revolution, beginning with the overthrow of Emperor Haile Selassie in 1974 which ushered in a military regime with Ethiopian and Eritrean forces later defeating Mengitsu Haile Mariam in 1991, culminated both in the emergence of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the independence of Eritrea in 1993. Yet the two neighbours soon went to war to settle their old scores, with their diasporas both funding the inter-state war and contributing to PCR. Ethiopian diaspora is in virtually all regions of the world, the vast majority in the United States and Canada and huge numbers in different European countries.

The Forum International for Ethiopians Living in Diaspora (FIELD) is one of the most active organisations involved in their country’s PCR. In January 2005, FIELD held a conference to interrogate the “Potential Within: Is the Ethiopian a Response to the Nation’s Brain Drain?” Its final report FIELD (2005) vehemently states that the diaspora was an inevitable potential and explored how best it could be harnessed. Two Ethiopian organisations share the acronym AHEAD: one is the Association for Higher Education and Development (AHEAD), which contributes toward the improvement of education in Ethiopia by exploring, soliciting, acquiring and delivering educational materials to Ethiopian universities and colleges; the other is Action for Health, Education and Development (AHEAD), a UK-based charity initiating and supporting projects aimed at combating poverty and inequalities in health, education and development in Ethiopia, particularly in the Gujii Zone of the country. There are numerous Ethiopian diaspora organisations elsewhere with exceptionally strong commitment to homeland development. Later, in an appeal to the Ethiopian diaspora, Mathza (2005) underlined the motives of a group concerned with various aspects of development in the country, namely loss of wealth and power, obsession to rule, opposition to land and ethnic policies and vengeance as well as envy.[7]

Eritrean Diaspora: A source of government revenue

After independence from Ethiopia in 1993, Eritrea became a state with a development relying more heavily on its diaspora than in most SSA states. When its diaspora refused to return home after independence, Eritrea imposed on them a “healing tax”, particularly to meet the cost of Ethio-Eritrean war; the diaspora’s remittances also bolstered household economy (Van Hear, 2003). This “compulsory remittance scheme” became a source, on the one hand, of pride and, on the other, of disdain. Eritrea’s independence struggle coincided with the rise of the Internet which has facilitated networks among homeland and diaspora Eritreans, through the formation of national institutions and political culture, for instance Bernal (2006: 162).[8] Through the Selam Peace-building Network (SPN) in Toronto Canada, Tezare et al. (2006) analyse the role of the Eritrean diaspora in peace-building and development in a project called University for Peace (UPEACE). The work traces Eritreans from the time they arrived in Canada in the late 1970s to early 1980s and establishes their involvement at community level, in peace and peace-building, in understanding and resolving conflict (Tezare et al. (2006: 12-23).

Unlike most African diasporas, the Eritrean diaspora comprises mainly forced (as opposed to voluntary) migrants, a trait which fosters its unity over many issues and one generally supportive of Eritrean government (Koser, 2007: 251). Individual and community activities of Eritrean diaspora can be collapsed into four categories: economic in terms of remittances; political, with the diaspora taking part in the drafting of the country’s constitution and in the electoral process emanating from it; social, through, inter alia, the website DEHAI: the Eritrean Community Online Network; and cultural in terms of cultural festival involving the diaspora and their homeland compatriots, “cultural lessons” in the form of language training and Eritrean history and culture (Koser, 2007: 244-249). It would appear that Eritrean diaspora’s resolve to engage in post-conflict reconstruction is founded on the country’s three-decades (1961-1991) of independence struggle and its patriotism reflected in its generous funding of Eritrea in the Ethio-Eritrean war of 1998-2000.

Diaspora’s hand in Somalia: The case of a failed state

The Somalia case is unique because, while conflict still rages, the country has cultivated a culture of dependence on its diaspora’s remittances which sustain household and communal development, and meet the needs of different warring factions in Somalia as well. The country’s diaspora has attracted sustained research in the countries hosting Somali refugees within and outside of Africa. In Denmark, for instance, there have been at least 50 Somali associations, constituting more than one-third of African associations in the country. Somcan &UK Cooperative Associations is an umbrella organisation that promotes collective return to Somaliland (the vibrant but unrecognised part of the Somali Republic) and has purchased land and established electricity in the country (Kleist, 2009: 2-3), and provided health and education services back home (p. 5). Clearly, these are welcome developments in a failed state that survives outside the circuit of the international community.

The system of xawilaad has been perfected by the Somali diaspora to sustain livelihoods of homeland compatriots as well as Somali refugees in refugee camps (Horst, 2002).[9] Although the system facilitates remittances without money having to go through Money Transfer Organisations (MTOs), the remittances cause tensions and growing inequality between receiving and non-receiving households. The Somali diaspora is on the one hand an asset for peacemaking and on the other a facilitator of sustained war in Somalia. Many Somali refugees in Dadaab refugee camps in Kenya receive remittances from the diaspora in Europe, Australia and the United States for their survival and to deal with contingency situations (Horst, 2002). The Somali case has to be understood against the country’s four decades of political and violent conflict (Gundel, 2003: 234). Apparently, the Somali diaspora has resigned to the view that it is not necessary for their country to have a government in place for any development to take place.

Southern Africa

This sub-region has several countries which have been ravaged by civil war, apartheid and misrule that forced citizens to flee as refugees and asylum seekers or migrants seeking employment opportunities or taking to family reunification.

Mozambique

Mozambique emerges as a country with a vibrant economy following cessation of conflicts between former long-term opponents, Mozambique Liberation Front or Fente de Libertacao de Mozambique (FRELIMO) and Resistencia Nacional Mocambicana (RENAMO, during the 1970s and 1980s. Had it not been for several flooding episodes, Mozambique’s economy would be the fastest growing in the entire SSA. The country’s diaspora in South Africa, Portugal and other Lusophone countries have stimulated PCR, subsequently luring South Africa to develop the Maputo and Beira corridors for programmed development. With its stable leadership which grew from diaspora groups, Mozambique is a beacon of democracy and economic vibrancy that are rarely experienced in much of SSA.

Zimbabwean Diaspora: the source of household survival

Zimbabwe, formerly one Southern Africa’s economic powerhouses, is a failed state following the government’s inhuman treatment of its nationals. Zimbabweans have been forced to flee both as refugees to the neighbouring SADC neighbours and as brain drain to the same countries and to the United Kingdom (Tevera and Zinyama, 2002).[10] The country’s home-based citizens have been surviving, albeit precariously, on emigrants’ translational and diasporic links, in particular financial remittances, food and other household requirements. About 80 per cent of Zimbabweans and 68 per cent in South Africa remitting money back home in the early 2000s primarily to support family members and secondarily to build houses (Bloch, 2005: 65-6).[11]

The Zimbabwean diaspora also maintains links through internet discussion groups, political activities, contributions to charities, business associations and donations to community organisations (p. 72). Unfortunately, the decade-long difficult conditions in Zimbabwe have not provided opportunities for serious reconstruction of the destroyed Zimbabwean economy.[12] It has been noted that “Zimbabweans abroad…have become very much embedded in the Zimbabwe crisis and all efforts designed to find a solution to the crisis cannot afford to exclude them”, acknowledging that the country’s diaspora had historically played an important in influencing both the political and economic course of the country (Muzondidya (2008: 1, 4). A number of Zimbabwe newspapers –The Zimbabwean, online ZW News and Zimonline, Zimbabwe Situation and feature news items on the country, thus, shaping Zimbabweans’ perceptions and attitudes toward events back home (p. 11).

POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

Post-conflict reconstruction poses challenges that are far beyond the capacity of the diasporas, however well-meaning they might be. The developed countries, INGOs and NGOs place a premium on providing assistance to SSA governments and their development partners on PCR in a variety of undertakings. Van Gennip (2005) cautions that:

finding resources for post-conflict reconstruction and development obviously poses a critical challenge…the strategic interests of large western donor countries ultimately determine the level of aid…in Africa where the level of forces and resources dispatched into conflict and post-conflict settings are far less than, for example, in the Balkans.

There is no “one size-fits- all” framework for PCR as conflicts differ in duration, intensity and scope of destruction and the degree to which they affect different classes of people. Rugumamu and Gbla (2003) amplify this, stating that:

Whereas conflicts in Uganda and Sierra Leone were products of state failure due to predatory or ineffectual governance, the erosion of the Rwandan state was a product of ethnic-cum-regional conflict and the Mozambican state’s failure was due to ideological conflicts.

Homeland Incentives for Diasporas

Some challenges revolve around incentives for engaging the diaspora in homeland development programmes, which Ionescu (2006: 34-39) identifies as programmatic responses, institutional arrangements, incentives, facilitated free movement, the right to buy land and property and portable as well as social rights. It has become fashionable for African diasporas to hold diaspora annual days in their home countries, examples of these including Ethiopian and Ghanaian diasporas. Institutional arrangements have seen stress of “(X) diaspora abroad”, for instance, Ghanaians Abroad, the Kenya Community Abroad; as well as Ethiopian and Senegalese diaspora organisations and so on. Another institutional arrangement is the creation of diaspora-handling offices in home countries: the General Directorate for Ethiopian Expatriates, the Ministry of Senegalese Abroad (Ionescu, 2006: 37) and similar arrangements in many more SSA countries. Incentives for engaging the diaspora in homeland development include dual citizenship, facilitating free movement by granting visa-free entry for nationals who are no longer citizens in their countries of origin (e.g. special IDs for foreign nationals of Ethiopian origin), the right to buy land and other property (as in Angola, Cape Verde, Guinea Bissau, Mozambique and Sao Tomé &Principe) and portable and transferable social rights in terms of bilateral social security system between countries of destination and origin for labour migrants (Ionescu, 2006: 39). SSA countries are gambling with these and many more incentives, albeit in the absence of sound research among or about their diasporas to inform the policy environment.

The Diaspora as a Multiple Capital

Ionescu’s (2006: 40-52) draws attention to diasporas as manifold capital: human, financial and entrepreneurial, social, affective and local. Clearly, this framework is more comprehensive than that of SSA countries who regard their diasporas solely as sources of financial remittances. Diasporas who improve their education, training, skills and knowledge in the countries of destination are considered human capital, which is why they are considered “brain drain” in their countries of origin.[13] In transnational migration, they are “transnationals” or “circular migrants” who tend to vie between their countries of origin and several destinations. Developments such as the African Experts and Diasporas database and Africa-Recruit, the South African Network of Skills Abroad (SANSA), the African Expert Diasporas Database Nigeria, Kenya’s Educationist and Medical Practitioners Abroad Database (pp.41-2) came in the wake of failed Transfer of Knowledge through Expatriate Nationals (TOKTEN) and the IOM-initiated Return of Qualified African Nationals (RQAN). In their place, the IOM has introduced the Migration for Development in Africa (MIDA) to facilitate periodic return of skilled African nationals to the region for project-tied assignments.

Financial and entrepreneurial capital includes foreign direct investment (FDI), trade, remittances, savings, start-up or business investments, purchase of real estate and humanitarian support (Ionescu, 2006: 44). SSA’s national newspapers, central bank accounts and other sources of information are awash with how diaspora remittances how exceeded overseas development assistance (ODA) or foreign aid and stimulate investment in home countries. Yet one curious question remains: impeccable accounting for their proper utilisation in the recipient households, communities and countries.[14] Examples of finance and business facilitation programmes include specific tax exemption on vehicles, personal belongings and investment goods to returnees and investors in Ethiopia; a special agency for investments of Ghanaians Abroad, Senegalese diaspora entrepreneurship programme targeting some productive sectors, special services for migrants by Banque de l’Habitat Sénégal, the Africa Recruit Investment Forum in 2004 and the African Diaspora Investment Forum organised by Axis in 2006 (p. 47-8).

The OECD, 2001, quoted in Ionescu, 2006: 48) considers social capital “networks together with shared norms, values and understanding that facilitate cooperation within and among groups”. It is in the light of this that the AU considers the “African diaspora” its sixth region” (p. 49); but, regrettably, one the AU scarcely understands its form, complexity, capacity and aspirations. Challenges in the home countries lie in diasporas’ lack of confidence in the poor homeland institutions and insufficient guarantees by SSA governments which could attract their investment and full deployment of entrepreneurial capacity.

Affective capital is postulated to bind diasporas to their countries of origin (Ionescu, 2006: 50-1). Yet it may no longer obtain in situations where transnationalism is taking a stronger grip pg African emigrants and where the emigrants’ countries of origin continue to give them lip service.

As “local capital”, diasporas are often inclined to make investments at the local level, usually in the region or locality of origin where they still have family ties and are familiar with the local context. Against this realisation, the Italian government, since 2003, has been collaborating with the Ghanaian and Senegalese governments through MIDA programmes (Ionescu, 2006: 51). Yet a grey area exists of either a lukewarm relationship or nasty rivalry between the diaspora and their homeland compatriots.

The assumption that post-conflict reconstruction is a man’s affair is grossly flawed. It needs to reconsider the existing framework to include a move from previous/existing to new paradigms: from gender-blind accounts to gender-sensitive analysis, from universality and homogeneity to specificity and diversity and from victimised women to female actors (Sørensen, 1998: 64-68). Involvement of women in PCR in Burundi, Rwanda and Mozambique are exemplary, underlining their commitment to shoulder roles that are typically men’s and rehabilitating conditions as well as reconciling adversaries or enemies faster than envisioned.

Engagement of donors (development partners) with the African diaspora is an necessary condition for homeland development. Newland and Erin (2004:29-36) suggest that such engagement could include human capital programmes such as MIDA and “virtual diaspora” programmes, community development activities involving so-called “Home Town Associations”, research, building capacity in diaspora communities (through co-development, for instance) and reflections on policy matters including Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These are issues that homeland governments rarely pay attention to, but they deserve serious discourse in an effort to explore the potential contribution of their national diasporas.

CONCLUSION

This paper has underscored two contrasting roles of the African diaspora in post-conflict construction in their homeland: a negative role with continued funding of conflict which it perpetuates, or a positive role where cessation of conflict has given room for the three “res” (reconstruction, reintegration and reconciliation) and PCR. Except for Somalia where conflict persists, most SSA countries have witnessed the positive role of their diasporas in PCR.

The African diaspora is in fact a variegated group of several diasporas of different countries and even from anyone SSA country. Moreover, African diasporas represent different types of voluntary and forced as well as irregular emigrants, about which their countries of origin know little. Relative to diasporas of non-conflict SSA countries, virtually all diasporas of post-conflict countries have a strong commitment to post-conflict reconstruction activities. The cases of Rwanda, Eritrea and Ethiopia attest to this fact.

The African diaspora is a resource in the PCR process. It is resourced in terms of finances, exposure, skills, knowledge and perception of the form the PCR endeavour should take. Yet the efforts of the African diasporas are frustrated in their homelands where governments remain sceptical and the homeland compatriots are less receptive of the diasporas’ poise for PCR. Clearly, these are voids that must of necessity be filled for the African diaspora to have a softer landing-pad back home and to become more committed to post-conflict reconstruction.

Several case studies analysed in this paper underline both similarities of PCR activities in which diasporas take part and differences occasioned by peculiar homeland situations. They provide impetus for further research among different categories of diaspora to generate information that would inform policy, giving rise to policy reviews and reformulation, as well as PCR programme design/redesign. It is inadvisable for African governments, individually or in the AU commitments, to formulate PCR policies and programmes with the African diaspora in mind, but without engaging with it at all stages of the whole process. There is a dire need for further research to explore African diaspora’s size, geographical location, characteristics, capabilities and inclination toward homeland development to feed into policy which in turn should generate meaningful diaspora-engaging programmes.

REFERENCES

Adepoju, A. (2008) “Perspectives on international migration and national development in sub-Saharan Africa”, in A. Adepoju, T. van Naerssen and A. Zoomers (2008) International Migration and National Development in Africa. Leiden: Brill, pp. 21-48.

Akyeampong, E. (2000) “Africans in the diaspora : the diaspora and Africa”, African Affairs 99: 183-215.

Baliamoune-Lutz, Mina & Addison, Tony (2007) “Erratum to Economic reform when institutional quality is weak: The case of the Maghreb", Journal of Policy Modeling 29 (1): 65-7929(6), pages 915-917.

Bernal, Victoria (2006) “Diaspora, cyberspace and political imagination: The Eritrean Online”, Global Networks 6 (2): 161-179.

Bloch, Alice (2005) The Development Potential of Zimbabweans in the Diaspora, IOM Migration Research Series No. 17. Geneva: IOM

Bracking, S. and Sachikonye, L. (2006) Remittances, Poverty Reduction and the Informalisation of Household Wellbeing in Zimbabwe, GPRG-WPS-045. Global Poverty Group (GPRG); http:.

Boateng, K. A. (2008) “Dual Citizenship: Nigeria Points the Way to a Solution for

Ghana” Ghana Home Page (; downloaded on 24/06/09).

Brubaker, R. (2005) “The diaspora Diaspora”, Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(1): 1-19.

Cohen, R. (1997) Global Diasporas: An Introduction. London: University College London Press.

Cohen, R. (2008) Diasporas in Conflict: Peace-Makers or Peace-Wreckers? Ed. Hazel Smith and Paul Stares. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2007

Coleman, (1990) XXX

Collier, P., Elliot, V.L., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal-Querol, M. and Sambanis, N.

(2003) Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank and Oxford University Press.

De Bruyn, T. and Wets, J. (2006) Remittances in the Great Lakes Region, IOM Migration Research Series,No. 25. Geneva: IOM.

Faist, T. (2000) The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration in Transnational Social Spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Forum International for Ethiopians Living in Diaspora – FIELD (2005) The Potential Within: Is the Ethiopian a Response to the Nation’s Brain Drain? Final Report: “Transforming Brian Drain into Brain Gain”, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, January 2005.

Flores, T.E. and Nooruddin, I. (2006) Democracy under the Gun: Understanding Post-Conflict Economic Recovery

Greenberg, M.E. and Zuckerman, E. (2009) The Gender Dimension of Post-Conflict Reconstruction, in T. Addison and T. Brück (eds), Making Peace Work: The Challenges of Social and Economic Reconstruction. London: Palgrave MacMillan and Maastricht: UNU-WIDER, pp. 6-2- 6-33.

Guarnizo, L. E. and Smith, M. P. “The locations of transnationalism”, in M.P. Smith and L.E. (eds), Transnationalism from Below. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 3-34.

Handrahan, L. (2004) “Conflict, gender, ethnicity and post-conflict reconstruction”, Security Dialogue 35: 429-445.

Horst, Cindy (2002) Xawilaad: The Importance of Overseas Connections in the Livelihoods of Somali Refugees in the Dadaab Refugee Camps of Kenya. Amsterdam Research Institute for Global Issues and Development Studies (AGIDS-InDRA, University of Amsterdam.

International Crisis Group (2004) Liberia and Sierra Leone: Rebuilding Failed States. Brussels: ICG, December 8.

Ionescu, Dina (2006) Engaging Diasporas as Development Partners for Home and Destination Countries: Challenges for Policymakers. Geneva: International Organisation for Migration.

Kent, G. (2005) Diaspora Power: Network Contributions to Peace-building and the Transformation of War Economies. Paper presented at the “Transforming War Economies” Seminar, Plymouth, 16-18 June.

Kelin, N. (2009) African Organisations and Homeland Development: The Case of Somali and Ghanaian Associations in Denmark. Paper presented at the DIIS Seminar: “Agents of Change? African Organisations and Homeland Development, April 3.

Koser, K. (2007) African diasporas and Post-conflict Reconstruction: An Eritrean Case Study, in H. Smith and P. Stares, ed. (2007) Diasporas in Conflict: Peace-Makers or Peace-Wreckers? Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 239-252.

Laguerre, M.S. n.d. “ Virtual Diasporas: A New Frontier of National Security” (Op- ed). Virtual Diasporas and Global Problem Solving Project Papers. San Francisco: The Nautilus Institute.

Maconachie, R., Binns, T., Tengbe, P. and Johnson, R. (2006) “Temporary m

Labour migration and sustainable post-conflict return in Sierra Leone”, GeoJournal 67: 223-240.

Mercer, C., Page, B. and Evans, M. (2008) Development and the African Diaspora: Place and the Politics of Home. London: Zed Books.

Mohamoud, A.A. (2006) “African Diaspora and Post-Conflict Reconstruction in Africa”, DIIS Brief. Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen, Denmark, February.

Mohan, G. and Zack-Williams, A.B. “Globalisation from below: conceptualising the role of the African diasporas in Africa’s development”, Review of African Political Economy (29 (92): 211-236.

Muzondidya, J. (2008) The Ambiguities of Politics: The Zimbabwe and the Zimbabwe Crisis. Paper presentation in the session “Promoting African Solutions to African Crisis: Prospects for Zimbabwe’s Peace and Reconciliation. ” Paper presented at the Africa Institute of South Africa &TEIA Forum of Mozambique Regional Conference, Maputo, Mozambique, 22-24 September.

Newland, K. and Erin, P. (2004) Beyond Remittances: The Role of Diaspora in Poverty Reduction in their Countries of Origin. Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Center.

Nkurunziza, J.D. (2008) “Civil war and post-conflict reconstruction in Africa”

(fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Knowledge/30754226-EN-2.4.3-NKURUNZIZA-TUNIS.PDF).

Otunnu, O. (1999) “Rwandese Refugees and Immigrants in Uganda”, in H. Adelman and A. Suhrke (eds.), The Path of a Genocide: The Rwanda Crisis from Uganda to Zaire. New Brunswick, USA: Transaction Publishers, pp. 3-29.

Oucho, J.O. (1997) “The ethnic factor in internal displacement of population in sub-Saharan Africa”, African Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 104-117.

Oucho, J.O. (2002) Undercurrents of Ethnic Conflict in Kenya. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.

Poblicks, N.C. (2002) “Kacoke Madit: A diaspora role in promoting peace”, Conciliation Resources.

Rugumamu, S. and Gbla, O. (2003) Uganda, Studies in Reconstruction and Capacity Building in Post-Conflict Countries. Harare: African Capacity Building Foundation.

Schoeman, M. and Nuade, Z. (2007) “Add In or Add On: The Role of Gender and the Position of Women in PCRD”, Implementation of the Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Development Policy Decision. PCRD/ Workshop/1 (II), African Union, Lusaka, Zambia, 17-19 July, Annex G.

Salehyan, I. and Gleditsch, K.K. (2006) “Refugees and the spread of civil war”, International Organization 60: 335-366.

Sirkeci, I. (2009) “Transnational mobility and conflict”, Migration Letters 6 (1): 3-14.

Smith, Hazel (2007) s in International Conflict, in Smith, H. and Stares, P. ed. (2007) Diasporas in Conflict: Peace-Makers or Peace-Wreckers? Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 3-16.

Smith, H. and Stares, P. ed. (2007) s in Conflict: Peace-Makers or Peace-Wreckers? Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

Sørensen, Birgitte (1998) Women and Post-Conflict Reconstruction, The War-torn Societies Project, Occasional Paper No.3. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

Tezare, K., Said, T., Baheta, D., Tewolde, H.W. and Melles, A. (2006) The Role of the Eritrean Diaspora in Peacebuilding and Development: Challenges and Opportunities. Toronto, Canada: Selam Peacebuilding Network (PN), October.

University of Calgary (2008) Transnational Citizenship and the African Conference, held at Rozsa Centre, 7-8 November.

Uganda Business and Professional Association – UBPA (2008) Uganda Diaspora Home is Best Summit, 287 December. Kampala: UBPA.

Uganda, Republic of. Presidential Standards Task Force. Nakasero: State House.

Van Gennip (2005) “Post-conflict reconstruction and development”, Development 48: 57-62.

Van Hear, N. (2003) Refugee Diasporas, Remittances, Development, and Conflict, Migration Information Source. Washington, D.C.: Migration Policy Centre.

Vertovec, S. (1999) “Conceiving and researching transnationalism”, Ethnic and Racial Studies 22 (2).

Tevera, D. and Zinyama, L. (2002) Zimbabweans Who Move: Perspectives on International Migration in Zimbabwe, Migration Policy Series No. 25. Cape Town: Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) and Ontario, Canada: Queen’s University: Southern African Migration Project (SAMP).

Zachary, P. n.d. “Diaspora, Capitalism and Exile as a Way of Life: Some observations on the political and economic mobilisation of dispersed peoples”. Virtual Diasporas and Global Problem Solving Project Papers. San Francisco: The Nautilus Institute.

-----------------------

[1] Brubaker (2005: 3) proposes other putative diasporas, described as dixie, yankee, white, conservative, gay, deaf, queer, redneck, digital, fundamentalist, terrorist , etc. Curiously, the taxanomy excludes the “African diaspora”, which the African Union (AU) recognises as its sixth region alongside northern, western, middle (central), eastern and southern Africa.

[2] Ionescu (2006: 13) states that different countries refer to their diasporas as: variously referring to them as “nationals abroad”, “permanent immigrants”, “citizen if (X)” origin living abroad”, “non-resident of (X) origin”, “expatriates”, “transnational citizen”, etc. The UK House of Commons (Sixth Report of Session 2003-4, Volume 1, quoted in Ionescu (2006:13) refers to diasporas as “international migrants who, although dispersed from their homelands, remain in some way part of their community of origin”.

[3] For details, see ; downloaded on 12/06/2009.

[4]A Ghanaian, Boateng (2008), decries the shortcomings of Ghana’s Dual Citizenship Act which falls of Nigeria’s and which, he thinks, the Ghana government should redress.

[5] The website Motherland Nigeria holds details of different Nigerian Organisations. (See (; downloaded on 24/06/09).

[6]Liberia goes on record as the first SSA country once ruled by a President now accused of crime against humanity in his country as well as Sierra Leone, and is currently standing trial by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, the Netherlands.

[7]For details, see: ; downloaded on 02/05/2007.

[8]Eritrean cyberspace, , Tigrinya for “voice” or “news”, contains a cyberspace-based survey of homeland and Eritreans on the operation and formation of public spheres, ways in which Eritreans were connected through a socio-political worldwide web, how they used digital communications to create a new kind of public sphere for political discussion and the relationship of the diaspora’s activities in cyberspace to Eritrea’s media, democracy and public sphere (Bernal, 2006: 162).

[9] This is an informal system of transfer by which money or goods are transferred to remitters’ families and kinsmen through emissaries based on trust. Subsequently, xawilaad companies mushroomed to engage in big businesses.

[10]James Muzondidya (2008) provides more categories of Zimbabwean, namely asylum seekers, political refugees, skilled expatriates, students, semi-skilled and unskilled labour migrants and undocumented/illegal migrants.

[11]In another study, the proportions are 24.7 percent of Zimbabweans in the UK and 22.7 per cent in South Africa (see Bracking and Sachikonye, 2006: 14).

[12]Zimbabwe’s Prime Minister in the unholy coalition government has been on visits to the developed North in June 2009 to drum up support for the country’s economic reconstruction, a feat the latter are as much sympathetic as they are cautious to gratify.

[13]Surprisingly, while skilled SSA nationals leave the region as “brain drain”, a large number ends up being “brain waste” in the countries of destination; this is an issue crying for research for a better understanding of the working situation in the development North.

[14]The World Bank announced a consultancy on Household Survey of African Migration Project to investigate the impact of remittances in migrants’ countries of origin. Unfortunately, the bid was won by non-African institutions that might not break the strong “cultural wall” standing in the way of their enquiries given the sensitivity of remittances among recipients.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download