Revised Archaeological Monitoring Plan for Phase I ...
Revised Archaeological Monitoring Plan for Phase I Geotechnical Testing at Kuaokal Ridge
Ka`ena Ahupua`a, Waialua District and Keawa`ula Ahupua`a, Wai`anae District, Island of O`ahu [TMK 6-9-003:001 and 8-1-001:014]
December 2018
MDA | Revised Archaeological Monitoring Plan for Phase I Geotechnical Testing at Kuaokal Ridge
Revised Archaeological Monitoring Plan for Phase I Geotechnical Testing at Kuaokal Ridge
Missile Defense Agency Ka`ena Ahupua`a, Waialua District and Keawa`ula Ahupua`a, Wai`anae District, Island of O`ahu [TMK 6-9-003:001 and 8-1-001:014]
Prepared By: Elizabeth Leclerc, HDR Inc. Andrew Mueller, RPA, HDR Inc.
HDR INC. ROLE Environmental Consultant LOCATION Island of O`ahu, Hawai`i TYPE OF WORK Archaeological Monitoring Plan CLIENT Missile Defense Agency
MDA | Revised Archaeological Monitoring Plan for Phase I Geotechnical Testing at Kuaokal Ridge
This page intentionally left blank.
MDA | Revised Archaeological Monitoring Plan for Phase I Geotechnical Testing at Kuaokal Ridge Abstract
Abstract
HDR Inc. has prepared this archaeological monitoring plan (AMP) for the Missile Defense Agency's (MDA) proposal to conduct Phase I Geotechnical Testing on Kuaokal Ridge, Ka`ena Ahupua`a, Waialua District and Keawa`ula Ahupua`a, Wai`anae District, Island of O`ahu. MDA proposes to conduct the testing to determine the constructability of possible future MDA projects at the location. A pedestrian archaeological inventory survey of the area of potential effect (APE) was completed in July 2018, which identified two archaeological and cultural sites: Moka`ena Heiau (SIHP 188) and Pu`u O Phaku Hpaina. These sites will be protected and avoided during the geotechnical testing. Keala Pono Archaeological Consulting will conduct archaeological monitoring of ground-disturbing activities during the geotechnical testing. Garcia and Associates is providing cultural monitoring for the project. HDR Inc. will provide oversight of monitoring activities and senior technical review of the resulting report on behalf of MDA.
The archaeological and cultural monitoring described in this plan are among MDA's mitigation commitments made to the Division of Forestry and Wildlife in association with the Divisions recommended finding of effect under Chapter 6E-42 of the Hawai`i Revised Statutes. Although the testing will not occur within any known archaeological sites or burial sites, the archaeological and cultural monitoring will ensure that the physical features at Site 188 and Site 8777 are avoided, and that any unanticipated discoveries of historic properties or burials are treated promptly and appropriately. The archaeological monitoring will also serve to characterize the potential for subsurface archaeological deposits in the area of potential effect (APE) to inform future undertakings, including the HDR-H undertaking.
This plan outlines monitoring procedures designed to identify and document the archaeological potential of the APE and any new historic properties that may be encountered during the course of geotechnical testing. This AMP also outlines the use of a cultural monitor during the project and procedures to follow in the event of the discovery of human remains or significant cultural objects. Following monitoring and laboratory processing of collected data, an archaeological monitoring report will be submitted to the Hawaii State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD).
MDA | Revised Archaeological Monitoring Plan for Phase I Geotechnical Testing at Kuaokal Ridge Abstract
This page intentionally left blank.
MDA | Revised Archaeological Monitoring Plan for Phase I Geotechnical Testing at Kuaokal Ridge Table of Contents
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................3 1.1 Description of the Undertaking...................................................................................5 1.2 Known Archaeology and Site Protection ....................................................................5 1.3 Monitoring Requirement.............................................................................................7 1.4 Plan Organization ......................................................................................................7
2. Background ......................................................................................................................7
2.1 Environmental Description .........................................................................................9
2.2 Traditional and Historical Setting .............................................................................10
2.2.1
Mo`olelo and Oral Traditions...................................................................10
2.2.2
Traditional Land Use ..............................................................................11
2.2.3
Historic Land Use ...................................................................................12
2.3 Archaeological Background .....................................................................................13
2.3.1 2.3.2
Previous Archaeological Research .........................................................13 Known Archaeological Sites ...................................................................13
2.4 Archaeological Implications for Monitoring...............................................................17
3. Monitoring Procedures ..................................................................................................18 3.1 Personnel ................................................................................................................19 3.2 Archaeological Monitoring........................................................................................19 3.3 Cultural Monitoring and Human Remains ................................................................20
4. Post-Field Procedures ...................................................................................................22 4.1 Laboratory Procedures ............................................................................................22 4.2 Curation...................................................................................................................22 4.3 Reporting.................................................................................................................22
5. References Cited ............................................................................................................23
Appendix A. Inadvertent Discovery Procedures and Points of Contact ..........................A-1
Figures
Figure 1. Project Area and Area of Potential Effect .....................................................................4 Figure 2. Area of Potential Effect with Notational Geotechnical Testing Locations ......................6 Figure 3. Plan Map of Site 188, Moka`ena Heiau (McElroy and Duhaylonsod 2018:31) ............15
Tables
Table 1. Previously Recorded Sites at KPSTS..........................................................................14
December 2018 | i
MDA | Revised Archaeological Monitoring Plan for Phase I Geotechnical Testing at Kuaokal Ridge Abbreviations and Acronyms
Abbreviations and Acronyms
A.D. AIS AMP APE CFR cm DLNR DOFAW GPS HAR HDR HDR-H HRHP ICRMP Keala Pono KPSTS LCA m MDA NAGPRA NHO NHPA NRHP ROE SHPD SMDC TMK WWII
Anno Domini archaeological inventory survey archaeological monitoring plan area of potential effect Code of Federal Regulations centimeter Department of Land and Natural Resources Division of Forestry and Wildlife global positioning system Hawai`i Administrative Rules HDR, Inc. Homeland Defense Radar ? Hawai`i Hawai`i Register of Historic Places Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plan Keala Pono Archaeological Consulting, LLC Ka`ena Point Satellite Tracking Station Land Commission Award meter Missile Defense Agency Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act Native Hawaiian Organization National Historic Preservation Act National Register of Historic Places Right-of-Entry State Historic Preservation Division Space and Missile Defense Command Tax Map Key World War II
ii | December 2018
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- archaeology an introduction to the world s greatest sites
- issue 20 january 2018
- 139 years of archaeology archaeological institute of
- marine archaeological reporting plan marp kincardine
- the society for pennsylvania archaeology inc newsletter
- discovery 2018
- revised archaeological monitoring plan for phase i
- 2018 british archaeological awards
- archaeological compliance guidance
Related searches
- progress monitoring assessments for reading
- self monitoring strategies for kids
- progress monitoring tools for reading
- progress monitoring tools for students
- lesson plan for monitoring comprehension
- progress monitoring tools for teachers
- progress monitoring tools for decoding
- progress monitoring tools for math
- progress monitoring forms for students
- evaluation and monitoring plan template
- aggressive monitoring checklist for reading
- best iphone monitoring apps for parents