Www.auburn.wednet.edu



Auburn School District #408

Program Evaluation Form Summary

|Title of In-service: |Motivational Interviewing Training |Date(s): |4/25/18 |

|Location: |James P. Fugate Administration Bldg. | | |

Type of In-service: Building-Determined 21 Hours Optional Day

LID Waiver Day

Other _____________________________

Your Position: Teacher (check one): Central Administrator

Elementary Building Administrator

Middle School Support Staff

High School Specialist

Other

|Total Number of Responses: |38 |

Indicate your agreement with each of the following statements by circling the appropriate number.

| |Strongly Agree |Somewhat Agree |Undecided |Somewhat |Strongly |Not Applicable |

| | | | |Disagree |Disagree | |

|1. The course met the stated objectives. |33 |5 | | | | |

|2. The activities related to and supported the stated |35 |3 | | | | |

|objectives. | | | | | | |

|3. The instructor(s) skillfully presented the material and |34 |4 | | | | |

|was responsive to the audience. | | | | | | |

|4. The instructor(s) was well prepared. |37 |1 | | | | |

|5. The instructor(s) was well qualified and knowledgeable. |37 |1 | | | | |

|6. The materials provided were useful for improving |31 |5 |2 | | | |

|instruction. | | | | | | |

|7. The written and/or electronic materials were relevant and |31 |7 | | | | |

|of high quality. | | | | | | |

|8. The information was applicable and relevant to improving |34 |4 | | | | |

|student learning. | | | | | | |

|9. The information presented is easily applied to the |29 |9 | | | | |

|classroom. | | | | | | |

|10. The presentation included strategies that met the needs |30 |6 |1 | | |1 |

|of diverse learners. | | | | | | |

|11. The overall program was excellent. |34 |3 | | | |1 |

What specific information was of greatest value to you?

• More tools to help kids!

• Excellent review & practice. Great Skills.

• So many tools. Remembering it’s an art.

• Assisting the student in making the positive changes they want to make.

• Techniques, OARS

• Wish we had more time. The workshop was fantastic.

• Knowing to use the OARS and the premise is for confront/address ambivalence.

• Excellent presenter. MI model, OARS, all very helpful!

• Change talk.

• I really liked to summative info. Also, all the language she gave us was great.

• Learning how to log in & following along with the process was helpful. I am looking forward to the training.

• The problem wasn’t with the instructor. (:

• Reminder to meet the student where they are at. This was a good refresher seminar.

• Learning how to not give advice, but really listen to what the student is saying and collaborate with them instead of giving advice.

• Examples and questions.

• The hand-outs are valuable.

• A great reminder on how to be a better listener.

• I feel I learned some strategies when working with students. Some ideas were refreshers.

•

Please provide any necessary feedback that would improve this in-service offering if repeated

Improve Facilities Modify activities for greater interaction Enhance presentation skills

Increase pacing Provide greater time for Questioning/Applicable practice Information needs greater depth of knowledge

Align better with District or Building strategic plan Other _______________________________________________________

• Clarify Objective. It was a lot to disgest.

• A tad more organized presentation with a big picture like a flow chart.

• Too crowded.

• Enhance presentation skills – Obviously not your fault in this instance.

Thank you for your feedback!

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download