REPRINTED FROM NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL

Matzen Const., Inc., 114 AD2d 625 (3rd Dept. 1985); Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. Custer, supra; Beneficial Finance Co. of New York, Inc. v. Youngman, 57 AD2d 727 (4th Dept. 1977); Krugman v. Bd. of Assessors of Vil. of Atlantic Beach, 141 AD2d 175 (2nd Dept. 1988). Moreover, Professor Siegel writes that a party refusing to answer a Notice to ... ................
................